CVE-2026-2388 - Reviews and Rating – Google Reviews <= 5.10 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Multiple Shortcodes
CVE ID :CVE-2026-2388
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:27 a.m. | 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
Description :The Reviews and Rating – Google Reviews plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 5.10. This is due to the wp_display() shortcode handler, used by multiple shortcodes, allowing attacker-controlled html_tags values to define raw HTML tags and then embedding untrusted vicinity content inside those tags. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Severity: 0.0 | NA
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-2388
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:27 a.m. | 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
Description :The Reviews and Rating – Google Reviews plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 5.10. This is due to the wp_display() shortcode handler, used by multiple shortcodes, allowing attacker-controlled html_tags values to define raw HTML tags and then embedding untrusted vicinity content inside those tags. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Severity: 0.0 | NA
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-18794 - OpenRGB: insufficient input data checks lead to Denial-of-Service, memory overread and overwrite
CVE ID :CVE-2026-18794
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:29 a.m. | 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
Description :The OpenRGB network protocol allows attackers to cause memory exhaustion and out-of-bounds memory reads and writes by passing inconsistent data.
Severity: 8.8 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-18794
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:29 a.m. | 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
Description :The OpenRGB network protocol allows attackers to cause memory exhaustion and out-of-bounds memory reads and writes by passing inconsistent data.
Severity: 8.8 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77536 - UniFi OS Improper Access Control Privilege Escalation
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77536
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:35 a.m. | 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in certain devices running UniFi OS to escalate privileges within such UniFi OS devices or instances.
Severity: 9.9 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77536
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:35 a.m. | 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in certain devices running UniFi OS to escalate privileges within such UniFi OS devices or instances.
Severity: 9.9 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77537 - UniFi Protect Application Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77537
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:39 a.m. | 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Protect Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 10.0 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77537
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:39 a.m. | 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Protect Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 10.0 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77538 - UniFi Connect Application Improper Access Control Privilege Escalation
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77538
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:47 a.m. | 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in UniFi Connect Application to escalate privileges within the UniFi Connect Application.
Severity: 8.2 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77538
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:47 a.m. | 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in UniFi Connect Application to escalate privileges within the UniFi Connect Application.
Severity: 8.2 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77539 - UniFi OS Server Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77539
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:50 a.m. | 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi OS Server to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.1 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77539
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:50 a.m. | 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi OS Server to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.1 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77540 - UniFi OS Server Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77540
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:53 a.m. | 59 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi OS Server to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.1 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77540
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:53 a.m. | 59 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi OS Server to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.1 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77541 - UniFi Network Application Improper Access Control Privilege Escalation
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77541
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:58 a.m. | 55 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in UniFi Network Application to escalate privileges within the UniFi Network Application.
Severity: 9.1 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77541
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 9:58 a.m. | 55 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in UniFi Network Application to escalate privileges within the UniFi Network Application.
Severity: 9.1 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77542 - UID Enterprise Agent Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77542
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:01 a.m. | 52 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UID Enterprise Agent to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.1 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77542
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:01 a.m. | 52 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UID Enterprise Agent to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.1 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77543 - UniFi Access Application Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77543
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:07 a.m. | 45 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Access Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.9 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77543
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:07 a.m. | 45 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Access Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.9 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-80346 - StarRocks through 4.0.13 Missing Authorization on DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW for Legacy Synchronous Materialized Views
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80346
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:09 a.m. | 43 minutes ago
Description :StarRocks performs no privilege check when a legacy synchronous materialized view is dropped. Every other statement type routed through AuthorizerStmtVisitor calls into Authorizer before execution, but visitDropMaterializedViewStatement returns immediately with a comment stating the check happens in execution logic. That holds only for asynchronous materialized views: LocalMetastore.dropMaterializedView calls Authorizer.checkMaterializedViewAction inside a branch taken when the resolved table is a MaterializedView. A legacy synchronous materialized view is stored as a rollup index on an OlapTable rather than a MaterializedView, so the other branch runs, reaching AlterJobMgr.processDropMaterializedView and MaterializedViewHandler, neither of which contains any Authorizer call. The former locates the target by scanning every OlapTable in the named database for a matching rollup index, and the latter validates only table state and name conflicts. Any authenticated account can therefore drop a legacy synchronous materialized view belonging to any database, holding no grant on the view, the base table or the database, and the drop is indistinguishable from an authorized one.
Severity: 7.1 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80346
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:09 a.m. | 43 minutes ago
Description :StarRocks performs no privilege check when a legacy synchronous materialized view is dropped. Every other statement type routed through AuthorizerStmtVisitor calls into Authorizer before execution, but visitDropMaterializedViewStatement returns immediately with a comment stating the check happens in execution logic. That holds only for asynchronous materialized views: LocalMetastore.dropMaterializedView calls Authorizer.checkMaterializedViewAction inside a branch taken when the resolved table is a MaterializedView. A legacy synchronous materialized view is stored as a rollup index on an OlapTable rather than a MaterializedView, so the other branch runs, reaching AlterJobMgr.processDropMaterializedView and MaterializedViewHandler, neither of which contains any Authorizer call. The former locates the target by scanning every OlapTable in the named database for a matching rollup index, and the latter validates only table state and name conflicts. Any authenticated account can therefore drop a legacy synchronous materialized view belonging to any database, holding no grant on the view, the base table or the database, and the drop is indistinguishable from an authorized one.
Severity: 7.1 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-80347 - mcp-fetch through 1.6.3 Server-Side Request Forgery via Unstripped IPv6 Literal Brackets
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80347
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:09 a.m. | 43 minutes ago
Description :mcp-fetch checks a fetch target against its SSRF guard without removing the brackets that surround an IPv6 literal. isSafeUrl reads the hostname from the parsed URL, which for a literal such as http://[::1]/ yields the bracketed string, and then tests it with net.isIP. That call returns zero for a bracketed value, so the branch holding the private-address checks is skipped entirely. The guard falls back to resolving the hostname, the bracketed string is not a resolvable name, no addresses are returned, and the target is reported safe. The HTTP client then strips the brackets and connects. Because the address may be given in IPv4-mapped form, the same path reaches any IPv4 target the loopback and private checks were meant to exclude, including link-local metadata endpoints. isPrivateIPv6 also has no case for the ::ffff: prefix, so the mapped form would still pass even if the brackets were removed. The fetch target is supplied as a tool argument, so an attacker who can influence what the model requests can read internal responses back into the model context.
Severity: 8.7 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80347
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:09 a.m. | 43 minutes ago
Description :mcp-fetch checks a fetch target against its SSRF guard without removing the brackets that surround an IPv6 literal. isSafeUrl reads the hostname from the parsed URL, which for a literal such as http://[::1]/ yields the bracketed string, and then tests it with net.isIP. That call returns zero for a bracketed value, so the branch holding the private-address checks is skipped entirely. The guard falls back to resolving the hostname, the bracketed string is not a resolvable name, no addresses are returned, and the target is reported safe. The HTTP client then strips the brackets and connects. Because the address may be given in IPv4-mapped form, the same path reaches any IPv4 target the loopback and private checks were meant to exclude, including link-local metadata endpoints. isPrivateIPv6 also has no case for the ::ffff: prefix, so the mapped form would still pass even if the brackets were removed. The fetch target is supplied as a tool argument, so an attacker who can influence what the model requests can read internal responses back into the model context.
Severity: 8.7 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-80348 - TarsWeb through 3.0.16 Missing Authorization on Patch Deploy, Download and Delete Endpoints
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80348
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:09 a.m. | 43 minutes ago
Description :TarsWeb enforces its per-application roles by calling AuthService from individual controller methods, and four methods in app/controller/patch/PatchController.js make no such call. uploadAndPublish accepts a package upload and then builds and dispatches a deployment task to every server matching the supplied application and module name, while its sibling uploadPatchPackage, which only stores the package, does check developer authorization first. The only precondition uploadAndPublish enforces is that the named server is registered, and any registered server in the installation satisfies it. downloadPackage and deletePatchPackage select a package by an unscoped sequential primary key covering every application's uploads, and setPatchPackageDefault changes which package a given application deploys by default. Any authenticated account, including one holding a role scoped to a single unrelated application, can therefore push a package to and trigger its deployment on any server the console manages, retrieve or delete any other application's package, and change which package is deployed by default.
Severity: 8.8 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80348
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:09 a.m. | 43 minutes ago
Description :TarsWeb enforces its per-application roles by calling AuthService from individual controller methods, and four methods in app/controller/patch/PatchController.js make no such call. uploadAndPublish accepts a package upload and then builds and dispatches a deployment task to every server matching the supplied application and module name, while its sibling uploadPatchPackage, which only stores the package, does check developer authorization first. The only precondition uploadAndPublish enforces is that the named server is registered, and any registered server in the installation satisfies it. downloadPackage and deletePatchPackage select a package by an unscoped sequential primary key covering every application's uploads, and setPatchPackageDefault changes which package a given application deploys by default. Any authenticated account, including one holding a role scoped to a single unrelated application, can therefore push a package to and trigger its deployment on any server the console manages, retrieve or delete any other application's package, and change which package is deployed by default.
Severity: 8.8 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-80349 - TarsWeb through 3.0.14 Authentication Bypass via Spoofed X-Forwarded-For and uid Parameter
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80349
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:09 a.m. | 43 minutes ago
Description :TarsWeb decides whether a request comes from a trusted local caller using a client-controlled header. app.js sets Koa's proxy option to true without naming which upstream proxies may be trusted and without limiting the number of forwarded hops, so the request address Koa reports is taken from the X-Forwarded-For header supplied by the caller. In midware/ssoMidware.js a single branch covers both the ignored-path list and the ignoreIps allowlist from config/loginConf.js, which contains the loopback address, and that branch assigns the effective account identity from the uid query parameter before falling through to the request without validating any ticket, cookie or password. A request carrying a forged X-Forwarded-For value naming the loopback address and a uid naming an existing account therefore reaches every route the console mounts as that account, including an administrator, with no credential of any kind. Those routes include user and role administration, service configuration, and package upload and deployment. Version 3.0.16 separates the two branches so that a match on the address allowlist assigns the configured default account rather than one named by the caller.
Severity: 9.8 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80349
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:09 a.m. | 43 minutes ago
Description :TarsWeb decides whether a request comes from a trusted local caller using a client-controlled header. app.js sets Koa's proxy option to true without naming which upstream proxies may be trusted and without limiting the number of forwarded hops, so the request address Koa reports is taken from the X-Forwarded-For header supplied by the caller. In midware/ssoMidware.js a single branch covers both the ignored-path list and the ignoreIps allowlist from config/loginConf.js, which contains the loopback address, and that branch assigns the effective account identity from the uid query parameter before falling through to the request without validating any ticket, cookie or password. A request carrying a forged X-Forwarded-For value naming the loopback address and a uid naming an existing account therefore reaches every route the console mounts as that account, including an administrator, with no credential of any kind. Those routes include user and role administration, service configuration, and package upload and deployment. Version 3.0.16 separates the two branches so that a match on the address allowlist assigns the configured default account rather than one named by the caller.
Severity: 9.8 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-80350 - OneUptime before 12.0.7 Server-Side Request Forgery via IPv4-Mapped IPv6 Webhook URL
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80350
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:09 a.m. | 43 minutes ago
Description :OneUptime's webhook target check rejects private and loopback addresses given in IPv4 form and a small set of IPv6 forms, but has no case for the IPv4-mapped IPv6 range. The webhook delivery path calls SSRFProtection.validateWebhookTargetIsSafe, and the host-literal screening inside Common/Server/Utils/SSRFProtection.ts, performed by isBlockedHostnameLiteral, rejects private and loopback IPv4 ranges and tests an IPv6 value against the unspecified address, the loopback, the link-local prefix and the unique-local prefixes. A value such as [::ffff:127.0.0.1] matches none of them. The value is also recognised as an address literal rather than a name, so the path that re-checks addresses obtained from resolution is not taken. The HTTP client treats the mapped form as the embedded IPv4 address and connects to it, so an authenticated project member who can configure a webhook can direct the server at loopback services, private network ranges and link-local metadata endpoints, and the response is recorded where the webhook result can be read. Version 12.0.7 adds handling for the mapped range.
Severity: 7.1 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80350
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:09 a.m. | 43 minutes ago
Description :OneUptime's webhook target check rejects private and loopback addresses given in IPv4 form and a small set of IPv6 forms, but has no case for the IPv4-mapped IPv6 range. The webhook delivery path calls SSRFProtection.validateWebhookTargetIsSafe, and the host-literal screening inside Common/Server/Utils/SSRFProtection.ts, performed by isBlockedHostnameLiteral, rejects private and loopback IPv4 ranges and tests an IPv6 value against the unspecified address, the loopback, the link-local prefix and the unique-local prefixes. A value such as [::ffff:127.0.0.1] matches none of them. The value is also recognised as an address literal rather than a name, so the path that re-checks addresses obtained from resolution is not taken. The HTTP client treats the mapped form as the embedded IPv4 address and connects to it, so an authenticated project member who can configure a webhook can direct the server at loopback services, private network ranges and link-local metadata endpoints, and the response is recorded where the webhook result can be read. Version 12.0.7 adds handling for the mapped range.
Severity: 7.1 | HIGH
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77545 - Ubiquiti UniFi OS Active Debug Code Privilege Escalation
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77545
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:13 a.m. | 39 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network, low privileges and under certain conditions could exploit an Active Debug Code vulnerability found in certain devices running UniFi OS to escalate privileges within such UniFi OS devices or instances.
Severity: 9.0 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77545
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:13 a.m. | 39 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network, low privileges and under certain conditions could exploit an Active Debug Code vulnerability found in certain devices running UniFi OS to escalate privileges within such UniFi OS devices or instances.
Severity: 9.0 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77546 - UniFi Access Application Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77546
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:16 a.m. | 36 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Access Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.9 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77546
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:16 a.m. | 36 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Access Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.9 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77547 - UniFi Access Application Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77547
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:20 a.m. | 33 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Access Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.9 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77547
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:20 a.m. | 33 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Access Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.9 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-77548 - UniFi Protect Application Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77548
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:23 a.m. | 30 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Protect Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.9 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77548
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:23 a.m. | 30 minutes ago
Description :A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Protect Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.
Severity: 9.9 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-80203 - Grav before 1.0.18 Authentication Bypass via Scoped API Key
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80203
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:28 a.m. | 25 minutes ago
Description :The getgrav/grav-plugin-api plugin before 1.0.18 does not enforce API-key scope in the requireNotSuperTarget() function in UsersController.php across seven sensitive user-management endpoints. The check uses isSuperAdmin() on the acting account rather than verifying whether the specific API key carries super authority (via isSuperWithinScope()). As a result, an API key scoped below full super authority but belonging to a super-admin account can act against other super-admin accounts—disabling their 2FA, deleting their avatar, minting new API keys under their identity, or deleting their existing API keys.
Severity: 9.8 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80203
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:28 a.m. | 25 minutes ago
Description :The getgrav/grav-plugin-api plugin before 1.0.18 does not enforce API-key scope in the requireNotSuperTarget() function in UsersController.php across seven sensitive user-management endpoints. The check uses isSuperAdmin() on the acting account rather than verifying whether the specific API key carries super authority (via isSuperWithinScope()). As a result, an API key scoped below full super authority but belonging to a super-admin account can act against other super-admin accounts—disabling their 2FA, deleting their avatar, minting new API keys under their identity, or deleting their existing API keys.
Severity: 9.8 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE-2026-80204 - Grav before 1.0.18 Authentication Bypass via Scoped API Key
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80204
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:28 a.m. | 25 minutes ago
Description :The Grav API plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-api) before 1.0.18 does not apply the API-key scope cap in the injectSecurityTab() function of BlueprintController when deciding whether a page's security/permissions blueprint section is editable. Because the function performs raw isSuperAdmin()/hasPermission() checks without a request parameter, it cannot enforce scopeAllows(). A caller holding a scoped API key may therefore see (and potentially edit) page permission fields beyond the scope granted to the key. The end-to-end write-time impact was not fully confirmed by the reporter.
Severity: 9.3 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
CVE ID :CVE-2026-80204
Published : Aug. 26, 2026, 10:28 a.m. | 25 minutes ago
Description :The Grav API plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-api) before 1.0.18 does not apply the API-key scope cap in the injectSecurityTab() function of BlueprintController when deciding whether a page's security/permissions blueprint section is editable. Because the function performs raw isSuperAdmin()/hasPermission() checks without a request parameter, it cannot enforce scopeAllows(). A caller holding a scoped API key may therefore see (and potentially edit) page permission fields beyond the scope granted to the key. The end-to-end write-time impact was not fully confirmed by the reporter.
Severity: 9.3 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...