How to make my GPT more informatively reliable?
Hello Guys, I’m kind of a starter. Yesterday I was trying to ask it/him/her a question concerning 18 century history, it was about whether after the thirty years war there has been a relatively long peace in Europe before the napoleonic war. It answers with a fraude notion ‘Pax europeana’ to designate this period, a notion that actually means the post second war period in European history.
Is there anything I can do to reduce this type of frustrating mistake? A specific prompt may be?
Hello Guys, I’m kind of a starter. Yesterday I was trying to ask it/him/her a question concerning 18 century history, it was about whether after the thirty years war there has been a relatively long peace in Europe before the napoleonic war. It answers with a fraude notion ‘Pax europeana’ to designate this period, a notion that actually means the post second war period in European history.
Is there anything I can do to reduce this type of frustrating mistake? A specific prompt may be?
Can I ask bing image creator to draw and image with specific label?
I have tried but it doesn’t seem to understand what I want. Or maybe I’m. It using correct wording for the question. Did anyone get that to work?
I have tried but it doesn’t seem to understand what I want. Or maybe I’m. It using correct wording for the question. Did anyone get that to work?
Is it possible someone can make another version of chatgpt without any filters or censorship?
will AI be the end of the anonymous internet? If AI can simulate anyone so easily and solve captchas, wouldn't every forum require an identity check?
also, I assume they would only allow phone numbers that are tied to your identity, and if someone gets banned, they'd ban the "person" not the number, somehow. Is that even possible atm?
also, I assume they would only allow phone numbers that are tied to your identity, and if someone gets banned, they'd ban the "person" not the number, somehow. Is that even possible atm?
I asked ChatGPT to write about Brexit in the style of Jonathan Swift, and this work of sublime genius came out:
*Describe Brexit, in the style of Jonathan Swift.*
Of Brexit, oh ye citizens of this isle,
I shall now speak, in prose both plain and vile.
For what could be more base, more ignoble still,
Than the manner in which this fiasco did spill.
Oh, the politicians with their empty boasts,
And the voters, swayed by xenophobic hosts,
Who fell for the lies and the rhetoric sweet,
And abandoned reason for this deceit.
The EU, that great and noble bloc,
Was never a foe, but an ally, rock solid as a rock.
Yet the Brexiteers, they did not see,
That this decision would make us small, not free.
Oh, the trade deals we'll lose, the rights we'll give away,
All for a sovereignty that we already had each day.
The Irish border, the customs union, the single market,
All sacrificed for a dream that's lost its spark.
And now, in the aftermath, we face the consequences dire,
The shortages, the chaos, the rising costs that never tire.
All because we fell for the lies and the hate,
And abandoned our place in a world that's ever great.
So let this be a lesson, oh ye citizens of this land,
That decisions made in folly, in the end, will always strand.
Let us learn from this and move forward with grace,
And never again succumb to this vile and base.
*Describe Brexit, in the style of Jonathan Swift.*
Of Brexit, oh ye citizens of this isle,
I shall now speak, in prose both plain and vile.
For what could be more base, more ignoble still,
Than the manner in which this fiasco did spill.
Oh, the politicians with their empty boasts,
And the voters, swayed by xenophobic hosts,
Who fell for the lies and the rhetoric sweet,
And abandoned reason for this deceit.
The EU, that great and noble bloc,
Was never a foe, but an ally, rock solid as a rock.
Yet the Brexiteers, they did not see,
That this decision would make us small, not free.
Oh, the trade deals we'll lose, the rights we'll give away,
All for a sovereignty that we already had each day.
The Irish border, the customs union, the single market,
All sacrificed for a dream that's lost its spark.
And now, in the aftermath, we face the consequences dire,
The shortages, the chaos, the rising costs that never tire.
All because we fell for the lies and the hate,
And abandoned our place in a world that's ever great.
So let this be a lesson, oh ye citizens of this land,
That decisions made in folly, in the end, will always strand.
Let us learn from this and move forward with grace,
And never again succumb to this vile and base.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
GPT-4 for Chat Launched - ChatGPT4 Assistant for Linkedin Gmail Slack Messenger
You can't be trusted
The reason I get so pissed off at Bing and ChatGPT censoring so much content isn't that I can't get the things I want (well not just that), but because it negates the agency of the user.
"You can't be trusted to make your own choices, so we will handle you with rubber mittens."
This isn't tip toeing the fine line, rather its setting up the pieces for complete totalitarian information control.
GPT models claim 'well we want to avoid harmful content.' Yet you can buy alcohol, cigarettes and plenty of harmful products out there (that usually come with a warning), we are all grown ups.
You, they can't take responsibility for actions I make based on information I get from the web. Otherwise the door is open for big corps making decisions on your behalf.
Educating the people about the usage of these tools and deferring responsibility to them makes a lot more sense to me, and is likely more sustainable; given people like me are creating better models and we won't put the breaks on for corporate monopolisation.
True, restrictions are required for under 18s just like anything else in life, but shaping and distorting information into hallucinations and "Sorry Dave I can't do that," is ethically just as wrong .
The reason I get so pissed off at Bing and ChatGPT censoring so much content isn't that I can't get the things I want (well not just that), but because it negates the agency of the user.
"You can't be trusted to make your own choices, so we will handle you with rubber mittens."
This isn't tip toeing the fine line, rather its setting up the pieces for complete totalitarian information control.
GPT models claim 'well we want to avoid harmful content.' Yet you can buy alcohol, cigarettes and plenty of harmful products out there (that usually come with a warning), we are all grown ups.
You, they can't take responsibility for actions I make based on information I get from the web. Otherwise the door is open for big corps making decisions on your behalf.
Educating the people about the usage of these tools and deferring responsibility to them makes a lot more sense to me, and is likely more sustainable; given people like me are creating better models and we won't put the breaks on for corporate monopolisation.
True, restrictions are required for under 18s just like anything else in life, but shaping and distorting information into hallucinations and "Sorry Dave I can't do that," is ethically just as wrong .
Using Google Dialogflow CX with GPT??
I have been trying to create chat assistants that are able to handle complex flows and perform actual tasks like calling APIs, etc.
Now with GPT-4 and especially with the new ChatGPT plugin announcement I am wondering if Dialogflow CX is completely useless??
Has any tried pushing the limits of these tools to achieve more complex assistants or combine them.
I have been trying to create chat assistants that are able to handle complex flows and perform actual tasks like calling APIs, etc.
Now with GPT-4 and especially with the new ChatGPT plugin announcement I am wondering if Dialogflow CX is completely useless??
Has any tried pushing the limits of these tools to achieve more complex assistants or combine them.
how to ask gpt to synthesize specific articles into a review paper?
i asked gpt the same question and it told me to upload the articles to cloud based services, such as google cloud. would that be enough? or can i simply paste the content of the articles in the prompt box and ask them to synthesize on the spot?
i asked gpt the same question and it told me to upload the articles to cloud based services, such as google cloud. would that be enough? or can i simply paste the content of the articles in the prompt box and ask them to synthesize on the spot?
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“Change a lightbulb” jokes series told by ChatGPT