"THE SO-CALLED OLD TESTAMENT MUST BE ABOLISHED ONCE AND FOR ALL AS A BOOK OF RELIGION. By this, the unsuccessful attempt of the last 1,500 years to make us spiritually into Jews will be ELIMINATED."

— Alfred Rosenberg

Source: Myth of the 20th Century p.426

@NSHeathenry

All of the old content has been deleted. The channel will remain like this from now on. Both sides of this conflict certainly had their own rights and wrongs, that's just a fact. Our opinion regarding the Faith of the NSDAP is still the same. National Socialism is undoubtedly Christian.

If you want to see good content and actual refutals of NS Heathenry's content, go to the community chat "National Socialists United". The owner, MH, [who's refutals we have forwarded here in the past] and the majority of the community members there are practically the only people [which we know of] who actually refute RaceFirst without slandering him.

We would also like to note that it's not just us who got scammed by Dietrich, it's also the owner of NSDAP was Christian who almost certainly had no idea this is who Dietrich really was. Perhaps there is even more people who fell victim to this deceitful pharisee.

Any slander against us that may come after we abandon this channel is more than likely just that, slander; nonsensical lies. I will say this though, the old owner who originally created this channel did not intend for it to turn out like this, he did not intend for us to slander anybody [with or without our knowledge], it's a pity that this catholic kike "G59/Dietrich" had to ruin it whilst also slandering innocent people for his own personal entertainment.

Once again, we send our deepest apologies to RaceFirst and any of the other members of NS Heathenry who we may have slandered. That's not what the goal of this channel was.

I am more than happy that the remaining admins are at least honorable enough to acknowledge this fatal mistake with me.

If we ever do decide to start posting on the channel again it's gonna be in a honorable manner without any personal drama. Although I doubt we will as each admin has his own obligations unlike that no-lifer g59 who filled our channel with nonsense. I am happy that the owner of NS Heathenry conducted himself honorably and accepted our apology instead of making fun of us like a child. We really do appreciate it and wish every White man regardless of religious confession a good life filled with joy. May God be with us all.

Thank you to everybody who tuned in to watch this hilariously stupid online drama lol.

♥️

RaceFirst full Dox

We would like to apologize to RaceFirst for the fake dox. g59 completely scammed us.

It's unfortunate that it took us so long to realize this. We will be taking down the dox and any other misinformation from our channel shortly after this message.

Once again, our deepest apologies.

So not only do we have proof that the creator (OstKrieg/G59) of RaceFirst's 'dox' admitted that it was fake, but the original slander channels spreading it admitted it too. The importance of this shines when you realize that its not just OstKrieg admitting it, but that the childish drama that happened between 2023-2024 was all just a nothingburger to many others too.

The slander against him shows that Christian "NS" crowd will believe anything they see as long as it supports them. The original channel (formerly named "⚡️⚡️NS Heathens Exposed⚡️⚡️") sponsoring the dox not long after sending it, went against its creator OstKrieg himself after the realization of it being faked and used as slander and instead changed the channel name to "G59/Dietrich Exposed" to which they themselves apologized to the entirety of NSHeathenry. The proof of this being the original channel is shown below:

Receipts:
https://t.me/saggioLegionBroadcasting/2101
https://t.me/saggioLegionBroadcasting/2102

(Messages have been saved incase they try to deny or delete any of it)

[Uncompressed]

ENDLESS BROWN SUPPORT FOR NSHE

Just like how one of their admins that does propaganda is a hispanic shitskin, the same can be applied for the people who are friends with its promoters.

Link

Any Official writings published by the NSDAP that contradicts christian dogma is always automatically dismissed as some "random pagan" insignificant member of the party. Funny how that works being that they cite Der Schulungsbrief too? Unfortunately for them they are wrong.

If we look at the original post they are referring to regarding the NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1942 „Das Reich und Europa siegen“ (Reichsorganisationsleiter der NSDAP), only scrolling back a couple pages shows that Head of the German labor front Robert Ley was the one that wrote it. Thanks for admitting that such a significant member of the NSDAP was not christian.

What this proves is that they don't care to look into what disagrees with them as this would only take a few seconds of investigation to see the article author.

[Look for yourself]

What does our opposition do when they see a quote so strangely contradictory to their views? Simply call it fabricated.

According to him, the article "Volkskampf gegen die internationale Verbrecherpresse! Gegen die jüdische Weltpressevergiftung!" written by Adolf Hitler in a special edition of the Völkischer Beobachter (144a) apparently "does not match" and appears "entirely fabricated" even though there's not only full transcription of the article, but that the article (144a) was specifically mentioned by the official NSDAP published book "Geschichte des "Völkischen Beobachters" und des Zentralverlages der NSDAP., Franz Eher Nachf" on the history of the Völkischer Beobachter. It reads:

"Issue 144a is a special edition against the Jewish-Marxist press scum. Its first page contains an essay by Adolf Hitler, "Gegen die jüdische Weltpressevergiftung" as well as further contributions by Alfred Rosenberg, Hans-Jörg Maurer, and Georg Jung. The issue also includes an excerpt from the NSDAP program."

As noted in the book, it makes clear reference that it was published after August. So they are wrong on the dates and the existence of the article.

[Link to the tweet]

The owner of NS_Heathenry_Exposed was so baffled by Hitler's speech regarding the catholic church that he immediately brushed it off as being a source-less piece despite being able to hear the original audio for himself.

Though of course, we will entertain this idea of a speech ONLY needing a textual citation since the source is so easy to find. From the official NSDAP newspaper "Völkischer Beobachter" on April 27, 1942, we are able to see the full transcription of the speech:

"Denn Europa ist zerfallen teils aus der natürlichen Uberalterung der nach dem Zusammenbruch des römischen Weltreiches führenden kontinentalen Macht, teils infolge der Unterspülung der Elemente, die diesem damaligen Zentrum des Abendlandes die volkliche und staatliche Grundlage gegeben hatten. Im Zwiespalt der antiken römischen Staatsidee einerseits und der nicht minder imperiale Ansprüche erhebenden römischen Kirche anderseits wurden die Fundamente der zentralen Staatsbildung Europas allmählich zerstört."

His appeal to the book "Adolf Hitler: Collection of Speeches" by Max Domarus shows how historically illiterate he is as he does not know that every single speech Hitler has ever gave cannot possibly be in a single book due to the fact that Hitler gave so many speeches. (including massive errors found in various parts of the book) Hence why we are able to find speeches in the bundesarchiv that are not present in his book. The original source will always be better.

Other sources for Hitler's speeches exist too.

Source: Völkischer Beobachter, 27. April 1942 "Die Rede des Führers" p.1

[Link to the tweet]

The illiteracy surrounding Mein Kampf from the owner of NS_Heathenry_Exposed is concerning
Ｐａｒｔ （１／２）

His standard for proving that things were somehow changed/removed/added into the Dalton translation is not based upon using the original German for which he was pressed to do, but based on another English translation. This is like seeing which Bible verse is more reliable based on comparing different translations rather than using the original text. It's simply retarded.

After one user showed the full original German of the passage about Christianity in Mein Kampf along with another user pressing him to do a comparison with the original German, he simply ignored it and still went on about using the Stalag translation for the basis of his claims. That is because when comparing the original German to what Dalton's modern translation, there isn't anything wrong with it in the first place.

Onto the issues with the Stalag edition, it originated from the James Murphy translation to which an unknown NSDAP member used Murphy's first draft of the translations upon he was at first denied access to after leaving Germany. Months later he made new translations based off of new revisions of his lost original manuscript which lead to the actual publication of the James Murphy translation (Hurst and Blackett).

"The solution to this mystery becomes relatively apparent when one becomes aware that in 1936, when Murphy was working in Berlin for the Nazi Propaganda Ministry, Goebbels commissioned him to produce an English language translation of the full text of Mein Kampf, a task he completed before leaving Germany in 1938. Once Murphy returned to England and Hurst & Blackett learned of his translation they expressed an interest in it, but Murphy had not even kept a copy of his text. It had been left in a locked file at the Ministry in Berlin, and since he was by then persona non grata with the Nazis, Murphy was denied access to it. At great risk, his wife returned alone to Berlin to try to persuade party officials to release it, but she failed. Nevertheless, she persisted and eventually was able to locate his former typist who relinquished to her the handwritten draft. During the next three months Murphy revised his original version and the resulting text was printed by Hurst & Blackett in March 1939. Why the Nazis decided to reprint Murphy's draft version is far from clear. They could not hope to distribute it in the major English-language markets, since British and American publishers claimed the right to do so under contract with the Zentralverlag. Although the Germans momentarily contemplated challenging such claims in foreign courts, they thought better of it, and allowed these English-language translations to persist. Yet in Germany there was no demand for another English version, such as that produced by the Zentralverlag."

[Link to the tweet]

On June 9th of 1944, Hans Frank the head of the German government in German-occupied Poland wrote in his diary that

“in order to fight the Jews it was essential that we (Germany) took Poland because here in Poland the natural fertility of the Jewish people lived (thrived) to a degree found nowhere else. Since the extermination of the Jews in Poland, the Jewish future is completely over, purely in terms of blood, because it was only here where Jews were having (many) children.”

according to the same diary you quoted, he says that the Holocaust really happened

Again ausrottung meant something completely different at that time than it does today

For anyone questioning the meaning of “auszurotten", here’s a 1943 German Foreign Office document in which “auszurotten" (the verbal-noun form: “Ausrottung”) is used to translate the term "annihilate" in an English statement made by the American rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise into German. This showcases that the term was used in this precise way by the regime in this period.

The Admin of NS_Heathenry_Exposed uses holocaust believer arguments to deny real authentic documents

In attempts to disregard historical documents such as Hans Frank's diary (relating to religion), he pulls up a quote from his diary in which is says "Seit der Ausrottung der Juden in Polen"

Now, you would expect that the admin "Heydrich PFP Guy" is writing down his own original thoughts on this matter? Answer: No. Not only does he shamelessly copy and paste word for word what this holocaust believer wrote on his substack, but he doesn't seem to fully understand its arguments. |Ausrottung, from aus+rotten, lit. ‘to root out.’ Notably, people (like animals, plants, etc.) can be “rooted out” without killing them; they are simply picked up and displaced. |By the implications of this argument, that means according to him we should believe in the legitimacy of the Holocaust.

Heydrich PFP Guy's argument completely falls apart when we look at Adolf Hitler using the word "Ausrottung" in a 1944 speech in relation to all of Jewry:

"Daß das jüdische Ziel der Vernichtung Europas am Ende die sichere Ausrottung des Judentums in Europa bringen wird, ist daber außer jedem Zweifel, und daß der Versuch der Engländer und Amerikaner, Europa und Deutschland durch den Bolschewismus zu vernichten und das deutsche Volk durch die moskowitischen Würger zu züchtigen, d. h. ausrotten zu lassen, nur das Gegenteil erreicht, d. b. die Bolschewisierung der angelsächsischen Welt selbst, ist ebenso sicher."

In accordance to Heydrich PFP Guy's argument on the word "Ausrottung", that must mean that Adolf Hitler proved the holocaust to be true because he himself proclaimed the "Ausrottung des Judentums". It simply makes no sense. No one should take this guy seriously.

Source: BArch NS 22/1240 Der Führer am 1. Januar 1944 p.26 | Official transcription of the speech can also be found in the "Völkischer Beobachter" 1/2. Januar 1944 Seite 2

NS_Heathenry_Exposed removing context to manipulate the meaning of Hitler's words

When NSHE was confronted on the idea that "the NSDAP recognized that Jews and Israelites were two opposite peoples", he was shown Hitler's 1920 speech in which Hitler said Abraham pimped his wife and Jews after Abraham’s time have followed his immoral example,

Instead of actually responding to that quote where Hitler is clearly denouncing Abraham, NSHE sends another excerpt of the same speech to which his meaning isn't found in the text. He only shows one half of it where at the end says in NSHE's own interpretation that the conflicts between the "Jews of the tribe of Judah (and Caleb)" were immense. So what comes after that, you may ask?

"first of all, at that time the gulf between the jews of the tribes of judah and calab and the northern israelite tribes was still unprecedented, and it was only david who managed to bridge this gulf and gradually create a connection through the unified cult of the god yahweh. we know very well that this cult [of jews] only chose jerusalem as its sole seat very late, and that it was only from that moment on that the jewish people were given a headquarters, but just as today, for example, berlin or new york or warsaw, etc"
[Source]

So after the conflict between these Jewish/Israelite tribes, it was solved by using the cult of the God Yahweh to break that conflict. Even in this same source Hitler is calling the tribe of Judah jewish. How can you be this stupid as to quote that while saying the NSDAP believed the Jews/Israelites are opposites?

In this same exact speech, NSHE intentionally ignores all of the sections where Hitler says:
1.) The Bible was written by Jews + was not written by an Anti-Semite
2.) The Jews were the greatest propagators of Christianity to promote it against the Roman empire

Other sources on Hitler's thoughts on the Israelites/Yahweh: HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE
NSDAP Literature on the Old Testament: Der Schulungsbrief 1937 #03, Der Schulungsbrief 1935 #12, Der Schulungsbrief 1936 #11, Völkischer Beobachter, June 8, 1944

NS_Heathenry_Exposed changes up his incoherent translation of Hitler's speech in Platterhof

First, NSHE publishes a meme to which they portray Hitler to say "I do not defend an anti-christian principle." as a complete sentence when it is in fact a context bound clause. The context and words of this matters as it shows how incoherent this translation is. As NSHeathenry already addressed, this statement does not say "I do not" but rather "This is not" (Das ist kein). So Hitler is describing the nature of the principle in itself rather than expressing a direct personal denial. The word used in the original transcript says "unchristlicher".

Now why is this relevant? The entire context surrounding this quote explains it:

"I have therefore introduced this principle [of intolerance] into German political life—not a new one, for communism had long since possessed this insight. BUT CHRISTIANITY ALSO POSSESSED THIS INSIGHT. I must point out to you, gentlemen: This is not an UNCHRISTIAN principle that I advocate. Christianity has destroyed others who did not want to think as prescribed, only not as easily and quickly as we do, but more slowly. We do it with a bullet, and there they did it with fire, they burned them."

Now all of a sudden, NSHE publishes a new translation (see image) to which it says "This is not an anti-Christian principle that I support". The meaning of "This is" and "I do not" changes the central context massively. Unchristian ≠ Anti-christian

Here is why NSHE's translation is incoherent: It shows that Hitler is saying that his introduction of intolerance is nothing new, saying both communism and christianity had this same insight/understanding. Because of this fact that christianity is "intolerant", it is therefore NOT ("ist kein") an UNCHRISTIAN ("unchristlicher") principle. The entire context of the passage is incoherent to their first translation that they push.

Therefore this quote is not at all a pro-christian quote. It's simply a historical example used for justification to be intolerant towards enemies of the war and rightly so.

In this same exact speech, Hitler says: Tolerance is a human concept, During WW1 he carried Schopenhauer's books instead of the Bible

SEE: Hitler affirming Christianity's intolerance embodied the Jewish mentality in Mein Kampf