BTC will be subject to law - and there will be no forks to stop this.

There is already good law from the Supreme Court in the US and the High Court in Britain detailing software orders. Suppose an order is given for a company or partnership or a group. The individuals who obtain that either split off into some other group or someone else even unconnected to the first one takes up the challenge and decides to violate the court order. In that case, this is a contempt of court, and it ends in criminal contempt where people are punished by going to prison.

There are no anonymous groups.

There are no anonymous developers. Everything here is public and not on the dark web. There is nothing that anybody involved cannot stop or be stopped from doing.

The entirety of the myth around crypto is based on lies and deception.

bitcoin is not encrypted in bitcoin is not a Cryptocurrency

no Blockchain can ever be a true Cryptocurrency

this year there will be no further debates on this topic

it will be categorically demonstrated

CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634032105213100?thread_ts=1634032105.213100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3134

Do you know what happens to companies like Coinbase if they decide to breach a court order by listing a fork designed specifically to violate a court order?

A nice listed public company like Coinbase.

Every single exchange is easy to control. But start with a simple thought experiment here. Start with regulated exchanges. The argument that they can bridge a court order and list any coin that forks to avoid a court order is rather asinine when you think about it.

To give you an idea of what happens to Coinbase or any other exchange that ever decides to take any coin listed on their system that violates a fork. Not the ones they are asked to recover but any coins from any individual including those that of mined newly. So let’s put it this way, the tokens within bitcoin are fungible. Those violating a court order are going to have to give them up to pay for other things. Do you think miners will mine when they cannot exchange for value.

Do you think exchanges will list forks when that means that they will no longer be able to be licensed, operate in the Western world, exchange for US dollars in any form including tether…

just think it through

CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634034426220200?thread_ts=1634034426.220200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3140

Bitcoin: The Most Law-Abiding System Ever Created.

16 Pages
Posted: 14 Oct 2021
Last revised: 15 Oct 2021

Min 10:35
"P2P trade means two people trading, theres no machine here, if you change that, you´re changing the system and the system is no longer fungible...Fungibility is not a technical issue, it is a Legal issue"

OnTheRecord - Craig S Wright (CSW) on Bitcoin Cash Drama!
34.533 visualizaciones
10 nov 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACEUOCoVvmw

https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-mgm-studios-inc-v-grokster-ltd

ISSUE:
Are the software distributors liable for the copyright infringement by a third party using their product?

ANSWER:
Yes.

Sorry Core - The Supreme court held you all liable in 2005.

And that references the protocol. The ftps site would be liable

CSW
Oct 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634838726026000?thread_ts=1634838726.026000&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3181

ccmanual.pdf

CSW
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/files/U85JW5MNG/FPMU8DBV3/ccmanual.pdf

https://twitter.com/sthenc/status/1451274440294088704

Remember, BTC requires that you help core devs commit tax fraud.

Please aid core devs in falsifying records - This is the call that you will see out there and the reality here is this is what it's about

CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635243307414200?thread_ts=1635243307.414200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3201

By the way, if you don't like how I am playing the game, remember that it is my game.

I set the rules, and they are fair as they don't change.

You don't need to play, but Blockchain is in law.

CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206

If you believe that bitcoin can exist in any fashion outside of legal structures, you’re an idiot. There is no other way to put it. If you think that domains can’t be seized, that the control of bitcoin is outside of government, you are a fucking moron.

And sorry, I’m being nice.

If you wanted the system to continue working without my involvement, the necessity was that you follow my path. By not following my path, you have created a path that requires that I return.

The simple answer here is that government and court orders apply. Every single Blockchain ever created and every single subsidiary system based on the Blockchain as a concept will always be subject to the will of courts. International law is messy, but ownership is very simple, and it has nothing to do with holding a key. That is possession.

I suggest that you have a read of Ayn Rand’s Atlas shrugged.

What you will take away from that is that the system’s creator can leave the system in the state that he found it. The example I will give you is Ellis Wyatt.

All of the soy boys in Core continuously talk about property rights. Yet, they want to take mine from me. They want to say that I’m donating everything to the world because they want to appropriate what I created. I did not give them the right to do that. Nor shall I.

Foundainhead is about the man

AS is about the world that will come

Only people can stop what is already starting and only the few

CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635333797454100?thread_ts=1635333797.454100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3210

Note:

Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot avoid mediating disputes.

Bitcoin and my Whitepaper does not say that a transaction cannot be reversed.

It discusses the economic effect and notes that there are limits

BitCoin changes the way this works and allows small TXs to be made - and large ones to be reversed/recovered.

There is no mediation of a USD 1.00 TX as the costs to do this fall on the person making the claim.

So, Bitcoin does not stop reversal - it makes small payments possible.

Bitcoin does not stop fraud.

A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable.

Bitcoin makes fraud more expensive.


Criminal Specialization as a Corollary of Rational Choice.
11 Pages
Craig S Wright
nChain; University of Southern Queensland - University of Southern Queensland, Students; Leicester Law School
Date Written: May 28, 2010
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3461064

Criminals act based on profit

CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635430084015700?thread_ts=1635430084.015700&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3217

People seem to believe that it would be in my interest to try and persuade others. But we’re not talking about those who can be persuaded. Rather, we have dogmatic pools that believe in a false religion. They worship nodes. They pray to them. They treat them as if they matter in bitcoin and in respect of consensus because they have been lied to by the high priests of their false religion.
There is no persuading these people. Not by words. Many, even when seeing the truth, will refuse to believe.

The only way to persuade people is by pressing them to experience truth.

If I have to, I will shut down every business that has anything to do with BTC one by one until they comply. This is not my choice, but they are illegally using my property. Until they come and negotiate and settle, I will exert pressure. If you think I have so far, you haven’t seen the pinnacle of the tip of the iceberg.

When I am done, nobody will ever believe the false mantra of social consensus.

There will be holdouts. There will be people who try and run nodes at home. And they will find that the cost bankrupts them as any exchange that touches their illegally copied version will be put out of business.

The simple thing to remember here is that bitcoin has no power over the law. There is no hidden aspect of bitcoin. As I’ve been saying, once bitcoin hits a certain size, it is well within the ability to control. If people want to try and make alternatives, they can, but with this, any Blockchain, and I mean any Blockchain that is ever conceivable, will always be controlled in this way

No DeFi system can exist outside of the ability for a court order to shut down.

The developers of such a system are liable. That is the purpose of the Grokster and Limewire cases that I’ve been putting up.

CSW
Oct 30, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635609861188100?thread_ts=1635609861.188100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3244

A DEX / DeFi liquidity pool is JUST a new way of saying -

Illegal coin mixer

The law of tracing exists.

If 10 of 100 coins are tainted and enter the DEX / "Illegal mixer", then all of the coins are now tainted

The people with 90 "honest coins" obtain 90% of their investment as the mixed coins are ALL tainted

So, if 10 people all add 10 coins and 10 are to be seized, all parties now have 9 coins of the 10 returned

To the person with tainted coins, this is good - it is a cost effective way to launder money

The coins are cleaned at the expense of the "honest" (rubes) owners who become money mules and lose their money invested.

A Dex, DeFi is a coin mixer, renamed. Nothing more, nothing less.

Just another already criminal aspect of all this

CSW
Nov 6, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636210136286800?thread_ts=1636210136.286800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3333

SEC Accelerates and Expands Reporting of Significant Events on Form 8-K
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers |
Last updated April 20, 2017
https://corporate.findlaw.com/finance/sec-accelerates-and-expands-reporting-of-significant-events-on.html

The letter is material and required an 8-k to be lodged by Coinbase.

You should NOTE this. That Coinbase is technically in default from withholding the SEC mandated 8-k form

It comes with possible felony charges. And, the CEO could be banned from operating an exchange or even a public company by not telling the market of this material event.

Funny how much h of this stuff I know.

Look up Rule 144, SEC.

Turn out, they (main pre-Ipo holders and officers) are legally bared and in criminal breach if they sell a single share or even take I lien on then for failing to disclose.

CSW
Nov 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636576941274100?thread_ts=1636576941.274100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3362

"Ira Kleiman NO va a recibir los cien millones de dólares NUNCA"
Andres Rivero
https://youtu.be/RD7N-6PUldg

CSW
Dec 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1640272998430900?thread_ts=1640272998.430900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3530

Question from SS:
Has Craig publically stated why he doesn't want to publically sign a message with a key from block 9 or with some other known Satoshi key?

I am talking about a statement in the last couple of years, not the 2016 Sartre statement.

Answer from CSW:
It is not a solution aND FUCK OFF with this

Honestly - IT IS EVERYTHING BITCOIN IS NOT@!!!!

If this is what you want - honestly - FUCK OFF!

I am tired of this crap.

You do not prove crap at all this way and I am more than sick of complete wankers stating this as they are too lazy to do real work!

No.
I say you cannot sign in reverse.

You cannot use an unregistered key to sign, buy definition

I said, proof has nothing to do with keys, never will, and if you think that, you need a lot of study as you are completely deluded

I said, bitcoin will move because of court orders.

It will NOT move by keys, ever.

It will be moved as KEYS ARE FUCKING NOT REQUIRED!

Please listen and please think!

Code is not law, keys are not identical. Nor will the ever be

There will never be any proof by keys as no fucking duck thing exists.

Keys do not, cannot, will fucking not ever in any way prove identity and stop thinking the crap a bunch of drug addicted shit for brain fools want to believe.

CSW
Dec 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1640615325107400?thread_ts=1640615325.107400&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3543

To some, the current developer issues in bitcoin are about overturning all the changes around Grokster and Limewire.

There is a concept in law called secondary liability. Another name is vicarious liability. I have covered this concept many times, and in fact, it is a part of my LLM thesis that was released before the launch of bitcoin. So you see, stating that you are peer-to-peer does not remove liability. I have mentioned that I used to work for groups associated with the software and media copyright industries. This includes RIAA and others. I also mentioned that I did work for MGM. I’m surprised that people haven’t put some of these things together properly, and if they did, they would come to understand what I see as the core of bitcoin in this.

In 2005, Grokster was sued by MGM, and the case went all the way to the Supreme Court in the USA. MGM won, and Grokster lost with the developers being considered fiduciaries. The Supreme Court held that groups and offenders, which could be loosely defined as it is with bitcoin core who develop and actively promote technology, can be held liable for an infringement that the user commits.

In addition, I understand the competition law in the United Kingdom very well. This was incorporated into my studies.

In addition, I understand the competition law in the United Kingdom very well. This was incorporated into my studies.
The action in the Federal Court to shut down Limewire applies to other peer-to-peer networks and systems as well. So if people believe that BTC is outside the law, they should remember the entire Limewire system being closed. If you don’t believe that peer-to-peer networks are outside of the reach of courts, you should look at Grokster. From that case, it was noted that if you actively recruit people who seek to infringe and bypass the law, you don’t have clean hands, and your system can be shut down. At present, the promotion of my database without any rights and the incorporation of some of my intellectual property into that system is a breach that is being promoted.

If you investigate this, you will find that it is a case of where a copyright owner, myself and urge the court to find the technology vendor, BTC core, liable for distributing a multiuse technology capable and purposely activated to infringe the database rights which are based on copyright in the US and special rules in the UK.

Creating a completely new system is a valid response, but you start from scratch. I have no issue with someone doing this unless they integrate my technology, in which case, the same issues from above apply. You should have no problems if you have a completely new database and start with no existing holders and don’t pre-mine (this is a tax issue and something separate as a pre-mine is a taxable event) unless you use any of the intellectual property that I have developed. So when people say that they will copy BSV, they seem to forget that you can’t. When people set up new systems or integrate some of the existing patented material that I have, they seem to neglect this form of infringement.

CSW
Jan 5, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1641367479357000?thread_ts=1641367479.357000&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3615

CSW
Feb 13, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1644775707601989?thread_ts=1644775707.601989&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3991