British Australian Community
1.63K subscribers
266 photos
154 videos
1 file
395 links
The BAC exists to promote and defend the interests of Anglo-Celtic Australians

All Links: https://tr.ee/72lgAz

Website: www.britishaustraliancommunity.com.au

JOIN US: http://britishaustraliancommunity.com.au/join/
Download Telegram
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Vision of GENUINE Reconciliation: Part 2 of 4 - Two Founding Peoples

Also relevant to reciprocal reconciliation is what both sides contributed to the other in their history together. Both contributed to Australian identity. Indigenous peoples’ main contribution was to share their land. Though the sharing was usually involuntary, it nevertheless makes ATSI people foundational for the nation.

Click HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US
on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ‘5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Vision of GENUINE Reconciliation: Part 3 of 4 - Non Negotiable Terms

Australia has two historic peoples, indigenous and Anglo-Celtic, both worthy of recognition, whether in the Constitution, in legislation, or in educational curricula.

If the Constitution is to be amended to afford recognition to Australia’s founding peoples, it is appropriate that both indigenous and Anglo Australians be recognised. At present indigenous peoples are shown sympathy, while Anglo history and behaviour are often vilified.

Written and spoken by Dr. Frank Salter.

WATCH ON YOUTUBE

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ‘5
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Vision of GENUINE Reconciliation: Part 3 of 4 - Non Negotiable Terms

Dr. Frank Salter highlights FOUR NON-NEGOTIABLE terms regarding GENUINE reconciliation. Can you think of any others?

Click HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ‘4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Vision of GENUINE Reconciliation: Part 3 of 4 - Non Negotiable Terms

No act of reconciliation should be allowed to threaten national continuity, unity or identity.

Click HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ’―5
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Vision of GENUINE Reconciliation: Part 3 of 4 - Non Negotiable Terms

Australia must settle indigenous grievance and minority assertiveness in general, or it will be less able to navigate the hazardous regional environment that is coming in the near future.

Click HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ‘5
MULTICULTURAL HYPOCRISY

In multicultural politics, it's not only normal but appropriate for individuals to be conscious of their cultural or ethnic identities and active in defending them, but the white majority is punished for expressing ethnic identity and preferences.

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ‘7
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Vision of GENUINE Reconciliation: Part 4 of 4 - Negotiable Terms

In order to establish trust, Aborigines should apologise to Anglo-Australians, when appropriate, for transgressions committed by members of their communities.

An Aboriginal apology would not at all excuse instances of bad behaviour towards indigenous people or nullify prime minister Rudd’s apology. But it is surely reasonable that indigenous leaders should apologise for patterns of bad behaviour shown by their own local communities.

CLICK HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
❀4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE HISTORIC AUSTRALIAN NATION πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί

We acknowledge the Anglo explorers,
pioneers and their descendants
who planted the British flag and
Western Civilisation on this continent,
creating the Australian nation.

We acknowledge the Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander peoples
who have lived here since the Dreamtime.

And we acknowledge the
Federal Commonwealth of Australia,
created by the nation under the Crown
to guard the nation and
the liberty of all citizens.

CLICK HERE for more content

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
❀6πŸ‘Ž3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Freedom of Speech is the first casualty of mass indiscriminate immigration.

Dr. Frank Salter discusses this and more at the Round Table Forum hosted by Western Heritage Australia.

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ”₯9πŸ‘2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Will YOU Answer The Call?

Your support is crucial in defending Anglo-Celtic Interests at all levels and preserving our identity and culture.

πŸ›‘οΈ JOIN THE BAC TODAY πŸ›‘οΈ

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί FOLLOW US πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί
❀14
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A VISION OF GENUINE RECONCILIATION: Part 4/4 - NEGOTIABLE TERMS

Senator Jacinta Price points out that in 2016 only 8 percent of the 1,082 indigenous-specific programs had been evaluated. Of those that were evaluated, the methods used were anecdotal and did not measure effectiveness. Price concludes that the β€œclose the gap” industry has failed.

Administrative irrationality begins with the failure to analyse the β€œgap”, meaning indigenous disability. Poor indigenous outcomes in education, income, child care, and criminality remain unexplained by government agencies. It is assumed that differences in outcome must be due to externally-imposed unfair disadvantage.

Click HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ‘7
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A VISION OF GENUINE RECONCILIATION: Part 4/4 - NEGOTIABLE TERMS

Truth-telling should also involve indigenous leaders. They should cease blaming Anglo-Australia for all their ills and stop supporting those who cast that slur or who belittle the nation.

They should not allow themselves to be used as battering rams by Anglophobes and others who would harm the Australian nation.

Click HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ‘5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A VISION OF GENUINE RECONCILIATION: Part 4/4 - NEGOTIABLE TERMS

This paper has been arguing that any form of recognition, including a voice, should be designed and enacted equitably. That includes financial contributions.

If indigenous people have agency, should not those who participate in a voice pay some of its cost? After all, the proposed voice is designed to be a private ethnic good. None of its advocates have provided justification for having non-indigenous citizens provide all the funding. What could be such a reason?

Click HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ‘4❀1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Frank Salter dropping TRUTH BOMBS with 'cancelled' Neighbours star @damienrichardson

The real problem as Damien sees it, is not the Left, but the mainstream conservative gatekeepers that work against the truth coming out.


Damien talks about the difficulties of having an original thought in the arts industry and how that led to him being cancelled for publicly refusing to take the jab. Although, having lost a job on television, many years ago, for writing an article critical of feminism, he had technically already been cancelled. Is it possible to be 'cancelled' twice?

Last month Damien was even vilified in the Age as LITERALLY HITLER for daring to identify the interests of white heterosexual males.

FOLLOW US
Click HERE for the FULL video
πŸ”₯8❀1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A VISION OF GENUINE RECONCILIATION: Part 4/4 - NEGOTIABLE TERMS

In order to establish trust, Aborigines should apologise to Anglo-Australians, when appropriate, for transgressions committed by members of their communities.

An Aboriginal apology would not at all excuse instances of bad behaviour towards indigenous people or nullify prime minister Rudd’s apology. But it is surely reasonable that indigenous leaders should apologise for patterns of bad behaviour shown by their own local communities.

Click HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
⚑4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A VISION OF GENUINE RECONCILIATION: Part 4/4 - NEGOTIABLE TERMS

Indigenous leaders must deliver, at least to some degree.
Saying β€œsorry” is nice, but non-indigenous-Australians primarily want the bad behaviour to end or at least decline to an acceptable level. The rest of the nation will provide support, but indigenous communities must solve this horrendous problem themselves.

There are no excuses. If they request help from local, state and federal governments, the nation will answer Yes. Community governance? Yes. Alcohol bans? Yes. Demands for sovereignty? No. Acceptance of attacks on the nation? Absolutely NOT!

Click HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ‘7
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Why does MASS IMMIGRATION undermine our social institutions?

πŸ‘‰πŸ»
FOLLOW US πŸ‘ˆπŸ»
πŸ›‘οΈ
JOIN THE BAC πŸ›‘οΈ
πŸ”₯8πŸ‘2⚑1🀬1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A VISION OF GENUINE RECONCILIATION: Part 4/4 - NEGOTIABLE TERMS

Responsible negotiation partners should also show consideration for the interests of all major stakeholders, which means citizens as a whole, including the Anglo-core nation.

And that will entail rejecting the anti-white component of the multicultural industry. Independently-minded and responsible spokesmen should step forward. Unity between the nation and its indigenous members should help, as would governments taking a stand and actively supporting patriotic indigenous leaders. The combination would be powerful.

Click HERE for the FULL video

FOLLOW US on all of your favourite platforms
πŸ‘7