La mediación de la demanda de Satoshi de Craig Wright del "inventor de Bitcoin" en "Impasse" https://criptopasion.com/la-mediacion-de-la-demanda-de-satoshi-de-craig-wright-del-inventor-de-bitcoin-en-impasse/
Kleiman Estate Wants the Money, but Wright Wants the Money and the Title
As CCN reported, the Kleiman estate admitted in its lawsuit that Craig Wright and/or Dave Kleiman could be Satoshi and probably invented bitcoin considering they started working on it in 2008. Tellingly, bitcoin was “born” a year later, in 2009.

“It is unclear whether Craig, Dave, and/or both created Bitcoin. It is undeniable, however, that Craig and Dave were involved in Bitcoin from its inception and that they both accumulated a vast wealth of bitcoins from 2009 through 2013.”

https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-law/bitcoin-inventor-craig-wright-mediation-satoshi-nakamoto-lawsuit/2019/06/18/
Forwarded from Ramon Quesada - News 🌷 (@RamonQuesada)
Dr. Craig Wright testifies he mined Satoshi Blocks, provides addresses - CoinGeek

"After Dr. Wright mined the first 70 blocks of bitcoin (the public addresses for which he has already disclosed), he implemented a unique and proprietary algorithm that he created to automate the key generation process so that each later block mined (after block 70) was assigned a different public address."

https://coingeek.com/dr-craig-wright-testifies-he-mined-satoshi-blocks-provides-addresses/
Forwarded from 190 Double Hashing - Mining (@RamonQuesada)
Cada día flipo más con Craig.
Vaya crack!!

"The use of a double-hash function also allows us to create a system that can be distributed and validated while acting within the law. Distribution functions can be sent to specialised systems that act in local jurisdictions. Consequently, it allows us to have immutable data storage that can be filtered with the hash being validated and a subsequent prune of illicit material being allowed in certain jurisdictions. That is, the double hash within Bitcoin creates a method where we can selectively deliver content"
Juicio Kleiman versus Wright: Satoshi se avergüenza de su creación.

«En el caso de Craig, intuyo que firmó una transacción con 20.000 entradas (1 millón de bitcoins), una o más salidas, y con nlocktime de enero de 2020. Esta transacción nunca ha sido transmitida a la red. Pero es válida, por lo que la red la aceptará si le es enviada.

Luego destruyó las claves (el wallet.dat).

Después cifró la transacción con Shamir Secret Sharing, dividiéndola en 15 partes, y se necesitan 8 de ellas para reconstruir la transacción.

Como en el trust había 7 depositarios, es razonable pensar que cada depositario recibió 2 partes del Shamir Secret, y Satoshi Craig fue el único que recibió 3 partes.

Entonces, Craig, para reconstruir la transacción, necesitaría recibir 5 partes (3 depositarios como mínimo)».

https://www.tucriptomoneda.com/juicio-kleiman-versus-wright-satoshi-se-averguenza-de-su-creacion/