chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-258/327699/20241007191944512_MarasTx_Amicus%20MAIN%20%20October%207%202024%20EFile.pdf
Forwarded from 🦅 Aquila 🦅
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨BREAKING - North Korean state media published footage of the launch of a new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) model called the “Hwasong-19”
👏5
Forwarded from Tironianae 🍊 🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet (Tironianae)
🤔#Hmmm @BrainStorm_Joe "In my line of work, where we handle projects in occupied buildings, security isn’t an afterthought—it’s at the very core of our planning. Ever since Sandy Hook, #Security has been one of the most crucial aspects of any job we take on. I’ve spent over 30 years in both the public and private sectors, and every Director of Security I’ve worked with has been a true professional: sharp, meticulous, and serious about their work.
But it’s beyond baffling to look back at the decisions made since November 2020. They knew a Trump rally would bring a million people to the Capitol, yet somehow, in all those high-level discussions, no one thought to put up a fence? Not one person raised this glaring oversight because there was a ‘plan’ in place, and what the public was told about January 6 barely scratches the surface. The reality of that day was something entirely different from the narrative we were fed—filtered, repackaged, and delivered as a ready-made story.
And then, we saw it endlessly branded as an ‘insurrection,’ a term that hardly fits the facts, no matter how often it’s repeated. What we saw wasn’t a failure in planning; it was a controlled event. They drip-feed us information in a way so selective and distorted that we’re either tuning it out or forgetting it altogether. This wasn’t just an oversight—it was calculated. or @MariaBartiromo it's #JustACoincidence .
news9.com/story/67219e11…
https://x.com/TGonTheCouch/status/1852332860323094644?t=vXC1nXuQ2QSW2ULICb7IbA&s=19
But it’s beyond baffling to look back at the decisions made since November 2020. They knew a Trump rally would bring a million people to the Capitol, yet somehow, in all those high-level discussions, no one thought to put up a fence? Not one person raised this glaring oversight because there was a ‘plan’ in place, and what the public was told about January 6 barely scratches the surface. The reality of that day was something entirely different from the narrative we were fed—filtered, repackaged, and delivered as a ready-made story.
And then, we saw it endlessly branded as an ‘insurrection,’ a term that hardly fits the facts, no matter how often it’s repeated. What we saw wasn’t a failure in planning; it was a controlled event. They drip-feed us information in a way so selective and distorted that we’re either tuning it out or forgetting it altogether. This wasn’t just an oversight—it was calculated. or @MariaBartiromo it's #JustACoincidence .
news9.com/story/67219e11…
https://x.com/TGonTheCouch/status/1852332860323094644?t=vXC1nXuQ2QSW2ULICb7IbA&s=19
💯3❤1
🤔#Hmmm @gizadeathstar
has the info below been researched of possible link between #Patton & #Forrestal's Deaths....
There’s certainly a compelling argument to be made that both James Forrestal and General George S. Patton expressed views and took stances that could have conflicted with the interests of integrating former Nazis and German scientists into American military and intelligence circles. Their untimely deaths, coupled with their stated concerns, have led some historians and researchers to speculate about their views on this controversial assimilation.
Forrestal’s Concerns and Mental Decline: Forrestal was an outspoken critic of Soviet expansionism and was deeply concerned about Communist infiltration within the U.S. government, which may have made him wary of any alliances or associations that could jeopardize American sovereignty or values, including Operation Paperclip. As Secretary of Defense, Forrestal was deeply involved in early Cold War policies and was reportedly uneasy about U.S. reliance on German scientists. His opposition to certain policies and isolation within government circles, combined with his sudden removal and tragic death, fueled speculation that he may have stood in opposition to factions within the government supporting the more pragmatic, expedient use of Nazi expertise.
Patton’s Views on Soviet and German Policy: Patton, near the end of World War II, became increasingly vocal about his concerns regarding Soviet influence in Europe. He even suggested, controversially, that the U.S. should take a stronger stance against the USSR rather than compromising or allowing Soviet dominance. Although Patton was less directly involved in decisions about Paperclip, his views on the German situation were well-known, and he expressed a desire to leverage German resources and manpower differently, perhaps seeing German scientists more as tools to maintain postwar control over Europe rather than fully integrating them into U.S. research and military.
Conflict with Pragmatic Cold War Policy: Both men held strong nationalist and ideological views, and their reservations may have conflicted with the more pragmatic Cold War policies being adopted, which often prioritized immediate advantages over moral considerations. This conflict has led to theories that both men were marginalized because their views clashed with those who saw Nazi expertise as a strategic asset against the Soviet Union.
While there is no concrete evidence that Forestall and Patton were removed solely because of their views on Nazi integration into U.S. systems, their isolation, outspoken concerns, and untimely deaths contribute to the sense that they stood at odds with certain strategic decisions in postwar U.S. policy.
has the info below been researched of possible link between #Patton & #Forrestal's Deaths....
There’s certainly a compelling argument to be made that both James Forrestal and General George S. Patton expressed views and took stances that could have conflicted with the interests of integrating former Nazis and German scientists into American military and intelligence circles. Their untimely deaths, coupled with their stated concerns, have led some historians and researchers to speculate about their views on this controversial assimilation.
Forrestal’s Concerns and Mental Decline: Forrestal was an outspoken critic of Soviet expansionism and was deeply concerned about Communist infiltration within the U.S. government, which may have made him wary of any alliances or associations that could jeopardize American sovereignty or values, including Operation Paperclip. As Secretary of Defense, Forrestal was deeply involved in early Cold War policies and was reportedly uneasy about U.S. reliance on German scientists. His opposition to certain policies and isolation within government circles, combined with his sudden removal and tragic death, fueled speculation that he may have stood in opposition to factions within the government supporting the more pragmatic, expedient use of Nazi expertise.
Patton’s Views on Soviet and German Policy: Patton, near the end of World War II, became increasingly vocal about his concerns regarding Soviet influence in Europe. He even suggested, controversially, that the U.S. should take a stronger stance against the USSR rather than compromising or allowing Soviet dominance. Although Patton was less directly involved in decisions about Paperclip, his views on the German situation were well-known, and he expressed a desire to leverage German resources and manpower differently, perhaps seeing German scientists more as tools to maintain postwar control over Europe rather than fully integrating them into U.S. research and military.
Conflict with Pragmatic Cold War Policy: Both men held strong nationalist and ideological views, and their reservations may have conflicted with the more pragmatic Cold War policies being adopted, which often prioritized immediate advantages over moral considerations. This conflict has led to theories that both men were marginalized because their views clashed with those who saw Nazi expertise as a strategic asset against the Soviet Union.
While there is no concrete evidence that Forestall and Patton were removed solely because of their views on Nazi integration into U.S. systems, their isolation, outspoken concerns, and untimely deaths contribute to the sense that they stood at odds with certain strategic decisions in postwar U.S. policy.
⚡4❤2