𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐒𝐃𝐀𝐏 𝐀𝐃𝐃𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐈𝐌 𝐎𝐅 𝐃𝐀𝐑𝐖𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐅 𝐈𝐍 𝐆𝐎𝐃

The Völkischer Beobachter, published an article that honored Darwin's contributions to evolutionary theory. A 1932 article, “Darwin,” claimed that Darwin’s theory was the theoretical foundation for eugenics and racial theory:

"There is no longer any significant controversy surrounding the doctrine of descent, at least not here in Germany. All sides have long recognized that it is pointless to deny the Christian belief in creation in its name (as "proletarian freethinkers" and "Muscovite godless" still do today), nor conversely, to deny the doctrine of descent out of supposed religious self-interest. God could and can create the world of life by whatever means he chooses; our only task is to investigate retrospectively how it might have come about. [...] The meritorious work of German racial hygienists (Schallmanner, Ploey, Lenz, Fischer, etc.) has already opened the eyes of wide circles to the true state of affairs, and we will help to convey the results of racial biological research, so extraordinarily important for the regeneration of our people and for which DARWIN PAVED THE WAY, to the broadest sections of the population. In doing so, we are laying good groundwork for the racial renewal of the German people and at the same time honoring the great naturalist and scholar Charles Darwin in the best possible way."

The text explains how its pointless to deny Christian creation in specifically the godless sense in the same way Christians deny evolution from a religious "self-interest". It's addressing both opposing sides of irrational logic.

Source: Prof. Dr. B., “Darwin,” Rasse, Volk und Staat: Rassenhygienisches Beiblatt, in Völkischer Beobachter 15, Juni 1932, Folge 2, 167 Ausgabe, Seite 1

𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐑 "𝐇𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐃" 𝐏𝐀𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐒?
A Closer look at the relevant context surrounding Mein Kampf

A commonly used quote thrown at National Socialists who do not adhere to the Christian faith is a quote regarding religious reformers of ancient Germanic custom. This quote supposedly makes Hitler seem like he hated ancient German culture or anyone who professed it, however the context suggests Hitler is targeting religious zealots that do not fight for a national upheaval of the nation but their own religious delusions.

"It’s highly distasteful to toss around old Germanic expressions that are neither appropriate for our present day, nor represent anything concrete. This deceives people into thinking that the importance of movement lies in its external vocabulary. This is a real menace, and unfortunately is quite prevalent today. At that time, and later, I had to warn followers repeatedly against these German folklore-ish wandering scholars who never accomplished anything positive or practical, except to cultivate their own overflowing self-conceit."

Hitler goes on about how the jew respects these same "folk-lore comedians" as they are not revolutionaries themselves. Without a national movement against all current powers, it would only make you incompetent. The talk of religious purity leads people away from the jewish question:

"Among those people, it’s often hard to distinguish between those who are merely stupid and incompetent, and those who have a definite rationale. My impression, especially with the so-called religious reformers based on ancient Germanic customs, is that they are sent by those who don’t wish to see a national revival of our people. Their whole activity leads people away from the common struggle against the common enemy, the Jew. This causes people to waste their strength on senseless and ruinous religious controversies."

Nowhere in the entire passage is Hitler mocking the ancient Germanic faith itself, only its contemporary adherents who do nothing for the revolutionary racial movement. This is further shown by the fact that Hitler respected the culture of pre-christian Germans: "It’s therefore outrageously unjust to speak of the pre-Christian Germans as ‘cultureless,’ as barbarians. They never have been that."

𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬

In Mein Kampf, Hitler had pointed out this same problem in Christians as they are not directly fighting the jew and infighting over religious controversies. Along with being indifferent to racial mixing:

"This pestilential contamination of the blood, blindly ignored by hundreds of thousands of our people, is being systematically conducted by the Jew today. These black parasites of our nation systematically corrupt our innocent blond girls and thus destroy something irreplaceable in this world. Both, yes, both Christian denominations look on with indifference at the desecration and destruction of a noble and unique creature who was given to the world by God’s grace. The future of the world, however, doesn’t depend on whether Protestants defeat Catholics, or Catholic Protestants; what matters is whether Aryan humanity survives or perishes. And yet the two Christian denominations are not fighting against the destroyer of this kind of man but are trying to destroy each other. The folkish oriented man has a sacred duty, within his own denomination, to make people stop talking about God's will and instead actually fulfill God’s will, and to not let God's work be desecrated."

Just as Hitler says, what matters is if the biological humanity of Aryans is maintained and preserved, not if one particular faith in the native German people is true or not.

Source: Mein Kampf, p.416-417, p.613, p.449 (See also p.460)

SEE: HITLER'S STANCE ON FAITH THROUGH PERSONAL CONSCIENCE

𝐎𝐓𝐓𝐎 𝐒𝐊𝐎𝐑𝐙𝐄𝐍𝐘 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐓𝐀𝐁𝐋𝐄 𝐓𝐀𝐋𝐊𝐒
A strangely cited passage from NS_Heathenry_Exposed

A piece of evidence against the validity of the table talks is cited from Otto Skorzeny's memoirs in which he spoke about the process and handling of the notes. What isn't talked about is the further context inside his memoirs in which he had the opportunity to attend these table talks but refused Hitler's offer:

""Naturally," Hitler had told me, "from now on, whenever you are with us, you will always be our guest, Skorzeny. I shall always be delighted to see you again." I thanked the Führer, but thereafter I refrained from attending those "midnight teas," which often dragged on until three or four in the morning. It was there that many advanced their careers—thanks to flattery and intrigue—provided they held views similar to those of Reichsleiter Martin Bormann, who was invariably present. The documentary volumes published after the war purport to reproduce the conversations held during some of these "midnight teas." Without Hitler’s knowledge, two of Bormann’s aides—Dr. Henry Picker and Dr. Heinrich Heim—had been tasked with recording the Führer’s words. Dr. Heim specified that he dictated these accounts from memory, having only rarely jotted down a few keywords, which he scribbled on a sheet of paper resting on his knees. Bormann would modify the version handed to him—always behind the Führer’s back—and, furthermore, the publishers have subsequently edited the text of these books, which were, naturally, never intended for publication. These documents must, therefore, be treated with the utmost circumspection by historians. The Reichsleiter—who was fiercely anticlerical—portrays Hitler as an atheist, and others as militant anti-Catholics; yet, in reality, the Führer—who was raised as a Catholic—never renounced his faith. Quite the contrary: he believed—and frequently stated—that the two principal pillars of Western civilization were the Roman Church and the British Empire. I have the weakness of thinking today that, perhaps, I was wrong not to attend the midnight teas whenever it was possible for me to do so. Had I attended, I might have been able to alert the Führer to certain realities of which he remained unaware."

How does Otto Skorzeny know whether the contents of the table talks itself are valid or not if he had admitted not going to them? How does he know that Hitler never renounced Catholicism? Answer: He simply doesn't. Otto Wagener's notes shows that Hitler denounced the Catholic teachings of the afterlife. Along with Gerhard Engel noting that the Catholic Church was too clever to publicly excommunicate him and wanting to fight the Church from its root.

Citing Skorzeny against the table talks is pointless if we look at the context of the passage.

SEE: HITLER'S TABLE TALK IS ENDLESSLY CORROBORATED BY OTHER INDEPENDENT SOURCES

𝐃𝐔𝐁𝐈𝐎𝐔𝐒 𝐐𝐔𝐎𝐓𝐄𝐒
The case of the book surrounding Adrien Arcand

In the book 'Serviam: The Political Ideology of Adrien Arcand' emerges two supposed quotes from Arthur Kitson and Kurt Lüdecke on Hitler's fancy being the Virgin mary and his private apartments having many crucifixes. The issue with this is the fact that among the 100+ footnotes inside the book, none exists for these two quotes nor further elaboration. Being that these specific testimonies cannot be found in any other place besides this book, it would be safe to say that these quotes are dubious at worst and faked at best.

When we look at an authentic writing of this same Kurt Lüdecke in his book "I knew Hitler", there are a multitude of his own testimonies given that further show Hitler did not believe in Christianity. Lüdecke recalled Hitler saying:

"The French Revolution, Bolshevism, all of Marxism, in fact, our whole deformity and atrophy of spirit and soul would never have come into being except for this oriental mummery, this abominable levelling mania, this cursed universalism of Christianity, which denies racialism and preaches suicidal tolerance.” [1]

Another interesting point brought by Mikael Nilsson in his book "Christianity in Hitler's Ideology" is that:

"The fact that we know of no prayer books or crosses (crucifixes) having been in Hitler’s possession is perhaps a problem for the thesis of Hitler as an honest Christian believer." [2]

Source:
[1] I Knew Hitler by Kurt Lüdecke (1938) p.466
[2] Christianity in Hitler's Ideology by Mikael Nilsson (PDF page 180)

𝐎𝐧 𝐍𝐢𝐥𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧'𝐬 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲
Taking the sources into account

Nilsson rightfully acknowledges that Hitler rejected the apostle Paul and his teachings. Such implication would then follow on being against the divinity of Jesus. What Nilsson argues is that there is an infinite nuance on what is Christian as according to him there is no objective definition of what is Christian:

"Some readers may think that what has been said thus far reasonably has to be interpreted as evidence that Hitler was not a Christian, because how could someone who thinks that the apostle Paul perverted Christianity be considered a Christian? However, it is not that easy to define who is a Christian and who is not. After all, various denominations and sects of self-proclaimed Christians have been fighting each other for centuries over this exact issue. [...] To talk of Nazi Christianity as heresy, writes Susannah Heschel, implies that there is an orthodoxy to compare it to. There is in fact no such thing." [1]

The greatest testament to what is Christian can be based on the divinity of Jesus, much of the evidence that isn't mentioned in Nilsson's book suggest that there doesn't seem to be a genuine belief in Jesus's divinity. Nilsson writes in his conclusion of the Jesus divinity chapter that: "All of what has been said above of course does not definitely prove that Hitler believed that Jesus really was divine, since it is impossible to know what someone truly believes." [2] This statement highlights that even Nilsson acknowledges that what Hitler said publicly on specific issues cannot be taken for granted.

Nonetheless, Nilsson does bring an interesting source to the table. He shows (although unsure how he knew this) that Heinrich Heim in a correspondence said Hitler seldom spoke about his personal religious beliefs openly. [3] This alone shows that Hitler's religious beliefs is nowhere near related to the established beliefs as any normal Christian would simply profess belief in Christ and go on with their day. Hitler's chief secretary Johanna Wolf was interrogated in 1948 about Hitler’s religious inclinations, she had just as much difficulty as many other's in Hitler's private circle in figuring out what Hitler actually believed in. [4] Taking Nilsson's own sources into account, Hitler believed Christianity itself was Jewish and had nothing to do with Jesus, further making the thesis of Hitler being exclusively against institutionalized religion false. The fact there aren't any private sources of Hitler affirming the divinity of Jesus in the same manner also is a huge problem to the central theme of Nilsson's book.

So what can we truly say about this?

Hitler rejected Yahweh, so there cannot be a "son of God" as there is no God the father. Hitler rejected appeal to revelation, Hitler deified Nature, Hitler gave an agnostic definition on what is the purpose of life and who created it, questioned if there was an afterlife, etc. Much of what Hitler appeals to in his worldview comes from Race, Nature, and Science. The fact that there are so many confidants in Hitler's circle independently attesting to Hitler rejecting Christianity only backs up the whole point.

A less talked about passage in Wagener's notes is Hitler recognized that Christmas was originally an old Germanic festival that was replaced with the birth of Christ. He commented "... the midnight sun and the yuletide festival are cosmic concepts already familiar to young people. But no one can say with certainty whether Christ was or was not bom on this particular day." [5]

Mikael Nilsson's book 'Christianity in Hitler's Ideology' doesn't add anything new to the debate.

Source:
[1] Christianity in Hitler's Ideology by Mikael Nilsson (PDF page 180)
[2] ibid, p.177
[3] ibid, p.179
[4] Hitler's Religion by Richard Weikart (PDF page 33)
[5] Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant by Otto Wagener p.278

𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐑 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐍𝐈𝐄𝐓𝐙𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐄
Setting the record straight

To say that Nietzsche did not have a profound influence on Hitler would be denying one of the core individuals within National Socialism's ideological tradition of optimism and will-power. Many have seen the infamous photo of Hitler in the Nietzsche-Archiv but little seem to know the official caption behind it. In Heinrich Hoffmann's book Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, the original caption writes: "The Führer at the bust of the German philosopher whose ideas inspired two great popular movements: that of National Socialist Germany and that of Fascist Italy.", [1] So already off the bat do we see public connection between Hitler and Nietzsche in official sources. Keep in mind that Hitler endorsed the Nietzsche-Archiv by privately funding it, giving 50,000 Reichsmarks. [2]

On July 30th of 1943, the NSDAP had documented that Adolf Hitler had personally gifted Mussolini a unique edition of the collected works of Nietzsche on his birthday:

"The Führer sent the Duce, as a personal gift for his 60th birthday, through Field Marshal von Kesselring, the collected works of Nietzsche in a specially produced, unique edition with a heartfelt dedication" [3]

If Hitler was not been influenced or simply had ignored Nietzsche, there would be no reason for Hitler to openly suggest the works of Nietzsche to others. The official NSDAP stance on Nietzsche was that he was: "the greatest defender and justifier of life and reality" [4] This was then justified by Hitler when in 1942 he appealed to Nietzsche's words for his own rightful fanatical optimism:

"Whoever thinks he can frighten me somehow or surprise me is wrong. I have always taken to heart the words of a great German philosopher: ‘A blow that does not knock a strong man over, only makes him stronger" [5]

In private, Hitler had equally praised Nietzsche. According to Walther Hewel in a conversation about Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche in 1941, Hitler said that Nietzsche was: "More intuitive than purely analytical. Affirmation of the laws of nature and of struggle. Positive user manual. Hence, the true philosopher of National Socialism." [6] Goebbels corroborates this as in 1943 in a conversation about Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, he noted Hitler to have said "Nietzsche is naturally much closer to our viewpoint than Schopenhauer" [7]

So it appears that Hitler had approved of Friedrich Nietzsche both publicly and privately.

Source:
[1] Heinrich Hoffmann: Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, 100 Bild-Dokumente aus dem Leben des Führers
[2] BArch R 43-II/894c Nietzsche-Institut Weimar 1935 p.63
[3] Der Führer: das Hauptorgan der NSDAP Gau Baden; der badische Staatsanzeiger 31.07.1943 p.1
[4] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #08 „Staat und Kirchen im 19. Jahrhundert“ (Reichsorganisationsleiter der NSDAP) p.299
[5] Völkischer Beobachter, Die Rede des Führers im Berliner Sportpalast, Januar 30,1942 p.3
[6] Diaries and Papers of Botschafter Hewel. Nachlass Walther Hewel. Microfilm DJ-75. Filmed February 1971. Film No 96928, Reel 23 [EP Microform Limited] p.151
[7] NARA, RG 242, T-84, Roll 264 p.296

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐇𝐘𝐏𝐎𝐂𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐘 𝐎𝐅 𝐈𝐌𝐀𝐆𝐄𝐑𝐘
The fruitless attempt at anti-NSHeathenry slander

It's quite funny how it's pointed out that in the post about Hitler's 1934 meeting of him saying that the German people can continue without Christianity, that the infamous anti-church propaganda images were used. Anyone with a brain can easily sense that this is for the sake of imagery and obviously not condoning the anti-NS tendencies of the allies.

Yet when this image from a French Anti-NS newspaper "L'Ami du peupl" in 1935 [1] on German soldiers whipping Jesus is used countless times, no one seems to care. in fact, they seemingly mistake this as somehow some contemporary pro-German pro-Christian illustration when its the opposite.

The same person (Jean-Louis Chancel) that made the "Gott mit uns" illustration also made a similar piece in 1940 depicting a National Socialist whipping presumably Jesus on the cross again. [2] If we were to apply this same logic onto them, then they are pro-allied propaganda themselves.

They are hypocrites.

Source:
[1] L'Ami du peuple, 7 août 1935, p. 1
[2] Chancel, Jean-Louis. Le Livre Noir 1939 - 1945. Paris: Les Éditions de la Nouvelle France, [circa 1945]

𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐑 𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐄𝐃 𝐑𝐀𝐂𝐄 𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐕𝐄 𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐆𝐈𝐎𝐍
Looking at Hitler's repeated meetings with Bishops

There are some noteworthy issues with the people who post this meme of Hitler allegedly saying "I do not place race above religion." The meme misleads readers to think that this is a speech by Hitler and thus entirely unquestionable when in fact it's Minutes of the conference of diocesan representatives in Berlin on April 25 and 26, 1933. [1] Another being that this meeting takes place 3 months before the Reichskonkordat was signed, implicating there is political motive behind it. The context portrays Hitler saying: "I was attacked for my handling of the Jewish question. For 1500 years, the Catholic Church viewed Jews as vermin, confined them to ghettos, and so on; that's when people realized what Jews were." [2]

Yet, in 1934, when Hitler met with two of the most recalcitrant Protestant bishops, Hans Meiser of Bavaria and Theophil Wurm of Württemberg, he seemed to have completely rejected this notion of following church tradition like he is reported to have said beforehand, and instead advocated for the doctrine of race as more authoritative than the Church. He issued a veiled threat, telling them that if they did not cooperate, Christianity would disappear, just as it had in Russia:

"Christianity will disappear from Germany just as it did from Russia. The denominations were unable to prevent the French Revolution, Bolshevism, Marxism, or the 1918 Revolution. [...] Germans existed for hundreds of thousands of years before Christ without Christianity and will continue to live even after Christianity has disappeared. [...] The Church must become accustomed to the doctrine of blood and race; just as the Catholic Church could not change the fact that the Earth revolves around the sun, so too could it not erase the irrefutable facts inherent in blood and race. If it does not acknowledge this, progress will simply pass it by." [3]

The latter meeting is undoubtedly an authentic note of Hitler's words as Faulhaber reported the same line of thought in Hitler in 1936. Indeed, the sources suggest that Hitler saying "I do not place race above religion" is not genuine belief Hitler held. To continue to peddle this meme would be ignoring the parts in Hitler's speeches where he specifically emphasized race over religion.

Race is the most important aspect of what makes culture and a Volk.

Source:
[1] Katholische Kirche und Nationalsozialismus: Dokumente 1930–1935 von Hans Müller p.104
[2] ibid, p.118
[3] LKA Nürnberg, Bestand Landesbischof Meiser, Sitzungsprotokolle 1933–37, Manuskriptband, 62 f. [Cited in Dokumente zur Kirchenpolitik des Dritten Reiches: Bd. 2. 1934/35 p.79-80]

SEE: HITLER'S OFFICIAL PARTY CIRCULAR ON RACE

𝐖𝐄 𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐅𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐉𝐔𝐃𝐀𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐗𝐈𝐒𝐌
Defending National Socialism

Almost everywhere in modern day do we see the effects of Judaism on our culture through controlling of the media/press and relentless foreign lobbying for the interests of nations except our own. This is internationalism. in 1927, Adolf Hitler explains how the core concepts of which Nationalism compliments Socialism. They are, in reality, synonymous, away from Marxist distortion:

"... and this, my dear friends, this transformation of these two concepts, socialism and nationalism, is in reality a rapprochement of the two. For then this happens: socialism becomes nationalism, nationalism becomes socialism. They are both one, socialism and nationalism. They are the greatest fighters for their own people, the greatest fighters in the struggle for existence on earth, and thus they are no longer battle cries against each other, but a battle cry that shapes its life according to this slogan." [1]

The inferiority of Marxism lies in the fact that it does not place the people (race) first above all. It places the economy first. In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote: "whenever economic interests dominated the life of the people, and pushed transcendent ideals into the background, the state collapsed; and economic ruin followed soon thereafter." [2] The effects of the removal of differences in human beings becomes catastrophic for the development of a nation as it does not recognize the scientific fact of heredity. [3]

HOW DOES MARXISM AID JUDAISM?

The invitation of racial chaos into society through the lens of class struggle only fragmentizes the country through endless infighting. The forceful destruction of the culture of society benefits the parasitic nature of the jews in their goal for alienating the Volk against each other. Whether Marxism can be anti-jewish in this sense is completely out of the question. We must look at its practical uses. Whatever helps the destruction of European societies is beneficial to Judaism.

Judaism in its development and values is completely foreign to Germanic ideals. One builds and one destroys. It is just as false of a religion as Islam. In the jewish holy books, they believe they are chosen by God (Deuteronomy 7:6) to rule the earth. In the Talmud, it speaks of rabbis saying living in the land of Israel is the fundamental context for a direct, unbroken relationship with God. [4] This supremacism of the jewish race is incompatible with the survival of Aryan humanity and must be opposed.

𝗔𝘀 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀, 𝘄𝗲 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗳𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗮𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝘅𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝗮𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽. 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲.

Source:
[1] BArch NS 26/54 Rede vom 06. März 1927 in Vilsbiburg p.267-269
[2] Mein Kampf (Dalton), p.211
[3] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1934 #02 p.14-16
[4] Babylonian Talmud, Ketubot 110b (The William Davidson Edition)

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐃𝐎𝐂𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐁𝐄𝐓𝐖𝐄𝐄𝐍 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐘
Exploring NS concepts using only NSDAP sources
Ｐａｒｔ （１／２）

1.) 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐥

In Christianity, the body and soul are completely separate (Matthew 10:28). It would then follow that the soul is a universal non-race bound entity and only a means to directly connect to God. This is a completely false doctrine and contradicts biological determinism. What is true, is the body is the expression of the soul. In the ideological training booklet of the NDSAP Der Schulungsbrief, it says:

"Based on research, we now know that at the beginning of our era, the Germanic peoples entered history with a worldview corresponding to their racial characteristics. This worldview was founded on the one hand on their attitude towards blood, and on the other hand on their attitude towards the soil. For them, man was not an arbitrary aggregation of soul, mind, and body, each leading a separate existence independently of the others, but rather they saw in man the wholeness bound in the blood. Soul, mind, and body were not in competition with each other in terms of value. [...] It remained the prerogative of Jewish analytical intellect to elevate the soul to the highest and most important point of reference for human beings. No longer was the blood-bound, total human being the subject of evaluation, but rather the abstract concept of the soul, which, as the Church Father Augustine stated, is a non-spatial, immaterial substance, and is therefore the same for all people, independent of their blood. The political Church built its system of rule upon this pure doctrine of the soul. Both the mind and the body were now considered inferior to the soul." [1]

The racial soul is the expression of inherent biological traits tied to different races. This applies to both ethics and understanding. Head of the NSDAP's Office of Racial Policy Walter Groß wrote that: "Human values, for better or for worse, are no longer the result of a good or bad environment, but rather an expression of the hereditary traits that reside in a person's blood and are passed down from fathers and mothers. We cannot change them, nor can we arbitrarily recreate lost ones. Instead, according to our current understanding, we must imagine that a people enters its history with a fixed set of genetic predispositions, and that all these given genetic traits continue to circulate within that people until somewhere the flow of blood is interrupted, and thus a particle of the original predispositions is destroyed forever." [2]

In the Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte, it equally displays this proudly and adds that this is not a materialistic idea, but rather a life-affirming one:

"Just as National Socialism is not universalistic, it is equally not materialistic, because it stands once and for all beyond the antithesis of body and soul, matter and spirit, nature and supernature." [3]

The NS concept of body/soul is fundamentally incompatible with Christianity because sin/salvation of the soul is universal, not racial. Spirit value in the Christian framework isn't measured biologically. Hitler too, affirmed of the genetic predispositions of race.

Source:
[1] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #03 Seele, Geist und Körper. Kampf gegen drei fremde Weltanschauungen von Kurt Ellersiek p.82-83
[2] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1934 #02 Der Rassengedanke Des Nationalsozialismus von Dr. Walter Groß p.16
[3] Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte: zentrale politische und kulturelle Zeitschrift der NSDAP 1938 "Von den inneren Kräften der deutschen Geschichte" von Dr. Matthes Ziegler p.18

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐃𝐎𝐂𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐁𝐄𝐓𝐖𝐄𝐄𝐍 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐘
Exploring NS concepts using only NSDAP sources
Ｐａｒｔ （２／２）

2.) 𝐑𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐯𝐬 𝐎𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐢𝐧

Christianity views human history as an ongoing conflict between humanity and sin which later follows into a path of redemption. (Romans 5:12) This is another example of a false doctrine due to its Inconsideration to the idea of race and racial struggle. The National Socialist conception of world history is specifically racial struggle, not sin. Hitler offers a metaphor for this: "The sin against blood and race is the original sin in this world. It brings an end to every nation that commits it." [1] Hitler argued that we need a new conception of history more fitted to National Socialism. He specifically based this on racial struggle:

"We have no historical research that values the importance of the human races for the destiny of peoples (Völker). We need a conception of history, which views history not as just compiling a series of battles, but that penetrates into the racial instincts of conquest, the primal racial elements. Then comes the new worldview! History instruction must lead to the original factors: race and racial instincts." [2]

Race is destiny. Without race, we are nothing as it hints at our own character (racial soul) and to believe in the Christian idea of free will would be contradictory to the racial determinism of National Socialist biology:

"But we must not forget that what our children inherit from us cannot be removed from them by any force in the world; that it constitutes their innermost being, which cannot be changed. And that is why we say: race is destiny. A destiny so cruel, so compelling, so controlling that it brands one person a criminal and makes another a genius. Neither is responsible for this. There is no free will in the sense that I could change and shape my character as I wish. My character, my essence, is there, is immutable, is given to me by fate; I do not control my character, but my character controls me." [3]

This is then backed up by the Hitler-Youth Journal on world history:

"We now see the meaning of world history not in whether the development of peoples, through the influence of Christianity, for example, has taken an inevitable course, or whether a universal idea of ​​humanity has bound all peoples together by a common bond, or whether the goal and meaning of our earthly existence will be achieved through the creation of a vast melting pot of peoples based on international solidarity, but rather in the extent to which the forces of race, in their struggle with and against national cultures, have prevailed and led to the victory of a culture appropriate to our race. From this perspective, world history appears to us as a continuous struggle of the most opposing elements, which do not follow any particular compulsion, but are the expression of a dynamic battle of the most diverse racial souls for dominance on this earth. That our view is correct is proven to us by the current, particularly sharp divide across the globe with a worldview that is designed to destroy the very best primal forces of Nordic blood and thus extinguish the lifeblood of the soul of the dominant race on this earth. We believe we can say that the struggle against Bolshevism is not merely a struggle of politics, economics, and sustenance, but a struggle between two worldviews that are as opposed as fire and water, because their foundations and spiritual sources spring from two fundamentally different racial souls." [4]

This idea of the world being a struggle between difference races is supported by Hitler.

Source:
[1] Mein Kampf (Dalton), p.306
[2] BArch NS 26/54 Rede vom 12. Juni 1925 in Plauen p.5
[3] Tornisterschrift des Oberkommando der Wehrmacht Abteilung Inland 1941 "Rassen und Rasse" p.13
[4] Wille und Macht. Jahrgang 3, Heft 18, 1935 Die Anfgaben des neuen Kampfes von Karlheinz Rüdiger p.12

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴏᴄᴛʀɪɴᴀʟ ᴄᴏɴᴛʀᴀᴅɪᴄᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ ɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ꜱᴏᴄɪᴀʟɪꜱᴍ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄʜʀɪꜱᴛɪᴀɴɪᴛʏ

Getting into the philosophical concepts of National Socialism, we can point to two main ideas:

1.) 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐥
National Socialist racial theory rejected the Christian separation of body and soul by arguing that the soul is biologically rooted in blood and race. Since Christianity teaches that the soul and salvation are universal and not determined by race, it demonstrates that the two concepts are irreconcilable.

2.) 𝐑𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐯𝐬 𝐎𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐢𝐧
National Socialism rejects the Christian idea that human history is centered on universal sin and redemption, instead interpreting history as a biological and racial struggle between competing peoples and racial souls. The NS worldview is based on racial determinism and race-based destiny, not sin based destiny.

Biology is the basis for the National Socialist worldview. When taken to it's fullest extent, National Socialism points to the rejection of everything that is foreign. The first principle of National Socialism comes from the fact that: The Volk is the meaning and purpose of our existence.

Contemporary Third Reich comparisons between the National Socialist worldview and the Christian worldview:
SS training material from the Reich Security Main Office
Training Guide for SS leader candidates in the Sicherheitsdienst

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐅𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐒𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐍𝐈𝐄𝐓𝐙𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐄 𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐃 𝐁𝐘 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐒𝐃𝐀𝐏
The sad attempt by NS_Heathenry_Exposed to defame Nietzsche's philosophy

Much confusion about Nietzche and his philosophy has risen in both the 19th and 20th century. No source but National Socialist Germany has explained it better. In 1937, an article in Der Schulungsbrief explained it in detail showing that in Nietzsche's works, he believed: "the essence of the Jew "parasitic.", that the Jews falsified morality in Europe, etc. [1]

The NSDAP publication 'Willie und Macht' also addressed this too:

"Professorial guardians of the National Socialist idea warn: "Nietzsche was a friend of the jews." But they do not report that the few jews who came close to him personally became his most hateful enemies after a while [...] "Nietzsche was a German hater." But the fact that he rejected the Germany of the time because he wanted the Germany of the future, that from the depths of a German protest he detested the Wilhelminian fatherlandism, the shallowness of the patriotic attitude and educational madness, is kept quiet. [...] We National Socialists know it more clearly than the people of bygone eras: we do not grow through doctrines, but through people who present us with challenges, who call us to action, and who command us to insight. Friedrich Nietzsche is a man whose voice reaches far beyond our own days, admonishing and demanding into the distant future. In this sense, we confess to be Nietzsche's successors." [2]

Moreover, what type of anti-semitism did Nietzsche oppose? We can see easily that Nietzsche was against jews but in other places we see arguments against anti-semitism. This is easily explained:

"What Nietzsche primarily attacked about antisemitism has largely been overcome today. It is historical antisemitism of confessional, social, or economic forms, which lacks a modern biological basis, especially antisemitism based on mere negation. "Antisemites do not forgive Jews for having intellect and money. Antisemites is a name for those who have come down hard." And he names those anti-Semites, the latest speculators in idealism, who today roll their eyes in a Christian-Aryan-bourgeois way and, through a patience-exhausting abuse of the cheapest means of agitation, the moral attitude, seek to agitate all the brutish elements of the people. [...] He acknowledges that capable, strong-willed individuals fight among them, but argues that anti-Semitism is all the more harmful because it wastes and poisons so much capable energy, and that is precisely why he fights against it. However, he only wages wars where he cannot afford to belittle others. Nietzsche's position on antisemitism is decisive, overriding all personal and other influences. He contrasts a non-biologically based antisemitism with the Lamarckian misconception of possible Jewish assimilation." [3]

National Socialists including Hitler never saw Nietzsche as an enemy but as a friend to our worldview.

Source:
[1] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #08 "Friedrich Nietzsche: Der unerbittliche Werter des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts" p.295-296
[2] Wille und Macht. "Bekenntnis zu Nietzsche" Jahrgang 3/4, Heft 24/1 1935 p.31-32
[3] Heinrich Härtle, Nietzsche und der Nationalsozialismus (Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP, Franz Eher Nachf., 1944) p.48-49

SEE: HITLER AND NIETZSCHE