Identifying Cain’s Mark - An Excerpt from Jeffrey Mardis’ Book: The Amazing Prophecy of Job (Part Two)

So please know that we’re not talking about an indictment against anyone. We’re talking about the BIBLE and SCIENCE. And the fact is, at death, our skin turns black, regardless of our ethnicity. Now, if that offends the reader, I’m sorry, there’s nothing I can do about it. Facts are stubborn things. And to be fair, in case you missed it, it’s also mentioned that this stage of decay brings with it sun-bleached “white” bones. So, “black” is not the only color named. No one is knocking anyone’s race. But, since a living person’s skeleton is hidden beneath the skin, a sun-bleached, white kind of mark upon Cain’s bones would’ve hardly been practical. Skin is part of man’s OUTWARD appearance, while bones are not. Thus, a death-like, black skin color would be the more practical sign. But regardless of how God marked Cain, the mark wasn’t given so that others would KILL HIM, but so that others would know NOT TO KILL HIM. What!? Yes:

“And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, LEST any finding him should kill him.” Gen. 4:15

The word “lest” means “to avoid the risk of” (see also Gen. 3:3, 11:4, 19:15, Eph. 2:8-9, etc.). Cain’s mark was for his protection because he, in turn, typified the Jew. Just as Cain killed his brother (Abel), so too did the Jews kill theirs (the Lord Jesus Christ). And just as Israel is a protected people, despite their heinous crime (Rom. 11:1-5), so was Cain.

If this is so, that black skin was Cain’s mark (Gen. 4:15), it in no way means that “white people are better than black people.” Nor does it mean that those of African descent are “demons” or are “unable to be saved” or any such wicked, heretical, nonsense that some on occasion have espoused (like the Mormon/LDS cult, Nazism, white supremacists, etc.).

-Pages 74-75

Source: https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/product/the-amazing-prophecy-of-job/

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: Neither Jew nor Greek?

Opponents of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which advocates ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, often argue, "There are no distinctions between nations anymore; don't you know that there is no longer Jew nor Greek?" The verse they reference is Galatians 3:28, which states,

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

However, when read in context, the opponents' argument quickly falls apart. If applied consistently, the opponent would also have to affirm transgenderism or non-binary identities, as the verse also states that there is neither male nor female. Simply put, this verse is merely emphasising that God shows no partiality in regard to the gospel (Rom. 2:11). Just as distinctions between male and female still exist, so too do distinctions between Jew and Greek.

@Kinism

Modern Integration Founded by a Jesuit Priest by Bryan Denlinger

There are so many people who persistently proclaim that it is the Jews who are behind the race mixing agenda. Though, no doubt there are Jews involved in promoting it¹, I have yet to hear these same people point the finger at the malevolent and damnable Jesuit Order as having any involvement, much less being the root of it. In many cases it seems to be a convenient omission of details in order to cover up for Rome.

¹See the previous video I posted by Bryan Denlinger which exposes some of the papal court Jews who were involved in the disgraceful overthrow of Virginia state law in the Loving v. Virginia case.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Malcolm X on Voluntary Racial Separation

Unlike his counterpart, Marxist Lucifer King Jr., Malcolm X did not believe in the total integration of the races. Instead, he believed in voluntary racial separation unto nationhood. He was truly a black nationalist. As a follower of Elijah Muhammad (as was Muhammad Ali, whom we will hear from later), he was also vehemently against miscegenation. In an interview with Louis Lomax, Malcolm stated:

“Only a man who is ashamed of what he is will marry out of his race. There has to be something wrong when a man or a woman leaves his own people and marries somebody of another kind. Men who are proud of being black marry black women; women who are proud of being black marry black men.”

-Lomax, Louis E. “A Summing Up: Louis Lomax Interviews Malcolm X.” When the Word Is Given: a Report on Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X, and the Black Muslim World, page 170

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

It is quite a dismal state of affairs when lost Hamite Muslims have more sense to believe in racial separation and sticking with their own kind in marriage than most Baptist preachers do today! This also dispels the misconception that only white supremacists believe in the separation of the races and the maintaining of racial purity.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: of one Blood?

Often, opponents of Kinism, the Christian doctrine of ethno-segregation, will state something such as, "Well, if nationhood is defined by ancestral lineage, then we are all of one nation because of Adam anyway". Scripture refutes this notion in Acts 17:26-27, which states,

"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:" ¹

In this passage, we learn that God created humanity from a common blood origin, presumably referring to Adam. However, even with this shared ancestry, the intentional division and establishment of distinct ethnic nations, ethnicities, by God, along with the appointment of their respective bounds and habitations, remains unaffected.

@Kinism

We catch a lot of flack here for our biblical stand on the separation of the races - everything from being called self hating whites to hating anyone who isn’t white - both couldn’t be further from the truth. We take the position that every rational person took no more than a century ago, even non believers knew enough.

We are commanded to reach the entire world with the gospel. Shame on anyone who won’t give the gospel to someone based on their skin or culture! You can support biblical separation and still care for the lost and dying world that doesn’t look like you. Was Cassius Clay a white supremacist for his mainline view on the races?


https://t.me/baptistgreek/1547

Kinism: Bounds of Habitation

Even with the acknowledgment of the reality of ethnic nations, critics of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which teaches ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, may argue, "Well, even if nations are defined by ethnicities and indeed exist, why should that dissuade us from mixing, integrating and coexisting?" However, scripture unequivocally declares that God intended nations, or ethnos, to have distinct, separate, bounds of habitation. If proven true, this would preclude any possibility of integration between ethnicities (nations) because we wouldn't have any ability to mix in the first place due to God-intended, divinely appointed, restrictions.

When looking at the scriptures, the concept of God intentionally setting bounds of habitation, distinct separations, and restrictions between nations is easily found. Firstly, in Deuteronomy 32:8, which states,

"When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel."

This notion is also later reiterated in the New Testament further emphasising not only the current and ongoing reality of nations but also their divinely appointed intentional separation/segregation. Acts 17:26-27 reads,

"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation"

Thus, to mix is to defy God's ordained order for this universe, distorting God's instituted design and intention for His creation.

@Kinism

It’s just a conspiracy bro

Kinism: Why Bother?

Critics of Kinism, a Christian belief in ethnic-based segregation, may argue, "Even if God intended nations to be separate, why bother enforcing that?" This statement, as I'll explain, is not just ignorant but also hypocritical.

First, consider how we view homosexual marriage as sinful—not just because of verses against sodomy (homosexual acts) but also because marriage was established to be a covenant exclusively between man and woman. Conservative Christians universally support maintaining this God-established institution.

Therefore, if you concede that Scripture teaches that God Himself instituted and ordered the distinctions and boundaries of nations, shouldn't we also aim to uphold this institution too? It would be inconsistent, if not hypocritical, to support one but not the other, for both are so tied to the ordering of the Lord's creation and instituted ways for how human life should be conducted.

@Kinism

Baptist Evangelist Justin Childers on Genesis 9:27

In the following video, brother Childers proves that Genesis 9:27 was not nullified by the New Testament and that the verse still applies to this very day. Childers speaks about how nearly all Christians for 1900 years had the same view on race relations but it all suddenly changed after 1964 (which is something I have reiterated on this channel numerous times). In the video, the arguments of the race mixers, based on faulty interpretations of Galatians 3:28 and Acts 17:26, are completely dismantled. Thus showing that there is no contradiction whatsoever between Genesis 9 and the aforementioned verses in the New Testament.

https://youtu.be/KDCnF0zGois?

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: Against Miscegenation
- Pt. 1.

The primary and consistent basis for Christians opposing homosexual marriage lies in the belief that God instituted marriage exclusively between a man and a woman, not in verses against homosexual actions. Likewise, God has also instituted the separation of nations. If nations are to remain distinct, it logically follows that miscegenation, the mixing of races/ethnicities, would be excluded. This is because individuals of different races (nations/ethnicities) would not have the opportunity to interact, mingle, and consequently form marital unions, as it would contradict the intended separation of nations—by forming a single covenant between two distinct nations.

To simplify, scripture dictates that the condemnation of homosexuality stems from God's established order of creation, where marriage is exclusively instituted for a union between a man and a woman. In the same vein, God's intention for nations is their separation and therefore inability to race mix, reinforcing the idea that consistency in belief supports both the rejection of homosexual unions and inter-national (ethnic/racial) unions—race mixing.

@Kinism

"Race is only skin deep!"

Race is a reality. St Augustine, when commenting on Galatians 3:28, teaches that racial differences remain during this life and they should be acknowledged and respected. The Church Father comments, "Difference of race or condition or sex is indeed taken away by the unity of faith, but it remains embedded in our mortal interactions, and in the journey of this life the apostles themselves teach that it is to be respected."

Pastor Mike Schreib on Race

Mike Schreib, who was the pastor of Bible Baptist Church International, presents a straightforward Bible study on the topic of race. In the beginning of the study he expounds upon the implications of Deuteronomy 32:8 and Acts 17:26 in regards to God’s desire for true diversity via separation and its relation to salvation. He correctly exposits Galatians 3:28, something the typical race mixer is incapable of doing, and spends the bulk of the rest of his study in Genesis 9. While commenting on the 9th chapter of Genesis brother Schreib covers the origin and history of the races and well as providing an excellent description of different non-physical characteristics of the races. His particular comments on the white man are quite insightful. He also makes some great spiritual applications to the furtherance of the gospel and the paramount importance of the King James Bible throughout.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: Against Miscegenation
- Pt. 2.

The Biblically prescribed prohibition of miscegenation, or race-mixing, is very easy to prove. Consider the following argument:

Premise 1: God created distinct ethnonations. (Gen. 10:5)

Premise 2: God instituted and defined the boundaries of their habitations, intending for them to remain distinct and separate. (Acts. 17:26-27)

Conclusion: Therefore, intermarriage between these nations goes against God's intended purpose of creation—separation, constituting a deviation from His will and, consequently, a sinful act. (1 Jn. 3:4, Jas. 4:17 )

@Kinism