Unmasking "NS Heathenry Exposed"
The illiteracy surrounding Mein Kampf from the owner of NS_Heathenry_Exposed is concerning
Ｐａｒｔ （１／２）
Ｐａｒｔ （１／２）
The illiteracy surrounding Mein Kampf from the owner of NS_Heathenry_Exposed is concerning
Ｐａｒｔ （２／２）
As for the translation itself (see image), its noted again that:
"A closer analysis, based on a larger sample of text, revealed the translation to be that of James Murphy for Hurst & Blackett. At times it proved to be identical, raising the further question as to why the apparent plagiarists made any changes at all, since it would have been simpler to reprint Murphy's text verbatim. More understandable, perhaps, was the use of a different table of contents and index and the omission of Murphy's introduction, but then why change the chapter titles? Why entitle the opening chapter "My Home," while Murphy called it "In the Home of My Parents"? Similarly, chapter 2 was changed from "Years of Study and Suffering in Vienna" to "Learning and Suffering in Vienna," and chapter 3 became "Vienna Days-General Reflections," from "Political Reflections Arising out of my Sojourn in Vienna," while chapters 4-9 retained identical titles. Perusal of the text revealed that ninety percent of it was identical to the Hurst & Blackett version, but some parts had significant variations. [...] The fact that the sections that are similar do not merely resemble one another but are duplicates leaves little doubt that the Zentralverlag must have had access to Murphy's translation."
So not only is the Stalag based off of an already inconsistent translation, but the slight changes made to it does not help it. Thus the "Stalag" edition is not the work of the NSDAP's homemade translation. So it must not be used an infallible translation of Mein Kampf. Thomas Dalton notes that:
"As it happens, every one of the previous translations has major problems and disadvantages, for a modern English reader. The two primary versions—Murphy and Manheim—are written in the style of early-20th-century British writers. They use a wide array of archaic ‘British-isms’ and British spellings that make reading awkward, particularly for Americans in the present day. Worse, they attempt to follow too closely Hitler’s original style. Like most Germans of the time, Hitler wrote long sentences, fashioned into long, complex paragraphs. Manheim follows this style scrupulously, to the detriment of the reader; Murphy at least occasionally breaks up long sentences into more readable segments. Worst of all, both major translations are simply poor efforts. They do not read well. One repeatedly encounters passages that are awkward, incoherent, or incomprehensible. There is little of the fluidity and lyrical power of the German original. For his part, Murphy takes a considerable amount of ‘translator’s license,’ interjecting unwarranted terminology and wording, or simply leaving things out. Manheim is more literal, but in the end is scarcely more readable. The reader simply needs to scan a sampling of either text to understand the situation."
The Thomas Dalton translation relies directly on the original German of Mein Kampf, whereas the formation of what we know as the "Stalag" was not. Though this is of course not out of deceptiveness, but for consumption. The Stalag edition was used for the Stalag concentration camp in Germany. (see the Ostara Publications forward)
Source:
[1] “An English Translation of Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ Printed in Germany, ca. 1940.” The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, vol. 80, no. 3, 1986, pp. 374–77.
[2] Rethinking “Mein Kampf” By Thomas Dalton ∙ February 18, 2016
[3] Mein Kampf: The Stalag Edition: The Only Complete and Officially Authorised English Translation Ever Issued (Ostara Publications)
Ｐａｒｔ （２／２）
As for the translation itself (see image), its noted again that:
"A closer analysis, based on a larger sample of text, revealed the translation to be that of James Murphy for Hurst & Blackett. At times it proved to be identical, raising the further question as to why the apparent plagiarists made any changes at all, since it would have been simpler to reprint Murphy's text verbatim. More understandable, perhaps, was the use of a different table of contents and index and the omission of Murphy's introduction, but then why change the chapter titles? Why entitle the opening chapter "My Home," while Murphy called it "In the Home of My Parents"? Similarly, chapter 2 was changed from "Years of Study and Suffering in Vienna" to "Learning and Suffering in Vienna," and chapter 3 became "Vienna Days-General Reflections," from "Political Reflections Arising out of my Sojourn in Vienna," while chapters 4-9 retained identical titles. Perusal of the text revealed that ninety percent of it was identical to the Hurst & Blackett version, but some parts had significant variations. [...] The fact that the sections that are similar do not merely resemble one another but are duplicates leaves little doubt that the Zentralverlag must have had access to Murphy's translation."
So not only is the Stalag based off of an already inconsistent translation, but the slight changes made to it does not help it. Thus the "Stalag" edition is not the work of the NSDAP's homemade translation. So it must not be used an infallible translation of Mein Kampf. Thomas Dalton notes that:
"As it happens, every one of the previous translations has major problems and disadvantages, for a modern English reader. The two primary versions—Murphy and Manheim—are written in the style of early-20th-century British writers. They use a wide array of archaic ‘British-isms’ and British spellings that make reading awkward, particularly for Americans in the present day. Worse, they attempt to follow too closely Hitler’s original style. Like most Germans of the time, Hitler wrote long sentences, fashioned into long, complex paragraphs. Manheim follows this style scrupulously, to the detriment of the reader; Murphy at least occasionally breaks up long sentences into more readable segments. Worst of all, both major translations are simply poor efforts. They do not read well. One repeatedly encounters passages that are awkward, incoherent, or incomprehensible. There is little of the fluidity and lyrical power of the German original. For his part, Murphy takes a considerable amount of ‘translator’s license,’ interjecting unwarranted terminology and wording, or simply leaving things out. Manheim is more literal, but in the end is scarcely more readable. The reader simply needs to scan a sampling of either text to understand the situation."
The Thomas Dalton translation relies directly on the original German of Mein Kampf, whereas the formation of what we know as the "Stalag" was not. Though this is of course not out of deceptiveness, but for consumption. The Stalag edition was used for the Stalag concentration camp in Germany. (see the Ostara Publications forward)
Source:
[1] “An English Translation of Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ Printed in Germany, ca. 1940.” The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, vol. 80, no. 3, 1986, pp. 374–77.
[2] Rethinking “Mein Kampf” By Thomas Dalton ∙ February 18, 2016
[3] Mein Kampf: The Stalag Edition: The Only Complete and Officially Authorised English Translation Ever Issued (Ostara Publications)
🏆10
Forwarded from Heydrich PFP Guy
On June 9th of 1944, Hans Frank the head of the German government in German-occupied Poland wrote in his diary that
“in order to fight the Jews it was essential that we (Germany) took Poland because here in Poland the natural fertility of the Jewish people lived (thrived) to a degree found nowhere else. Since the extermination of the Jews in Poland, the Jewish future is completely over, purely in terms of blood, because it was only here where Jews were having (many) children.”
“in order to fight the Jews it was essential that we (Germany) took Poland because here in Poland the natural fertility of the Jewish people lived (thrived) to a degree found nowhere else. Since the extermination of the Jews in Poland, the Jewish future is completely over, purely in terms of blood, because it was only here where Jews were having (many) children.”
Forwarded from Heydrich PFP Guy
Unmasking "NS Heathenry Exposed"
the extermination of the Jews in Poland
according to the same diary you quoted, he says that the Holocaust really happened
Forwarded from ᛉ Dominik ᛣ
Unmasking "NS Heathenry Exposed"
On June 9th of 1944, Hans Frank the head of the German government in German-occupied Poland wrote in his diary that “in order to fight the Jews it was essential that we (Germany) took Poland because here in Poland the natural fertility of the Jewish people…
Again ausrottung meant something completely different at that time than it does today
Forwarded from Heydrich PFP Guy
ᛉ Dominik ᛣ
Again ausrottung meant something completely different at that time than it does today
For anyone questioning the meaning of “auszurotten", here’s a 1943 German Foreign Office document in which “auszurotten" (the verbal-noun form: “Ausrottung”) is used to translate the term "annihilate" in an English statement made by the American rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise into German. This showcases that the term was used in this precise way by the regime in this period.
The Admin of NS_Heathenry_Exposed uses holocaust believer arguments to deny real authentic documents
In attempts to disregard historical documents such as Hans Frank's diary (relating to religion), he pulls up a quote from his diary in which is says "Seit der Ausrottung der Juden in Polen"
Now, you would expect that the admin "Heydrich PFP Guy" is writing down his own original thoughts on this matter? Answer: No. Not only does he shamelessly copy and paste word for word what this holocaust believer wrote on his substack, but he doesn't seem to fully understand its arguments. |Ausrottung, from aus+rotten, lit. ‘to root out.’ Notably, people (like animals, plants, etc.) can be “rooted out” without killing them; they are simply picked up and displaced. |By the implications of this argument, that means according to him we should believe in the legitimacy of the Holocaust.
Heydrich PFP Guy's argument completely falls apart when we look at Adolf Hitler using the word "Ausrottung" in a 1944 speech in relation to all of Jewry:
"Daß das jüdische Ziel der Vernichtung Europas am Ende die sichere Ausrottung des Judentums in Europa bringen wird, ist daber außer jedem Zweifel, und daß der Versuch der Engländer und Amerikaner, Europa und Deutschland durch den Bolschewismus zu vernichten und das deutsche Volk durch die moskowitischen Würger zu züchtigen, d. h. ausrotten zu lassen, nur das Gegenteil erreicht, d. b. die Bolschewisierung der angelsächsischen Welt selbst, ist ebenso sicher."
In accordance to Heydrich PFP Guy's argument on the word "Ausrottung", that must mean that Adolf Hitler proved the holocaust to be true because he himself proclaimed the "Ausrottung des Judentums". It simply makes no sense. No one should take this guy seriously.
Source: BArch NS 22/1240 Der Führer am 1. Januar 1944 p.26 | Official transcription of the speech can also be found in the "Völkischer Beobachter" 1/2. Januar 1944 Seite 2
In attempts to disregard historical documents such as Hans Frank's diary (relating to religion), he pulls up a quote from his diary in which is says "Seit der Ausrottung der Juden in Polen"
Now, you would expect that the admin "Heydrich PFP Guy" is writing down his own original thoughts on this matter? Answer: No. Not only does he shamelessly copy and paste word for word what this holocaust believer wrote on his substack, but he doesn't seem to fully understand its arguments. |Ausrottung, from aus+rotten, lit. ‘to root out.’ Notably, people (like animals, plants, etc.) can be “rooted out” without killing them; they are simply picked up and displaced. |By the implications of this argument, that means according to him we should believe in the legitimacy of the Holocaust.
Heydrich PFP Guy's argument completely falls apart when we look at Adolf Hitler using the word "Ausrottung" in a 1944 speech in relation to all of Jewry:
"Daß das jüdische Ziel der Vernichtung Europas am Ende die sichere Ausrottung des Judentums in Europa bringen wird, ist daber außer jedem Zweifel, und daß der Versuch der Engländer und Amerikaner, Europa und Deutschland durch den Bolschewismus zu vernichten und das deutsche Volk durch die moskowitischen Würger zu züchtigen, d. h. ausrotten zu lassen, nur das Gegenteil erreicht, d. b. die Bolschewisierung der angelsächsischen Welt selbst, ist ebenso sicher."
In accordance to Heydrich PFP Guy's argument on the word "Ausrottung", that must mean that Adolf Hitler proved the holocaust to be true because he himself proclaimed the "Ausrottung des Judentums". It simply makes no sense. No one should take this guy seriously.
Source: BArch NS 22/1240 Der Führer am 1. Januar 1944 p.26 | Official transcription of the speech can also be found in the "Völkischer Beobachter" 1/2. Januar 1944 Seite 2
🏆15
NS_Heathenry_Exposed removing context to manipulate the meaning of Hitler's words
When NSHE was confronted on the idea that "the NSDAP recognized that Jews and Israelites were two opposite peoples", he was shown Hitler's 1920 speech in which Hitler said Abraham pimped his wife and Jews after Abraham’s time have followed his immoral example,
Instead of actually responding to that quote where Hitler is clearly denouncing Abraham, NSHE sends another excerpt of the same speech to which his meaning isn't found in the text. He only shows one half of it where at the end says in NSHE's own interpretation that the conflicts between the "Jews of the tribe of Judah (and Caleb)" were immense. So what comes after that, you may ask?
"first of all, at that time the gulf between the jews of the tribes of judah and calab and the northern israelite tribes was still unprecedented, and it was only david who managed to bridge this gulf and gradually create a connection through the unified cult of the god yahweh. we know very well that this cult [of jews] only chose jerusalem as its sole seat very late, and that it was only from that moment on that the jewish people were given a headquarters, but just as today, for example, berlin or new york or warsaw, etc"
[Source]
So after the conflict between these Jewish/Israelite tribes, it was solved by using the cult of the God Yahweh to break that conflict. Even in this same source Hitler is calling the tribe of Judah jewish. How can you be this stupid as to quote that while saying the NSDAP believed the Jews/Israelites are opposites?
In this same exact speech, NSHE intentionally ignores all of the sections where Hitler says:
1.) The Bible was written by Jews + was not written by an Anti-Semite
2.) The Jews were the greatest propagators of Christianity to promote it against the Roman empire
Other sources on Hitler's thoughts on the Israelites/Yahweh: HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE
NSDAP Literature on the Old Testament: Der Schulungsbrief 1937 #03, Der Schulungsbrief 1935 #12, Der Schulungsbrief 1936 #11, Völkischer Beobachter, June 8, 1944
When NSHE was confronted on the idea that "the NSDAP recognized that Jews and Israelites were two opposite peoples", he was shown Hitler's 1920 speech in which Hitler said Abraham pimped his wife and Jews after Abraham’s time have followed his immoral example,
Instead of actually responding to that quote where Hitler is clearly denouncing Abraham, NSHE sends another excerpt of the same speech to which his meaning isn't found in the text. He only shows one half of it where at the end says in NSHE's own interpretation that the conflicts between the "Jews of the tribe of Judah (and Caleb)" were immense. So what comes after that, you may ask?
"first of all, at that time the gulf between the jews of the tribes of judah and calab and the northern israelite tribes was still unprecedented, and it was only david who managed to bridge this gulf and gradually create a connection through the unified cult of the god yahweh. we know very well that this cult [of jews] only chose jerusalem as its sole seat very late, and that it was only from that moment on that the jewish people were given a headquarters, but just as today, for example, berlin or new york or warsaw, etc"
[Source]
So after the conflict between these Jewish/Israelite tribes, it was solved by using the cult of the God Yahweh to break that conflict. Even in this same source Hitler is calling the tribe of Judah jewish. How can you be this stupid as to quote that while saying the NSDAP believed the Jews/Israelites are opposites?
In this same exact speech, NSHE intentionally ignores all of the sections where Hitler says:
1.) The Bible was written by Jews + was not written by an Anti-Semite
2.) The Jews were the greatest propagators of Christianity to promote it against the Roman empire
Other sources on Hitler's thoughts on the Israelites/Yahweh: HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE
NSDAP Literature on the Old Testament: Der Schulungsbrief 1937 #03, Der Schulungsbrief 1935 #12, Der Schulungsbrief 1936 #11, Völkischer Beobachter, June 8, 1944
🏆18
NS_Heathenry_Exposed changes up his incoherent translation of Hitler's speech in Platterhof
First, NSHE publishes a meme to which they portray Hitler to say "I do not defend an anti-christian principle." as a complete sentence when it is in fact a context bound clause. The context and words of this matters as it shows how incoherent this translation is. As NSHeathenry already addressed, this statement does not say "I do not" but rather "This is not" (Das ist kein). So Hitler is describing the nature of the principle in itself rather than expressing a direct personal denial. The word used in the original transcript says "unchristlicher".
Now why is this relevant? The entire context surrounding this quote explains it:
"I have therefore introduced this principle [of intolerance] into German political life—not a new one, for communism had long since possessed this insight. BUT CHRISTIANITY ALSO POSSESSED THIS INSIGHT. I must point out to you, gentlemen: This is not an UNCHRISTIAN principle that I advocate. Christianity has destroyed others who did not want to think as prescribed, only not as easily and quickly as we do, but more slowly. We do it with a bullet, and there they did it with fire, they burned them."
Now all of a sudden, NSHE publishes a new translation (see image) to which it says "This is not an anti-Christian principle that I support". The meaning of "This is" and "I do not" changes the central context massively. Unchristian ≠ Anti-christian
Here is why NSHE's translation is incoherent: It shows that Hitler is saying that his introduction of intolerance is nothing new, saying both communism and christianity had this same insight/understanding. Because of this fact that christianity is "intolerant", it is therefore NOT ("ist kein") an UNCHRISTIAN ("unchristlicher") principle. The entire context of the passage is incoherent to their first translation that they push.
Therefore this quote is not at all a pro-christian quote. It's simply a historical example used for justification to be intolerant towards enemies of the war and rightly so.
In this same exact speech, Hitler says: Tolerance is a human concept, During WW1 he carried Schopenhauer's books instead of the Bible
SEE: Hitler affirming Christianity's intolerance embodied the Jewish mentality in Mein Kampf
First, NSHE publishes a meme to which they portray Hitler to say "I do not defend an anti-christian principle." as a complete sentence when it is in fact a context bound clause. The context and words of this matters as it shows how incoherent this translation is. As NSHeathenry already addressed, this statement does not say "I do not" but rather "This is not" (Das ist kein). So Hitler is describing the nature of the principle in itself rather than expressing a direct personal denial. The word used in the original transcript says "unchristlicher".
Now why is this relevant? The entire context surrounding this quote explains it:
"I have therefore introduced this principle [of intolerance] into German political life—not a new one, for communism had long since possessed this insight. BUT CHRISTIANITY ALSO POSSESSED THIS INSIGHT. I must point out to you, gentlemen: This is not an UNCHRISTIAN principle that I advocate. Christianity has destroyed others who did not want to think as prescribed, only not as easily and quickly as we do, but more slowly. We do it with a bullet, and there they did it with fire, they burned them."
Now all of a sudden, NSHE publishes a new translation (see image) to which it says "This is not an anti-Christian principle that I support". The meaning of "This is" and "I do not" changes the central context massively. Unchristian ≠ Anti-christian
Here is why NSHE's translation is incoherent: It shows that Hitler is saying that his introduction of intolerance is nothing new, saying both communism and christianity had this same insight/understanding. Because of this fact that christianity is "intolerant", it is therefore NOT ("ist kein") an UNCHRISTIAN ("unchristlicher") principle. The entire context of the passage is incoherent to their first translation that they push.
Therefore this quote is not at all a pro-christian quote. It's simply a historical example used for justification to be intolerant towards enemies of the war and rightly so.
In this same exact speech, Hitler says: Tolerance is a human concept, During WW1 he carried Schopenhauer's books instead of the Bible
SEE: Hitler affirming Christianity's intolerance embodied the Jewish mentality in Mein Kampf
🏆14
𝐍𝐒𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐍𝐑𝐘 𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐄𝐃 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐃𝐄𝐒 𝐎𝐍 𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐑'𝐒 𝐑𝐄𝐉𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐀𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝐏𝐀𝐔𝐋—
In yet another failed attempt to refute NS Heathenry, Heydrich, the owner of NSHE, has either intentionally or accidentally admitted that Hitler despised the father of institutional Christianity—Paul of Tarsus, the author of the 13 Epistles and missionary to the gentiles.
“Hitler repeatedly argued that Christ had opposed what he described as Jewish domination and was crucified for it, while PAUL LATER DISTORTED HIS TEACHINGS—just as Marx, in his view, had distorted the original communal idea behind Socialism.”
— NS Heathenry Exposed
Of course, rejecting the apostle Paul and the Old Testament as well as the immaculate conception of Christ isn't just heresy, it's the outright apostasy from God per Can. 751 § 1 of the Catholic Church. To add insult to injury, Hitler also believed Mary was a harlot who slept with a Roman legionnaire, likely tapping into the story peddled by Celsus.
"There were probably many descendants of Roman legionaries (Gauls) living in Galilee, and JESUS WAS ONE OF THEM. It is possible that his mother was Jewish."
— Adolf Hitler [Werner Jochmann Notes, p.354]
HITLER ON POST-CONSTANTINIAN CHRISTIANITY:
"Christianity was all-destroying Bolshevism. Yet ... Christ, wanted something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ... The decisive falsification of Jesus' teaching came through [Saint] Paul." [1]
"At that time and into the Middle Ages, the most terrible tortures, maltreatments and burnings in the name of Christianity, and today the same in the name of Bolshevism. SAUL BECAME [SAINT] PAUL AND MORDECAI BECAME KARL MARX." [2]
@Christmutt
In yet another failed attempt to refute NS Heathenry, Heydrich, the owner of NSHE, has either intentionally or accidentally admitted that Hitler despised the father of institutional Christianity—Paul of Tarsus, the author of the 13 Epistles and missionary to the gentiles.
“Hitler repeatedly argued that Christ had opposed what he described as Jewish domination and was crucified for it, while PAUL LATER DISTORTED HIS TEACHINGS—just as Marx, in his view, had distorted the original communal idea behind Socialism.”
— NS Heathenry Exposed
Of course, rejecting the apostle Paul and the Old Testament as well as the immaculate conception of Christ isn't just heresy, it's the outright apostasy from God per Can. 751 § 1 of the Catholic Church. To add insult to injury, Hitler also believed Mary was a harlot who slept with a Roman legionnaire, likely tapping into the story peddled by Celsus.
"There were probably many descendants of Roman legionaries (Gauls) living in Galilee, and JESUS WAS ONE OF THEM. It is possible that his mother was Jewish."
— Adolf Hitler [Werner Jochmann Notes, p.354]
HITLER ON POST-CONSTANTINIAN CHRISTIANITY:
"Christianity was all-destroying Bolshevism. Yet ... Christ, wanted something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ... The decisive falsification of Jesus' teaching came through [Saint] Paul." [1]
"At that time and into the Middle Ages, the most terrible tortures, maltreatments and burnings in the name of Christianity, and today the same in the name of Bolshevism. SAUL BECAME [SAINT] PAUL AND MORDECAI BECAME KARL MARX." [2]
@Christmutt
🏆9
REFUTATION FAILED
When "Hitler LOVED Christ" was confronted on the fact that he LIED that the 144a issue of the "Völkischer beobachter" is fabricated, he doubled down using Artificial intelligence as his only source to proudly claim it was not written by Hitler and the original does not mention him as the author.
Except when we look at the actual original, it says 'Volkskampf gegen die internationale Verbrecherpresse! Gegen die jüdische Weltpressevergiftung!" von Adolf Hitler'. It quite literally says its written BY ("von") Adolf Hitler.
On top of the fact that we have the original Völkischer beobachter article to see who wrote it, the NSDAP also affirmed that it was "an essay by Adolf Hitler". What type of cope is this?
[Refuting Hitler LOVED Christ on the idea that VB article 144a does not exist]
When "Hitler LOVED Christ" was confronted on the fact that he LIED that the 144a issue of the "Völkischer beobachter" is fabricated, he doubled down using Artificial intelligence as his only source to proudly claim it was not written by Hitler and the original does not mention him as the author.
Except when we look at the actual original, it says 'Volkskampf gegen die internationale Verbrecherpresse! Gegen die jüdische Weltpressevergiftung!" von Adolf Hitler'. It quite literally says its written BY ("von") Adolf Hitler.
On top of the fact that we have the original Völkischer beobachter article to see who wrote it, the NSDAP also affirmed that it was "an essay by Adolf Hitler". What type of cope is this?
[Refuting Hitler LOVED Christ on the idea that VB article 144a does not exist]
🏆12
NS_Heathenry_Exposed claims this passage was taken out of context when it was still in context
The first passage of the quote is a different context than the second passage within the paragraph. Anyone whos read it can see that. Talking about Christianity as a slogan against itself is not on topic with Hitler's distinction between Christ/Christianity
"we must declare ourselves as the only true Christians. But then with the full force of the party against the saboteurs. Christianity is the slogan for the destruction of the priests, just as socialism was once the slogan for the destruction of the Marxist bigwigs."
The extra lines of text on there is not listed is because its already been addressed. So if we take the sources into account, Hitler was anti-christian because he viewed Christianity as bolshevism to destroy the roman empire which had nothing to do with Christ as a figure. Which means this argument easily falls flat on itself.
Proof:
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/984
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/985
If we look at later entries of the original handwritten notes, we can see a much greater context explaining this line of thinking:
"The Führer passionately refuses to play the role of a religious founder. He does not want to become a Buddha later on. He is solely and exclusively a politician. The best way to deal with the churches is to present oneself as a more positive Christian. So, it is necessary, for the time being, to remain reserved on these matters and to ruthlessly suppress the churches wherever they become impudent and interfere in state affairs. And we will strive to ensure this to the best of our ability."
[Source]
We should not forget Goebbels also recording that Hitler was: Anti-Christian, Agreed with Nietzsche on Christianity, rejected the Christian doctrine of salvation, etc
The first passage of the quote is a different context than the second passage within the paragraph. Anyone whos read it can see that. Talking about Christianity as a slogan against itself is not on topic with Hitler's distinction between Christ/Christianity
"we must declare ourselves as the only true Christians. But then with the full force of the party against the saboteurs. Christianity is the slogan for the destruction of the priests, just as socialism was once the slogan for the destruction of the Marxist bigwigs."
The extra lines of text on there is not listed is because its already been addressed. So if we take the sources into account, Hitler was anti-christian because he viewed Christianity as bolshevism to destroy the roman empire which had nothing to do with Christ as a figure. Which means this argument easily falls flat on itself.
Proof:
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/984
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/985
If we look at later entries of the original handwritten notes, we can see a much greater context explaining this line of thinking:
"The Führer passionately refuses to play the role of a religious founder. He does not want to become a Buddha later on. He is solely and exclusively a politician. The best way to deal with the churches is to present oneself as a more positive Christian. So, it is necessary, for the time being, to remain reserved on these matters and to ruthlessly suppress the churches wherever they become impudent and interfere in state affairs. And we will strive to ensure this to the best of our ability."
[Source]
We should not forget Goebbels also recording that Hitler was: Anti-Christian, Agreed with Nietzsche on Christianity, rejected the Christian doctrine of salvation, etc
🏆17
𝐇𝐔𝐃𝐀𝐋 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐁𝐎𝐎𝐊 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐔𝐑𝐄
NS_Heathenry_Exposed seems to enjoy posting from Alois Hudal's book even though its neither a concrete establishment of National Socialism and the fact that it was CENSORED. The end goal of his book was not merely for the sake of National Socialism, but for establishing Christianity itself and its attempts to make both ideas sync to his own reasoning. Hudal himself has written that National Socialism requires a Christian "injection" to avoid ultimately ending in unrestrained barbarity implying its principles in itself would become increasingly opposed to that of Christian ethics.
As expected, Hudal's book "The foundations of National Socialism" is not an authoritative source on NS as he at times contradicts its core principle. For example, Hudal writes:
"According to Christian worldview, unconditional superordination and primacy belong not to blood but to spirit. Where human will shows weaknesses and inhibitions, the deepest root lies, however much climate, landscape, and race may also play a part, in a spiritual sphere, in original sin and not in blood. THEREFORE RACE CAN NEVER ALONE AND IN ITSELF BE ELEVATED TO A MORAL CONCEPT OF VALUE, without our wishing to deny that the individual races distinguish themselves through certain dispositions peculiar only to them. [...] The task of science is to investigate to what extent climate, landscape, environment, and blood co-form and shape the intellectual-moral attitude of a nation. But whoever wishes to write a history of nations determined by blood and race is no less a materialist than the disciples of Marxism when they wish to explain the development of peoples only according to economic and class determined oppositions. [...] The importing of the racial into the essence of Christianity, however, leads with compelling necessity to the abandonment of the absolute, to becoming stuck in the natural, to the loss of all unconditional values, to the relativism of knowledge and morality."
According to Hudal's logic, Hitler would be "no less a materialist than the disciples of Marxism" as Hitler himself says that History instruction must lead to the original factors of race and that racial-mixing is the only true original sin of this world as it brings the end of nations. (Race > Religion). Hudal then writes:
"The dogmatic edifice of National Socialism rests upon two concepts: nation and race. From both foundations, which are closely interrelated, there emerge—as soon as they are thought through consistently—important practical demands of uncompromising clarity. The overemphasis on the concepts of race and hereditary substance harbors within itself the danger of a distancing from Christianity for the Germanic people, BECAUSE THIS RELIGION ORIGINATED FROM FOREIGN RACES AND CULTURAL SPHERES. On the hygienicsocial level, however, there appears as a consequence the elimination of the hereditarily diseased mass through marriage prohibitions and sterilization. If one does not give the concepts of nation and race a narrower interpretation, it is difficult to avoid these two conclusions. With complete clarity, therefore, the demand for sterilization appears throughout the entire leading National Socialist literature as a selfevident matter, for which the radical representatives would prefer not to admit any further justification or evaluation from the realm of morality."
National Socialism is a worldview based on biology. The implications of this means that its adherents ought to profess their allegiance to the laws of race and blood as is it race that gives us meaning and purpose to our existence. Without this underlying principle, it simply wouldn't be National Socialism.
Finally, we shall not forget that Hudal's thorough rejection of Alfred Rosenberg is in strike contradiction to Hitler's personal and private defense of him being the NSDAP's leading intellectual architects. Hudal ultimately came to the conclusion himself that a strong tie of Christianity and National Socialism together isn't realistic and broke away from that idea.
NS_Heathenry_Exposed seems to enjoy posting from Alois Hudal's book even though its neither a concrete establishment of National Socialism and the fact that it was CENSORED. The end goal of his book was not merely for the sake of National Socialism, but for establishing Christianity itself and its attempts to make both ideas sync to his own reasoning. Hudal himself has written that National Socialism requires a Christian "injection" to avoid ultimately ending in unrestrained barbarity implying its principles in itself would become increasingly opposed to that of Christian ethics.
As expected, Hudal's book "The foundations of National Socialism" is not an authoritative source on NS as he at times contradicts its core principle. For example, Hudal writes:
"According to Christian worldview, unconditional superordination and primacy belong not to blood but to spirit. Where human will shows weaknesses and inhibitions, the deepest root lies, however much climate, landscape, and race may also play a part, in a spiritual sphere, in original sin and not in blood. THEREFORE RACE CAN NEVER ALONE AND IN ITSELF BE ELEVATED TO A MORAL CONCEPT OF VALUE, without our wishing to deny that the individual races distinguish themselves through certain dispositions peculiar only to them. [...] The task of science is to investigate to what extent climate, landscape, environment, and blood co-form and shape the intellectual-moral attitude of a nation. But whoever wishes to write a history of nations determined by blood and race is no less a materialist than the disciples of Marxism when they wish to explain the development of peoples only according to economic and class determined oppositions. [...] The importing of the racial into the essence of Christianity, however, leads with compelling necessity to the abandonment of the absolute, to becoming stuck in the natural, to the loss of all unconditional values, to the relativism of knowledge and morality."
According to Hudal's logic, Hitler would be "no less a materialist than the disciples of Marxism" as Hitler himself says that History instruction must lead to the original factors of race and that racial-mixing is the only true original sin of this world as it brings the end of nations. (Race > Religion). Hudal then writes:
"The dogmatic edifice of National Socialism rests upon two concepts: nation and race. From both foundations, which are closely interrelated, there emerge—as soon as they are thought through consistently—important practical demands of uncompromising clarity. The overemphasis on the concepts of race and hereditary substance harbors within itself the danger of a distancing from Christianity for the Germanic people, BECAUSE THIS RELIGION ORIGINATED FROM FOREIGN RACES AND CULTURAL SPHERES. On the hygienicsocial level, however, there appears as a consequence the elimination of the hereditarily diseased mass through marriage prohibitions and sterilization. If one does not give the concepts of nation and race a narrower interpretation, it is difficult to avoid these two conclusions. With complete clarity, therefore, the demand for sterilization appears throughout the entire leading National Socialist literature as a selfevident matter, for which the radical representatives would prefer not to admit any further justification or evaluation from the realm of morality."
National Socialism is a worldview based on biology. The implications of this means that its adherents ought to profess their allegiance to the laws of race and blood as is it race that gives us meaning and purpose to our existence. Without this underlying principle, it simply wouldn't be National Socialism.
Finally, we shall not forget that Hudal's thorough rejection of Alfred Rosenberg is in strike contradiction to Hitler's personal and private defense of him being the NSDAP's leading intellectual architects. Hudal ultimately came to the conclusion himself that a strong tie of Christianity and National Socialism together isn't realistic and broke away from that idea.
🏆18
NS_Heathenry_Exposed is SCARED to address the anti-Christian basis of Heinrich Himmler's theology.
Instead of beating around the bush implicating that Himmler was somehow a pro-Christian in his service as Reichsführer-SS such as showing a document where he releases preists or simply helping preserve history by requesting a centuries years old Bible to be stored away, why not actually show statements from Himmler where fundamentally supports Christianity and not him just portraying a historical example of the church embedding Germanic values?
The reality is: Himmler condemned Christianity as 2,000 year old Bolshevism, Removed Christian clergy from the SS, and wanted to awaken a worldview based on our pre-christian ancestors for the SS [etc]
No amount of religious stats of regular SS men will negate the fact that the SS-leadership wished to intentionally get rid of the influence of Christianity. That is where the focus truly is.
What is the evidence for this?
• The SS-Hauptamt explicitly talked about plans to overcome Christianity by means of SS literature and reinterpretation of the current idea of what God is [1] [2]
• The SS training programs recommended anti-Christian literature for its ideological training [3]
• Discouraged people who followed Christianity from participating in the SS leadership training course [4]
• Official Sicherheitsdienst training document condemning Christianity [5]
• The SS publishing house Nordland-Verlag on engaging in ideological confrontation with Christianity + receiving approval from the Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda to publish anti-Christian children's books [6] [7]
We can see the manifestations of this plan throughout the SS in the following literature on the topic of Christianity/God:
• Waffen-SS
• Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler
• SS-Hitlerjugend
• SS-Götz von Berlichingen
• SS-Das Reich
• SS-Totenkopf
• Sicherheitsdienst
• Reichssicherheitshauptamt
No one in NS_Heathenry_Exposed will address any of these SS documents on Christianity since it ultimately crumbles what they push. Hitler was aware of this anti-Christian push in the SS and supported it.
HIMMLER WAS NOT CHRISTIAN
Instead of beating around the bush implicating that Himmler was somehow a pro-Christian in his service as Reichsführer-SS such as showing a document where he releases preists or simply helping preserve history by requesting a centuries years old Bible to be stored away, why not actually show statements from Himmler where fundamentally supports Christianity and not him just portraying a historical example of the church embedding Germanic values?
The reality is: Himmler condemned Christianity as 2,000 year old Bolshevism, Removed Christian clergy from the SS, and wanted to awaken a worldview based on our pre-christian ancestors for the SS [etc]
No amount of religious stats of regular SS men will negate the fact that the SS-leadership wished to intentionally get rid of the influence of Christianity. That is where the focus truly is.
What is the evidence for this?
• The SS-Hauptamt explicitly talked about plans to overcome Christianity by means of SS literature and reinterpretation of the current idea of what God is [1] [2]
• The SS training programs recommended anti-Christian literature for its ideological training [3]
• Discouraged people who followed Christianity from participating in the SS leadership training course [4]
• Official Sicherheitsdienst training document condemning Christianity [5]
• The SS publishing house Nordland-Verlag on engaging in ideological confrontation with Christianity + receiving approval from the Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda to publish anti-Christian children's books [6] [7]
We can see the manifestations of this plan throughout the SS in the following literature on the topic of Christianity/God:
• Waffen-SS
• Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler
• SS-Hitlerjugend
• SS-Götz von Berlichingen
• SS-Das Reich
• SS-Totenkopf
• Sicherheitsdienst
• Reichssicherheitshauptamt
No one in NS_Heathenry_Exposed will address any of these SS documents on Christianity since it ultimately crumbles what they push. Hitler was aware of this anti-Christian push in the SS and supported it.
HIMMLER WAS NOT CHRISTIAN
🏆21
More source denial from NS_Heathenry_Exposed
In their 2024 era channel, NSHE has claimed that the quote "a christian era can only possess a christian art, a national socialist era only a national socialist art.” from Hitler's speech in 1936 is "clearly a forgery" in which the source of the quote was "already dubious enough" even though the source is so clear cut in what it is in the original image that they present.
So when we investigate the validity of such claims, the quote is in fact a real quote from Hitler in 1936. On page 67 of 'Der Parteitag der Ehre vom 8. bis 14. September 1936 offizieller Bericht über den Verlauf des Reichsparteitages mit sämtlichen Kongressreden' it displays said quote.
How interesting that they say "It doesn't match up with the firsthand evidence we have". This appears to be a recurring in their way of thinking.
[See for yourself]
In their 2024 era channel, NSHE has claimed that the quote "a christian era can only possess a christian art, a national socialist era only a national socialist art.” from Hitler's speech in 1936 is "clearly a forgery" in which the source of the quote was "already dubious enough" even though the source is so clear cut in what it is in the original image that they present.
So when we investigate the validity of such claims, the quote is in fact a real quote from Hitler in 1936. On page 67 of 'Der Parteitag der Ehre vom 8. bis 14. September 1936 offizieller Bericht über den Verlauf des Reichsparteitages mit sämtlichen Kongressreden' it displays said quote.
How interesting that they say "It doesn't match up with the firsthand evidence we have". This appears to be a recurring in their way of thinking.
[See for yourself]
🏆18
NS_Heathenry_Exposed cuts out and ignores an interesting piece of information regarding the November 4/5 meeting with Faulhaber
What Faulhaber reports here as posted by NSHE isn't something new. In the same exact meeting, Hitler also recounted some of the ways the Catholic Church had been forced to change in the past, such as giving up the geocentric model of the solar system. In a similar fashion, the Catholic Church should abandon its opposition to National Socialism, such as racial legislation, which, Hitler insisted, were based on the firm foundation of science:
"The Führer's second topic was National Socialism and the Church. He spoke only of the Catholic Church. Everything in the Church had changed, he said: the question of whether the world was created in six days or six million years, whether the sun revolves around the earth, the invasion of the Huns, the Reformation, the French Revolution... Therefore, the Church, too, must abandon its fight against our racial legislation, which was based on absolute scientific research. These laws were still being preached against from the pulpit. He had on his desk files concerning 380 (370?) indictments against clergymen who had expressed hostility towards the new state. The Center Party priests could not accept that National Socialism had prevailed and achieved so much. Christianity, he said, was inextricably linked to our people and to Western culture through a thousand-year history. One cannot condone everything that has happened in these 1900 years, for example, in the history of the German emperors and popes, but Christianity was a power back then. If the Church continues to behave hostilely towards National Socialism and perpetuates the struggle, then National Socialism will have to manage without the Church. Tell them: We may do as we please, the Church cannot be reconciled; it fought against us before the seizure of power and continues to do so today, despite the danger of widespread abandonment. If only the Church would at least give up the fight for tactical reasons! Compared to the great goal the Führer has set for himself—to defeat Bolshevism and make the German people happy—everything else is small and a ridiculous trifle."
Interestingly at the very end of this document despite all of which is discussed, Faulhaber notes that Hitler's personal image on the Catholic church is still unclear to him:
"Less clear is the image of the Catholic Church in his spirit as a divine institution, with its divine mission independent of the state, with its unchangeable dogmas, with its historical and cultural greatness.”
SEE: FAULHABER DENYING NATIONAL SOCIALISM AS PURE APOSTASY
Source: Cardinal Faulhaber on November 4/5, 1936 [Akten Kardinal Michael von Faulbabers 1917-1945, Bd. 2, 1935-1945, Dok. 572., p.187 and p.194]
What Faulhaber reports here as posted by NSHE isn't something new. In the same exact meeting, Hitler also recounted some of the ways the Catholic Church had been forced to change in the past, such as giving up the geocentric model of the solar system. In a similar fashion, the Catholic Church should abandon its opposition to National Socialism, such as racial legislation, which, Hitler insisted, were based on the firm foundation of science:
"The Führer's second topic was National Socialism and the Church. He spoke only of the Catholic Church. Everything in the Church had changed, he said: the question of whether the world was created in six days or six million years, whether the sun revolves around the earth, the invasion of the Huns, the Reformation, the French Revolution... Therefore, the Church, too, must abandon its fight against our racial legislation, which was based on absolute scientific research. These laws were still being preached against from the pulpit. He had on his desk files concerning 380 (370?) indictments against clergymen who had expressed hostility towards the new state. The Center Party priests could not accept that National Socialism had prevailed and achieved so much. Christianity, he said, was inextricably linked to our people and to Western culture through a thousand-year history. One cannot condone everything that has happened in these 1900 years, for example, in the history of the German emperors and popes, but Christianity was a power back then. If the Church continues to behave hostilely towards National Socialism and perpetuates the struggle, then National Socialism will have to manage without the Church. Tell them: We may do as we please, the Church cannot be reconciled; it fought against us before the seizure of power and continues to do so today, despite the danger of widespread abandonment. If only the Church would at least give up the fight for tactical reasons! Compared to the great goal the Führer has set for himself—to defeat Bolshevism and make the German people happy—everything else is small and a ridiculous trifle."
Interestingly at the very end of this document despite all of which is discussed, Faulhaber notes that Hitler's personal image on the Catholic church is still unclear to him:
"Less clear is the image of the Catholic Church in his spirit as a divine institution, with its divine mission independent of the state, with its unchangeable dogmas, with its historical and cultural greatness.”
SEE: FAULHABER DENYING NATIONAL SOCIALISM AS PURE APOSTASY
Source: Cardinal Faulhaber on November 4/5, 1936 [Akten Kardinal Michael von Faulbabers 1917-1945, Bd. 2, 1935-1945, Dok. 572., p.187 and p.194]
🏆18
Admin inside NS_Heathenry_Exposed cites AI to say the quotes from Hewel's diaries are made up then proceeds to lie about checking the diary
When NSHE Admin named "Plot" was confronted with the fact that Hitler's personal friend and Head of the Personal Staff of the Reichsminister for Foreign Affairs Walther Hewel documented extensively conversations regarding Hitler and Christianity, he used AI as confirmation bias and completely failed.
Upon looking at Hewel's dairy, it does show said entries (June 8th, 1941). Plot's claim that quotes on forced conversion, sagas, eternal jew, etc is a rather malicious lie as he himself has claimed to have searched inside the diary and said that the quotes "doesn't exist", now lets look at the image above where it illustrates them: ^
Where would we be today if Christianity hadn't been forced upon us? And against our will, with fire and sword in the name of the good God.
"Vergleich mit England. Wo wären wir heute, wenn nicht das Christentum uns aufgezwungen worden wäre. Und zwar gegen unseren Willen, mit Feuer und Schwert im Namen des gütigen Gottes."
How pathetic are the stories of the saints compared to the Greek, Roman, and then Germanic sagas.
"Wie jämmerlich sind die Heiligengeschichten gegenüber den griechischen, römischen und dann Germanischen Sagen."
In terms of cruelty, Christianity has broken all records. Christianity is the revenge of the eternal Jew.
"In Bezug auf Grausamkeit hat das Christentum alle Rekorde geschlagen. Das Christentum ist die Rache des ewigen Juden."
Final verdict: the quotes are in fact REAL. Do not be intellectually lazy like the admins inside of NSHE.
Source: Diaries and Papers of Botschafter Hewel. Nachlass Walther Hewel. Microfilm DJ-75. Filmed February 1971. Film No 96928, Reel 23 [EP Microform Limited] p.118, p.44, p.45
[Transcriptions here]
[SEE: HEWEL'S DIARY DIRECTLY CORROBORATING THE TABLE TALKS]
When NSHE Admin named "Plot" was confronted with the fact that Hitler's personal friend and Head of the Personal Staff of the Reichsminister for Foreign Affairs Walther Hewel documented extensively conversations regarding Hitler and Christianity, he used AI as confirmation bias and completely failed.
Upon looking at Hewel's dairy, it does show said entries (June 8th, 1941). Plot's claim that quotes on forced conversion, sagas, eternal jew, etc is a rather malicious lie as he himself has claimed to have searched inside the diary and said that the quotes "doesn't exist", now lets look at the image above where it illustrates them: ^
Where would we be today if Christianity hadn't been forced upon us? And against our will, with fire and sword in the name of the good God.
"Vergleich mit England. Wo wären wir heute, wenn nicht das Christentum uns aufgezwungen worden wäre. Und zwar gegen unseren Willen, mit Feuer und Schwert im Namen des gütigen Gottes."
How pathetic are the stories of the saints compared to the Greek, Roman, and then Germanic sagas.
"Wie jämmerlich sind die Heiligengeschichten gegenüber den griechischen, römischen und dann Germanischen Sagen."
In terms of cruelty, Christianity has broken all records. Christianity is the revenge of the eternal Jew.
"In Bezug auf Grausamkeit hat das Christentum alle Rekorde geschlagen. Das Christentum ist die Rache des ewigen Juden."
Final verdict: the quotes are in fact REAL. Do not be intellectually lazy like the admins inside of NSHE.
Source: Diaries and Papers of Botschafter Hewel. Nachlass Walther Hewel. Microfilm DJ-75. Filmed February 1971. Film No 96928, Reel 23 [EP Microform Limited] p.118, p.44, p.45
[Transcriptions here]
[SEE: HEWEL'S DIARY DIRECTLY CORROBORATING THE TABLE TALKS]
🏆23
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐕𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐃𝐄𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐃 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌
The SD surveillance on the Vatican Radio revealed that the Catholic Church was openly against the "modern pagan racial teachings" of NS + openly stating that the racial laws introduced by NS in italy were a "contradiction" of official canon law since the church cannot denounce interracial marriage.
Documents:
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1476
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1478
𝐎𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐭 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐞 [ENCYCLICAL]
A number of people say nowhere is it referencing the NSDAP and yet completely ignore how the original says "on the church and the german reich" then talks about the "open negotiations for a concordat, which the Reich Government proposed on the basis of a scheme of several years' standing" then makes clear reference to the NSDAP violating the concordat: "... in the course of these anxious and trying years following upon the conclusion of the concordat, every one of Our words, every one of Our acts, has been inspired by the binding law of treaties. At the same time, anyone must acknowledge, not without surprise and reprobation, how the OTHER CONTRACTING PARTY emasculated the terms of the treaty, distorted their meaning, and eventually considered its more or less official violation as a normal policy."
What is said here isn't of surprise as even Pacelli (Pius XII) had noted: "... the difficulties and persecution, carried to a virtually intolerable degree, which the Catholic Church in Germany is now enduring in open violation of the Concordat." Pacelli even addressed Hitler himself as his government on the "violent hostility" towards the Catholic church in Germany. Pacelli (Pius XII) specifically said this encyclical was against the "Nazi doctrines condemned in the recent encyclical" in a letter from April 30, 1937. Former Ambassador to the Holy See Ernst von Weizsäcker wrote in 1940 that National Socialism couldn't be doctrinally united with Christianity.
The NSDAP had already knew of the encyclical and its intentions. In the Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte, the encyclical has been addressed as an anti-National Socialist piece. For this reason, the NSDAP had banned the distribution of the Mit brennender Sorge. This directly connects to what the Vatican radio has preached against the worldview of National Socialism as common knowledge.
• Pope Pius XI on National Socialism as "materialism"
• Pope Pius XII on National Socialism being the same as Bolshevism
Racial universalism within the theology of Christianity is clear when we see that every race can have salvation and was also created in the image of the Christian God. The church proudly proclaims this as official doctrine. The primacy of blood is nowhere in Christianity. This has been made clear in NSDAP sources such as; HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE.
The contemporary sources demonstrate that the church was against National Socialism in its core ideas.
SEE: HITLER ON THE PRIMACY OF THE STATE OVER THE CHURCH
The SD surveillance on the Vatican Radio revealed that the Catholic Church was openly against the "modern pagan racial teachings" of NS + openly stating that the racial laws introduced by NS in italy were a "contradiction" of official canon law since the church cannot denounce interracial marriage.
Documents:
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1476
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1478
𝐎𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐭 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐞 [ENCYCLICAL]
A number of people say nowhere is it referencing the NSDAP and yet completely ignore how the original says "on the church and the german reich" then talks about the "open negotiations for a concordat, which the Reich Government proposed on the basis of a scheme of several years' standing" then makes clear reference to the NSDAP violating the concordat: "... in the course of these anxious and trying years following upon the conclusion of the concordat, every one of Our words, every one of Our acts, has been inspired by the binding law of treaties. At the same time, anyone must acknowledge, not without surprise and reprobation, how the OTHER CONTRACTING PARTY emasculated the terms of the treaty, distorted their meaning, and eventually considered its more or less official violation as a normal policy."
What is said here isn't of surprise as even Pacelli (Pius XII) had noted: "... the difficulties and persecution, carried to a virtually intolerable degree, which the Catholic Church in Germany is now enduring in open violation of the Concordat." Pacelli even addressed Hitler himself as his government on the "violent hostility" towards the Catholic church in Germany. Pacelli (Pius XII) specifically said this encyclical was against the "Nazi doctrines condemned in the recent encyclical" in a letter from April 30, 1937. Former Ambassador to the Holy See Ernst von Weizsäcker wrote in 1940 that National Socialism couldn't be doctrinally united with Christianity.
The NSDAP had already knew of the encyclical and its intentions. In the Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte, the encyclical has been addressed as an anti-National Socialist piece. For this reason, the NSDAP had banned the distribution of the Mit brennender Sorge. This directly connects to what the Vatican radio has preached against the worldview of National Socialism as common knowledge.
• Pope Pius XI on National Socialism as "materialism"
• Pope Pius XII on National Socialism being the same as Bolshevism
Racial universalism within the theology of Christianity is clear when we see that every race can have salvation and was also created in the image of the Christian God. The church proudly proclaims this as official doctrine. The primacy of blood is nowhere in Christianity. This has been made clear in NSDAP sources such as; HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE.
The contemporary sources demonstrate that the church was against National Socialism in its core ideas.
SEE: HITLER ON THE PRIMACY OF THE STATE OVER THE CHURCH
🏆14
Unmasking "NS Heathenry Exposed"
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐕𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐃𝐄𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐃 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌 The SD surveillance on the Vatican Radio revealed that the Catholic Church was openly against the "modern pagan racial teachings" of NS + openly stating that the racial laws introduced by NS in italy were a "contradiction"…
VATIKANRDN.png
21.4 MB
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐦𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐜𝐡𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐨 — 𝐀 𝐝𝐞𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐞
How the channel "NSDAP Loved Christ" leaves out important context
Hitler's political pragmatism appears evident when Hoffmann reports in his memoirs Hitler telling him: "if the people THINK (denkt) I’m a devout man, well, no harm will come of that!". The choice of words Hitler uses here demonstrates that Hitler didn't mind political gain from being portrayed as a devout Christian.
Further evidence supporting this is found within the captions that were changed within the book 'Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt'. Originally, the caption reinforced the image:
“A photographic chance event becomes a symbol: Adolf Hitler, the supposed "heretic", leaving the Marinekirche in Wilhelmshaven."
In the later publication, not only was the crucifix removed. but the pronounced religious tone found in the previous caption was also cut out, indicating this was an intentional edit:
"Adolf Hitler after sightseeing at the historic Marinekirche in Wilhelmshaven"
While Germans viewing the version with the cross would likely think Hitler was leaving a church service, the later caption made clear Hitler was not attending a worship service, but merely visiting a historic site.
Another commonly omitted section of Hoffmann's memoirs is the fact that Hitler condoned Martin Bormann's anti-church attitude even if some extreme measures had to be revoked:
"One of the most fanatical opponents of the Church in the whole Party was Bormann, and although Hitler generally condoned his attitude, there were many repressive measures introduced by Bormann, which Hitler felt compelled to countermand."
Hoffmann's words here are corroborated by Hitler's adjutant Otto Dietrich to which in his memoirs he stated:
"On the other hand he [Hitler] did not hold back the hotheads in the Party, Himmler and especially Bormann, who incessantly attacked the churches. On the contrary, he [Hitler] supported them and encouraged them by his private, violently antichurch remarks."
Source:
Heinrich Hoffmann: Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, 100 Bild-Dokumente aus dem Leben des Führers, 201.-220. Tsd., Zeitgeschichte-Verlag, Berlin, [1933] and [1942-1943]
Hitler Was My Friend: The Memoirs of Hitler’s Photographer by Heinrich Hoffmann
The Hitler I knew: memoirs of the Third Reich's press chief by Otto Dietrich
How the channel "NSDAP Loved Christ" leaves out important context
Hitler's political pragmatism appears evident when Hoffmann reports in his memoirs Hitler telling him: "if the people THINK (denkt) I’m a devout man, well, no harm will come of that!". The choice of words Hitler uses here demonstrates that Hitler didn't mind political gain from being portrayed as a devout Christian.
Further evidence supporting this is found within the captions that were changed within the book 'Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt'. Originally, the caption reinforced the image:
“A photographic chance event becomes a symbol: Adolf Hitler, the supposed "heretic", leaving the Marinekirche in Wilhelmshaven."
In the later publication, not only was the crucifix removed. but the pronounced religious tone found in the previous caption was also cut out, indicating this was an intentional edit:
"Adolf Hitler after sightseeing at the historic Marinekirche in Wilhelmshaven"
While Germans viewing the version with the cross would likely think Hitler was leaving a church service, the later caption made clear Hitler was not attending a worship service, but merely visiting a historic site.
Another commonly omitted section of Hoffmann's memoirs is the fact that Hitler condoned Martin Bormann's anti-church attitude even if some extreme measures had to be revoked:
"One of the most fanatical opponents of the Church in the whole Party was Bormann, and although Hitler generally condoned his attitude, there were many repressive measures introduced by Bormann, which Hitler felt compelled to countermand."
Hoffmann's words here are corroborated by Hitler's adjutant Otto Dietrich to which in his memoirs he stated:
"On the other hand he [Hitler] did not hold back the hotheads in the Party, Himmler and especially Bormann, who incessantly attacked the churches. On the contrary, he [Hitler] supported them and encouraged them by his private, violently antichurch remarks."
Source:
Heinrich Hoffmann: Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, 100 Bild-Dokumente aus dem Leben des Führers, 201.-220. Tsd., Zeitgeschichte-Verlag, Berlin, [1933] and [1942-1943]
Hitler Was My Friend: The Memoirs of Hitler’s Photographer by Heinrich Hoffmann
The Hitler I knew: memoirs of the Third Reich's press chief by Otto Dietrich
🏆12
𝐀𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐍𝐒_𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧𝐫𝐲_𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐞'𝐬 𝐣𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐧-𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐬 𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬
NSHE Admin "Plot" created a funny larp of a tierlist ranking who is the most and least subversive to his standards and unsurprisingly he favors jews and browns over people who show NSDAP documents and defend Hitler's honor.
A great example is the fact that he ranked (S) Völkisch Spirit as infinitely more subversive than the jew (C) Ben Shapiro.
NSHeathenry's advocacy for National Socialism and Hitler is so easily present when we look at what has been posted outlining its ideas. Examples being:
Hitler's speeches on the importance of the racial idea
Hitler's speeches on the Almighty
Hitler's 1923 interview on socialism
Quote from Mein Kampf on racial-mixing
Quote from Hitler's second book on eugenic practices
National Socialism is a biological worldview
Hitler's speech on the law of Eternal Struggle
Hitler as the relentless enemy of Bolshevism
NSHeathenry's official side channel 'Hitler was not a Zionist':
Hitler's 1920 speech against the zionist idea of the state + Mein Kampf on zionism
Germany policy document on the Palestine question
Official Gestapo arrest list of zionist organizations
NSDAP document on the removal of all jewish mischlinge from the Wehrmacht
Völkischer Beobachter article on zionism
NSDAP ideological training booklet on zionism
To say NSHeathenry is subversive is a blatant lie as not only do they defend Hitler, but also are explicitly on the forefront of debunking the mainstream claims of pro-Zionism in NS. What NSHeathenry does that not many channels do is discuss the nuance in Hitler's personal religious convictions as shown purely by documents/testimonies.
NSHeathenry gladly honored Hitler on his birthday in 2026 yet no posts in NS_Heathenry_Exposed of doing so exists.
SEE: NSHEATHENRY'S STATEMENT ON MODERN POLITICAL CHRISTIANITY
NSHE Admin "Plot" created a funny larp of a tierlist ranking who is the most and least subversive to his standards and unsurprisingly he favors jews and browns over people who show NSDAP documents and defend Hitler's honor.
A great example is the fact that he ranked (S) Völkisch Spirit as infinitely more subversive than the jew (C) Ben Shapiro.
NSHeathenry's advocacy for National Socialism and Hitler is so easily present when we look at what has been posted outlining its ideas. Examples being:
Hitler's speeches on the importance of the racial idea
Hitler's speeches on the Almighty
Hitler's 1923 interview on socialism
Quote from Mein Kampf on racial-mixing
Quote from Hitler's second book on eugenic practices
National Socialism is a biological worldview
Hitler's speech on the law of Eternal Struggle
Hitler as the relentless enemy of Bolshevism
NSHeathenry's official side channel 'Hitler was not a Zionist':
Hitler's 1920 speech against the zionist idea of the state + Mein Kampf on zionism
Germany policy document on the Palestine question
Official Gestapo arrest list of zionist organizations
NSDAP document on the removal of all jewish mischlinge from the Wehrmacht
Völkischer Beobachter article on zionism
NSDAP ideological training booklet on zionism
To say NSHeathenry is subversive is a blatant lie as not only do they defend Hitler, but also are explicitly on the forefront of debunking the mainstream claims of pro-Zionism in NS. What NSHeathenry does that not many channels do is discuss the nuance in Hitler's personal religious convictions as shown purely by documents/testimonies.
NSHeathenry gladly honored Hitler on his birthday in 2026 yet no posts in NS_Heathenry_Exposed of doing so exists.
SEE: NSHEATHENRY'S STATEMENT ON MODERN POLITICAL CHRISTIANITY
🏆22
𝐍𝐒_𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧𝐫𝐲_𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐛𝐲 𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫
Ｐａｒｔ （１／２）
The speech posted here isn't actually as contradictory as what their interpretation portrays. It isn't fundamentally opposed to our side as Hitler portrayed God/Nature as synonymous in establishing the laws that dominate the universe as morality and not simply appealing to the bible for morality.
[READ THIS]
Onto some more evidence that supports this would be that according to Hitler all of life is bounded by struggle in addition to the fact that the universe follows only the laws of nature and natural selection that humanity cannot eliminate, only might makes right in the end as any other morality based on love cannot prevail over it. We can only know one law, that of which only allows the strongest to prevail over the weak. Due to this, the foundation of the NS state can only be based on the "only the laws of life".
Some think that because Hitler spoke so often about praying to God that he believed in a God that intervened in history. That, however, would be to ignore the times he disparaged prayer and suggested that humans only receive from God what they earn by their own efforts. In September 1938 at the Nuremberg Party Congress, he stated that:
"Our humility is the unconditional bowing before and respect for the DIVINE laws of existence known to us humans. Our prayer means: courageous fulfillment of the duties arising from them." [1]
The German people were supposed to pray by helping themselves and by dint of their own power, not by saying words to God:
"The Lord God has never helped a lazy person. He also helps no coward. He also helps no people that does not want to help itself. The principle applies in the greatest sense: People, help yourself, then the Lord God will not deny you his help!" [2]
Ｐａｒｔ （１／２）
The speech posted here isn't actually as contradictory as what their interpretation portrays. It isn't fundamentally opposed to our side as Hitler portrayed God/Nature as synonymous in establishing the laws that dominate the universe as morality and not simply appealing to the bible for morality.
[READ THIS]
Onto some more evidence that supports this would be that according to Hitler all of life is bounded by struggle in addition to the fact that the universe follows only the laws of nature and natural selection that humanity cannot eliminate, only might makes right in the end as any other morality based on love cannot prevail over it. We can only know one law, that of which only allows the strongest to prevail over the weak. Due to this, the foundation of the NS state can only be based on the "only the laws of life".
Some think that because Hitler spoke so often about praying to God that he believed in a God that intervened in history. That, however, would be to ignore the times he disparaged prayer and suggested that humans only receive from God what they earn by their own efforts. In September 1938 at the Nuremberg Party Congress, he stated that:
"Our humility is the unconditional bowing before and respect for the DIVINE laws of existence known to us humans. Our prayer means: courageous fulfillment of the duties arising from them." [1]
The German people were supposed to pray by helping themselves and by dint of their own power, not by saying words to God:
"The Lord God has never helped a lazy person. He also helps no coward. He also helps no people that does not want to help itself. The principle applies in the greatest sense: People, help yourself, then the Lord God will not deny you his help!" [2]
🏆14