Sleepy Joe to address the nation tomorrow evening at 8pm

👀👀👀👀👀👀
Yesterday President Biden delegates power to Secretary of State Anthony Blinken. His biological father Donald Blinken founded Warburg Pincus who created CrowdStrike that took down Microsoft. Anthony Blinken’s step father is none other than Samuel Pisar. Pisar served as the trusted lawyer of Mossad spy Robert Maxwell and Pisar became Epstein’s lawyer after Maxwell died.

~T edit: Shared this yesterday, but there's more. His stepfather was a friend, business partner, and confidant of Ghislaine Maxwell’s father, Robert Maxwell.

https://x.com/cowboycrypto313/status/1815584789438529710?t=72H4X60Th3SI5aOg-h_KlA&s=19

How does the succession of President to Vice President happen case of a Presidents death or aBOUT TO DIE
ChatGPT

In the United States, the succession of the President to the Vice President in case of death or incapacity is governed by the 25th Amendment to the Constitution and the Presidential Succession Act of 1947. Here’s how it generally works:

Death or Incapacity of the President: If the President dies, resigns, or becomes incapacitated, the Vice President immediately assumes the office of President.

Vacancy in the Office of Vice President: If there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President (either due to death, resignation, or assuming the Presidency), the President nominates a new Vice President who must be confirmed by a majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Further Succession: If both the President and Vice President are unable to serve (e.g., due to death, resignation, or incapacity), the Presidential Succession Act specifies that the Speaker of the House of Representatives would become President, followed by the President pro tempore of the Senate, and then the Cabinet members in the order of their departments' creation.

These procedures ensure continuity of leadership in the event of unforeseen circumstances affecting the President and Vice President.
is there any official actions that must take place
ChatGPT

Yes, several official actions and procedures must take place when a President dies, resigns, or is incapacitated. Here’s a detailed breakdown:
1. Death of the President

Vice President Assumes Office: Upon the death of the President, the Vice President automatically becomes President. This is immediate and requires no formal procedure or swearing-in ceremony, although one is usually held for formality and public assurance.

Oath of Office: The new President typically takes the Presidential oath of office as soon as possible, though this is more ceremonial since the transition of power is immediate upon the President's death.

2. Resignation of the President

Formal Resignation Letter: The President must submit a written resignation to the Secretary of State. This has only happened once in U.S. history, when President Richard Nixon resigned in 1974.

Vice President Becomes President: Once the resignation is effective, the Vice President becomes President and takes the oath of office.

3. Incapacity of the President

25th Amendment Procedures:

Voluntary Declaration: If the President recognizes their incapacity, they can voluntarily transfer power to the Vice President by submitting a written declaration to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. This makes the Vice President the Acting President.

Involuntary Declaration: If the President is unable or unwilling to declare incapacity, the Vice President and a majority of the principal officers of the executive departments (the Cabinet) can declare the President incapacitated. This also makes the Vice President the Acting President. This declaration must be sent in writing to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House.

Restoration of Powers: The President can resume powers by declaring they are capable of performing duties. If there is disagreement (e.g., the Vice President and Cabinet disagree), Congress decides the matter, requiring a two-thirds vote in both Houses to prevent the President from resuming office.

4. Vacancy in the Vice Presidency

Nomination of a New Vice President: When the Vice President assumes the Presidency or if the Vice Presidency becomes vacant for any reason, the new President nominates a candidate for Vice President.

Congressional Confirmation: The nominee must be confirmed by a majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

5. Order of Succession Beyond Vice President

Presidential Succession Act of 1947: If both the President and Vice President are unable to serve, the line of succession is as follows:
Speaker of the House
President pro tempore of the Senate
Secretary of State
Secretary of the Treasury
Secretary of Defense
Attorney General
Secretary of the Interior
Secretary of Agriculture
Secretary of Commerce
Secretary of Labor
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Secretary of Transportation
Secretary of Energy
Secretary of Education
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Secretary of Homeland Security

Swearing-In: Any successor who assumes the presidency must take the Presidential oath of office.

6. Ceremonial and Administrative Actions

State Funeral: In the case of a President's death, a state funeral is typically held.

Notification of Congress and the Public: Official announcements are made to inform Congress and the public of the changes in leadership.

White House Transition: The White House staff and Secret Service adjust to accommodate the new President, including securing the Presidential residence and offices.

Historical Precedents

John Tyler (1841): Upon the death of President William Henry Harrison, Vice President John Tyler asserted his right to become President, setting the precedent that was later codified in the 25th Amendment.

Gerald Ford (1973-1974): After Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned, President Nixon nominated Gerald Ford as Vice President, who was then confirmed by Congress. When Nixon resigned in 1974, Ford became President and nominated Nelson Rockefeller as Vice President, who also had to be confirmed.

These actions ensure a smooth and constitutional transition of power in the U.S. government, maintaining stability and continuity of leadership.
Have any changes been made to Succession plan
ChatGPT

Yes, there have been significant changes to the presidential succession plan over the years. These changes have been made to clarify the process, address potential gaps, and ensure a smooth transition of power in various situations. Here's an overview of the key changes:
1. Original Constitutional Framework

Article II, Section 1, Clause 6: Initially, the U.S. Constitution provided that the Vice President would assume the "Powers and Duties" of the Presidency in the event of the President's removal, death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the office. However, it was unclear whether this meant the Vice President became the President or merely acted as President.

2. Presidential Succession Act of 1792

Order of Succession: This act established the initial line of succession, placing the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House after the Vice President.

3. Presidential Succession Act of 1886

Cabinet Officers Added: This act removed congressional leaders from the line of succession and placed cabinet officers in the order of the creation of their departments, starting with the Secretary of State.

4. Presidential Succession Act of 1947

Current Order of Succession: This act, signed into law by President Harry Truman, reinstated the Speaker of the House and President pro tempore of the Senate in the line of succession, followed by Cabinet members. The order established was:
Vice President
Speaker of the House of Representatives
President pro tempore of the Senate
Secretary of State
Secretary of the Treasury
Secretary of Defense
Attorney General
Secretary of the Interior
Secretary of Agriculture
Secretary of Commerce
Secretary of Labor
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Secretary of Transportation
Secretary of Energy
Secretary of Education
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Secretary of Homeland Security (added in 2006)

5. 25th Amendment (Ratified in 1967)

The 25th Amendment was a significant addition to the Constitution, providing clear guidelines on presidential succession and addressing ambiguities that existed before:

Section 1: Clarifies that the Vice President becomes President if the President dies, resigns, or is removed from office.

Section 2: Allows the President to nominate a Vice President if that office becomes vacant, with confirmation required by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Example: Gerald Ford's nomination and confirmation as Vice President following Spiro Agnew's resignation in 1973.

Section 3: Allows the President to voluntarily transfer power to the Vice President by declaring an inability to discharge the duties of the office, making the Vice President the Acting President. The President can later resume duties by declaring the ability to do so.
Examples:
President Ronald Reagan temporarily transferred power to Vice President George H.W. Bush during surgery in 1985.
President George W. Bush invoked this section during medical procedures in 2002 and 2007, temporarily transferring power to Vice President Dick Cheney.

Section 4: Provides a mechanism for the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet to declare the President unable to perform the duties of the office, making the Vice President the Acting President. This is the only section that has never been invoked.
Procedure for Disagreement: If the President contests the declaration of incapacity, Congress must decide, requiring a two-thirds vote in both Houses to keep the Vice President as Acting President.

6. Recent Considerations and Discussions

While no formal changes have been made since the addition of the Department of Homeland Security to the line of succession in 2006, there have been discussions and considerations regarding further changes:

Inclusion of Non-Elected Officials: Some have questioned whether Cabinet members, who are appointed rather than elected, should remain in the line of succession, particularly those with limited foreign policy experience.

Continuity of Government: Post-9/11 concerns have led to discussions about ensuring continuity of government in cases of catastrophic events that might affect multiple successors.

Legislative Proposals: Occasionally, proposals are made to modify the line of succession or to clarify specific scenarios not explicitly covered by existing laws.

7. Historical Applications

William Henry Harrison and John Tyler (1841): Harrison was the first President to die in office, leading to confusion over whether John Tyler would become President or merely act as President. Tyler assumed the full powers of the Presidency, setting a precedent later codified in the 25th Amendment.

Zachary Taylor and Millard Fillmore (1850): Fillmore succeeded Taylor upon his death, following the precedent set by Tyler.

Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson (1865): Johnson became President after Lincoln's assassination.

James A. Garfield and Chester A. Arthur (1881): After Garfield's death, Arthur assumed the Presidency.

William McKinley and Theodore Roosevelt (1901): Roosevelt succeeded McKinley after his assassination.

Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge (1923): Coolidge became President following Harding's death.

Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman (1945): Truman assumed the Presidency after Roosevelt's death during World War II, leading to significant discussions about succession procedures.

John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson (1963): Johnson became President following Kennedy's assassination, highlighting the need for a clearer succession plan, which contributed to the drafting of the 25th Amendment.

Conclusion

The Presidential Succession framework in the United States has evolved significantly over time, reflecting lessons learned from historical events and adapting to the complexities of modern governance. The current system, primarily defined by the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 and the 25th Amendment, aims to ensure a stable and orderly transition of power under various circumstances, providing clarity and continuity in leadership.
Did any of Trumps Executive orders effect this?
ChatGPT

No, former President Donald Trump's executive orders did not directly affect the presidential line of succession or the procedures outlined by the 25th Amendment and the Presidential Succession Act of 1947. The presidential succession order is primarily governed by constitutional amendments and federal statutes, which cannot be altered by executive orders alone.

However, Trump did issue executive orders related to continuity of government, which can indirectly influence how government functions in times of crisis. Here’s a look at relevant actions during his administration:
Executive Orders Related to Continuity of Government

Executive Order 13799 (2017) - Establishment of Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity:
Although this order was more focused on election integrity rather than succession, it reflected an interest in maintaining robust electoral processes, which are foundational to a stable government transition.

Executive Order 13961 (2020) - Governance and Integration of Federal Mission Resilience:
Issued on December 7, 2020, this order aimed to enhance the federal government's resilience and continuity of operations in the face of emergencies, disasters, or other disruptions.
It emphasized planning for continuity of government to ensure essential functions could continue, including national security and leadership transitions.
This order did not change the line of succession but underscored the importance of readiness for scenarios that could threaten government stability.

Executive Order 13919 (2020) - Ordering the Selected Reserve and Certain Members of the Individual Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty:
While primarily a response to COVID-19 and not directly related to succession, this order demonstrated the use of executive power in managing crises that could impact governmental operations and succession planning indirectly.

Legislative and Constitutional Authority

The Presidential Succession Act and the 25th Amendment are legislative and constitutional measures that define the line of succession and processes for transferring power. These are areas where executive orders cannot directly make changes.

Presidential Succession Act: Establishes the order of succession beyond the Vice President.
25th Amendment: Provides mechanisms for dealing with presidential incapacity and clarifies succession procedures.

Proposed Changes and Discussions

During Trump's presidency, there were discussions and concerns about presidential succession and the potential invocation of the 25th Amendment, particularly during the events surrounding the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot and Trump's subsequent impeachment.

25th Amendment Discussions: There were public and political discussions about the possible use of the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office, but these discussions did not lead to any changes in the succession laws.

Continuity of Government

Executive orders issued by Trump focused on continuity of government efforts are vital for ensuring that government operations can persist in emergencies. This planning includes:

Succession Planning: Ensuring that key roles in the government can be filled promptly in case of vacancies or incapacities.
Crisis Management: Enhancing the resilience of government functions to continue operations amid disruptions.
National Security: Maintaining leadership and control of essential government functions in times of national crises.

Conclusion

While Trump's executive orders did not directly alter the presidential line of succession, they emphasized the importance of preparedness and continuity of government operations. The line of succession remains governed by the U.S. Constitution and federal laws, which require Congressional action or constitutional amendments to change.
What specific things did the EO 13919 change
ChatGPT

Executive Order 13919, titled “Ordering the Selected Reserve and Certain Members of the Individual Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty,” was issued by former President Donald Trump on April 30, 2020. This order was a response to the COVID-19 pandemic and aimed to bolster the military's ability to support national efforts against the virus by calling up reserve forces. Here’s a detailed look at what EO 13919 specifically changed and its implications:
Key Provisions of EO 13919

Activation of Reserves:
The order authorized the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Department of the Navy) to call up to 200,000 members of the Selected Reserve and the Individual Ready Reserve to active duty.
This activation was intended for units and individual members who could provide essential support in combating COVID-19.

Duration of Service:
The order allowed these personnel to be activated for a period not to exceed 365 consecutive days.

Roles and Responsibilities:
The reserves were tasked with supporting operations such as medical and logistical support, transportation, and other essential duties required to manage and mitigate the effects of the pandemic.

Flexibility in Deployment:
The Secretaries were given the authority to determine the necessary forces and how best to deploy them to support civilian authorities, ensuring that the military could adapt to the evolving needs of the pandemic response.

Scope of Application:
This order applied to all branches of the U.S. military, including the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, as well as the National Guard and Reserve components.

Implications and Impact

Enhancing Military Support in COVID-19 Response:
The primary impact of EO 13919 was to enable a more robust military support role in the pandemic response. By activating reserve components, the military could provide critical manpower and resources to assist federal, state, and local authorities.

Flexibility and Readiness:
The order increased flexibility in military operations, allowing for rapid deployment of personnel where needed most. This was crucial for tasks such as setting up field hospitals, distributing medical supplies, and supporting vaccine distribution efforts.

Strengthening National Defense Capabilities:
By having the reserves available, the U.S. military maintained readiness and resilience, ensuring that the defense posture was not weakened during the public health crisis.

Collaboration with Civil Authorities:
The deployment of military reserves facilitated better collaboration with civilian agencies, enhancing the overall response capabilities in managing the pandemic's impacts.

Support for Essential Infrastructure:
Activated personnel also helped protect and support critical infrastructure and supply chains, contributing to national security and public safety during the pandemic.

Context and Background

COVID-19 Pandemic:
EO 13919 was part of a broader federal response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which included various emergency measures aimed at mobilizing resources and personnel to address the crisis.
At the time, the U.S. was experiencing significant challenges in healthcare capacity, supply shortages, and the need for widespread logistical support.

Military Readiness:
The order reflected a strategy to leverage military capabilities to enhance national preparedness and resilience in emergencies, highlighting the military's vital role in non-combat humanitarian and disaster response missions.

Comparison with Previous Orders

Similar Orders:
Previous presidents have issued similar orders to activate reserves during emergencies, such as natural disasters or conflicts, to support domestic and international missions.
For example, reserve activations were used extensively after Hurricane Katrina and during Operation Desert Storm.

Unique Context:
EO 13919 was unique in its focus on a public health crisis, demonstrating the military's adaptability and the government's reliance on its capabilities during unprecedented times.

Conclusion

Executive Order 13919 was a crucial step in expanding the U.S. military's role in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic. By authorizing the activation of reserve forces, it ensured that the military could provide significant support to civilian authorities, enhancing the overall national response effort. While it did not change the presidential succession order, it underscored the importance of flexibility and readiness in times of crisis, allowing the government to effectively manage the challenges posed by the pandemic.
What is this SECRET//SI//REL TO USA, FVEY
(U) PROCEDURES FOR THE AVAILABILJI.TY OR DISSEMINATION OF
RAW SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION BY THE
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY UNDER SECTION 2.3 OF
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333
(RAW SIGINT AVAILABILITY PROCEDURES
ChatGPT

The "SECRET//SI//REL TO USA, FVEY (U) PROCEDURES FOR THE AVAILABILITY OR DISSEMINATION OF RAW SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION BY THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY UNDER SECTION 2.3 OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333", also known as the RAW SIGINT AVAILABILITY PROCEDURES, refers to guidelines established by the NSA regarding the handling, sharing, and dissemination of raw signals intelligence (SIGINT) data. These procedures are essential for ensuring that SIGINT is handled in compliance with legal and policy requirements, especially when shared among members of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. Here's a breakdown of what this document entails:
Overview of Signals Intelligence (SIGINT)

Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) is a category of intelligence-gathering that involves intercepting signals between people (communications intelligence, or COMINT) or electronic signals not directly used in communication (electronic intelligence, or ELINT). This type of intelligence is crucial for national security, enabling governments to monitor communications and electronic signals from foreign entities that may pose threats or are of strategic interest.
Executive Order 12333

Executive Order 12333, issued in 1981, provides the overarching authority for the U.S. intelligence community to collect and process information necessary for national security. Section 2.3 of this order specifically addresses the collection of information on U.S. persons, stipulating that certain procedures must be followed to protect privacy and civil liberties.
Five Eyes Alliance (FVEY)

The Five Eyes (FVEY) is an intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. These countries collaborate closely in intelligence sharing, and the designation "REL TO USA, FVEY" indicates that the document is classified and intended to be shared among these nations.
Key Components of the RAW SIGINT AVAILABILITY PROCEDURES

The RAW SIGINT AVAILABILITY PROCEDURES outline the policies and protocols for handling raw signals intelligence data by the National Security Agency (NSA) and its dissemination to partner agencies, both domestic and international. Here are some key components of these procedures:
1. Classification and Access Control

Classification Levels: The document is classified as SECRET//SI//REL TO USA, FVEY, indicating it contains sensitive information related to signals intelligence that can be shared with Five Eyes partners.

Access Control: Only personnel with the necessary security clearance and a need-to-know basis are permitted access to this information. This ensures that sensitive SIGINT is protected from unauthorized access and dissemination.

2. Collection and Handling of Raw SIGINT

Raw SIGINT Definition: Raw SIGINT refers to unprocessed intelligence data directly obtained from intercepted signals. This can include communications data, metadata, and other electronic signals.

Handling Procedures: The NSA must handle raw SIGINT in accordance with strict guidelines to prevent misuse, including safeguards for the protection of U.S. persons' information.

3. Dissemination to Foreign Partners

Sharing with Five Eyes Partners: The procedures allow for the sharing of certain raw SIGINT with Five Eyes partners to enhance joint intelligence capabilities and national security cooperation.

Restrictions on Dissemination: Even among Five Eyes partners, there are restrictions on disseminating certain types of information, particularly when it pertains to the privacy rights of U.S. persons or sensitive national security interests.

4. Use of Raw SIGINT

Analysis and Exploitation: Raw SIGINT is used for analysis and exploitation to generate intelligence reports that inform decision-making and policy formulation.

Legal Compliance: The use of raw SIGINT must comply with legal standards and oversight requirements, ensuring that any collection or analysis involving U.S. persons is conducted lawfully.

5. Privacy and Civil Liberties Protection

Minimization Procedures: The NSA employs minimization procedures to protect the identities and communications of U.S. persons who are not the targets of surveillance. This involves redacting or anonymizing personal information where appropriate.

Oversight and Accountability: Regular oversight by internal and external bodies ensures compliance with privacy and civil liberties protections. This includes audits and reviews by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the Department of Justice, and Congressional oversight committees.

6. Legal and Policy Framework

Authority under Executive Order 12333: The procedures are grounded in the authority granted by EO 12333, which establishes the legal framework for intelligence activities conducted by the NSA and other U.S. intelligence agencies.

Interagency Coordination: Coordination between the NSA and other intelligence community elements is crucial to ensure consistency in the application of these procedures and adherence to U.S. law and international agreements.

Importance of the Procedures

The RAW SIGINT AVAILABILITY PROCEDURES are vital for maintaining the balance between effective intelligence gathering and the protection of individual rights. They ensure that the NSA's activities are conducted in a manner that respects privacy and civil liberties while enabling the agency to fulfill its national security mission.
Historical Context and Relevance

These procedures were developed in response to historical concerns about intelligence overreach and privacy violations. They reflect a broader effort to provide transparency and accountability in intelligence operations, particularly those involving electronic surveillance and data collection.
Conclusion

The RAW SIGINT AVAILABILITY PROCEDURES outline the protocols for the handling and dissemination of raw signals intelligence by the NSA, emphasizing legal compliance, privacy protection, and international collaboration within the Five Eyes alliance. By adhering to these procedures, the NSA ensures that its intelligence activities are conducted responsibly, safeguarding national security while respecting individual rights.

He may not actually be dead, but they’ve been acting like it for a while.

Jimmy Carter has been in Hospice care for a year and a half.

Studies vary, but it seems the majority of people remain under Hospice care 30 days or less.

Granted, Carter has the means to prolong the inevitable for as long as they want, but…
it’s hard not to wonder if timing is everything (McCain, RBG…)

BREAKING: The Department of Defense announces that an "accounting mistake" resulted in giving an additional $6.2 billion to Ukraine than previously reported.

@GeneralMCNews

🚨🚨🚨 MAJOR ALERT: SLEEPY JOE HAS BECOME VERY VERY SICK …

ALL FLIGHTS AROUND THE LAKE WHERE HE WAS LAST SEEN WITH OBAMA HAVE BEEN CANCELLED !!!

VERILY …

👉 JOIN Q