Recibir propiedad robada y BitCoin.
por Craig Wright
12 marzo 2021
https://es.ramonquesada.com/espanol-es/recibir-propiedad-robada-y-bitcoin/

BitCoin's unilateral contract
https://t.me/joinchat/VeI-ddmiIaBhMzVk

There seems to be a little bit of confusion about the nature of Bitcoin. Some of this comes from people saying that we should be targeting the miners. This process is not correct, and I'll explain why.

In creating a system, only a few individuals or organisations have any involvement in the issue of a coin or the creation of the database. This is not distributed as people say, it can be a group of people and developers, but it still only that group.

When I created Bitcoin, I was the sole individual, which went into my companies and trusts. Being that I have now tasked the stewardship of the protocol to the Bitcoin association, they are responsible for all changes to the protocol.

The development team at nChain are contracted to the Bitcoin Association. Consequently, the developers do not hold liability for any action and do not need to act. The Bitcoin association needs to retain responsibility in this case.

Next, miners don't set the rules. Miners enforce the rules. This is a significant distinction that I've been trying to get people to follow. The police enforce rules; you don't want police setting rules.

Miners vote on the acceptance of valid rules; they don't decide on the rules. Miners act under a unilateral contract. A unilateral contract can be breached. Every block is offered as a unilateral contract that any party can seek to be paid on. A miner is paid not for setting the rules but for enforcing them. The whitepaper uses the word enforced very specifically. Any needed rules and incentives can be enforced, and this means that the miners are required to follow the rules that the Bitcoin association sets.

As the steward of my protocol, changes that are within the protocol may be implemented. The alert key allowed Bitcoin to be frozen. OP_CODESEPARATOR would have allowed multiple methods for this to be enacted in the first version of Bitcoin. One of the reasons Mike Hearn took this out of Bitcoin and changed other parts of the code was that people thought this was a problem. It isn't a problem. Moreover, Bitcoin is not this decentralised system that is designed to bypass the law.

So, this is the breakdown:

1- The creator and issuer is me.
2- I have assigned stewardship of the protocol to the Bitcoin association.
3- The Bitcoin association distributes Bitcoin to the miners under contract for the enforcement of rules.
4- The miners are contracted to follow the rules of the system.
5- Developers work for the association under contract or otherwise.

There is nothing new here, there is nothing cypherpunk about bitcoin, and that it is not about the decentralisation of political power.

CSW
Feb 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1612439877287600?thread_ts=1612439877.287600&cid=C5131HKFX

Parece haber un poco de confusión sobre la naturaleza de Bitcoin. Algo de esto proviene de personas que dicen que deberíamos dirigir (targeting) a los mineros. Este proceso no es correcto y explicaré por qué.

Al crear un sistema, solo unas pocas personas u organizaciones participan en la emisión de una moneda o en la creación de la base de datos. Esto no se distribuye como dice la gente, puede ser un grupo de personas y desarrolladores, pero sigue siendo solo ese grupo.

Cuando creé Bitcoin, yo era la única persona que estaba en mis empresas y fideicomisos. Dado que ahora le he encomendado la administración del protocolo a la Asociación Bitcoin, ellos son responsables de todos los cambios en el protocolo.

El equipo de desarrollo de nChain está contratado por la Bitcoin Association. En consecuencia, los desarrolladores no son responsables de ninguna acción y no necesitan actuar. La Asociación Bitcoin debe seguir siendo responsable en este caso.

Lo siguiente, los mineros no establecen las reglas. Los mineros hacen cumplir las reglas. Esta es una distinción importante que he intentado que la gente siga. La policía hace cumplir las reglas; no quieres que la policía establezca reglas.

Los mineros votan sobre la aceptación de reglas válidas; pero NO deciden las reglas. Los mineros actúan bajo un contrato unilateral. Se puede incumplir un contrato unilateral. Cada bloque se ofrece como un contrato unilateral por el que cualquier parte puede solicitar que se le pague. A un minero se le paga no por establecer las reglas, sino por hacerlas cumplir. El documento técnico (White Paper) utiliza la palabra impuesta de manera muy específica. Se pueden hacer cumplir las reglas e incentivos necesarios, y esto significa que los mineros deben seguir las reglas que establece la Asociación Bitcoin.

Como administrador (Steward) de mi protocolo, se pueden implementar cambios dentro del protocolo. La clave de alerta (Alert Key) permitió que Bitcoin se congelara. OP_CODESEPARATOR habría permitido múltiples métodos para que esto se promulgara en la primera versión de Bitcoin. Una de las razones por las que Mike Hearn quitó Alert Key de Bitcoin y cambió otras partes del código fue que la gente pensó que esto era un problema. No es problema. Además, Bitcoin no es este sistema descentralizado que está diseñado para eludir la ley.

Entonces, este es el desglose:

1- El creador y emisor soy yo.
2- He asignado la administración del protocolo a la Asociación Bitcoin.
3- La Asociación Bitcoin distribuye Bitcoin a los mineros bajo contrato para el cumplimiento de las reglas.
4- Los mineros están contratados para seguir las reglas del sistema.
5- Los desarrolladores trabajan para la Asociación bajo contrato o de otra manera.

No hay nada nuevo aquí, no hay nada de cypherpunk sobre bitcoin, y no se trata de la descentralización del poder político.

CSW
4 de febrero de 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1612439877287600?thread_ts=1612439877.287600&cid=C5131HKFX

21 Millions Coins
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFle4l2dEnJ5ScXq7A

BitCoin Issuier
https://t.me/joinchat/jC3vw2NSEdY3ODRk

BitCoin's unilateral contract
https://t.me/joinchat/VeI-ddmiIaBhMzVk

BitCoin database ownership
https://t.me/BitCoinDatabaseOwnership

BitCoin envelope
https://t.me/joinchat/GasEXhiZitA0YTY0

BSV Lost Coins "sunken treasure"
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEmB34wzToZnkTvyaw

Craig Wright Tokens
https://t.me/joinchat/y9jgtX4wVSUzZWZk

The overseas companies owned the Australian companies.

The Australian companies did the creation of intellectual property and any activity such as bitcoin mining. Many of the activities that I did I published widely and hence the intellectual property in those has been given freely to the world.

More importantly, every single bitcoin was created on the launch of bitcoin in January 2009. At that point I was controlling a company in Australia that owned all of the just under 21 million bitcoin denominated tokens that would ever exist.

CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505718083600?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX

El litigio por la creación del White Paper de BitCoin.
Por Ramon Quesada https://foro.bsvespanol.org/t/craig-es-satoshi/64/14?u=ramonquesada

And we have now left Europe and entered the

- The Final Countdown. Europe (Official Video)
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=the+final+countdown&docid=607994261061043386&mid=E8A0E403467AE64DCAD4E8A0E403467AE64DCAD4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

so far Coobieee and crew
https://t.me/joinchat/VNOTBvWDr9d8ZCTc

Did you know that the bitcoin White Paper is included in the bitcoin database.

So, BTC and BCH are publishing a copy of the White Paper

you see, I didn't publish the White Paper I distributed it

So, unauthorised use and distribution is a breach of the copyright

yes, you could create a new Genesis block but then you would still require the old Blockchain to be able to validate all of the UTXO's

and that would still require licensing
so, I guess that's frypan or fire
rock and hard place

Unfortunately, this means they not only have to prove that I'm not Satoshi (i.e. try prove the truth is a lie) but also demonstrate that my version of bitcoin as I originally envisioned it before I even launched it in 2009 mirrors theirs

Oh, and if they act like Mr Ver and try and run away....

you know, jurisdiction issues et cetera and associated reasoning

CSW
Jan 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611169327384500?thread_ts=1611169327.384500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/1969

Follow up with Quotes

Dr. Craig Wright awarded USA Copyright for Bitcoin White Paper
The USA Copyright office has awarded Dr. Craig Steven Wright the copyright for the original Bitcoin whitepaper, which Dr. Wright originally published online in 2008 under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.
The copyright was awarded after the Copyright office was presented with the concrete proof that Dr. Wright was indeed the author of the seminal paper which started the Bitcoin revolution.
In addition to the original Bitcoin whitepaper, the USA Copyright office awarded Dr. Wright the copyright for most of the original Bitcoin code (version 0.1).
The copyrights can be found here.
 U.S. copyright registration no. TXu 2-136-996, effective date April 11, 2019, for the paper entitled Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, with year of completion 2008. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.
 U.S. copyright registration no. TX-8-708-058, effective date April 13, 2019, for computer program entitled Bitcoin, with year of completion 2009 and date of first publication January 3, 2009. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright wrote most of version 0.1 of the Bitcoin client software, and the registration covers the portions he authored.

Wright originally come out as the creator of Bitcoin in 2016, and provided proof to several people, including Gavin Anderson former lead developer of the Bitcoin project. However, the Bitcoin Core (BTC) group, who had commandeered the Bitcoin project, led a successful smear campaign against Dr. Wright.
The group had twisted the original vision of Bitcoin by stifling scaling attempts and creating secondary settlement networks, like the Lighting Network, which take transactions off chain and away from what Bitcoin was meant to be.
It was this bastardization, twisting and crippling of Bitcoin that turned it into what BTC is today. This pushed Wright to lift the Satoshi Nakamoto veil for good.
Dr. Wright explains, “When I wrote the bitcoin Whitepaper, I uploaded it on the bitcoin.org domain so that people would start understanding bitcoin. I've come to understand that few people if any of taken the time to understand what is written in this paper so I have formally published it and registered it with the copyright registry so that I can start teaching people the true meaning of what bitcoin is about and stop people twisting the narrative.”
That twisted narrative lead to criminals, like drug dealers and money launders, to become the face of Bitcoin. The accountability and traceability that the Bitcoin blockchain provides was left on the back burner, and it was marketed to the worst elements of society. Wright could not stand for that.
“The last thing that I said to Gavin Anderson in 2011 when I handed him the control of the code was that "I wish you wouldn't keep talking about me as a mysterious shadowy figure, the press just turns that into a pirate currency angle,” Dr. Wright recalls. “Maybe instead make it about the open source project and give more credit to your dev contributors; it helps motivate them.”
Now that Wright has reclaimed ownership of the Bitcoin whitepaper, he’s hoping his creation can regain the original mission it was meant to have. “Bitcoin was designed to be honest and not another criminal coin,” he said. “It's time for people to learn that and see that I'm (as Satoshi) not just some shady figure because I didn't want publicity”
Dr. Wright will be attending the upcoming CoinGeek Toronto scaling conference, and will feature prominently in a Fireside chat with Bitcoin Association Founding President Jimmy Nguyen. The conversation is bound to have plenty of revelations about the early history of Bitcoin, so it will be well worth attending.

https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registratio

CSW
May 21, 2019
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2220

CSW
Feb 6, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1580990732173100?thread_ts=1580990732.173100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2306

https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/

CSW
Feb 9, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1581267195201900?thread_ts=1581226380.141500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2323

I found this today and I couldn't believe it

"7. Satoshi Removed His Name from the Bitcoin Software Before Leaving.

Finally, a last interesting find was that Satoshi did formally “quit” Bitcoin, removing his name from the copyright claim in the software and leaving the code to all “Bitcoin developers.” "

10 Years Ago Today, Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Sent His Final Message.
Pete Rizzo
Apr 26, 2021,12:30pm EDT
|1,026,250 views

https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.forbes.com/sites/peterizzo/2021/04/26/10-years-ago-today-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-sent-his-final-message/amp/

CSW
May 16,. 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621158268489100

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2338