Telegram Chat
(about CSW post)
Please feel free to share your thoughts and comments about CSW posts.
https://t.me/CSW_SlackChat

Básicamente la mejor información sobre el código la aportó Ray Dillinger, en el 2013 publicada en BitcoinTalk, bajo el seudónimo de Cryddit

Copyright (c) 2008 Satoshi Nakamoto

Bitcoin source from November 2008.
December 23, 2013

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=382374.0

No había reparado en este detalle:

Tulip [Trading Limited] owns the right to the name "Bitcoin" and the Bitcoin database.

Igual el juicio contra los desarrolladores también sirve para afirmar la propiedad del nombre y de la base de datos...

Hal Finney hal at finney.org
Sat Jan 10 21:22:01 EST 2009
Previous message: feds try to argue touch tone content needs no wiretap order
Next message: What risk is being defended against here?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Satoshi Nakamoto writes:
Satoshi Nakamoto writes:
> Announcing the first release of Bitcoin, a new electronic cash
> system that uses a peer-to-peer network to prevent double-spending.
> It's completely decentralized with no server or central authority.
>
> See bitcoin.org for screenshots.
>
> Download link:
> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/bitcoin/bitcoin-0.1.0.rar
Hal


https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/015004.html

10 - Keys are not ownership
Ownership can be represented and controled by the keys.
WP says Keys are controlled by the owner

"Live Interview w/ Dr. Craig Wright (Bitcoin SV)"
2021 01 29
Dustin Plantholt
https://youtu.be/JzZ6ZePY25Q
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFB2EauBXSlckluVRQ

Property - Ownership
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFLf1jzTt75dqZ9fng

21 Millions Coins News
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFle4l2dEnJ5ScXq7A

BitCoin Issuier
https://t.me/joinchat/jC3vw2NSEdY3ODRk

BitCoin envelope
https://t.me/joinchat/GasEXhiZitA0YTY0

BSV Lost Coins
"sunken treasure"
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEmB34wzToZnkTvyaw

Recibir propiedad robada y BitCoin.
por Craig Wright
12 marzo 2021
https://es.ramonquesada.com/espanol-es/recibir-propiedad-robada-y-bitcoin/

BitCoin's unilateral contract
https://t.me/joinchat/VeI-ddmiIaBhMzVk

There seems to be a little bit of confusion about the nature of Bitcoin. Some of this comes from people saying that we should be targeting the miners. This process is not correct, and I'll explain why.

In creating a system, only a few individuals or organisations have any involvement in the issue of a coin or the creation of the database. This is not distributed as people say, it can be a group of people and developers, but it still only that group.

When I created Bitcoin, I was the sole individual, which went into my companies and trusts. Being that I have now tasked the stewardship of the protocol to the Bitcoin association, they are responsible for all changes to the protocol.

The development team at nChain are contracted to the Bitcoin Association. Consequently, the developers do not hold liability for any action and do not need to act. The Bitcoin association needs to retain responsibility in this case.

Next, miners don't set the rules. Miners enforce the rules. This is a significant distinction that I've been trying to get people to follow. The police enforce rules; you don't want police setting rules.

Miners vote on the acceptance of valid rules; they don't decide on the rules. Miners act under a unilateral contract. A unilateral contract can be breached. Every block is offered as a unilateral contract that any party can seek to be paid on. A miner is paid not for setting the rules but for enforcing them. The whitepaper uses the word enforced very specifically. Any needed rules and incentives can be enforced, and this means that the miners are required to follow the rules that the Bitcoin association sets.

As the steward of my protocol, changes that are within the protocol may be implemented. The alert key allowed Bitcoin to be frozen. OP_CODESEPARATOR would have allowed multiple methods for this to be enacted in the first version of Bitcoin. One of the reasons Mike Hearn took this out of Bitcoin and changed other parts of the code was that people thought this was a problem. It isn't a problem. Moreover, Bitcoin is not this decentralised system that is designed to bypass the law.

So, this is the breakdown:

1- The creator and issuer is me.
2- I have assigned stewardship of the protocol to the Bitcoin association.
3- The Bitcoin association distributes Bitcoin to the miners under contract for the enforcement of rules.
4- The miners are contracted to follow the rules of the system.
5- Developers work for the association under contract or otherwise.

There is nothing new here, there is nothing cypherpunk about bitcoin, and that it is not about the decentralisation of political power.

CSW
Feb 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1612439877287600?thread_ts=1612439877.287600&cid=C5131HKFX