... and the whole of Report 9 is littered with frequent warnings and disclaimers, thereby absolving its responsibility for any advice taken therefrom. Note the disclaimer on efficacy of vaccines, even so, the (FALSE) assumption is there, that vaccines are EXPECTED to prevent transmission!!
Not related to class action or government negligence but proof that lawyers are doing their jobs and a PRECEDENT for all future mask discrimination cases. Read the last line in particular.
Trawling through the Ferguson report (Report 9) - measures were always meant to be in place for a minimum of 3 months and up to 2 years. And it shows how the second wave gets created out of the suppression measures. Nothing to do with viral behaviour. 100% Man made! “The more successful a strategy is at temporary suppression, the larger the later epidemic is predicted to be... due to a lesser build-up of herd immunity.” DO YOU THINK IT WOULD HAVE HELPED THE PUBLIC TO HAVE KNOWN THIS?????
Forwarded from Liz Evans
The UKMFA, Lawyers for Liberty and The Workers Union of England have published an Open Letter to Employers demanding Covid-19 Vaccination of Employees, for employees and potential employees to share with employers who are proposing to mandate Covid-19 vaccines on their employees. It outlines the legal rights of the employee to informed consent, bodily autonomy and medical freedom, and relevant employment law protections afforded to employees. It summarises the legal duties of employers. It also summarises the potential risks of Covid-19 vaccines and the trial data which indicates that Covid-19 vaccines do NOT prevent infection or transmission of the virus. Please share far and wide - this should protect workers from unlawful mandates and stop them being sacked for refusing to comply.
https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5fa5866942937a4d73918723/6017f56ad166465fb9025da6_UKMFA_L4L_Workers_Union-Employers_Vaccine_Open_Letter.pdf
https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5fa5866942937a4d73918723/6017f56ad166465fb9025da6_UKMFA_L4L_Workers_Union-Employers_Vaccine_Open_Letter.pdf
Answering this question I’ve just been asked (see screenshots):
1. The Fuellmich case is not yet a global class action, nor has the Fuellmich team’s work been applied to any part of the UK as yet.
2. CACUK is a negligence case against government officials for harms suffered by people in the UK only. It can be seen as a parallel case to the Fuellmich case, which is currently running in Germany, the US and Canada.
3. CACUK is a civil case, not a criminal case. There are no “victims” in a civil case, only “claimants.” (A separate criminal case is being pursued elsewhere.)
4. If the case wins, you cannot claim compensation from any individual or institution who supports the measures. Only the named defendant can be ordered to pay damages and this is decided by the judge(s). If you have a claim against a particular company, you must pursue that separately as a personal claim.
5. The defendant in a civil case is not found “guilty” of a crime and is not called a “criminal” from a legal standpoint. If the case were to escalate to the ICC, that may change.
6. As to the source of any compensatory funds, that depends on whether the defendant is liable in their personal capacity or as part of an organisation.
Hope that helps. Please feel free to ask any questions you need clarified in the CACUK Community Chat group and I will try my best to answer them.
1. The Fuellmich case is not yet a global class action, nor has the Fuellmich team’s work been applied to any part of the UK as yet.
2. CACUK is a negligence case against government officials for harms suffered by people in the UK only. It can be seen as a parallel case to the Fuellmich case, which is currently running in Germany, the US and Canada.
3. CACUK is a civil case, not a criminal case. There are no “victims” in a civil case, only “claimants.” (A separate criminal case is being pursued elsewhere.)
4. If the case wins, you cannot claim compensation from any individual or institution who supports the measures. Only the named defendant can be ordered to pay damages and this is decided by the judge(s). If you have a claim against a particular company, you must pursue that separately as a personal claim.
5. The defendant in a civil case is not found “guilty” of a crime and is not called a “criminal” from a legal standpoint. If the case were to escalate to the ICC, that may change.
6. As to the source of any compensatory funds, that depends on whether the defendant is liable in their personal capacity or as part of an organisation.
Hope that helps. Please feel free to ask any questions you need clarified in the CACUK Community Chat group and I will try my best to answer them.