21 Millions Coins
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFle4l2dEnJ5ScXq7A

BitCoin Issuier
https://t.me/joinchat/jC3vw2NSEdY3ODRk

BitCoin's unilateral contract
https://t.me/joinchat/VeI-ddmiIaBhMzVk

BitCoin database ownership
https://t.me/BitCoinDatabaseOwnership

BitCoin envelope
https://t.me/joinchat/GasEXhiZitA0YTY0

BSV Lost Coins "sunken treasure"
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEmB34wzToZnkTvyaw

Craig Wright Tokens
https://t.me/joinchat/y9jgtX4wVSUzZWZk

The overseas companies owned the Australian companies.

The Australian companies did the creation of intellectual property and any activity such as bitcoin mining. Many of the activities that I did I published widely and hence the intellectual property in those has been given freely to the world.

More importantly, every single bitcoin was created on the launch of bitcoin in January 2009. At that point I was controlling a company in Australia that owned all of the just under 21 million bitcoin denominated tokens that would ever exist.

CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505718083600?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX

El litigio por la creación del White Paper de BitCoin.
Por Ramon Quesada https://foro.bsvespanol.org/t/craig-es-satoshi/64/14?u=ramonquesada

And we have now left Europe and entered the

- The Final Countdown. Europe (Official Video)
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=the+final+countdown&docid=607994261061043386&mid=E8A0E403467AE64DCAD4E8A0E403467AE64DCAD4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

so far Coobieee and crew
https://t.me/joinchat/VNOTBvWDr9d8ZCTc

Did you know that the bitcoin White Paper is included in the bitcoin database.

So, BTC and BCH are publishing a copy of the White Paper

you see, I didn't publish the White Paper I distributed it

So, unauthorised use and distribution is a breach of the copyright

yes, you could create a new Genesis block but then you would still require the old Blockchain to be able to validate all of the UTXO's

and that would still require licensing
so, I guess that's frypan or fire
rock and hard place

Unfortunately, this means they not only have to prove that I'm not Satoshi (i.e. try prove the truth is a lie) but also demonstrate that my version of bitcoin as I originally envisioned it before I even launched it in 2009 mirrors theirs

Oh, and if they act like Mr Ver and try and run away....

you know, jurisdiction issues et cetera and associated reasoning

CSW
Jan 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611169327384500?thread_ts=1611169327.384500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/1969

Follow up with Quotes

Dr. Craig Wright awarded USA Copyright for Bitcoin White Paper
The USA Copyright office has awarded Dr. Craig Steven Wright the copyright for the original Bitcoin whitepaper, which Dr. Wright originally published online in 2008 under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.
The copyright was awarded after the Copyright office was presented with the concrete proof that Dr. Wright was indeed the author of the seminal paper which started the Bitcoin revolution.
In addition to the original Bitcoin whitepaper, the USA Copyright office awarded Dr. Wright the copyright for most of the original Bitcoin code (version 0.1).
The copyrights can be found here.
 U.S. copyright registration no. TXu 2-136-996, effective date April 11, 2019, for the paper entitled Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, with year of completion 2008. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.
 U.S. copyright registration no. TX-8-708-058, effective date April 13, 2019, for computer program entitled Bitcoin, with year of completion 2009 and date of first publication January 3, 2009. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright wrote most of version 0.1 of the Bitcoin client software, and the registration covers the portions he authored.

Wright originally come out as the creator of Bitcoin in 2016, and provided proof to several people, including Gavin Anderson former lead developer of the Bitcoin project. However, the Bitcoin Core (BTC) group, who had commandeered the Bitcoin project, led a successful smear campaign against Dr. Wright.
The group had twisted the original vision of Bitcoin by stifling scaling attempts and creating secondary settlement networks, like the Lighting Network, which take transactions off chain and away from what Bitcoin was meant to be.
It was this bastardization, twisting and crippling of Bitcoin that turned it into what BTC is today. This pushed Wright to lift the Satoshi Nakamoto veil for good.
Dr. Wright explains, “When I wrote the bitcoin Whitepaper, I uploaded it on the bitcoin.org domain so that people would start understanding bitcoin. I've come to understand that few people if any of taken the time to understand what is written in this paper so I have formally published it and registered it with the copyright registry so that I can start teaching people the true meaning of what bitcoin is about and stop people twisting the narrative.”
That twisted narrative lead to criminals, like drug dealers and money launders, to become the face of Bitcoin. The accountability and traceability that the Bitcoin blockchain provides was left on the back burner, and it was marketed to the worst elements of society. Wright could not stand for that.
“The last thing that I said to Gavin Anderson in 2011 when I handed him the control of the code was that "I wish you wouldn't keep talking about me as a mysterious shadowy figure, the press just turns that into a pirate currency angle,” Dr. Wright recalls. “Maybe instead make it about the open source project and give more credit to your dev contributors; it helps motivate them.”
Now that Wright has reclaimed ownership of the Bitcoin whitepaper, he’s hoping his creation can regain the original mission it was meant to have. “Bitcoin was designed to be honest and not another criminal coin,” he said. “It's time for people to learn that and see that I'm (as Satoshi) not just some shady figure because I didn't want publicity”
Dr. Wright will be attending the upcoming CoinGeek Toronto scaling conference, and will feature prominently in a Fireside chat with Bitcoin Association Founding President Jimmy Nguyen. The conversation is bound to have plenty of revelations about the early history of Bitcoin, so it will be well worth attending.

https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registratio

CSW
May 21, 2019
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2220

CSW
Feb 6, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1580990732173100?thread_ts=1580990732.173100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2306

https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/

CSW
Feb 9, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1581267195201900?thread_ts=1581226380.141500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2323

I found this today and I couldn't believe it

"7. Satoshi Removed His Name from the Bitcoin Software Before Leaving.

Finally, a last interesting find was that Satoshi did formally “quit” Bitcoin, removing his name from the copyright claim in the software and leaving the code to all “Bitcoin developers.” "

10 Years Ago Today, Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Sent His Final Message.
Pete Rizzo
Apr 26, 2021,12:30pm EDT
|1,026,250 views

https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.forbes.com/sites/peterizzo/2021/04/26/10-years-ago-today-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-sent-his-final-message/amp/

CSW
May 16,. 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621158268489100

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2338

1/2
What you going to soon find out is that most of what the other side have if not all is a combination of hearsay and character attacks. It is been difficult not responding on much of this for a period of over two years. But for instance, they talk about made up companies in the trust and said that they didn't exist because this is all they have.

This is the part that nobody wants you to look at.
Craig Wright R&D was the original name of the trust. Even though the trust was overseas, I registered these in Australia. As trustee I acted for it is an overseas entity. When they say how this didn't exist, or that the trust didn't exist, that is one little problem. The problem is that I registered it for an Australian business number.

Craig Wright R&D and the other entities as businesses representing the trusts have been registered since 29 February 2000. It was reformed under the trust business name for myself, remembering that a business called Craig Wright is not Craig Wright the person, on 10 February 2007. This is when I started creating bitcoin.

At that point I changed from DeMorgan to using myself as the trustee name. There are multiple other overseas trusts that were registered in Australia.

These all have records. These are not as difficult to check as people think either.

In January 2009 I formed a company called information defence in Australia.
In May 2009 I formed a company called integyrs in Australia.
In June 2009 with other people I formed a company called Greyfog in Australia. Others such as Cloudcroft all followed before Panopticrypt was formed in 2011.

All of these entities were held in trust. That is my shares were held in trust.

What people don't seem to understand is that the legal owner of an asset is the trustee and the trust maintains equitable ownership.

Tulip is simply the renamed version of the trust called Craig Wright R&D and DeMorgan at various times in history.

The overseas companies owned the Australian companies.

The Australian companies did the creation of intellectual property and any activity such as bitcoin mining. Many of the activities that I did I published widely and hence the intellectual property in those has been given freely to the world.

More importantly, every single bitcoin was created on the launch of bitcoin in January 2009. At that point I was controlling a company in Australia that owned all of the just under 21 million bitcoin denominated tokens that would ever exist.

Bitcoin was created using what is known in legal circles as a unilateral contract, this is a concept that even a junior law student would understand. See carbolic Smoke Ball.

In 2009, there was no millions in bitcoin as some people seem to think. There was around $2 million worth of running computers that was cost coupled with further sunk costs. The value of the bitcoin was nothing. It was not the value of computer hardware, it was only the value that people would be willing to pay for it and that was zero right up until 2010.

The interesting thing that people don't understand in an analysis of partnership, if there was one with Dave, he would owe me money. There isn't of course but the reality is partners have to share cost and profit.

The distribution was created on the launch of bitcoin. It's not the distributor, that is a process. The contract is the issue, I am simply put the issuer.

The distinction here is that bitcoin is issued initially without value and hence in the manner it was issued there isn't all the problems people speculate about. By creating bitcoin and launching it the way I did, all of the increase in value was created after the launch. More importantly, it took a lot of money, time and machines to be able to enable all of this.

CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365

The license of the database is not applied under MIT.

under an MIT license each file needs to individually have the license applied. The database was not created with a license and it was put up for download without license.

The agents of the network other nodes.

Nodes are paid to provide a contract service. They are not instantly paid, there is a maturity level of 100 blocks that means that they cannot quickly act and take a block that is orphaned

Blocks do not act to issue or create bitcoin.

https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/https://bitcoin.org/

The original site states this very clearly.

Coins are distributed to the nodes.. They are not created by the nodes

Nodes "generate blocks".

They do not create bitcoin

nodes are agents of the network and are paid

Nodes create entries in the database as an outsourced agency. They are an agent.

Without an explicit agreement stating that they maintain intellectual property rights, agents don't gain rights.

The creation of blocks is a distributed process because of the hundred block maturity level.

Nodes do not merely find a block solution, they have to propagate it to other nodes and have it valid for 100 blocks. The validation process involves other nodes ensuring that its correct

Note, the way that you validate a block is by creating another block on top of it, so only miners are nodes

The ordering of transactions is contained as a database right. That will include the Merkle tree and hash structure

the block headers will be included as a database right

Think about the contents of the database table.

You can own a database or public emails - the structure matters

And, in Bitcoin, it cannot have the structure changed

https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/guides/database-rights-the-basics

The creator of a database can allow use any way he wants.

Bitcoin requires that people can append and view the database. It does not allow them to take it and use it in other means outside of the use in bitcoin.

The nodes provide a service in creating the database. The database can be protected if there is a substantial investment. So far around 20 million bitcoin (and BTC on the copy) have been put into the payment of obtaining and verifying and presenting this information.

I think given the current value of the complete system that this is a substantial investment.

An infringement occurs when an individual or company extracts already utilises all or a substantial part of the contents of a protected database. This has to be done without the consent of the owner.

The rights to the bitcoin database a limited for the verification, exchange and validation of bitcoin transactions. When used for bitcoin, the databases validly deployed. That is bitcoin the electronic cash system.

The mere consultation of a database, using the database to send transactions or to act as a node is not an infringement under the provisions.

77m Limited v Ordnance Survey Limited [2019]

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5dcb8f992c94e07f88e8ddb2

The TX to Finney was not until days later and after Bk 70

No, Each block contains at least 1 TX

A database is not covered under MIT licenses unless it is explicitly and independently licensed.

The database rights provisions of Europe do not cover software. These are two separate issues.

When individuals started using the original version of code, they downloaded the first version of the database from my nodes.

CSW
Jan 4,. 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1609783515120700?thread_ts=1609775039.107700&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2430

If I copy Facebook and Twitter's databases and run up a competing system, the are not FB and Twitter

Change the protocol
Copy the Databases

And you are not bitcoin

BTC is nothing like bitcoin

It is merely a copy of the database that is used to start a copy by breaches of copyright

A theft

CSW
Jun 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1623330469323100?thread_ts=1623330469.323100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2564

Will attempts to enforce Bitcoin DB rights in the EU be effective?
Have seen discussions arguing no because Directive 96/9/EC restricts protections to 15 years. If true, this would provide just over 4 years of protection remaining.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31996L0009:EN:HTML

Bitcoin como un Security
Por Craig Wright
25 julio 2021
https://es.ramonquesada.com/espanol-es/bitcoin-como-sistema-de-seguridad-por-craig-wright/

Bitcoin as a Security
By Craig Wright
25 Jul 2021
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/bitcoin-as-a-security/