“Boris got told what to do now we’re in phase 3” these guys are young but they know exactly what’s going on..

Those who tried to get on the zoom call on Friday, my sincere apologies as we had some technical issues at the start but finally managed to get on around 8 minutes past 12 and we did have a great meeting, do join us next month - Friday 6th August.

This month we shared thoughts on what keeps us centred, focused and strong throughout this crisis of humanity...

The consensus seemed to be having some form of daily ritual, especially in the evening before bed but also connecting with nature during the day, framing our thoughts in positive terms, affirming our sovereignty - our free & powerful self. To do this regularly, even when we don’t feel like it, puts us in a place where we can deal with difficult situations as they arise.

We are definitely winning. 🙏🏼💙💛❤️🙏🏼

Nursery/School closure template email response
I received an email today, informing me my daughter's nursery will be closed because of an asymptomatic positive PCR result. I asked the nursery if they will refund the fees I have paid, or whether they are accepting key worker / vulnerable group children in the nursery during the closure period. I received a clear "NO" to both, quoting part of their terms and conditions, which state that where the closure is BEYOND THEIR CONTROL, there will be no refunds.

But following a guideline doesn't count as being 'beyond your control' so here is my response, which you're welcome to use as template - adapt it to your own circumstances...

Hi Xxxxx

Thanks for your quick reply.

Where you say, "we are fully closed during the isolation period as per government guidelines," this appears to mean that you are following guidelines, rather than enforced rules, when it comes to the closure of the nursery. Obviously we accept you are taking this action because you believe it to be in everybody's best interests; but it is difficult to see how such a closure can be, as you say, beyond your control. I say this because, if it were not up to you, and the government or some other body were forcing you to close the nursery, then it would be the government or that other body who would be responsible for compensating the parents for their financial loss during the closure period.

So, if there are hard rules that you are following, which you have no control over, and are forced to close whether you choose to or not, please forward me a written copy of these rules so that I can claim for my loss against the responsible party.

If you don't have written enforced rules, or you are following guidelines that leave it to your discretion how you manage a situation involving a positive PCR test, then I would have to say the closure is not beyond your control.

I have every sympathy for you in these difficult times. I would remind you however that the evidence shows nursery age children to be at practically zero risk from covid - both in catching and transmitting the disease. That, and the impact of the disruption to their routine from the closure would naturally have formed part of your decision-making. I am not suggesting you change your decision, only that you compensate for losses resulting from your decision, where it is not a decision beyond your control. You could perhaps try to claim back from the government any compensatory payouts you make to parents, if you believe the government is ultimately responsible, since they issued guidelines that you have followed. I imagine the government's response would be that, because it was only a guideline, the legal responsibility for the decision was yours - so it might be worth seeking legal advice on this, if you are unsure.

Please could you also provide me with a copy of the particular guidelines you are following, as they seem to be directed at schools rather than nurseries.

Also please inform me what compensation the nursery will receive when deciding to close for positive PCR results, including whether you can be compensated for the deep clean, and whether there is a 'covid budget' in place.
Many thanks,
========================================
https://t.me/CACUKsupport
https://t.me/OutMedMan

UPDATE: Early Years Childcare Providers should REFUND fees if they close for COVID.

Following my challenge to their stance that closure was “beyond their control” the nursery gave me a number to ring, which I did (0800 046 8687), and the very helpful and friendly staff provided information that was fairly conclusive, which I relayed to the nursery in an email as follows:
____________

Dear Xxxxxxx

I called the number you gave and they were helpful, they alerted me to the following:

1. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-early-years-and-childcare-closures/actions-for-early-years-and-childcare-providers-during-the-coronavirus-covid-19-pandemic#charging-parents-and-carers-if-their-child-is-unable-to-take-up-their-place

On this page there is a heading about 2/3 of the way down the page "Charging parents and carers if their child is unable to take up their place" and it says:

"The general principle is that providers should not charge parents or carers for services that cannot be provided. If there is a barrier to accessing childcare, based on government guidance or the law, the provider should not charge the parents or carers for this period."

2. The lady explained this came from the Competitions and Markets Authority (CMA) open letter to the early years sector available here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/904194/Open_letter_to_Nursery_and_Early_Years__settings.pdf

On page 3 of this letter it says,

"(i) Providers requiring full or excessively large fees for services which are not being carried out due to the pandemic public health restrictions and government guidance.

"10. Our view is that –

• Consumers should not have to pay for services that cannot be provided

• Consumers should also be offered a refund where services are paid for in advance but do not take place as agreed in the contract.

• Contract terms requiring consumers to pay providers who are not providing the services agreed in the contract are likely to be unfair and unenforceable"

3. The full advice from the CMA to the Early Years' Sector is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nursery-and-early-years-sector-covid-19-restrictions-and-consumer-law

I hope this helps...
________

https://t.me/CACUKsupport

https://t.me/OutMedMan

If anyone wants to host in their region please join the group ☝🏻

Dr. David Martin, legal and technical expert, one of the sharpest brains on the planet today, provides evidence to the Corona Committee on the origins of the alleged "novel" virus, including related patent info from 21 years ago. A must watch for anyone who likes technical and accurate facts: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-david-martin-dr-reiner-fuellmich-july-9-2021_RlmKScwsMf6ATEG.html

Read the BMJ story here: https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1656

My daughter’s nursery had to refund my fees during their COVID closure.

If every nursery and paid school were put under pressure this way, they’d think twice about shutting down.

The law says they can’t charge and must refund:

https://cacuk.uk/result-covid-compensation-confirmed

STATEMENT FROM THE BIG WEEKDAY EVENT TEAM ABOUT JULY 19TH 2021

1. Monday the 19th of July is the day for the Men and Women of this Country. This is not a protest or a march. We will be instructing the police whom we employ, to act lawfully and to protect us from harm, injury, and death.

This is their public duty as per the oath they swore. Most importantly the 19th is a day to protect our children. To stop the crimes being committed against us, without fear or favour and independent of government. We will submit crime reports on the day, more detail to follow.

2. Everyone’s safety is paramount, remember this is a PEACEFUL non-violent day, and families will be present, we do not advocate camping, and you attend at your own risk. We are powerful within the law; we do not need to break it!

3. As free Men and Women it is of course, up to you to arrive at a time of your convenience. We intend to start the day at 12 noon due to Parliament sitting times.

4. Parliament sitting times on the website for the 19th are 1430-2230 (subject to change). hence the 12 noon start. We would like you to stay as late as you can, although we understand this is not always possible, please come prepared with food and water.

5. Any statements released from other groups or individuals quoting association with the day and/or individuals in the team are representative of their own personal views only. Please follow The Great Reopening and London Protest channels for updates.

6. There is a Crowdfunder circulating for an AV van which is supported, but not associated with the day, whilst people are entitled to pursue their own endeavours, no crowd funding, merchandising or money exchanging by any groups is associated with those planning the main purpose of the day.

7. There will be a separate post with more details from Mark Sexton on how to complete your own crime report, please keep an eye on these channels for further information.

8. Channels:

London protest official:
https://t.me/londonofficialworldwiderally

The Great re-opening:
https://t.me/TGRINFOCHAT

Plan your Journey:
https://t.me/joinchat/4jsXmqg41Pw1YWE0

Thank you for your continued support. Please bring a friend, colleague, family member or someone else with you. In the meantime, stay positive, keep your vibration high and watch out for updates on the channels above.

“We have entered the era of apartheid. God help us”.

Lisbon appeal court Judge blasts off over Portugal’s “Sanitary Apartheid”

By Natasha Donn -10th July 2021

Hundreds of people are sharing a Facebook post written by Lisbon Appeal Court judge Florbela Sebastião e Silva in reaction to the decisions now emanating from the government.

Judge Florbela’s words show that the anger growing in Portugal is not exclusive to the working classes (meaning here the people trying to work, not low-income citizens): it is spreading through every corner of society.

This is her message, coming as citizens everywhere start to query the sense in doing as they are being ordered:

“ I am aware that most people do not have authoritative legal knowledge and, if they have any, it is always general knowledge that is the result of the learning that every citizen should have access to and just enough to exercise their most basic rights.

“What upsets me as the judge that I have been for more than 25 years, including exercising duties in a Superior Court, is to see legal instruments presented, without support in the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic, that are creating an authentic apartheid within Portuguese society.

“How is it possible that Portugal, having been the second country in the world to abolish slavery, and even one of the first countries to sign international treaties for the defense of human rights, is now a country that discriminates its inhabitants on the basis of a health passport and on the assumption that people are all sick and as such have to undergo tests – in this case PCR tests whose reliability, as we know, is null and even highly misleading – in order to simply be able to have lunch in a restaurant?

“The Constitution of the Portuguese Republic (CRP) has not been suspended, nor can its rules be altered, delimited or reduced by a mere Resolution of the Council of Ministers.

“The Constitution of the Portuguese Republic can only be amended by the Assembly of the Republic after 5 years following its last revision or, in case of absolute necessity, extraordinarily, but provided that a majority of 4/5 of the Members of Parliament in effective exercise of their duties is obtained – according to article 284 of the CRP.

“As I have explained before, there is no legal basis for a “State of Calamity” or a “State of Alert” enshrined in the Law.

“Thus, pursuant to the provisions of article 44, paragraph 1 of the CRP: “All citizens are guaranteed the right to move and settle freely in any part of national territory.”

“This rule of free movement of people – also enshrined in European Union legislation – cannot be suspended, revoked or suppressed by a mere Resolution of the Council of Ministers outside of any State of Emergency or State of Siege, and even in these cases , conditioning has to prove to be justified and must always be for a very limited period of time.

“Now, at a time when the whole world is returning to normal, when the masks – those of COVID and others – are dropping and putting an end to the shameful restrictions that led millions to unemployment and misery, and to a state of Collective insanity, Portugal carries on restrictions, without any constitutional basis and against, not only the Law of the Nation, but more importantly against all European legislation and recommendations?

“No one can be discriminated against for reasons of health – if these were really the reasons at the base of this pandemic – even less for not taking a test or receiving a vaccine.

“And it is unthinkable that someone sees their access to a restaurant, a hotel or any other establishment subject to a test that, as I have said, is not reliable (scientists themselves have said this: it depends on the number of cycles used and it is already known that the standard number in Portugal is above 35 cycles, which renders the test absolutely unreal and useless), and that translates into a medical act that can only be performed by qualified personnel with the express and informed consent of the person .

“The last time I read through all my legal bundles, Portugal was a State of Law, with clear rules on governance, the division of State powers, the reservation of Law and respect for human dignity.

“Now, and unfortunately, I see that my country has become a former South Africa with an Apartheid regime: a Banana Republic where Constitutional Law is discarded

“And all this when it is already known the DGS, summoned by the Administrative Court of the Circle of Lisbon, came to admit that after all, only 152 deaths have been registered by COVID, and only 4 were subject to autopsy.

“The WHO itself, in a communiqué dated 25 June 2021, has already stated, in black and white, that it is not recommended to carry out tests in asymptomatic people, much less on the scale that Portugal intends to implement.

“Any PCR test is a medical act that must be authorized and no one can be discriminated against for refusing to take the test.

“Nor can anyone be stopped from accessing public places on the basis of whether or not the test takes place – precisely because it has to be consented.

“Nor is it possible to understand that these Orwellian restrictions only work on weekends. If there was really a public health situation, the virus would not only run rampant on weekends, nor only in restaurants.

“It is absolutely unacceptable for the Portuguese population to see restrictions imposed that have no scientific basis, no serious clinical support – as the DGS admitted before the Administrative Court of the Lisbon Circle when it said it did not have any scientific documents to support the sanitary measures imposed – which are affronts to human dignity, the Portuguese Legal Order and the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic – which, last time I looked, was still the highest Law of the Nation and the one that still defends us from people, party machines and lobbies who are gluttonous in their thirst to impose their will on others.

“After all, wasn’t this what the “Revolution” of April 25th was all about?

“Portugal is no longer under rule of law or a State where human rights are respected.

“We have entered the era of apartheid. God help us”.

Judge Florbela may be one of the first to start putting her head above the parapet, but considering the number of times her post has been shared since being uploaded last night, her message is travelling rapidly as the country approaches municipal elections (in September) – the first real moment when people can show how they feel about the way daily life has been manipulated in the name of a virus which over 99% of the population recovers from at home.

👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼read above words of Lisbon appeal court judge, Portugal.

Have you signed up yet? vaxcontrolgroup.com - set up by freedom hubbers, have spoken to them personally and recommend joining to support the cause and long term project. I'm told Mike Yeadon has joined.

SINGERS WANTED!!!!👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
CHILDREN AND ADULT SINGERS REQUIRED🎤🎤
On Monday 19 July we are planning to join the protest outside Parliament and plan to sing and video record an alternative version of Pink Floyd’s Another Brick in the wall. Changing the words to ‘We don’t need no vaccination.....’

So we need lots of children aged 8 to 14 years. There is only one verse repeated. It is a very very easy song.

Join this channel where you will find more info and contact details. https://t.me/joinchat/VIqoxLd4qLk2NDNk LYRICS
We don't need no vaccination.
We don't need no forced control.
Experimental DNA Changes.
Doctor leave our kids alone

Hey! Doctor!
Leave them kids alone!

All in all you’re just an
evil brick in the wall.
Nuremberg Trials
no excuses at all!!

https://youtu.be/NNNK53tpg2w

Best video so far on the vaccine divide. please like & share widely

Milton Keynes event