Owner. Owned, ownership.

These words are noted over 20 times in my White paper.

Possession.... zero

Currency, once.

But, that relates to fiat. Not bitcoin.

CSW
Nov 5, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636120301163800?thread_ts=1636120301.163800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3328

"Understanding the Bitcoin Whitepaper |
Section 5: Network"

https://youtu.be/M4MJnmUEMjQ

"Understanding the Bitcoin Whitepaper |
Section Ten: Privacy"

https://youtu.be/VyEZJYH8L7Y

I don’t mention identity or rather identities that often in my White Paper. I did in some of the earlier drafts, but they became too long. I think my earliest draft of the White Paper was sixty pages. That said, the section on privacy notes that identities are firewalled from the transactions. As such, it is very important to note that identity does exist in bitcoin.

In section 10, my White Paper has a figure that mentions the “New Privacy Model”. This section does not say that people are anonymous. The nature of pseudonymous exchanges requires identity. However, what you will see is that the public transaction chain is separated from the identity information. Those exchanging goods and services can also exchange identity. Additionally, there are methodologies for cryptographic forms of proof that will link identity off-chain and out of the public eye while maintaining the integrity of any information.

You will note that I say that bitcoin achieves a level of privacy. I do not state that it achieves complete anonymity. What I do say is that a trusted third party does not need your information. To think about this, you need to understand that there is no longer a trusted third-party fiduciary with information about the individuals who were exchanging. There are requirements for identity to be maintained directly, but that is separate from third-party exchanges.

You will also note that the system requires all transactions to be publicly announced. So if you read that section, you will see that we break the flow of information in another place. I do mention the word anonymous, but this is to do with pseudonymity. The public cannot link a transaction. As I note, it is similar to a stock exchange. In the ticker tape, only limited information is publicly made available. However, all of the information concerning the identity of the parties is known by the brokers and the owners.

Think about this in more detail. I’m referencing an analogy of a stock exchange and the ticker tape. The public information is the ticker tape, and that is analogous to the Blockchain. At no point will people believe that the stock market works without identity. The owners of shares are known. They may not be publicly announced, but that is not the issue in this section.

Silk Road was trying to create a system that was balanced in favour of the criminals.

The criminal got yo be private, but the victims (users) sold their identity to the criminals.

The user sends bitcoin etc, the criminals have your address and a proof of complicity. This lead to child exploitation, blackmail and worse.

CSW
Nov 15, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636983026023800?thread_ts=1636983026.023800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3430

I don’t mention identity or rather identities that often in my White Paper. I did in some of the earlier drafts, but they became too long. I think my earliest draft of the White Paper was sixty pages. That said, the section on privacy notes that identities are firewalled from the transactions. As such, it is very important to note that identity does exist in bitcoin.

In section 10, my White Paper has a figure that mentions the “New Privacy Model”. This section does not say that people are anonymous. The nature of pseudonymous exchanges requires identity. However, what you will see is that the public transaction chain is separated from the identity information. Those exchanging goods and services can also exchange identity. Additionally, there are methodologies for cryptographic forms of proof that will link identity off-chain and out of the public eye while maintaining the integrity of any information.

You will note that I say that bitcoin achieves a level of privacy. I do not state that it achieves complete anonymity. What I do say is that a trusted third party does not need your information. To think about this, you need to understand that there is no longer a trusted third-party fiduciary with information about the individuals who were exchanging. There are requirements for identity to be maintained directly, but that is separate from third-party exchanges.

You will also note that the system requires all transactions to be publicly announced. So if you read that section, you will see that we break the flow of information in another place. I do mention the word anonymous, but this is to do with pseudonymity. The public cannot link a transaction. As I note, it is similar to a stock exchange. In the ticker tape, only limited information is publicly made available. However, all of the information concerning the identity of the parties is known by the brokers and the owners.

Think about this in more detail. I’m referencing an analogy of a stock exchange and the ticker tape. The public information is the ticker tape, and that is analogous to the Blockchain. At no point will people believe that the stock market works without identity. The owners of shares are known. They may not be publicly announced, but that is not the issue in this section.

Silk Road was trying to create a system that was balanced in favour of the criminals.

The criminal got yo be private, but the victims (users) sold their identity to the criminals.

The user sends bitcoin etc, the criminals have your address and a proof of complicity. This lead to child exploitation, blackmail and worse.

CSW
Nov 15, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636983026023800?thread_ts=1636983026.023800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3430

"By March 2008, Wright testified, he had a handwritten version of what would become the bitcoin white paper. He reduced that to a 40-page typed version, then a 20-page version, then a 10-page version, which is what he sent Dave Kleiman, he said"

Kleiman v. Wright: Craig Wright Takes Stand Again in Final Day of Testimony.
Deirdra Funcheon
Nov 23, 202

https://www.coindesk.com/business/2021/11/23/kleiman-v-wright-craig-wright-takes-stand-again-in-final-day-of-testimony/

The Great Wiping Controversy.pdf

"Origins of the Bitcoin Whitepaper - Neo4j Tutorial on Digital Forensics and Document Fingerprinting" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/FdQV9ZudZzA

Wright's 'Bitcoin Bible' Copyright Win Slips Challenge - Law360
https://www.law360.com/articles/1449017/wright-s-bitcoin-bible-copyright-win-slips-challenge

It does not matter that 1 million home users find an error. They can’t do anything about it. The only way to report an error and reject the block is to find a new block.
 
Consequently, the entire claim that anything other than a node defined in the White Paper in section 5 that creates blocks matters is false.

It is not just misleading.
 
The claim being presented that UASF nodes have any power in any Blockchain system is misrepresenting the nature of the system as far as to even go into fraudulent misrepresentation, and it is bordering on criminal fraud. Those people promoting this are deceiving investors.

CSW
Jan 5, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1641415391441100?thread_ts=1641415391.441100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3630

Un tribunal de Londres se negó el miércoles a revisar una decisión que otorgaba al científico informático Craig Wright los derechos de propiedad intelectual sobre la "biblia bitcoin". https://law360.com/articles/1449017…

To perjure is to knowingly make misleading or false statements under oath or to sign a legal document that you know to be false or misleading. The claim that these people have not been able to tell what a node is when a node is very clearly defined in my White Paper to be a system that creates blocks is when taken in any other light misleading.

Anybody who tells you that a bitcoin node can be counted if it has never created a block is lying and disseminating a false statement. Those who are bitcoin developers know the difference and understand what a node, is but they are actively promoting a falsehood to cover their lies and crimes.

It will not be me who faces perjury charges. It will be the members of COPA and the BTC developers who have actively promoted a falsehood in court that go and face perjury.

The claim that nodes can be unknown is also false. The Blockchain is always going to broadcast the addresses associated with a node that has found a block. Simply put, any exchange that accepts transactions from a system that is breaching rules and court orders will be cut off from the global financial system and hence, will cease to exist.

Moreover, you can enforce against the known miners. Any miner that fails to implement controls is also going to be held in breach. That is, even if only 50% of miners were known, that would be sufficient because the sale of blocks to exchanges that are unknown would need to be recorded and hence known.

Every single node utilises systems that go through the United States. Everyone users systems that go through Britain and Europe. The so-called claims that these are isolated are false. The Fibre relay network in itself forms a foundation that be acted against.

CSW
Jan 10, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1641822782070800?thread_ts=1641822782.070800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3690

From the BitCoin White Paper:

- Not double spending.
- Not trusted third party.
- Peer-to-peer distributed timestamp server.
- From one party to another.
- Timestamps transactions by hashing.
- Chain of hash-based proof-of-work.
- Record in a public history of transactions
- Small casual transactions (micro transactions)
- Payment system based on cryptographic proof.
- Protect sellers from fraud.
- Routine escrow mechanisms could easily be implemented.
- Chronological order of transactions.
- Chain of digital signatures.
- Verify by the chain of
ownership.
- The earliest transaction is the one that counts.
- The proof-of-work solves the decision making.
- The honest chain will grow the fastest.
- Incentive make more profitable to play by the rules.
- Moore's Law, storage should not be a problem.
- Accept alerts from network nodes (WP Section: 8- SPV)
- Privacy: by keeping public keys anonymous.(similar to stock exchanges)
- A new key pair should be used for each transaction.
- Nodes do not need to be identified.


Not from the BitCoin White Paper:
- RBF (Replace By Fees)
- SegWit (Segregated Witness)
- Lingtning Network
- Taproot

https://t.me/BitcoinWP/406

10. Privacy

The traditional banking model achieves a level of privacy by limiting access to information to the parties involved and the trusted third party. The necessity to announce all transactions publicly
precludes this method, but privacy can still be maintained by breaking the flow of information in another place: by keeping public keys anonymous. The public can see that someone is sending
an amount to someone else, but without information linking the transaction to anyone. This is similar to the level of information released by stock exchanges, where the time and size of individual trades, the "tape", is made public, but without telling who the parties were.
As an additional firewall, a new key pair should be used for each transaction to keep them
from being linked to a common owner. Some linking is still unavoidable with multi-input
transactions, which necessarily reveal that their inputs were owned by the same owner. The risk is that if the owner of a key is revealed, linking could reveal other transactions that belonged to the same owner.

https://t.me/BitcoinWP/403

In the COPA proceeding, the claim statesd that nodes run the network and that (8) “The Bitcoin White Paper also defines, inter alia, the steps required to operate as a computer node of the Bitcoin Network”.[1] This paper states the following:

5. Network
The steps to run the network are as follows:
1) New transactions are broadcast to all nodes.

2) Each node collects new transactions into a block.

3) Each node works on finding a difficult proof-of-work for its block.

4) When a node finds a proof-of-work, it broadcasts the block to all nodes.

5) Nodes accept the block only if all transactions in it are valid and not already spent.

6) Nodes express their acceptance of the block by working on creating the next block in the chain, using the hash of the accepted block as the previous hash.

This process is very clear. In the definition, nodes only “vote” or process transactions through the creation of blocks and by building new blocks on previously broadcast blocks of accepted transactions. The number of nodes that have created blocks is publicly available. At most, 2016 nodes may operate as the difficulty adjustment period of two weeks only allows this number. Further, the claim that nodes can run and create blocks using different software versions is misleading as the other nodes will reject these blocks. The definition of how bitcoin works preclude this.

Bird and Bird want to make one claim in one proceeding and another in a separate one.

CSW
Jan 19, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1642619905047800?thread_ts=1642619905.047800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3772

There is no accident - that is misleading.

Yes, by stating the client committed a perjury

No. That is not knowledge at that point

The WP is knowledge

CSW
Jan 19, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1642619994048500?thread_ts=1642619994.048500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3774