I know people (especially Roger Spurr) are enamored with the petrified giant vagina & penis theory. Personally, I think there are too many problems with it.
I think THIS makes far more sense. It also explains perfectly the banding within the caves, as well as the seams. See my 'Tree Diving' video for examples of banding in caves vs. Tree grain.
I find it very odd that Roger has not incorporated the very obvious evidence for great trees into his Mudfossil narrative. If great titans existed, then the great trees surely did as well.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=vaginas++in+trees&t=brave&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images
I think THIS makes far more sense. It also explains perfectly the banding within the caves, as well as the seams. See my 'Tree Diving' video for examples of banding in caves vs. Tree grain.
I find it very odd that Roger has not incorporated the very obvious evidence for great trees into his Mudfossil narrative. If great titans existed, then the great trees surely did as well.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=vaginas++in+trees&t=brave&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images
Duckduckgo
vaginas in trees at DuckDuckGo
DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.
👍20❤2🥰2🤔2