NS_Heathenry_Exposed claims this passage was taken out of context when it was still in context
The first passage of the quote is a different context than the second passage within the paragraph. Anyone whos read it can see that. Talking about Christianity as a slogan against itself is not on topic with Hitler's distinction between Christ/Christianity
"we must declare ourselves as the only true Christians. But then with the full force of the party against the saboteurs. Christianity is the slogan for the destruction of the priests, just as socialism was once the slogan for the destruction of the Marxist bigwigs."
The extra lines of text on there is not listed is because its already been addressed. So if we take the sources into account, Hitler was anti-christian because he viewed Christianity as bolshevism to destroy the roman empire which had nothing to do with Christ as a figure. Which means this argument easily falls flat on itself.
Proof:
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/984
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/985
If we look at later entries of the original handwritten notes, we can see a much greater context explaining this line of thinking:
"The Fรผhrer passionately refuses to play the role of a religious founder. He does not want to become a Buddha later on. He is solely and exclusively a politician. The best way to deal with the churches is to present oneself as a more positive Christian. So, it is necessary, for the time being, to remain reserved on these matters and to ruthlessly suppress the churches wherever they become impudent and interfere in state affairs. And we will strive to ensure this to the best of our ability."
[Source]
We should not forget Goebbels also recording that Hitler was: Anti-Christian, Agreed with Nietzsche on Christianity, rejected the Christian doctrine of salvation, etc
The first passage of the quote is a different context than the second passage within the paragraph. Anyone whos read it can see that. Talking about Christianity as a slogan against itself is not on topic with Hitler's distinction between Christ/Christianity
"we must declare ourselves as the only true Christians. But then with the full force of the party against the saboteurs. Christianity is the slogan for the destruction of the priests, just as socialism was once the slogan for the destruction of the Marxist bigwigs."
The extra lines of text on there is not listed is because its already been addressed. So if we take the sources into account, Hitler was anti-christian because he viewed Christianity as bolshevism to destroy the roman empire which had nothing to do with Christ as a figure. Which means this argument easily falls flat on itself.
Proof:
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/984
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/985
If we look at later entries of the original handwritten notes, we can see a much greater context explaining this line of thinking:
"The Fรผhrer passionately refuses to play the role of a religious founder. He does not want to become a Buddha later on. He is solely and exclusively a politician. The best way to deal with the churches is to present oneself as a more positive Christian. So, it is necessary, for the time being, to remain reserved on these matters and to ruthlessly suppress the churches wherever they become impudent and interfere in state affairs. And we will strive to ensure this to the best of our ability."
[Source]
We should not forget Goebbels also recording that Hitler was: Anti-Christian, Agreed with Nietzsche on Christianity, rejected the Christian doctrine of salvation, etc
๐17
๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐
NS_Heathenry_Exposed seems to enjoy posting from Alois Hudal's book even though its neither a concrete establishment of National Socialism and the fact that it was CENSORED. The end goal of his book was not merely for the sake of National Socialism, but for establishing Christianity itself and its attempts to make both ideas sync to his own reasoning. Hudal himself has written that National Socialism requires a Christian "injection" to avoid ultimately ending in unrestrained barbarity implying its principles in itself would become increasingly opposed to that of Christian ethics.
As expected, Hudal's book "The foundations of National Socialism" is not an authoritative source on NS as he at times contradicts its core principle. For example, Hudal writes:
"According to Christian worldview, unconditional superordination and primacy belong not to blood but to spirit. Where human will shows weaknesses and inhibitions, the deepest root lies, however much climate, landscape, and race may also play a part, in a spiritual sphere, in original sin and not in blood. THEREFORE RACE CAN NEVER ALONE AND IN ITSELF BE ELEVATED TO A MORAL CONCEPT OF VALUE, without our wishing to deny that the individual races distinguish themselves through certain dispositions peculiar only to them. [...] The task of science is to investigate to what extent climate, landscape, environment, and blood co-form and shape the intellectual-moral attitude of a nation. But whoever wishes to write a history of nations determined by blood and race is no less a materialist than the disciples of Marxism when they wish to explain the development of peoples only according to economic and class determined oppositions. [...] The importing of the racial into the essence of Christianity, however, leads with compelling necessity to the abandonment of the absolute, to becoming stuck in the natural, to the loss of all unconditional values, to the relativism of knowledge and morality."
According to Hudal's logic, Hitler would be "no less a materialist than the disciples of Marxism" as Hitler himself says that History instruction must lead to the original factors of race and that racial-mixing is the only true original sin of this world as it brings the end of nations. (Race > Religion). Hudal then writes:
"The dogmatic edifice of National Socialism rests upon two concepts: nation and race. From both foundations, which are closely interrelated, there emergeโas soon as they are thought through consistentlyโimportant practical demands of uncompromising clarity. The overemphasis on the concepts of race and hereditary substance harbors within itself the danger of a distancing from Christianity for the Germanic people, BECAUSE THIS RELIGION ORIGINATED FROM FOREIGN RACES AND CULTURAL SPHERES. On the hygienicsocial level, however, there appears as a consequence the elimination of the hereditarily diseased mass through marriage prohibitions and sterilization. If one does not give the concepts of nation and race a narrower interpretation, it is difficult to avoid these two conclusions. With complete clarity, therefore, the demand for sterilization appears throughout the entire leading National Socialist literature as a selfevident matter, for which the radical representatives would prefer not to admit any further justification or evaluation from the realm of morality."
National Socialism is a worldview based on biology. The implications of this means that its adherents ought to profess their allegiance to the laws of race and blood as is it race that gives us meaning and purpose to our existence. Without this underlying principle, it simply wouldn't be National Socialism.
Finally, we shall not forget that Hudal's thorough rejection of Alfred Rosenberg is in strike contradiction to Hitler's personal and private defense of him being the NSDAP's leading intellectual architects. Hudal ultimately came to the conclusion himself that a strong tie of Christianity and National Socialism together isn't realistic and broke away from that idea.
NS_Heathenry_Exposed seems to enjoy posting from Alois Hudal's book even though its neither a concrete establishment of National Socialism and the fact that it was CENSORED. The end goal of his book was not merely for the sake of National Socialism, but for establishing Christianity itself and its attempts to make both ideas sync to his own reasoning. Hudal himself has written that National Socialism requires a Christian "injection" to avoid ultimately ending in unrestrained barbarity implying its principles in itself would become increasingly opposed to that of Christian ethics.
As expected, Hudal's book "The foundations of National Socialism" is not an authoritative source on NS as he at times contradicts its core principle. For example, Hudal writes:
"According to Christian worldview, unconditional superordination and primacy belong not to blood but to spirit. Where human will shows weaknesses and inhibitions, the deepest root lies, however much climate, landscape, and race may also play a part, in a spiritual sphere, in original sin and not in blood. THEREFORE RACE CAN NEVER ALONE AND IN ITSELF BE ELEVATED TO A MORAL CONCEPT OF VALUE, without our wishing to deny that the individual races distinguish themselves through certain dispositions peculiar only to them. [...] The task of science is to investigate to what extent climate, landscape, environment, and blood co-form and shape the intellectual-moral attitude of a nation. But whoever wishes to write a history of nations determined by blood and race is no less a materialist than the disciples of Marxism when they wish to explain the development of peoples only according to economic and class determined oppositions. [...] The importing of the racial into the essence of Christianity, however, leads with compelling necessity to the abandonment of the absolute, to becoming stuck in the natural, to the loss of all unconditional values, to the relativism of knowledge and morality."
According to Hudal's logic, Hitler would be "no less a materialist than the disciples of Marxism" as Hitler himself says that History instruction must lead to the original factors of race and that racial-mixing is the only true original sin of this world as it brings the end of nations. (Race > Religion). Hudal then writes:
"The dogmatic edifice of National Socialism rests upon two concepts: nation and race. From both foundations, which are closely interrelated, there emergeโas soon as they are thought through consistentlyโimportant practical demands of uncompromising clarity. The overemphasis on the concepts of race and hereditary substance harbors within itself the danger of a distancing from Christianity for the Germanic people, BECAUSE THIS RELIGION ORIGINATED FROM FOREIGN RACES AND CULTURAL SPHERES. On the hygienicsocial level, however, there appears as a consequence the elimination of the hereditarily diseased mass through marriage prohibitions and sterilization. If one does not give the concepts of nation and race a narrower interpretation, it is difficult to avoid these two conclusions. With complete clarity, therefore, the demand for sterilization appears throughout the entire leading National Socialist literature as a selfevident matter, for which the radical representatives would prefer not to admit any further justification or evaluation from the realm of morality."
National Socialism is a worldview based on biology. The implications of this means that its adherents ought to profess their allegiance to the laws of race and blood as is it race that gives us meaning and purpose to our existence. Without this underlying principle, it simply wouldn't be National Socialism.
Finally, we shall not forget that Hudal's thorough rejection of Alfred Rosenberg is in strike contradiction to Hitler's personal and private defense of him being the NSDAP's leading intellectual architects. Hudal ultimately came to the conclusion himself that a strong tie of Christianity and National Socialism together isn't realistic and broke away from that idea.
๐18
NS_Heathenry_Exposed is SCARED to address the anti-Christian basis of Heinrich Himmler's theology.
Instead of beating around the bush implicating that Himmler was somehow a pro-Christian in his service as Reichsfรผhrer-SS such as showing a document where he releases preists or simply helping preserve history by requesting a centuries years old Bible to be stored away, why not actually show statements from Himmler where fundamentally supports Christianity and not him just portraying a historical example of the church embedding Germanic values?
The reality is: Himmler condemned Christianity as 2,000 year old Bolshevism, Removed Christian clergy from the SS, and wanted to awaken a worldview based on our pre-christian ancestors for the SS [etc]
No amount of religious stats of regular SS men will negate the fact that the SS-leadership wished to intentionally get rid of the influence of Christianity. That is where the focus truly is.
What is the evidence for this?
โข The SS-Hauptamt explicitly talked about plans to overcome Christianity by means of SS literature and reinterpretation of the current idea of what God is [1] [2]
โข The SS training programs recommended anti-Christian literature for its ideological training [3]
โข Discouraged people who followed Christianity from participating in the SS leadership training course [4]
โข Official Sicherheitsdienst training document condemning Christianity [5]
โข The SS publishing house Nordland-Verlag on engaging in ideological confrontation with Christianity + receiving approval from the Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda to publish anti-Christian children's books [6] [7]
We can see the manifestations of this plan throughout the SS in the following literature on the topic of Christianity/God:
โข Waffen-SS
โข Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler
โข SS-Hitlerjugend
โข SS-Gรถtz von Berlichingen
โข SS-Das Reich
โข SS-Totenkopf
โข Sicherheitsdienst
โข Reichssicherheitshauptamt
No one in NS_Heathenry_Exposed will address any of these SS documents on Christianity since it ultimately crumbles what they push. Hitler was aware of this anti-Christian push in the SS and supported it.
HIMMLER WAS NOT CHRISTIAN
Instead of beating around the bush implicating that Himmler was somehow a pro-Christian in his service as Reichsfรผhrer-SS such as showing a document where he releases preists or simply helping preserve history by requesting a centuries years old Bible to be stored away, why not actually show statements from Himmler where fundamentally supports Christianity and not him just portraying a historical example of the church embedding Germanic values?
The reality is: Himmler condemned Christianity as 2,000 year old Bolshevism, Removed Christian clergy from the SS, and wanted to awaken a worldview based on our pre-christian ancestors for the SS [etc]
No amount of religious stats of regular SS men will negate the fact that the SS-leadership wished to intentionally get rid of the influence of Christianity. That is where the focus truly is.
What is the evidence for this?
โข The SS-Hauptamt explicitly talked about plans to overcome Christianity by means of SS literature and reinterpretation of the current idea of what God is [1] [2]
โข The SS training programs recommended anti-Christian literature for its ideological training [3]
โข Discouraged people who followed Christianity from participating in the SS leadership training course [4]
โข Official Sicherheitsdienst training document condemning Christianity [5]
โข The SS publishing house Nordland-Verlag on engaging in ideological confrontation with Christianity + receiving approval from the Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda to publish anti-Christian children's books [6] [7]
We can see the manifestations of this plan throughout the SS in the following literature on the topic of Christianity/God:
โข Waffen-SS
โข Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler
โข SS-Hitlerjugend
โข SS-Gรถtz von Berlichingen
โข SS-Das Reich
โข SS-Totenkopf
โข Sicherheitsdienst
โข Reichssicherheitshauptamt
No one in NS_Heathenry_Exposed will address any of these SS documents on Christianity since it ultimately crumbles what they push. Hitler was aware of this anti-Christian push in the SS and supported it.
HIMMLER WAS NOT CHRISTIAN
๐21
More source denial from NS_Heathenry_Exposed
In their 2024 era channel, NSHE has claimed that the quote "a christian era can only possess a christian art, a national socialist era only a national socialist art.โ from Hitler's speech in 1936 is "clearly a forgery" in which the source of the quote was "already dubious enough" even though the source is so clear cut in what it is in the original image that they present.
So when we investigate the validity of such claims, the quote is in fact a real quote from Hitler in 1936. On page 67 of 'Der Parteitag der Ehre vom 8. bis 14. September 1936 offizieller Bericht รผber den Verlauf des Reichsparteitages mit sรคmtlichen Kongressreden' it displays said quote.
How interesting that they say "It doesn't match up with the firsthand evidence we have". This appears to be a recurring in their way of thinking.
[See for yourself]
In their 2024 era channel, NSHE has claimed that the quote "a christian era can only possess a christian art, a national socialist era only a national socialist art.โ from Hitler's speech in 1936 is "clearly a forgery" in which the source of the quote was "already dubious enough" even though the source is so clear cut in what it is in the original image that they present.
So when we investigate the validity of such claims, the quote is in fact a real quote from Hitler in 1936. On page 67 of 'Der Parteitag der Ehre vom 8. bis 14. September 1936 offizieller Bericht รผber den Verlauf des Reichsparteitages mit sรคmtlichen Kongressreden' it displays said quote.
How interesting that they say "It doesn't match up with the firsthand evidence we have". This appears to be a recurring in their way of thinking.
[See for yourself]
๐18
NS_Heathenry_Exposed cuts out and ignores an interesting piece of information regarding the November 4/5 meeting with Faulhaber
What Faulhaber reports here as posted by NSHE isn't something new. In the same exact meeting, Hitler also recounted some of the ways the Catholic Church had been forced to change in the past, such as giving up the geocentric model of the solar system. In a similar fashion, the Catholic Church should abandon its opposition to National Socialism, such as racial legislation, which, Hitler insisted, were based on the firm foundation of science:
"The Fรผhrer's second topic was National Socialism and the Church. He spoke only of the Catholic Church. Everything in the Church had changed, he said: the question of whether the world was created in six days or six million years, whether the sun revolves around the earth, the invasion of the Huns, the Reformation, the French Revolution... Therefore, the Church, too, must abandon its fight against our racial legislation, which was based on absolute scientific research. These laws were still being preached against from the pulpit. He had on his desk files concerning 380 (370?) indictments against clergymen who had expressed hostility towards the new state. The Center Party priests could not accept that National Socialism had prevailed and achieved so much. Christianity, he said, was inextricably linked to our people and to Western culture through a thousand-year history. One cannot condone everything that has happened in these 1900 years, for example, in the history of the German emperors and popes, but Christianity was a power back then. If the Church continues to behave hostilely towards National Socialism and perpetuates the struggle, then National Socialism will have to manage without the Church. Tell them: We may do as we please, the Church cannot be reconciled; it fought against us before the seizure of power and continues to do so today, despite the danger of widespread abandonment. If only the Church would at least give up the fight for tactical reasons! Compared to the great goal the Fรผhrer has set for himselfโto defeat Bolshevism and make the German people happyโeverything else is small and a ridiculous trifle."
Interestingly at the very end of this document despite all of which is discussed, Faulhaber notes that Hitler's personal image on the Catholic church is still unclear to him:
"Less clear is the image of the Catholic Church in his spirit as a divine institution, with its divine mission independent of the state, with its unchangeable dogmas, with its historical and cultural greatness.โ
SEE: FAULHABER DENYING NATIONAL SOCIALISM AS PURE APOSTASY
Source: Cardinal Faulhaber on November 4/5, 1936 [Akten Kardinal Michael von Faulbabers 1917-1945, Bd. 2, 1935-1945, Dok. 572., p.187 and p.194]
What Faulhaber reports here as posted by NSHE isn't something new. In the same exact meeting, Hitler also recounted some of the ways the Catholic Church had been forced to change in the past, such as giving up the geocentric model of the solar system. In a similar fashion, the Catholic Church should abandon its opposition to National Socialism, such as racial legislation, which, Hitler insisted, were based on the firm foundation of science:
"The Fรผhrer's second topic was National Socialism and the Church. He spoke only of the Catholic Church. Everything in the Church had changed, he said: the question of whether the world was created in six days or six million years, whether the sun revolves around the earth, the invasion of the Huns, the Reformation, the French Revolution... Therefore, the Church, too, must abandon its fight against our racial legislation, which was based on absolute scientific research. These laws were still being preached against from the pulpit. He had on his desk files concerning 380 (370?) indictments against clergymen who had expressed hostility towards the new state. The Center Party priests could not accept that National Socialism had prevailed and achieved so much. Christianity, he said, was inextricably linked to our people and to Western culture through a thousand-year history. One cannot condone everything that has happened in these 1900 years, for example, in the history of the German emperors and popes, but Christianity was a power back then. If the Church continues to behave hostilely towards National Socialism and perpetuates the struggle, then National Socialism will have to manage without the Church. Tell them: We may do as we please, the Church cannot be reconciled; it fought against us before the seizure of power and continues to do so today, despite the danger of widespread abandonment. If only the Church would at least give up the fight for tactical reasons! Compared to the great goal the Fรผhrer has set for himselfโto defeat Bolshevism and make the German people happyโeverything else is small and a ridiculous trifle."
Interestingly at the very end of this document despite all of which is discussed, Faulhaber notes that Hitler's personal image on the Catholic church is still unclear to him:
"Less clear is the image of the Catholic Church in his spirit as a divine institution, with its divine mission independent of the state, with its unchangeable dogmas, with its historical and cultural greatness.โ
SEE: FAULHABER DENYING NATIONAL SOCIALISM AS PURE APOSTASY
Source: Cardinal Faulhaber on November 4/5, 1936 [Akten Kardinal Michael von Faulbabers 1917-1945, Bd. 2, 1935-1945, Dok. 572., p.187 and p.194]
๐18
Admin inside NS_Heathenry_Exposed cites AI to say the quotes from Hewel's diaries are made up then proceeds to lie about checking the diary
When NSHE Admin named "Plot" was confronted with the fact that Hitler's personal friend and Head of the Personal Staff of the Reichsminister for Foreign Affairs Walther Hewel documented extensively conversations regarding Hitler and Christianity, he used AI as confirmation bias and completely failed.
Upon looking at Hewel's dairy, it does show said entries (June 8th, 1941). Plot's claim that quotes on forced conversion, sagas, eternal jew, etc is a rather malicious lie as he himself has claimed to have searched inside the diary and said that the quotes "doesn't exist", now lets look at the image above where it illustrates them: ^
Where would we be today if Christianity hadn't been forced upon us? And against our will, with fire and sword in the name of the good God.
"Vergleich mit England. Wo wรคren wir heute, wenn nicht das Christentum uns aufgezwungen worden wรคre. Und zwar gegen unseren Willen, mit Feuer und Schwert im Namen des gรผtigen Gottes."
How pathetic are the stories of the saints compared to the Greek, Roman, and then Germanic sagas.
"Wie jรคmmerlich sind die Heiligengeschichten gegenรผber den griechischen, rรถmischen und dann Germanischen Sagen."
In terms of cruelty, Christianity has broken all records. Christianity is the revenge of the eternal Jew.
"In Bezug auf Grausamkeit hat das Christentum alle Rekorde geschlagen. Das Christentum ist die Rache des ewigen Juden."
Final verdict: the quotes are in fact REAL. Do not be intellectually lazy like the admins inside of NSHE.
Source: Diaries and Papers of Botschafter Hewel. Nachlass Walther Hewel. Microfilm DJ-75. Filmed February 1971. Film No 96928, Reel 23 [EP Microform Limited] p.118, p.44, p.45
[Transcriptions here]
[SEE: HEWEL'S DIARY DIRECTLY CORROBORATING THE TABLE TALKS]
When NSHE Admin named "Plot" was confronted with the fact that Hitler's personal friend and Head of the Personal Staff of the Reichsminister for Foreign Affairs Walther Hewel documented extensively conversations regarding Hitler and Christianity, he used AI as confirmation bias and completely failed.
Upon looking at Hewel's dairy, it does show said entries (June 8th, 1941). Plot's claim that quotes on forced conversion, sagas, eternal jew, etc is a rather malicious lie as he himself has claimed to have searched inside the diary and said that the quotes "doesn't exist", now lets look at the image above where it illustrates them: ^
Where would we be today if Christianity hadn't been forced upon us? And against our will, with fire and sword in the name of the good God.
"Vergleich mit England. Wo wรคren wir heute, wenn nicht das Christentum uns aufgezwungen worden wรคre. Und zwar gegen unseren Willen, mit Feuer und Schwert im Namen des gรผtigen Gottes."
How pathetic are the stories of the saints compared to the Greek, Roman, and then Germanic sagas.
"Wie jรคmmerlich sind die Heiligengeschichten gegenรผber den griechischen, rรถmischen und dann Germanischen Sagen."
In terms of cruelty, Christianity has broken all records. Christianity is the revenge of the eternal Jew.
"In Bezug auf Grausamkeit hat das Christentum alle Rekorde geschlagen. Das Christentum ist die Rache des ewigen Juden."
Final verdict: the quotes are in fact REAL. Do not be intellectually lazy like the admins inside of NSHE.
Source: Diaries and Papers of Botschafter Hewel. Nachlass Walther Hewel. Microfilm DJ-75. Filmed February 1971. Film No 96928, Reel 23 [EP Microform Limited] p.118, p.44, p.45
[Transcriptions here]
[SEE: HEWEL'S DIARY DIRECTLY CORROBORATING THE TABLE TALKS]
๐23
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
The SD surveillance on the Vatican Radio revealed that the Catholic Church was openly against the "modern pagan racial teachings" of NS + openly stating that the racial laws introduced by NS in italy were a "contradiction" of official canon law since the church cannot denounce interracial marriage.
Documents:
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1476
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1478
๐๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ง๐๐๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ [ENCYCLICAL]
A number of people say nowhere is it referencing the NSDAP and yet completely ignore how the original says "on the church and the german reich" then talks about the "open negotiations for a concordat, which the Reich Government proposed on the basis of a scheme of several years' standing" then makes clear reference to the NSDAP violating the concordat: "... in the course of these anxious and trying years following upon the conclusion of the concordat, every one of Our words, every one of Our acts, has been inspired by the binding law of treaties. At the same time, anyone must acknowledge, not without surprise and reprobation, how the OTHER CONTRACTING PARTY emasculated the terms of the treaty, distorted their meaning, and eventually considered its more or less official violation as a normal policy."
What is said here isn't of surprise as even Pacelli (Pius XII) had noted: "... the difficulties and persecution, carried to a virtually intolerable degree, which the Catholic Church in Germany is now enduring in open violation of the Concordat." Pacelli even addressed Hitler himself as his government on the "violent hostility" towards the Catholic church in Germany. Pacelli (Pius XII) specifically said this encyclical was against the "Nazi doctrines condemned in the recent encyclical" in a letter from April 30, 1937. Former Ambassador to the Holy See Ernst von Weizsรคcker wrote in 1940 that National Socialism couldn't be doctrinally united with Christianity.
The NSDAP had already knew of the encyclical and its intentions. In the Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte, the encyclical has been addressed as an anti-National Socialist piece. For this reason, the NSDAP had banned the distribution of the Mit brennender Sorge. This directly connects to what the Vatican radio has preached against the worldview of National Socialism as common knowledge.
โข Pope Pius XI on National Socialism as "materialism"
โข Pope Pius XII on National Socialism being the same as Bolshevism
Racial universalism within the theology of Christianity is clear when we see that every race can have salvation and was also created in the image of the Christian God. The church proudly proclaims this as official doctrine. The primacy of blood is nowhere in Christianity. This has been made clear in NSDAP sources such as; HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE.
The contemporary sources demonstrate that the church was against National Socialism in its core ideas.
SEE: HITLER ON THE PRIMACY OF THE STATE OVER THE CHURCH
The SD surveillance on the Vatican Radio revealed that the Catholic Church was openly against the "modern pagan racial teachings" of NS + openly stating that the racial laws introduced by NS in italy were a "contradiction" of official canon law since the church cannot denounce interracial marriage.
Documents:
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1476
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1478
๐๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ง๐๐๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ [ENCYCLICAL]
A number of people say nowhere is it referencing the NSDAP and yet completely ignore how the original says "on the church and the german reich" then talks about the "open negotiations for a concordat, which the Reich Government proposed on the basis of a scheme of several years' standing" then makes clear reference to the NSDAP violating the concordat: "... in the course of these anxious and trying years following upon the conclusion of the concordat, every one of Our words, every one of Our acts, has been inspired by the binding law of treaties. At the same time, anyone must acknowledge, not without surprise and reprobation, how the OTHER CONTRACTING PARTY emasculated the terms of the treaty, distorted their meaning, and eventually considered its more or less official violation as a normal policy."
What is said here isn't of surprise as even Pacelli (Pius XII) had noted: "... the difficulties and persecution, carried to a virtually intolerable degree, which the Catholic Church in Germany is now enduring in open violation of the Concordat." Pacelli even addressed Hitler himself as his government on the "violent hostility" towards the Catholic church in Germany. Pacelli (Pius XII) specifically said this encyclical was against the "Nazi doctrines condemned in the recent encyclical" in a letter from April 30, 1937. Former Ambassador to the Holy See Ernst von Weizsรคcker wrote in 1940 that National Socialism couldn't be doctrinally united with Christianity.
The NSDAP had already knew of the encyclical and its intentions. In the Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte, the encyclical has been addressed as an anti-National Socialist piece. For this reason, the NSDAP had banned the distribution of the Mit brennender Sorge. This directly connects to what the Vatican radio has preached against the worldview of National Socialism as common knowledge.
โข Pope Pius XI on National Socialism as "materialism"
โข Pope Pius XII on National Socialism being the same as Bolshevism
Racial universalism within the theology of Christianity is clear when we see that every race can have salvation and was also created in the image of the Christian God. The church proudly proclaims this as official doctrine. The primacy of blood is nowhere in Christianity. This has been made clear in NSDAP sources such as; HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE.
The contemporary sources demonstrate that the church was against National Socialism in its core ideas.
SEE: HITLER ON THE PRIMACY OF THE STATE OVER THE CHURCH
๐14
Unmasking "NS Heathenry Exposed"
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ The SD surveillance on the Vatican Radio revealed that the Catholic Church was openly against the "modern pagan racial teachings" of NS + openly stating that the racial laws introduced by NS in italy were a "contradiction"โฆ
VATIKANRDN.png
21.4 MB
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ฆ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฅ๐๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐๐ง ๐๐ก๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ก๐จ๐ญ๐จ โ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐
How the channel "NSDAP Loved Christ" leaves out important context
Hitler's political pragmatism appears evident when Hoffmann reports in his memoirs Hitler telling him: "if the people THINK (denkt) Iโm a devout man, well, no harm will come of that!". The choice of words Hitler uses here demonstrates that Hitler didn't mind political gain from being portrayed as a devout Christian.
Further evidence supporting this is found within the captions that were changed within the book 'Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt'. Originally, the caption reinforced the image:
โA photographic chance event becomes a symbol: Adolf Hitler, the supposed "heretic", leaving the Marinekirche in Wilhelmshaven."
In the later publication, not only was the crucifix removed. but the pronounced religious tone found in the previous caption was also cut out, indicating this was an intentional edit:
"Adolf Hitler after sightseeing at the historic Marinekirche in Wilhelmshaven"
While Germans viewing the version with the cross would likely think Hitler was leaving a church service, the later caption made clear Hitler was not attending a worship service, but merely visiting a historic site.
Another commonly omitted section of Hoffmann's memoirs is the fact that Hitler condoned Martin Bormann's anti-church attitude even if some extreme measures had to be revoked:
"One of the most fanatical opponents of the Church in the whole Party was Bormann, and although Hitler generally condoned his attitude, there were many repressive measures introduced by Bormann, which Hitler felt compelled to countermand."
Hoffmann's words here are corroborated by Hitler's adjutant Otto Dietrich to which in his memoirs he stated:
"On the other hand he [Hitler] did not hold back the hotheads in the Party, Himmler and especially Bormann, who incessantly attacked the churches. On the contrary, he [Hitler] supported them and encouraged them by his private, violently antichurch remarks."
Source:
Heinrich Hoffmann: Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, 100 Bild-Dokumente aus dem Leben des Fรผhrers, 201.-220. Tsd., Zeitgeschichte-Verlag, Berlin, [1933] and [1942-1943]
Hitler Was My Friend: The Memoirs of Hitlerโs Photographer by Heinrich Hoffmann
The Hitler I knew: memoirs of the Third Reich's press chief by Otto Dietrich
How the channel "NSDAP Loved Christ" leaves out important context
Hitler's political pragmatism appears evident when Hoffmann reports in his memoirs Hitler telling him: "if the people THINK (denkt) Iโm a devout man, well, no harm will come of that!". The choice of words Hitler uses here demonstrates that Hitler didn't mind political gain from being portrayed as a devout Christian.
Further evidence supporting this is found within the captions that were changed within the book 'Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt'. Originally, the caption reinforced the image:
โA photographic chance event becomes a symbol: Adolf Hitler, the supposed "heretic", leaving the Marinekirche in Wilhelmshaven."
In the later publication, not only was the crucifix removed. but the pronounced religious tone found in the previous caption was also cut out, indicating this was an intentional edit:
"Adolf Hitler after sightseeing at the historic Marinekirche in Wilhelmshaven"
While Germans viewing the version with the cross would likely think Hitler was leaving a church service, the later caption made clear Hitler was not attending a worship service, but merely visiting a historic site.
Another commonly omitted section of Hoffmann's memoirs is the fact that Hitler condoned Martin Bormann's anti-church attitude even if some extreme measures had to be revoked:
"One of the most fanatical opponents of the Church in the whole Party was Bormann, and although Hitler generally condoned his attitude, there were many repressive measures introduced by Bormann, which Hitler felt compelled to countermand."
Hoffmann's words here are corroborated by Hitler's adjutant Otto Dietrich to which in his memoirs he stated:
"On the other hand he [Hitler] did not hold back the hotheads in the Party, Himmler and especially Bormann, who incessantly attacked the churches. On the contrary, he [Hitler] supported them and encouraged them by his private, violently antichurch remarks."
Source:
Heinrich Hoffmann: Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, 100 Bild-Dokumente aus dem Leben des Fรผhrers, 201.-220. Tsd., Zeitgeschichte-Verlag, Berlin, [1933] and [1942-1943]
Hitler Was My Friend: The Memoirs of Hitlerโs Photographer by Heinrich Hoffmann
The Hitler I knew: memoirs of the Third Reich's press chief by Otto Dietrich
๐12
๐๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐_๐๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐๐ง๐ซ๐ฒ_๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐'๐ฌ ๐ฃ๐๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ง-๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ง ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฅ๐๐ซ ๐๐๐ฏ๐จ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ฌ
NSHE Admin "Plot" created a funny larp of a tierlist ranking who is the most and least subversive to his standards and unsurprisingly he favors jews and browns over people who show NSDAP documents and defend Hitler's honor.
A great example is the fact that he ranked (S) Vรถlkisch Spirit as infinitely more subversive than the jew (C) Ben Shapiro.
NSHeathenry's advocacy for National Socialism and Hitler is so easily present when we look at what has been posted outlining its ideas. Examples being:
Hitler's speeches on the importance of the racial idea
Hitler's speeches on the Almighty
Hitler's 1923 interview on socialism
Quote from Mein Kampf on racial-mixing
Quote from Hitler's second book on eugenic practices
National Socialism is a biological worldview
Hitler's speech on the law of Eternal Struggle
Hitler as the relentless enemy of Bolshevism
NSHeathenry's official side channel 'Hitler was not a Zionist':
Hitler's 1920 speech against the zionist idea of the state + Mein Kampf on zionism
Germany policy document on the Palestine question
Official Gestapo arrest list of zionist organizations
NSDAP document on the removal of all jewish mischlinge from the Wehrmacht
Vรถlkischer Beobachter article on zionism
NSDAP ideological training booklet on zionism
To say NSHeathenry is subversive is a blatant lie as not only do they defend Hitler, but also are explicitly on the forefront of debunking the mainstream claims of pro-Zionism in NS. What NSHeathenry does that not many channels do is discuss the nuance in Hitler's personal religious convictions as shown purely by documents/testimonies.
NSHeathenry gladly honored Hitler on his birthday in 2026 yet no posts in NS_Heathenry_Exposed of doing so exists.
SEE: NSHEATHENRY'S STATEMENT ON MODERN POLITICAL CHRISTIANITY
NSHE Admin "Plot" created a funny larp of a tierlist ranking who is the most and least subversive to his standards and unsurprisingly he favors jews and browns over people who show NSDAP documents and defend Hitler's honor.
A great example is the fact that he ranked (S) Vรถlkisch Spirit as infinitely more subversive than the jew (C) Ben Shapiro.
NSHeathenry's advocacy for National Socialism and Hitler is so easily present when we look at what has been posted outlining its ideas. Examples being:
Hitler's speeches on the importance of the racial idea
Hitler's speeches on the Almighty
Hitler's 1923 interview on socialism
Quote from Mein Kampf on racial-mixing
Quote from Hitler's second book on eugenic practices
National Socialism is a biological worldview
Hitler's speech on the law of Eternal Struggle
Hitler as the relentless enemy of Bolshevism
NSHeathenry's official side channel 'Hitler was not a Zionist':
Hitler's 1920 speech against the zionist idea of the state + Mein Kampf on zionism
Germany policy document on the Palestine question
Official Gestapo arrest list of zionist organizations
NSDAP document on the removal of all jewish mischlinge from the Wehrmacht
Vรถlkischer Beobachter article on zionism
NSDAP ideological training booklet on zionism
To say NSHeathenry is subversive is a blatant lie as not only do they defend Hitler, but also are explicitly on the forefront of debunking the mainstream claims of pro-Zionism in NS. What NSHeathenry does that not many channels do is discuss the nuance in Hitler's personal religious convictions as shown purely by documents/testimonies.
NSHeathenry gladly honored Hitler on his birthday in 2026 yet no posts in NS_Heathenry_Exposed of doing so exists.
SEE: NSHEATHENRY'S STATEMENT ON MODERN POLITICAL CHRISTIANITY
๐22
๐๐_๐๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐๐ง๐ซ๐ฒ_๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฅ๐๐ซ
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
The speech posted here isn't actually as contradictory as what their interpretation portrays. It isn't fundamentally opposed to our side as Hitler portrayed God/Nature as synonymous in establishing the laws that dominate the universe as morality and not simply appealing to the bible for morality.
[READ THIS]
Onto some more evidence that supports this would be that according to Hitler all of life is bounded by struggle in addition to the fact that the universe follows only the laws of nature and natural selection that humanity cannot eliminate, only might makes right in the end as any other morality based on love cannot prevail over it. We can only know one law, that of which only allows the strongest to prevail over the weak. Due to this, the foundation of the NS state can only be based on the "only the laws of life".
Some think that because Hitler spoke so often about praying to God that he believed in a God that intervened in history. That, however, would be to ignore the times he disparaged prayer and suggested that humans only receive from God what they earn by their own efforts. In September 1938 at the Nuremberg Party Congress, he stated that:
"Our humility is the unconditional bowing before and respect for the DIVINE laws of existence known to us humans. Our prayer means: courageous fulfillment of the duties arising from them." [1]
The German people were supposed to pray by helping themselves and by dint of their own power, not by saying words to God:
"The Lord God has never helped a lazy person. He also helps no coward. He also helps no people that does not want to help itself. The principle applies in the greatest sense: People, help yourself, then the Lord God will not deny you his help!" [2]
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
The speech posted here isn't actually as contradictory as what their interpretation portrays. It isn't fundamentally opposed to our side as Hitler portrayed God/Nature as synonymous in establishing the laws that dominate the universe as morality and not simply appealing to the bible for morality.
[READ THIS]
Onto some more evidence that supports this would be that according to Hitler all of life is bounded by struggle in addition to the fact that the universe follows only the laws of nature and natural selection that humanity cannot eliminate, only might makes right in the end as any other morality based on love cannot prevail over it. We can only know one law, that of which only allows the strongest to prevail over the weak. Due to this, the foundation of the NS state can only be based on the "only the laws of life".
Some think that because Hitler spoke so often about praying to God that he believed in a God that intervened in history. That, however, would be to ignore the times he disparaged prayer and suggested that humans only receive from God what they earn by their own efforts. In September 1938 at the Nuremberg Party Congress, he stated that:
"Our humility is the unconditional bowing before and respect for the DIVINE laws of existence known to us humans. Our prayer means: courageous fulfillment of the duties arising from them." [1]
The German people were supposed to pray by helping themselves and by dint of their own power, not by saying words to God:
"The Lord God has never helped a lazy person. He also helps no coward. He also helps no people that does not want to help itself. The principle applies in the greatest sense: People, help yourself, then the Lord God will not deny you his help!" [2]
๐14
Unmasking "NS Heathenry Exposed"
๐๐_๐๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐๐ง๐ซ๐ฒ_๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฅ๐๐ซ ๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ The speech posted here isn't actually as contradictory as what their interpretation portrays. It isn't fundamentally opposed to our side as Hitler portrayed God/Nature as synonymousโฆ
๐๐_๐๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐๐ง๐ซ๐ฒ_๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฅ๐๐ซ
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
The entire thrust of this portion of Hitler's 1937 speech was that humans are subject to nature, who alone dictates morality:
โFor only then [if the instinct for self-preservation could be eliminated] could one try to let the statutes of a League of Nations or Geneva system take the place of the law of the ALL-POWERFUL NATURE (Allgewalt Natur), valid since the beginning of all life on this Earth. But just as the immutable laws of Nature governing the preservation of life have until now been decisive for humanityโs struggle for existence, so too will they remain so in the future." [3]
Hitler still relied on the righteous judgment of Providence. Germans would have to prove themselves worthy of his divine help:
"The Almighty will be the just judge. Our task, however, is to fulfill our duty in such a way that we are able to stand before him as the creator of all worlds according to the law of struggle for existence given by him, that we spare no life without ever despairing and shun no labour in order to preserve the life of our people for the future." [4]
Finally, Hitler had told Otto Wagner that: "it is only in the freedom of nature that a human being can also open himself to a higher morality and a higher ethic." [5]
Hitler did not construe prayer as talking to a personal God. Rather, he thought that knowing and following the laws of nature paved the true path to success. Since Hitler said what created the Laws of Nature and matter itself is unknowable instead of simply confessing it to be the Christian God, this creates a lot of nuance surrounding if Hitler was truly a Christian. The evidence indicates he was not.
Source:
[1] BArch NS 18/1432 Die Fรผhrer-Rede auf der Kulturtagung 6.9.1938 p.21
[2] Rede am 3. Oktober 1941 in Berlin Erรถfinung des WHW in Der groรdeutsche Freiheitskampf: Reden Adolf Hitlers vom 16. Mรคrz 1941 bis 15. Mรคrz 1942 (Zentralverlag der NSDAP., Franz Eher Nachf., 1944) p.87
[3] Reden des Fรผhrers am Parteitag der Arbeit 1937 (Zentralverlag der NSDAP., Franz Eher Nachf., 1938) p.87
[4] Vรถlkischer Beobachter, 31. Januar 1943, p.2
[5] Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant by Otto Wagener p.279
SEE: HITLER ON CHRISTIANITY CONTRADICTING NATURAL LAW
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
The entire thrust of this portion of Hitler's 1937 speech was that humans are subject to nature, who alone dictates morality:
โFor only then [if the instinct for self-preservation could be eliminated] could one try to let the statutes of a League of Nations or Geneva system take the place of the law of the ALL-POWERFUL NATURE (Allgewalt Natur), valid since the beginning of all life on this Earth. But just as the immutable laws of Nature governing the preservation of life have until now been decisive for humanityโs struggle for existence, so too will they remain so in the future." [3]
Hitler still relied on the righteous judgment of Providence. Germans would have to prove themselves worthy of his divine help:
"The Almighty will be the just judge. Our task, however, is to fulfill our duty in such a way that we are able to stand before him as the creator of all worlds according to the law of struggle for existence given by him, that we spare no life without ever despairing and shun no labour in order to preserve the life of our people for the future." [4]
Finally, Hitler had told Otto Wagner that: "it is only in the freedom of nature that a human being can also open himself to a higher morality and a higher ethic." [5]
Hitler did not construe prayer as talking to a personal God. Rather, he thought that knowing and following the laws of nature paved the true path to success. Since Hitler said what created the Laws of Nature and matter itself is unknowable instead of simply confessing it to be the Christian God, this creates a lot of nuance surrounding if Hitler was truly a Christian. The evidence indicates he was not.
Source:
[1] BArch NS 18/1432 Die Fรผhrer-Rede auf der Kulturtagung 6.9.1938 p.21
[2] Rede am 3. Oktober 1941 in Berlin Erรถfinung des WHW in Der groรdeutsche Freiheitskampf: Reden Adolf Hitlers vom 16. Mรคrz 1941 bis 15. Mรคrz 1942 (Zentralverlag der NSDAP., Franz Eher Nachf., 1944) p.87
[3] Reden des Fรผhrers am Parteitag der Arbeit 1937 (Zentralverlag der NSDAP., Franz Eher Nachf., 1938) p.87
[4] Vรถlkischer Beobachter, 31. Januar 1943, p.2
[5] Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant by Otto Wagener p.279
SEE: HITLER ON CHRISTIANITY CONTRADICTING NATURAL LAW
Internet Archive
Des Reden der Fuhrers am den Parteitag der Arbeit 1937 : Adolf Hitler : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Hitlers speeches at the 1937 Party congress
๐13
๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐'๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐
๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
Obviously, Hitler was not referring to Jesus as the Logos who became flesh, because he is not describing the Logos as God becoming an individual human. Rather, for him, the Logos was a God who is closely interconnected with the cosmos, โpervadingโ the entire world:
"For me, God is the Logos of St.John, which has become flesh and LIVES IN THE WORLD, interwoven with it and pervading it, conferring on it drives and driving force, and constituting the actual meaning and content of the world."
Hitler specifically stated that his interpretation of the Logos is pagan. In no sense does he imply that the Logos is conceptually related to Jesus or Yahweh. Hitler also believes that the Bible, Hell, Heaven and Purgatory are nonsense and distortions of the historical figure of Christ:
โPerhaps the adherents of the Roman Church would call this โpaganism.โ That may well be so. In that case, Christ was a pagan. I call pagan their distortions of Christโs ideas and teachings, their cults, THEIR CONCEPTION OF HELL AND PURGATORY AND HEAVEN, and their worship of saints. None of the religions of antiquity, no Negroid idolatry, not even the most primitive sects of the Mohammedan, Indian, or Chinese religions has created so many gods and auxiliary' deities as the Roman Church."
Furthermore, Hitler defined the Logos of John as an โurgeโ to procreate and fulfill the purpose of life, which is synonymous with the Wille of Schopenhauer's philosophy. This is obviously not a Christian concept:
โIn this connection, I am repeatedly reminded of the Gospel of St. John, which begins with the words, โIn the beginning was the โLogosโ โโwhich is why I translate it as โurge.โ Quite simply, in the beginning was the urge to fulfill this purpose of earthly life. From it, the instinct of self-preservation developed logically, as did the instinct to be fruitful and multiply. They are meant to carry out this task presented by nature, this meaning of all life, as long and as abundantly as possibleโthat is, to the greatest conceivable extent."
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
Obviously, Hitler was not referring to Jesus as the Logos who became flesh, because he is not describing the Logos as God becoming an individual human. Rather, for him, the Logos was a God who is closely interconnected with the cosmos, โpervadingโ the entire world:
"For me, God is the Logos of St.John, which has become flesh and LIVES IN THE WORLD, interwoven with it and pervading it, conferring on it drives and driving force, and constituting the actual meaning and content of the world."
Hitler specifically stated that his interpretation of the Logos is pagan. In no sense does he imply that the Logos is conceptually related to Jesus or Yahweh. Hitler also believes that the Bible, Hell, Heaven and Purgatory are nonsense and distortions of the historical figure of Christ:
โPerhaps the adherents of the Roman Church would call this โpaganism.โ That may well be so. In that case, Christ was a pagan. I call pagan their distortions of Christโs ideas and teachings, their cults, THEIR CONCEPTION OF HELL AND PURGATORY AND HEAVEN, and their worship of saints. None of the religions of antiquity, no Negroid idolatry, not even the most primitive sects of the Mohammedan, Indian, or Chinese religions has created so many gods and auxiliary' deities as the Roman Church."
Furthermore, Hitler defined the Logos of John as an โurgeโ to procreate and fulfill the purpose of life, which is synonymous with the Wille of Schopenhauer's philosophy. This is obviously not a Christian concept:
โIn this connection, I am repeatedly reminded of the Gospel of St. John, which begins with the words, โIn the beginning was the โLogosโ โโwhich is why I translate it as โurge.โ Quite simply, in the beginning was the urge to fulfill this purpose of earthly life. From it, the instinct of self-preservation developed logically, as did the instinct to be fruitful and multiply. They are meant to carry out this task presented by nature, this meaning of all life, as long and as abundantly as possibleโthat is, to the greatest conceivable extent."
๐11
Unmasking "NS Heathenry Exposed"
๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐'๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐
๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐'๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐
๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
For those who had bothered to read through the book they would have noticed Wagener was โcrestfallenโ at Hitler's rejection of Christianity and his advocacy of ethnocentrism and Darwinism:
"I was crestfallen. For the first time, I understood clearly the difference between my way of thinking and his [Hitler's]. I was a socialist, an advocate of cooperation, a Christian, even in reference to the relationship and cooperation among nations and peoples beyond their own borders; and he was a national socialist, a โZeissist,โ a nationalist of the English stamp, whose socialist thinking was only for his Volk and within his own Volk. Toward the rest of the world, however, he was, in the last analysis, a crass economic liberalist, egotist, and imperialist."
Hitler believed that the body of Jesus' was removed from the tomb, which is contrary to the idea of the divine resurrection:
โImmediately after the death of Christ, whom the reactionaries crucified, they set about exterminating, at least imprisoning and depriving of their rights, all those who had accepted Christ before his death. Christโs body was removed from the tomb, to keep it from becoming an object of veneration and a tangible relic of the great new founder of a religion!"
Nevertheless, the only thing that would resurrect would be the teachings of socialism itself as Hitler is purported to say.
Source: Otto Wagener, HitlerโMemoirs of a Confidant, ed. Henry Ashby Turner, trans. Ruth Hein (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985) p.164, p.224, p.314, p.316
WAGENER'S RECOLLECTIONS ARE CONSISTENT WITH HITLER'S 1944 SPEECH
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
For those who had bothered to read through the book they would have noticed Wagener was โcrestfallenโ at Hitler's rejection of Christianity and his advocacy of ethnocentrism and Darwinism:
"I was crestfallen. For the first time, I understood clearly the difference between my way of thinking and his [Hitler's]. I was a socialist, an advocate of cooperation, a Christian, even in reference to the relationship and cooperation among nations and peoples beyond their own borders; and he was a national socialist, a โZeissist,โ a nationalist of the English stamp, whose socialist thinking was only for his Volk and within his own Volk. Toward the rest of the world, however, he was, in the last analysis, a crass economic liberalist, egotist, and imperialist."
Hitler believed that the body of Jesus' was removed from the tomb, which is contrary to the idea of the divine resurrection:
โImmediately after the death of Christ, whom the reactionaries crucified, they set about exterminating, at least imprisoning and depriving of their rights, all those who had accepted Christ before his death. Christโs body was removed from the tomb, to keep it from becoming an object of veneration and a tangible relic of the great new founder of a religion!"
Nevertheless, the only thing that would resurrect would be the teachings of socialism itself as Hitler is purported to say.
Source: Otto Wagener, HitlerโMemoirs of a Confidant, ed. Henry Ashby Turner, trans. Ruth Hein (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985) p.164, p.224, p.314, p.316
WAGENER'S RECOLLECTIONS ARE CONSISTENT WITH HITLER'S 1944 SPEECH
๐14
๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ข๐๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ "๐๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐ง ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ก"
In 1:20:05, it says that "Hitler and Rosenberg were no fans of Horbiger's work" (called it "occultism" in the video) and although this is true for Rosenberg, this cannot be said for Hitler. Hence why no quotation could be provided for it. In July 1938, Himmler had written: "I state clearly and unequivocally: I advocate for free research in all forms, and therefore also for the free research of the World Ice Theory. I even intend to warmly support this free research and find myself in good company, as the Fรผhrer and Chancellor of the German Reich, Adolf Hitler, has been a convinced supporter of this doctrine, scorned by the guilds of science, for many years." [1] An SS document from Himmler's personal staff Rudolf Brandt in August 1942 also shows that in the spring of 1942, Hitler told Himmler the harsh winter of 1941โ42 and other recent climatic conditions convinced him more than ever that the World Ice Theory of Hรถrbiger was correct: "In the spring of this year, the Fรผhrer stated in a conversation with the Reichsfรผhrer that the harsh winter of this year and also the climatic developments of the last few years had led him more and more to the conviction that Hรถrbiger's World Ice Theory was correct." [2] Which means according to the wording by the writers of this video, Hitler believed in "occultist" cosmology.
An example of cherrypicking in the video is shown at 1:22:05 when Albert Speer is used as a source to accurately portray Hitler's private thoughts. In the same source that the video is citing, it completely demolishes the entire premise of the video when Albert Speer recollects Hitler saying: "You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?" [3] Disagreeing with Himmler's fascination with excavation of Germanic prehistory isn't evidence in itself that Hitler was somehow Christian as when we look further down into the context, Hitler didn't want the historical inadequacy of our German forefathers to be revealed: "All we prove by that is that we were still throwing stone hatchets and crouching around open fires when Greece and Rome had already reached the highest stage of culture. We really should do our best to keep quiet about this past. Instead Himmler makes a great fuss about it all. The present-day Romans must be having a laugh at these revelations." [4]
Of course, we cannot forget in 1:26:26 the forged interviews that still remain sourceless to this day by the original people that posted it. The video talks about a Gudrun Himmler interview in 1992 that is so weirdly contradictory to all historical documents possible. When confronting the original website that posted these "interviews" about the actual source, they said: "Ultimately, if some armchair internet historian doesn't believe they are real, and some teenage history genius made it all up, that's fine with us. We don't really care." hence no type of academic recording exists and it only exists on a niche satanic website.
Interestingly, the video also mentioned what Goebbels wrote in his diary in 1939 and their best argument was "does this sound like something Hitler would say?" instead of actually addressing the substance of the source itself. The next sentence afterwards was "or was Goebbels simply hearing what he wanted to hear" the issue with this baseless argument is the fact that what Goebbels writes can directly be corroborated by other independent sources. Alfred Rosenberg too, in his memoirs, noted that "Gรถbbels kept a diary on his talks with the Fรผhrer ..." [5]
Source:
[1] NARA, RG 242, T-175, Roll 68 US National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC (NARA) p.372-373
[2] ibid, p.365
[3] Inside the Third Reich by Albert Speer p.96
[4] ibid, p.94-95
[5] Memoirs by Alfred Rosenberg
In 1:20:05, it says that "Hitler and Rosenberg were no fans of Horbiger's work" (called it "occultism" in the video) and although this is true for Rosenberg, this cannot be said for Hitler. Hence why no quotation could be provided for it. In July 1938, Himmler had written: "I state clearly and unequivocally: I advocate for free research in all forms, and therefore also for the free research of the World Ice Theory. I even intend to warmly support this free research and find myself in good company, as the Fรผhrer and Chancellor of the German Reich, Adolf Hitler, has been a convinced supporter of this doctrine, scorned by the guilds of science, for many years." [1] An SS document from Himmler's personal staff Rudolf Brandt in August 1942 also shows that in the spring of 1942, Hitler told Himmler the harsh winter of 1941โ42 and other recent climatic conditions convinced him more than ever that the World Ice Theory of Hรถrbiger was correct: "In the spring of this year, the Fรผhrer stated in a conversation with the Reichsfรผhrer that the harsh winter of this year and also the climatic developments of the last few years had led him more and more to the conviction that Hรถrbiger's World Ice Theory was correct." [2] Which means according to the wording by the writers of this video, Hitler believed in "occultist" cosmology.
An example of cherrypicking in the video is shown at 1:22:05 when Albert Speer is used as a source to accurately portray Hitler's private thoughts. In the same source that the video is citing, it completely demolishes the entire premise of the video when Albert Speer recollects Hitler saying: "You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?" [3] Disagreeing with Himmler's fascination with excavation of Germanic prehistory isn't evidence in itself that Hitler was somehow Christian as when we look further down into the context, Hitler didn't want the historical inadequacy of our German forefathers to be revealed: "All we prove by that is that we were still throwing stone hatchets and crouching around open fires when Greece and Rome had already reached the highest stage of culture. We really should do our best to keep quiet about this past. Instead Himmler makes a great fuss about it all. The present-day Romans must be having a laugh at these revelations." [4]
Of course, we cannot forget in 1:26:26 the forged interviews that still remain sourceless to this day by the original people that posted it. The video talks about a Gudrun Himmler interview in 1992 that is so weirdly contradictory to all historical documents possible. When confronting the original website that posted these "interviews" about the actual source, they said: "Ultimately, if some armchair internet historian doesn't believe they are real, and some teenage history genius made it all up, that's fine with us. We don't really care." hence no type of academic recording exists and it only exists on a niche satanic website.
Interestingly, the video also mentioned what Goebbels wrote in his diary in 1939 and their best argument was "does this sound like something Hitler would say?" instead of actually addressing the substance of the source itself. The next sentence afterwards was "or was Goebbels simply hearing what he wanted to hear" the issue with this baseless argument is the fact that what Goebbels writes can directly be corroborated by other independent sources. Alfred Rosenberg too, in his memoirs, noted that "Gรถbbels kept a diary on his talks with the Fรผhrer ..." [5]
Source:
[1] NARA, RG 242, T-175, Roll 68 US National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC (NARA) p.372-373
[2] ibid, p.365
[3] Inside the Third Reich by Albert Speer p.96
[4] ibid, p.94-95
[5] Memoirs by Alfred Rosenberg
๐14
๐๐_๐๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐๐ง๐ซ๐ฒ_๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ง ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ
Friedrich von Rabenau was notoriously known for being against National Socialism. However, that's not solely the key point, the key point is the fact that Rabenau was anti-NS on the basis of Christianity. Rabenau had connections to the people behind the July 20 bomb plot:
"Von Rabenau had been an early intermediary between Beckโs resistance group and some of the leading generals who tried in 1940 to influence Brauchitsch. In March 1941 Hassell and Goerdeler discussed with von Rabenau whether Brauchitsch could be approached again. Before 20 July Goerdeler regularly sent von Rabenau as a trusted emissary to the individual generals. Retired from active service in 1942, the old general had completed a degree at the theological faculty of Berlin University and added the licentiate to his honorary doctorate. The Reich Central Security Office had tracked down von Rabenau as a friend of Goerdelerโs; like Bonhoeffer, he was executed in Flossenbรผrg." [1] Eduard Spranger, who had knew and talked to Rabenau, recalls him saying in 1944 that: "we had no way of getting rid of the Hitler government by force; we would have to go along with it to the bitter end ..." [2] Should we really take Rabenau's word on what can possibly be doctrine? Rabenau has always before and after the rise and fall of the Third Reich been connected with Christianity. For this very reason, he became a theologian.
It appears that Friedrich von Rabenau's theology studies in 1943 greatly helped him in attacking Hitler and the NS government as Goebbels writes in his diary that: "General von Rabenau, who was dismissed as the head of the Reich Archive and now wants to study theology in order to oppose the Fรผhrer. What kind of generals are these! They don't hesitate to accept pensions from the state, but they still want to fight against the state and the regime." [3] This is shown to be true as in Friedrich von Rabenau's lay sermons in 1944, he states that: "Others want to replace religion with a worldview. That simply won't do. Religion and worldview are not on the same level. They cannot even be in opposition; unless one makes the childish attempt to deify humanity. A worldview as a substitute for religion means substituting the finite for the infinite." [4]
A more authoritative source would be Gauleiter Friedrich Schmidt Head of the NSDAP Training Office, who wrote in direct contradiction of Rabenau:
"We National Socialists profess our allegiance to the eternal, divine, immutable, and inviolable laws of the moral order of creation, which apply equally to the life of the individual and to the life of nations. We profess our allegiance to the laws of race, blood, and heredity [...] we National Socialists are those who are closer to God because we experience and acknowledge God's laws within ourselves as laws that, through the will of God, serve and operate as forms and expressions of our lives." [5]
Of course, if we wish to point out what's published in the NSDAP publishing house, we can gladly point to: HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE just to name a few.
Source:
[1] Dietrich Bonhoeffer: a biography by Eberhard Bethge p. 919-920
[2] BArch N 62/93 Erinnerungsbericht von Eduard Spranger รผber Rabenau 1946 p.37
[3] Die Tagebรผcher von Joseph Goebbels: Band 7 Januar - Mรคrz 1943 Teil II p.180-181
[4] BArch N 62/112 Laienpredigten p.153
[5] Der Hoheitstrรคger Weltanschauung, Religion, Konfession: Ein Kampfbericht vom weltanschaulichen Krรคftefeld 2. Jahrg. (1938), Folge III p.4 and p.7
Friedrich von Rabenau was notoriously known for being against National Socialism. However, that's not solely the key point, the key point is the fact that Rabenau was anti-NS on the basis of Christianity. Rabenau had connections to the people behind the July 20 bomb plot:
"Von Rabenau had been an early intermediary between Beckโs resistance group and some of the leading generals who tried in 1940 to influence Brauchitsch. In March 1941 Hassell and Goerdeler discussed with von Rabenau whether Brauchitsch could be approached again. Before 20 July Goerdeler regularly sent von Rabenau as a trusted emissary to the individual generals. Retired from active service in 1942, the old general had completed a degree at the theological faculty of Berlin University and added the licentiate to his honorary doctorate. The Reich Central Security Office had tracked down von Rabenau as a friend of Goerdelerโs; like Bonhoeffer, he was executed in Flossenbรผrg." [1] Eduard Spranger, who had knew and talked to Rabenau, recalls him saying in 1944 that: "we had no way of getting rid of the Hitler government by force; we would have to go along with it to the bitter end ..." [2] Should we really take Rabenau's word on what can possibly be doctrine? Rabenau has always before and after the rise and fall of the Third Reich been connected with Christianity. For this very reason, he became a theologian.
It appears that Friedrich von Rabenau's theology studies in 1943 greatly helped him in attacking Hitler and the NS government as Goebbels writes in his diary that: "General von Rabenau, who was dismissed as the head of the Reich Archive and now wants to study theology in order to oppose the Fรผhrer. What kind of generals are these! They don't hesitate to accept pensions from the state, but they still want to fight against the state and the regime." [3] This is shown to be true as in Friedrich von Rabenau's lay sermons in 1944, he states that: "Others want to replace religion with a worldview. That simply won't do. Religion and worldview are not on the same level. They cannot even be in opposition; unless one makes the childish attempt to deify humanity. A worldview as a substitute for religion means substituting the finite for the infinite." [4]
A more authoritative source would be Gauleiter Friedrich Schmidt Head of the NSDAP Training Office, who wrote in direct contradiction of Rabenau:
"We National Socialists profess our allegiance to the eternal, divine, immutable, and inviolable laws of the moral order of creation, which apply equally to the life of the individual and to the life of nations. We profess our allegiance to the laws of race, blood, and heredity [...] we National Socialists are those who are closer to God because we experience and acknowledge God's laws within ourselves as laws that, through the will of God, serve and operate as forms and expressions of our lives." [5]
Of course, if we wish to point out what's published in the NSDAP publishing house, we can gladly point to: HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE just to name a few.
Source:
[1] Dietrich Bonhoeffer: a biography by Eberhard Bethge p. 919-920
[2] BArch N 62/93 Erinnerungsbericht von Eduard Spranger รผber Rabenau 1946 p.37
[3] Die Tagebรผcher von Joseph Goebbels: Band 7 Januar - Mรคrz 1943 Teil II p.180-181
[4] BArch N 62/112 Laienpredigten p.153
[5] Der Hoheitstrรคger Weltanschauung, Religion, Konfession: Ein Kampfbericht vom weltanschaulichen Krรคftefeld 2. Jahrg. (1938), Folge III p.4 and p.7
๐16
๐๐_๐๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐๐ง๐ซ๐ฒ_๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฆ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ซ๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ซ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐ญ๐๐ฑ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ข๐๐ค๐๐
Dishonesty on clear display
NSHE claims NSHeathenry has done minimal research on the passage regarding the 1934 diary entry while also doing exactly that. Mikael Nilsson claims that it was "probably, a sort of an inside joke." but what is Nilsson's source for this specifically? Nothing. Yet NSHE can say with confidence that it does not have any type of anti-christian overtone. While of course, this isn't meant to literally mean he was a Germanic pagan in the sense, its still outlined that this remark of being a pagan is still consistent with his views on Christianity. The full passage reads as follows:
"Now, with a laugh, he repeatedly emphasized that he has been a pagan all along, and the time has come when the Christian poisoning is approaching its end. These remarks have remained top secret, but recently a Berlin society woman has been proudly gossiping about them." [1]
NSHE cannot address the fact that the diaries have been used in the Nuremberg files and have been photocopied and archived ever since. When we see the photocopies of any anti-christian passage in Rosenberg's diary and compare it with the originals, it shows that there has been no textual change. There isn't a scholarly basis for which Alfred Rosenberg's diary isn't authentic. In fact, it seems as though NSHE likes to ignore the fact that Mikael Nilsson wrote that:
"There are also other published sources that have been helpful to me when writing this book. For example, the very extensive diaries of the Gau leader of Berlin and later Propaganda Minister, Joseph Goebbels. These are now available almost in their entirety courtesy of the IfZ; the only exceptions are the extremely few cases where the glass plate negatives (on which the diaries had been photographed) have degenerated over time and become illegible. [...] Another important source consists of the diaries of Alfred Rosenberg , which only rather recently became available in their entirety to historians. Rosenbergโs diaries are of course problematic, just like the rest of these sources, and the utterances ascribed to Hitler simply cannot be uncritically cited as being correct and verbatim. Nonetheless, together with other independent sources they offer important insights into Hitler โs mind (and of course into the minds of the authors themselves) and his thinking on religious matters." [2]
Strangely, Nilsson does not go over the plethora of entries inside Goebbels's diary of Hitler either rejecting Christianity as a whole or its core doctrines. Until then, they will continue to be cited as we and Nilsson know that they are authentic records. Nilsson talks about forged sources such as the supposed Hitler poems and the 'Hitler diaries' by Konrad Kujau. [3] It was only by forensic evidence that they have been debunked, yet, after all these years, there is zero forensic evidence that the Goebbels/Rosenberg diaries are forged.
Source:
[1] 1749-PS [Handwritten Alfred Rosenberg Diary for the 14 May, 1934 - 18 March, 1935 Time Period] p.28 (Transcription done in Das politische Tagebuch Alfred Rosenbergs aus den Jahren 1934/35 und 1939/40 by Hans-Gรผnther Seraphim 1956 p.32)
[2] Christianity in Hitler's Ideology by Mikael Nilsson (PDF pages 18-19)
[3] ibid, (PDF page 17)
Dishonesty on clear display
NSHE claims NSHeathenry has done minimal research on the passage regarding the 1934 diary entry while also doing exactly that. Mikael Nilsson claims that it was "probably, a sort of an inside joke." but what is Nilsson's source for this specifically? Nothing. Yet NSHE can say with confidence that it does not have any type of anti-christian overtone. While of course, this isn't meant to literally mean he was a Germanic pagan in the sense, its still outlined that this remark of being a pagan is still consistent with his views on Christianity. The full passage reads as follows:
"Now, with a laugh, he repeatedly emphasized that he has been a pagan all along, and the time has come when the Christian poisoning is approaching its end. These remarks have remained top secret, but recently a Berlin society woman has been proudly gossiping about them." [1]
NSHE cannot address the fact that the diaries have been used in the Nuremberg files and have been photocopied and archived ever since. When we see the photocopies of any anti-christian passage in Rosenberg's diary and compare it with the originals, it shows that there has been no textual change. There isn't a scholarly basis for which Alfred Rosenberg's diary isn't authentic. In fact, it seems as though NSHE likes to ignore the fact that Mikael Nilsson wrote that:
"There are also other published sources that have been helpful to me when writing this book. For example, the very extensive diaries of the Gau leader of Berlin and later Propaganda Minister, Joseph Goebbels. These are now available almost in their entirety courtesy of the IfZ; the only exceptions are the extremely few cases where the glass plate negatives (on which the diaries had been photographed) have degenerated over time and become illegible. [...] Another important source consists of the diaries of Alfred Rosenberg , which only rather recently became available in their entirety to historians. Rosenbergโs diaries are of course problematic, just like the rest of these sources, and the utterances ascribed to Hitler simply cannot be uncritically cited as being correct and verbatim. Nonetheless, together with other independent sources they offer important insights into Hitler โs mind (and of course into the minds of the authors themselves) and his thinking on religious matters." [2]
Strangely, Nilsson does not go over the plethora of entries inside Goebbels's diary of Hitler either rejecting Christianity as a whole or its core doctrines. Until then, they will continue to be cited as we and Nilsson know that they are authentic records. Nilsson talks about forged sources such as the supposed Hitler poems and the 'Hitler diaries' by Konrad Kujau. [3] It was only by forensic evidence that they have been debunked, yet, after all these years, there is zero forensic evidence that the Goebbels/Rosenberg diaries are forged.
Source:
[1] 1749-PS [Handwritten Alfred Rosenberg Diary for the 14 May, 1934 - 18 March, 1935 Time Period] p.28 (Transcription done in Das politische Tagebuch Alfred Rosenbergs aus den Jahren 1934/35 und 1939/40 by Hans-Gรผnther Seraphim 1956 p.32)
[2] Christianity in Hitler's Ideology by Mikael Nilsson (PDF pages 18-19)
[3] ibid, (PDF page 17)
๐13
๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ '๐๐จ๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ญ ๐๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง' ๐ฅ๐ข๐
vindicating Goebbels's diary entries on Christianity
As we know, multiple different countries obtained and archived Goebbels's original diary rather it be through the glass plates or the actual paper entries. The American 'Hoover institute' managed to obtain the original notebooks of Goebbels from 1925โ26 in the Fรผhrerbunker and have also obtained the original 1942โ1943 typewritten entries from Lieutenant Colonel William Heimlich in 1946-1947 [1] these listed entries have been stored in the Hoover Archives since then.
Subsequently, the publication of these original 1942โ1943 dairies happened in 1948 by Louis P. Lochner with the help of the Hoover institute. In the publisher's note of the book, Huge Gibson wrote: "The publishers regret that it was possible to make use of only a small part of the original material in a single volume. The level of interest could have been maintained if far more space had been available. The original diaries will serve as source material for many future writers, and to this end they are to be deposited in the Hoover War Library at Stanford University where they will be accessible to the public. It is hoped that this will result in further translations and publications." [2] Thus, the source of these diaries listed aren't from the soviet archives. Goebbels had ordered for his diaries to be copied in the form of microfiche onto glass plates [3] then these same glass plates were later found unopened in the Soviet archives.
In a May 1943 diary entry, Goebbels records Hitler thoroughly rejecting the Christian teaching of salvation. When we compare the originals from the Hoover institute with the later founded glass plate version, we can see that this entry is entirely authentic which shows Hitler was not a Christian. [4] [5]
[SEE IMAGE]
We have no scholarly reason to believe that the original diary entries of the great Joseph Goebbels is faked/edited based on direct cross reference of multiple sources.
Source:
[1] Curse of the Goebbels Diaries by Bertrand M. Patenaude August 13, 2012
[2] The Goebbels Diaries, 1942โ1943. Edited, translated, and with an introduction by Louis P. Lochner. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1948 [See May 1943 anti-christian entry here]
[3] Joseph Goebbels und sein Tagebuch: Zu den handschriftlichen Aufzeichnungen von 1924 bis 1941 von Elke Frรถhlich Vierteljahrshefte fรผr Zeitgeschichte Jahrgang 35 (1987) Heft 4 p.498โ499
[4] NARA, RG 242, T-84, Roll 264 p.259
[5] BArch N 1118/54 Tagebuch-Aufzeichnungen p.375
vindicating Goebbels's diary entries on Christianity
As we know, multiple different countries obtained and archived Goebbels's original diary rather it be through the glass plates or the actual paper entries. The American 'Hoover institute' managed to obtain the original notebooks of Goebbels from 1925โ26 in the Fรผhrerbunker and have also obtained the original 1942โ1943 typewritten entries from Lieutenant Colonel William Heimlich in 1946-1947 [1] these listed entries have been stored in the Hoover Archives since then.
Subsequently, the publication of these original 1942โ1943 dairies happened in 1948 by Louis P. Lochner with the help of the Hoover institute. In the publisher's note of the book, Huge Gibson wrote: "The publishers regret that it was possible to make use of only a small part of the original material in a single volume. The level of interest could have been maintained if far more space had been available. The original diaries will serve as source material for many future writers, and to this end they are to be deposited in the Hoover War Library at Stanford University where they will be accessible to the public. It is hoped that this will result in further translations and publications." [2] Thus, the source of these diaries listed aren't from the soviet archives. Goebbels had ordered for his diaries to be copied in the form of microfiche onto glass plates [3] then these same glass plates were later found unopened in the Soviet archives.
In a May 1943 diary entry, Goebbels records Hitler thoroughly rejecting the Christian teaching of salvation. When we compare the originals from the Hoover institute with the later founded glass plate version, we can see that this entry is entirely authentic which shows Hitler was not a Christian. [4] [5]
[SEE IMAGE]
We have no scholarly reason to believe that the original diary entries of the great Joseph Goebbels is faked/edited based on direct cross reference of multiple sources.
Source:
[1] Curse of the Goebbels Diaries by Bertrand M. Patenaude August 13, 2012
[2] The Goebbels Diaries, 1942โ1943. Edited, translated, and with an introduction by Louis P. Lochner. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1948 [See May 1943 anti-christian entry here]
[3] Joseph Goebbels und sein Tagebuch: Zu den handschriftlichen Aufzeichnungen von 1924 bis 1941 von Elke Frรถhlich Vierteljahrshefte fรผr Zeitgeschichte Jahrgang 35 (1987) Heft 4 p.498โ499
[4] NARA, RG 242, T-84, Roll 264 p.259
[5] BArch N 1118/54 Tagebuch-Aufzeichnungen p.375
๐17
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
For the sake of defending the Honor of National Socialism, we will go through one out of the many examples of Christian "National Socialists" injecting their way of thought into already formulated doctrines.
The idea that a non-white can be just as American as a White person of good character is a fundamentally anti-National Socialist talking point. Why? Because the foundations of America was built only for white men by White men. Even those who were foreign residents to America but White were able to be citizens.
ASSIMILATION IS AGAINST BLOOD AND SOIL
Hitler writes in Mein Kampf:
"But itโs an almost inconceivable mental error to think that a Negro or a Chinese will become a German because he has learned the German language and is willing to speak it in the future, or even that he will vote for a German political party. Our bourgeois nationalists could never clearly see that any such Germanization is in reality a de-Germanization. Even if today all the obvious differences between the various peoples could be bridged over and finally wiped out by the use of a common language, that would begin a process of bastardization that, in our case, wouldnโt signify Germanization but rather the DESTRUCTION of the German element. [...] That which makes a people, or better, a race, is not language but blood. Therefore it would only be justifiable to speak of Germanization if that process could change the blood of the subjected people. But this is impossible. A change would be possible only by a mixture of blood, but in this case the quality of the superior race would be debased. The final result of such a mixture would be the destruction of precisely those qualities that enabled the conquering race to achieve victory."
Assimilation will be the death of our race. A great example is when historically, Christians assimilated jews into society as long as they became confessing Christians/Baptism. Hitler actually mentions this in Mein Kampf:
"[Christian] anti-Semitism didn't upset the Jews very much, simply because it had a purely religious foundation. If worst came to worst, a few drops of baptismal water could always save the Jew and the business at the same time."
An order for a National Socialist who professes Christianity to be consistent in the area of the worldview itself, he must also profess the racial idea. Without it, its not National Socialism, but nothing else. As race is the basis of our humanity and development. Hitler writes:
"Generally speaking, we must not forget that the highest aim of human existence is not the maintenance of a state of government, but rather the preservation of the species."
National Socialism will forever be in our hearts and our selfless defense of it is rooted in the common good before the individual.
For the sake of defending the Honor of National Socialism, we will go through one out of the many examples of Christian "National Socialists" injecting their way of thought into already formulated doctrines.
The idea that a non-white can be just as American as a White person of good character is a fundamentally anti-National Socialist talking point. Why? Because the foundations of America was built only for white men by White men. Even those who were foreign residents to America but White were able to be citizens.
ASSIMILATION IS AGAINST BLOOD AND SOIL
Hitler writes in Mein Kampf:
"But itโs an almost inconceivable mental error to think that a Negro or a Chinese will become a German because he has learned the German language and is willing to speak it in the future, or even that he will vote for a German political party. Our bourgeois nationalists could never clearly see that any such Germanization is in reality a de-Germanization. Even if today all the obvious differences between the various peoples could be bridged over and finally wiped out by the use of a common language, that would begin a process of bastardization that, in our case, wouldnโt signify Germanization but rather the DESTRUCTION of the German element. [...] That which makes a people, or better, a race, is not language but blood. Therefore it would only be justifiable to speak of Germanization if that process could change the blood of the subjected people. But this is impossible. A change would be possible only by a mixture of blood, but in this case the quality of the superior race would be debased. The final result of such a mixture would be the destruction of precisely those qualities that enabled the conquering race to achieve victory."
Assimilation will be the death of our race. A great example is when historically, Christians assimilated jews into society as long as they became confessing Christians/Baptism. Hitler actually mentions this in Mein Kampf:
"[Christian] anti-Semitism didn't upset the Jews very much, simply because it had a purely religious foundation. If worst came to worst, a few drops of baptismal water could always save the Jew and the business at the same time."
An order for a National Socialist who professes Christianity to be consistent in the area of the worldview itself, he must also profess the racial idea. Without it, its not National Socialism, but nothing else. As race is the basis of our humanity and development. Hitler writes:
"Generally speaking, we must not forget that the highest aim of human existence is not the maintenance of a state of government, but rather the preservation of the species."
National Socialism will forever be in our hearts and our selfless defense of it is rooted in the common good before the individual.
๐18
๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
NS_Heathenry_Exposed grasping at straws
Another reason why the dubious document of the Protocols of Zion is bullshit even though some contents of it can be seen as consistent with jewish world domination, is the fact that parts of it that is so often cherrypicked by NSHE is what Hitler actually believed in. Prime example being Charles Darwin.
Hitler primarily believed in these two Darwinian concepts; Struggle for Existence and Natural Selection. Both of these concepts are thoroughly intertwined with the biology behind National Socialism. Belief in Darwinism does not necessarily contradict the idea of believing in God either.
In a 1944 speech at the Wolfs Lair, Hitler said:
"for what is called a world-view is in reality nothing other than knowledge of the world, i.e. knowledge of the primitive laws according to which human cultures and people have developed, but also according to which the whole universe and life in general develops: all are in accordance to the laws of struggle and NATURAL SELECTION. This means that the natural selection of life must not be artificially blocked and locked up, but that the way must be cleared for this natural selection."
A year before that, Hitler had professed that we ought to follow the Struggle for existence given by a higher power:
"The Almighty will be the just judge. Our task, however, is to fulfill our duty in such a way that we are able to stand before him as the creator of all worlds according to the law of struggle for existence given by him, that we spare no life without ever despairing and shun no labour in order to preserve the life of our people for the future."
Even all the way back to 1933, Hitler had quoted the work of prominent Darwinist Ernst Haeckel almost word for word:
"The gulf between the lowest creature which can still be styled man and our highest races is greater than that between the lowest type of man and the highest ape."
Hitler had confirmed all of this to Otto Wagener when he is recalled to have said:
"Everywhere in life only a process of selection can prevail. Among the animals, among plants, wherever observations have been made, basically the stronger, the better survives. The simpler life forms have no written constitution. Selection therefore runs a natural course. As Darwin correctly proved: the choice is not made by some agencyโnature chooses. [...] That is the will of nature. What is healthy abhors that which is sick, the productive abhors the life of the drone, purposeful striving abhors indifferent depravity."
For more posts on Hitler's belief in Darwinism, see: HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE
Official endorsement of Darwinism from NSDAP sources
1.) The Vรถlkischer Beobachter endorsed prominent Darwinist Ernst Haeckel as establishing the biology behind National Socialism
2.) File from the Reichssicherheitshauptamt endorsing Darwinism to be applied into the Waffen-SS
3.) Head of the Office of Racial Policy Walter Gross said the law of selection rules all of nature
If, we are to take NSHE's word implying that being a Darwinist does not make you Christian, then that is all the more a great concession that Hitler was not a Christian. It appears as though Christian larpers on telegram fear racial science.
NS_Heathenry_Exposed grasping at straws
Another reason why the dubious document of the Protocols of Zion is bullshit even though some contents of it can be seen as consistent with jewish world domination, is the fact that parts of it that is so often cherrypicked by NSHE is what Hitler actually believed in. Prime example being Charles Darwin.
Hitler primarily believed in these two Darwinian concepts; Struggle for Existence and Natural Selection. Both of these concepts are thoroughly intertwined with the biology behind National Socialism. Belief in Darwinism does not necessarily contradict the idea of believing in God either.
In a 1944 speech at the Wolfs Lair, Hitler said:
"for what is called a world-view is in reality nothing other than knowledge of the world, i.e. knowledge of the primitive laws according to which human cultures and people have developed, but also according to which the whole universe and life in general develops: all are in accordance to the laws of struggle and NATURAL SELECTION. This means that the natural selection of life must not be artificially blocked and locked up, but that the way must be cleared for this natural selection."
A year before that, Hitler had professed that we ought to follow the Struggle for existence given by a higher power:
"The Almighty will be the just judge. Our task, however, is to fulfill our duty in such a way that we are able to stand before him as the creator of all worlds according to the law of struggle for existence given by him, that we spare no life without ever despairing and shun no labour in order to preserve the life of our people for the future."
Even all the way back to 1933, Hitler had quoted the work of prominent Darwinist Ernst Haeckel almost word for word:
"The gulf between the lowest creature which can still be styled man and our highest races is greater than that between the lowest type of man and the highest ape."
Hitler had confirmed all of this to Otto Wagener when he is recalled to have said:
"Everywhere in life only a process of selection can prevail. Among the animals, among plants, wherever observations have been made, basically the stronger, the better survives. The simpler life forms have no written constitution. Selection therefore runs a natural course. As Darwin correctly proved: the choice is not made by some agencyโnature chooses. [...] That is the will of nature. What is healthy abhors that which is sick, the productive abhors the life of the drone, purposeful striving abhors indifferent depravity."
For more posts on Hitler's belief in Darwinism, see: HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE
Official endorsement of Darwinism from NSDAP sources
1.) The Vรถlkischer Beobachter endorsed prominent Darwinist Ernst Haeckel as establishing the biology behind National Socialism
2.) File from the Reichssicherheitshauptamt endorsing Darwinism to be applied into the Waffen-SS
3.) Head of the Office of Racial Policy Walter Gross said the law of selection rules all of nature
If, we are to take NSHE's word implying that being a Darwinist does not make you Christian, then that is all the more a great concession that Hitler was not a Christian. It appears as though Christian larpers on telegram fear racial science.
๐9
Unmasking "NS Heathenry Exposed"
๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ NS_Heathenry_Exposed grasping at straws Another reason why the dubious document of the Protocols of Zion is bullshit even though some contents of it can be seen as consistent with jewish world domination, is the fact that parts of itโฆ
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐?
The supposed ban of "primitive Darwinism" explained
NSHE cites the supposed ban on Darwinism, but further investigation into this shows that this is not a universal ban on Darwinism and its teachings as racial research is based upon it. The very source (Die Bรผcherei) used to prove there was a ban on Darwinism did the exact opposite. This is thoroughly explained:
"A much stronger piece of evidence that Richards and others have brought forward to contest the view that Nazis were Darwinists is a list of categories of forbidden books published in the periodical Die Bรผcherei in 1935. [1] This list, compiled for libraries in Saxony, included several categories of works that should be banned, including: โWorks of worldview or biological character whose content is the superficial scientific enlightenment of a primitive Darwinism and monism (Haeckel and those emulating him, as well as Ostwald).โ [2] Richards insists that this evidence seals his case that the Nazis rejected Darwinism. But does it? First of all, most historians recognize that the Nazi system was polycratic and Nazis often disagreed among themselves. Thus a Saxon official issuing a banned book list is important, but not decisive, evidence; it must be weighed in light of other evidence. Secondly, this statement does not ban Darwinism per se, but โprimitive Darwinism and monism.โ Many Nazis rejected Haeckelโs and Ostwaldโs monism, not because it contained evolutionary theory, but because Haeckelโs Monist League, especially in the 1920s and early 1930s, had tilted toward socialism, pacifism, feminism, and other doctrines contrary to the Nazi worldview. [3] Finally, the same periodical that published the banned book list also published book reviews and recommended books that libraries should buy. In 1934 they published an article on books dealing with race and eugenics. They recommended that libraries acquire books expressly teaching biological evolution, such as Martin Staemmlerโs Rassenpflege im vรถlkischen Staat, the famous Baur-Fischer-Lenz work on human genetics and eugenics, and Gรผntherโs Rassenkunde des deutschen Volkes. [4] This journal also approved many other works that promoted evolutionary theory. [5] Apparently the journal Die Bรผcherei not only did not think books should be banned simply because they contain Darwinism or evolutionary theory, but, on the contrary, they recommended that libraries acquire books teaching Darwinism."
As we can see in the image ^, Darwin was still promoted as a valid figure and compatible with National Socialism.
Source:
[1] Richards, Tragic Sense of Life, 446โ47; Richards, โWas Hitler a Darwinian?โ
[2] โRichtlinien fรผr die Bestandsprรผfung in den Volksbรผchereien Sachsens,โ Die Bรผcherei: Zeitschrift fรผr deutsche Schrifttumspflege 2 (1935): 279โ80.
[3] Richard Weikart, โโEvolutionรคre Aufklรคrungโ? Zur Geschichte des Monistenbundesโ in Wissenschaft, Politik, und รffentlichkeit: Von der Wiener Moderne bis zur Gegenwart, ed. Mitchell G. Ash and Christian H. Stifter (Vienna: WUV Universitรคtsverlag, 2002), 131โ48.
[4] โZu unserm Sonderverzeichnis: Rassenpflege, warum und wie?โ Die Bรผcherei 1, no. 1 (1934): 46.
[5] Review of Edgar Dacquรฉ, Urweltkunde Sรผddeutschlands, in Die Bรผcherei 3 (1936): 278; Hermann Eisner, review of Erich Schneider, Entwicklungsgeschichte der naturwissenschaftlichen Weltanschauung von der griechischen Naturphilosophie bis zur modernen Vererbungslehre, in Die Bรผcherei 4 (1937): 67โ68; Hermann Propach, review of Theodor Schmucker, Geschichte der Biologie: Forschung und Lehre, in Die Bรผcherei 5 (1938): 626โ27; Margarethe Kรถlle, review of Bruno Gebhard, ed., Wunder des Lebens, in Die Bรผcherei 5 (1938): 620.
[Cited in The Role of Darwinism in Nazi Racial Thought | German Studies Review 36.3 (2013): 537โ556]
The supposed ban of "primitive Darwinism" explained
NSHE cites the supposed ban on Darwinism, but further investigation into this shows that this is not a universal ban on Darwinism and its teachings as racial research is based upon it. The very source (Die Bรผcherei) used to prove there was a ban on Darwinism did the exact opposite. This is thoroughly explained:
"A much stronger piece of evidence that Richards and others have brought forward to contest the view that Nazis were Darwinists is a list of categories of forbidden books published in the periodical Die Bรผcherei in 1935. [1] This list, compiled for libraries in Saxony, included several categories of works that should be banned, including: โWorks of worldview or biological character whose content is the superficial scientific enlightenment of a primitive Darwinism and monism (Haeckel and those emulating him, as well as Ostwald).โ [2] Richards insists that this evidence seals his case that the Nazis rejected Darwinism. But does it? First of all, most historians recognize that the Nazi system was polycratic and Nazis often disagreed among themselves. Thus a Saxon official issuing a banned book list is important, but not decisive, evidence; it must be weighed in light of other evidence. Secondly, this statement does not ban Darwinism per se, but โprimitive Darwinism and monism.โ Many Nazis rejected Haeckelโs and Ostwaldโs monism, not because it contained evolutionary theory, but because Haeckelโs Monist League, especially in the 1920s and early 1930s, had tilted toward socialism, pacifism, feminism, and other doctrines contrary to the Nazi worldview. [3] Finally, the same periodical that published the banned book list also published book reviews and recommended books that libraries should buy. In 1934 they published an article on books dealing with race and eugenics. They recommended that libraries acquire books expressly teaching biological evolution, such as Martin Staemmlerโs Rassenpflege im vรถlkischen Staat, the famous Baur-Fischer-Lenz work on human genetics and eugenics, and Gรผntherโs Rassenkunde des deutschen Volkes. [4] This journal also approved many other works that promoted evolutionary theory. [5] Apparently the journal Die Bรผcherei not only did not think books should be banned simply because they contain Darwinism or evolutionary theory, but, on the contrary, they recommended that libraries acquire books teaching Darwinism."
As we can see in the image ^, Darwin was still promoted as a valid figure and compatible with National Socialism.
Source:
[1] Richards, Tragic Sense of Life, 446โ47; Richards, โWas Hitler a Darwinian?โ
[2] โRichtlinien fรผr die Bestandsprรผfung in den Volksbรผchereien Sachsens,โ Die Bรผcherei: Zeitschrift fรผr deutsche Schrifttumspflege 2 (1935): 279โ80.
[3] Richard Weikart, โโEvolutionรคre Aufklรคrungโ? Zur Geschichte des Monistenbundesโ in Wissenschaft, Politik, und รffentlichkeit: Von der Wiener Moderne bis zur Gegenwart, ed. Mitchell G. Ash and Christian H. Stifter (Vienna: WUV Universitรคtsverlag, 2002), 131โ48.
[4] โZu unserm Sonderverzeichnis: Rassenpflege, warum und wie?โ Die Bรผcherei 1, no. 1 (1934): 46.
[5] Review of Edgar Dacquรฉ, Urweltkunde Sรผddeutschlands, in Die Bรผcherei 3 (1936): 278; Hermann Eisner, review of Erich Schneider, Entwicklungsgeschichte der naturwissenschaftlichen Weltanschauung von der griechischen Naturphilosophie bis zur modernen Vererbungslehre, in Die Bรผcherei 4 (1937): 67โ68; Hermann Propach, review of Theodor Schmucker, Geschichte der Biologie: Forschung und Lehre, in Die Bรผcherei 5 (1938): 626โ27; Margarethe Kรถlle, review of Bruno Gebhard, ed., Wunder des Lebens, in Die Bรผcherei 5 (1938): 620.
[Cited in The Role of Darwinism in Nazi Racial Thought | German Studies Review 36.3 (2013): 537โ556]
๐10