Forwarded from Liz Evans
The UKMFA, Lawyers for Liberty and The Workers Union of England have published an Open Letter to Employers demanding Covid-19 Vaccination of Employees, for employees and potential employees to share with employers who are proposing to mandate Covid-19 vaccines on their employees. It outlines the legal rights of the employee to informed consent, bodily autonomy and medical freedom, and relevant employment law protections afforded to employees. It summarises the legal duties of employers. It also summarises the potential risks of Covid-19 vaccines and the trial data which indicates that Covid-19 vaccines do NOT prevent infection or transmission of the virus. Please share far and wide - this should protect workers from unlawful mandates and stop them being sacked for refusing to comply.
https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5fa5866942937a4d73918723/6017f56ad166465fb9025da6_UKMFA_L4L_Workers_Union-Employers_Vaccine_Open_Letter.pdf
https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5fa5866942937a4d73918723/6017f56ad166465fb9025da6_UKMFA_L4L_Workers_Union-Employers_Vaccine_Open_Letter.pdf
Answering this question I’ve just been asked (see screenshots):
1. The Fuellmich case is not yet a global class action, nor has the Fuellmich team’s work been applied to any part of the UK as yet.
2. CACUK is a negligence case against government officials for harms suffered by people in the UK only. It can be seen as a parallel case to the Fuellmich case, which is currently running in Germany, the US and Canada.
3. CACUK is a civil case, not a criminal case. There are no “victims” in a civil case, only “claimants.” (A separate criminal case is being pursued elsewhere.)
4. If the case wins, you cannot claim compensation from any individual or institution who supports the measures. Only the named defendant can be ordered to pay damages and this is decided by the judge(s). If you have a claim against a particular company, you must pursue that separately as a personal claim.
5. The defendant in a civil case is not found “guilty” of a crime and is not called a “criminal” from a legal standpoint. If the case were to escalate to the ICC, that may change.
6. As to the source of any compensatory funds, that depends on whether the defendant is liable in their personal capacity or as part of an organisation.
Hope that helps. Please feel free to ask any questions you need clarified in the CACUK Community Chat group and I will try my best to answer them.
1. The Fuellmich case is not yet a global class action, nor has the Fuellmich team’s work been applied to any part of the UK as yet.
2. CACUK is a negligence case against government officials for harms suffered by people in the UK only. It can be seen as a parallel case to the Fuellmich case, which is currently running in Germany, the US and Canada.
3. CACUK is a civil case, not a criminal case. There are no “victims” in a civil case, only “claimants.” (A separate criminal case is being pursued elsewhere.)
4. If the case wins, you cannot claim compensation from any individual or institution who supports the measures. Only the named defendant can be ordered to pay damages and this is decided by the judge(s). If you have a claim against a particular company, you must pursue that separately as a personal claim.
5. The defendant in a civil case is not found “guilty” of a crime and is not called a “criminal” from a legal standpoint. If the case were to escalate to the ICC, that may change.
6. As to the source of any compensatory funds, that depends on whether the defendant is liable in their personal capacity or as part of an organisation.
Hope that helps. Please feel free to ask any questions you need clarified in the CACUK Community Chat group and I will try my best to answer them.
CACUK Support pinned «Answering this question I’ve just been asked (see screenshots): 1. The Fuellmich case is not yet a global class action, nor has the Fuellmich team’s work been applied to any part of the UK as yet. 2. CACUK is a negligence case against government officials…»
Answering this question I’ve just been asked by a CACUK cohort:
“There is a local organic shop near me in Xxxxx. I went in there two weeks ago and for the first time was told that because I was mask exempt I was not allowed in. Staff would do the shopping for me.
“I said I wanted to browse. They repeated the same thing. I wrote to the manager.
“Here is his response:
“Dear Xxxxx
“Thank you for your email and I am sorry that you are unhappy with our facemask policy.
“We find ourselves in a very difficult position as every customer is important to us. Our Face Mask policy was introduced after some of our Xxxxx Shop staff were hit with Covid resulting in the shop being closed, deep cleaned and temporary staff being used for the 10 day isolation period. We had to implement a policy that meant we reduced the risk as far as possible of our staff, their families, and customers being exposed to this dreadful virus. Our policy is that no one may enter our shop without a mask. This is not in any way discriminatory. Where people are exempt from wearing a mask we have offered to do personal shopping and deliver to their homes for free within the local area.
“I do not believe that the law can force us to put our staff and customers at risk. Hopefully you are able to accept our position and I hope that this whole Covid world will be behind us shortly.”
Answer [Below is my opinion, based on my legal study. It should not be taken as gospel, nor as legal advice. Always research to the best of your ability and get personal legal advice where necessary]:
“Our policy is that no one may enter our shop without a mask. This is not in any way discriminatory.”
This statement is wrong. It IS discriminatory against those who are unable to wear a mask because of a disability. The policy overrides the government’s guidance on the issue, and breaches the Equality Act 2010.
“Where people are exempt from wearing a mask we have offered to do personal shopping and deliver to their homes for free within the local area.”
This is a reasonable OFFER. You are not obliged to accept the offer. If you decline, they should allow you into the shop to browse. HOWEVER, their offer could arguably fall under “reasonable adjustments” under the Equality Act. You may reasonably negotiate with the company and explain why that adjustment doesn’t work for you and why you think the government’s recommendation of allowing you in without a mask is the only viable option to put you on a level playing field with non-disabled people who CAN wear a mask without harm, or risk of harm, and freely browse the shop. Where the negotiation can’t be settled, the question would need to be tested in the courts...
... so it is down to you, whether this is something you wish to pursue or not.
CACUK is not able to pursue the myriad individual discrimination cases against all the various retailers and institutions who are operating so lawlessly under this oppressive bullshit NWO regime. CACUK is concerned with the high level policies that our government has erroneously set down for the sheepled businesses, which they appear to be grasping with both hands and running away with. In doing so, we hope to put an end to the madness and see a better future for everybody.
“We had to implement a policy that meant we reduced the risk as far as possible of our staff, their families, and customers being exposed to this dreadful virus.”
No, they CHOSE to implement a policy which they might BELIEVE reduces the risk. That doesn’t make the policy correct or reasonable.
“I do not believe that the law can force us to put our staff and customers at risk.”
This is correct. In the same way, the shop cannot force YOU to put yourself at risk by wearing a mask, if that could cause you harm.
“Hopefully you are able to accept our position...”
If you don’t accept their position then you have the option to walk away or to negotiate further. If you cannot reach an agreement that works for you, you then have the option to take legal action for discrimination against you.
“There is a local organic shop near me in Xxxxx. I went in there two weeks ago and for the first time was told that because I was mask exempt I was not allowed in. Staff would do the shopping for me.
“I said I wanted to browse. They repeated the same thing. I wrote to the manager.
“Here is his response:
“Dear Xxxxx
“Thank you for your email and I am sorry that you are unhappy with our facemask policy.
“We find ourselves in a very difficult position as every customer is important to us. Our Face Mask policy was introduced after some of our Xxxxx Shop staff were hit with Covid resulting in the shop being closed, deep cleaned and temporary staff being used for the 10 day isolation period. We had to implement a policy that meant we reduced the risk as far as possible of our staff, their families, and customers being exposed to this dreadful virus. Our policy is that no one may enter our shop without a mask. This is not in any way discriminatory. Where people are exempt from wearing a mask we have offered to do personal shopping and deliver to their homes for free within the local area.
“I do not believe that the law can force us to put our staff and customers at risk. Hopefully you are able to accept our position and I hope that this whole Covid world will be behind us shortly.”
Answer [Below is my opinion, based on my legal study. It should not be taken as gospel, nor as legal advice. Always research to the best of your ability and get personal legal advice where necessary]:
“Our policy is that no one may enter our shop without a mask. This is not in any way discriminatory.”
This statement is wrong. It IS discriminatory against those who are unable to wear a mask because of a disability. The policy overrides the government’s guidance on the issue, and breaches the Equality Act 2010.
“Where people are exempt from wearing a mask we have offered to do personal shopping and deliver to their homes for free within the local area.”
This is a reasonable OFFER. You are not obliged to accept the offer. If you decline, they should allow you into the shop to browse. HOWEVER, their offer could arguably fall under “reasonable adjustments” under the Equality Act. You may reasonably negotiate with the company and explain why that adjustment doesn’t work for you and why you think the government’s recommendation of allowing you in without a mask is the only viable option to put you on a level playing field with non-disabled people who CAN wear a mask without harm, or risk of harm, and freely browse the shop. Where the negotiation can’t be settled, the question would need to be tested in the courts...
... so it is down to you, whether this is something you wish to pursue or not.
CACUK is not able to pursue the myriad individual discrimination cases against all the various retailers and institutions who are operating so lawlessly under this oppressive bullshit NWO regime. CACUK is concerned with the high level policies that our government has erroneously set down for the sheepled businesses, which they appear to be grasping with both hands and running away with. In doing so, we hope to put an end to the madness and see a better future for everybody.
“We had to implement a policy that meant we reduced the risk as far as possible of our staff, their families, and customers being exposed to this dreadful virus.”
No, they CHOSE to implement a policy which they might BELIEVE reduces the risk. That doesn’t make the policy correct or reasonable.
“I do not believe that the law can force us to put our staff and customers at risk.”
This is correct. In the same way, the shop cannot force YOU to put yourself at risk by wearing a mask, if that could cause you harm.
“Hopefully you are able to accept our position...”
If you don’t accept their position then you have the option to walk away or to negotiate further. If you cannot reach an agreement that works for you, you then have the option to take legal action for discrimination against you.
Only you can make this decision, so decide if it’s worth it.
CACUK is not looking to fight individual cases with retailers; it is concerned with the reasoning behind the government’s guidance that’s driven the tyranny and madness sweeping our nation.
Join the class action group here: https://cacuk.world/
Look up the terms: “disability”, “protected characteristics” & “reasonable adjustments” in the Equality Act 2010 available here: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/pdfs/ukpga_20100015_en.pdf
Afterthought: this shitshow era of dealing with frightened automatons blinded by propaganda and incapable of clear reasoning, this provides us a great opportunity to sharpen our humanistic skills and reach out to win over hearts and minds. See the long game. Pick your battles, create a vision for your future.
CACUK is not looking to fight individual cases with retailers; it is concerned with the reasoning behind the government’s guidance that’s driven the tyranny and madness sweeping our nation.
Join the class action group here: https://cacuk.world/
Look up the terms: “disability”, “protected characteristics” & “reasonable adjustments” in the Equality Act 2010 available here: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/pdfs/ukpga_20100015_en.pdf
Afterthought: this shitshow era of dealing with frightened automatons blinded by propaganda and incapable of clear reasoning, this provides us a great opportunity to sharpen our humanistic skills and reach out to win over hearts and minds. See the long game. Pick your battles, create a vision for your future.
Class Action Covid UK
Harmed by Covid Measures? If you’ve suffered loss or injury because of Covid Measures in the UK, you may have a claim against the government for causing these harms. Class Action Covid UK covers the full spectrum of losses and injuries from all the Measures…
CACUK Support pinned «Answering this question I’ve just been asked by a CACUK cohort: “There is a local organic shop near me in Xxxxx. I went in there two weeks ago and for the first time was told that because I was mask exempt I was not allowed in. Staff would do the shopping…»
This Sunday at 4pm I will do a half-hour review/critique of the Ferguson Report.
That report is credited with driving lockdowns in the UK and US.
I will explain clearly why the report is EVIL and why it means we could potentially be in lockdown FOREVER.
I spent several days analysing the report, including reading some of their references and looking into the modelling code.
I will share my analysis with you, if you are interested, and give you a chance to ask questions. Zoom link will be posted in the CACUK Official Telegram Channel.
That report is credited with driving lockdowns in the UK and US.
I will explain clearly why the report is EVIL and why it means we could potentially be in lockdown FOREVER.
I spent several days analysing the report, including reading some of their references and looking into the modelling code.
I will share my analysis with you, if you are interested, and give you a chance to ask questions. Zoom link will be posted in the CACUK Official Telegram Channel.
CACUK Support pinned «This Sunday at 4pm I will do a half-hour review/critique of the Ferguson Report. That report is credited with driving lockdowns in the UK and US. I will explain clearly why the report is EVIL and why it means we could potentially be in lockdown FOREVER.…»
You are invited to an open Zoom meeting.
Topic:
Time:
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us04web.zoom.us/j/77521815732?pwd=UGNLRkxLVnBFeVRSNi81SVdUQjV6Zz09
Meeting ID: 775 2181 5732
Passcode: rs7Ru6
MEETING WILL BE RECORDED. By attending you consent to the recording.
The infamous Report 9 can be downloaded here: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2020-03-16-COVID19-Report-9.pdf
Share this with anyone who cares about the truth.
See you there! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Topic:
CACUK on Report 9: How the Ferguson Team could keep you in intermittent lockdown FOREVER. And what YOU can do about it. Time:
Feb 7, 2021 4pm London time (GMT) Join Zoom Meeting
https://us04web.zoom.us/j/77521815732?pwd=UGNLRkxLVnBFeVRSNi81SVdUQjV6Zz09
Meeting ID: 775 2181 5732
Passcode: rs7Ru6
MEETING WILL BE RECORDED. By attending you consent to the recording.
The infamous Report 9 can be downloaded here: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2020-03-16-COVID19-Report-9.pdf
Share this with anyone who cares about the truth.
See you there! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Zoom Video
Join our Cloud HD Video Meeting
Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise video communications, with an easy, reliable cloud platform for video and audio conferencing, chat, and webinars across mobile, desktop, and room systems. Zoom Rooms is the original software-based conference room solution…
CACUK Support pinned «You are invited to an open Zoom meeting. Topic: CACUK on Report 9: How the Ferguson Team could keep you in intermittent lockdown FOREVER. And what YOU can do about it. Time: Feb 7, 2021 4pm London time (GMT) Join Zoom Meeting https://us04web.zoo…»
Forwarded from Outlaw Medical Mandates
From https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645850/ this applies, I believe, to the AZ vaccine - traditional vaccines as opposed to the mRNA vaxxes. 1) CONFIRMS historical evidence of ADE with previous Corona vaccine experiments. 2) CONFIRMS sufficient info was available so that subjects should have been informed. 3) CONFIRMS fully informed consent was not procured in the trials. ... one word: GOTCHA! ......... NOW you can take them all to court for beach of the Nuremberg Code (but there are more recent, and better laws to use than the Nuremberg code, which is 70 years old and relative vague). SHARE THE SHIT WITH THIS ☝🏼!!!!!🙌🏼👊🏼🙏🏽
Forwarded from Power To The People UK
For anyone who has received a fine for ‘breaching covid legislations’ the first thing I recommend you do is to a data request from ACRO regarding any information they hold about you, including fines. I have had 3 fines so far and yet NONE are registered on their (very fraudulent and illegal) website. When you get this back you can then submit this to the council or organisation who are requesting you pay the fine (it’s usually the council) with a letter saying that you are not paying and don’t need to pay as there is no criminal or civil reason for you to do so and you can see that there is no data linking you to any Pentality Charge Notices.
You can do this with this link - https://www.acro.police.uk/SAStep1
You can do this with this link - https://www.acro.police.uk/SAStep1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sunday's Zoom - Ferguson's Perpetual Lockdown and Why THIS is the Key to Restoring our Freedoms. No Zoom this Sunday as it's Valentine's Day, but from 21st this will be a regular 4pm session. Links will be shared on CACUK Official.
Great news, we finally have a donorbox campaign (https://donorbox.org/cacuk) to raise funds for the ongoing work towards the case against the UK government, and any associated work to help stop the hoax and prevent it from happening again. no one is obliged to donate but do let people know, please, in case someone would like to contribute. Thank you. https://donorbox.org/cacuk
donorbox.org
Covid Measures Cause Harm. | CACUK (Powered by Donorbox)
WE SEEK JUSTICE FOR HARMS FROM "COVID MEASURES".Our case is different from other Covid cases. First, we challenge the pretext of a pandemic, based on the government's own data and information. We also highlight the government's assumption that v...