AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE Q2 FY27 β OK π±
β’ Net Profit: βΉ308 Cr | β16% YoY | β9% QoQ
β’ Net Interest Income: βΉ536 Cr | β17% YoY | β5% QoQ
β’ Pre-Provision Operating Profit: βΉ397 Cr | β16% YoY | β9% QoQ
β’ Provisions: βΉ24 Cr | β84% YoY | β23% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ7.04
β’ Net Profit: βΉ308 Cr | β16% YoY | β9% QoQ
β’ Net Interest Income: βΉ536 Cr | β17% YoY | β5% QoQ
β’ Pre-Provision Operating Profit: βΉ397 Cr | β16% YoY | β9% QoQ
β’ Provisions: βΉ24 Cr | β84% YoY | β23% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ7.04
MAITHAN ALLOYS Q2 FY27 β OK π±
β’ Net Profit: βΉ84 Cr | β170% YoY | β79% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ557 Cr | β13% YoY | β3% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ87 Cr | β170% YoY | β4% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 15.6% vs 6.5% (YoY) | 16.8% (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: -βΉ40 Cr
β’ EPS: βΉ27.85 | β167% YoY | β79% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ84 Cr | β170% YoY | β79% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ557 Cr | β13% YoY | β3% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ87 Cr | β170% YoY | β4% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 15.6% vs 6.5% (YoY) | 16.8% (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: -βΉ40 Cr
β’ EPS: βΉ27.85 | β167% YoY | β79% QoQ
INDIA SHELTER FINANCE Q2 FY27 (STANDALONE) β OK π±
β’ Net Profit: βΉ146 Cr | β20% YoY | β2% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ450 Cr | β22% YoY | β4% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ320 Cr | β18% YoY | β3% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit Margin: 71.0% vs 73.3% (YoY) | 71.5% (QoQ)
β’ EPS: βΉ13.28
β’ Net Profit: βΉ146 Cr | β20% YoY | β2% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ450 Cr | β22% YoY | β4% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ320 Cr | β18% YoY | β3% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit Margin: 71.0% vs 73.3% (YoY) | 71.5% (QoQ)
β’ EPS: βΉ13.28
TCI EXPRESS Q2 FY27 β OK π±
β’ Net Profit: βΉ23 Cr | Flat YoY | β15% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ338 Cr | β10% YoY | β8% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ36 Cr | β9% YoY | β16% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 10.8% vs 10.9% (YoY) | 10.0% (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ4 Cr
β’ EPS: βΉ5.74 | β8% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ23 Cr | Flat YoY | β15% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ338 Cr | β10% YoY | β8% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ36 Cr | β9% YoY | β16% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 10.8% vs 10.9% (YoY) | 10.0% (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ4 Cr
β’ EPS: βΉ5.74 | β8% YoY | β10% QoQ
SIGNATUREGLOBAL Q2 FY27 β GOOD β
β’ Net Profit: βΉ67 Cr | β243% YoY | β505% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ817 Cr | β141% YoY | β48% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ76 Cr vs Loss of βΉ74 Cr (YoY) | vs Loss of βΉ45 Cr (QoQ)
β’ EBITDA Margin: 9.2% vs -22.0% (YoY) | -8.1% (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ53 Cr
β’ EPS: βΉ4.76 | β243% YoY | β503% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ67 Cr | β243% YoY | β505% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ817 Cr | β141% YoY | β48% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ76 Cr vs Loss of βΉ74 Cr (YoY) | vs Loss of βΉ45 Cr (QoQ)
β’ EBITDA Margin: 9.2% vs -22.0% (YoY) | -8.1% (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ53 Cr
β’ EPS: βΉ4.76 | β243% YoY | β503% QoQ
β€1
BHARTI HEXACOM Q2 FY27 (STANDALONE) β GOOD β
β’ Net Profit: βΉ566 Cr | β34% YoY | β17% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ2,582 Cr | β11% YoY | β3% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ1,377 Cr | β14% YoY | β4% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 53.3% vs 52.1% (YoY) | 52.7% (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ64 Cr
β’ EPS: βΉ11.32 | β34% YoY | β17% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ566 Cr | β34% YoY | β17% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ2,582 Cr | β11% YoY | β3% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ1,377 Cr | β14% YoY | β4% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 53.3% vs 52.1% (YoY) | 52.7% (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ64 Cr
β’ EPS: βΉ11.32 | β34% YoY | β17% QoQ
GPT HEALTHCARE Q2 FY27 (STANDALONE) β GOOD β
β’ Net Profit: βΉ15 Cr | β45% YoY | β21% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ136 Cr | β14% YoY | β7% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ27 Cr | β21% YoY | β11% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 19.8% vs 18.7% (YoY) | 19.2% (QoQ)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ15 Cr | β45% YoY | β21% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ136 Cr | β14% YoY | β7% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ27 Cr | β21% YoY | β11% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 19.8% vs 18.7% (YoY) | 19.2% (QoQ)
HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION Q2 FY27 β WEAK β οΈ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ23 Cr | β53% YoY | β56% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ897 Cr | β7% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ103 Cr | β30% YoY | β2% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 11.5% vs 15.4% (YoY) | 10.5% (QoQ)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ23 Cr | β53% YoY | β56% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ897 Cr | β7% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ103 Cr | β30% YoY | β2% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 11.5% vs 15.4% (YoY) | 10.5% (QoQ)
INDIAN HUME PIPE Q2 FY27 (STANDALONE) β WEAK β οΈ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ22.75 Cr | β34.43% YoY | β3.48% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ286.76 Cr | β21.39% YoY | β5.30% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ34.45 Cr | β33.17% YoY | β15.79% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 12.01% vs 14.13% (YoY) | 9.83% (QoQ)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ22.75 Cr | β34.43% YoY | β3.48% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ286.76 Cr | β21.39% YoY | β5.30% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ34.45 Cr | β33.17% YoY | β15.79% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 12.01% vs 14.13% (YoY) | 9.83% (QoQ)
RAMCOCEM: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 404.3M RUPEES VS 773.4M (YOY)
RAMCOCEM: Q2 EBITDA 3.26B RUPEES VS 3.88B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 13.25% VS 17.33% (YOY)
RAMCOCEM: Q2 REVENUE 24.63B RUPEES VS 22.39B (YOY)
RAMCOCEM: Q2 EBITDA 3.26B RUPEES VS 3.88B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 13.25% VS 17.33% (YOY)
RAMCOCEM: Q2 REVENUE 24.63B RUPEES VS 22.39B (YOY)
REPCOHOME: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 1.12B RUPEES VS 1.03B (YOY)
REPCOHOME: Q2 EBITDA 4.16B RUPEES VS 3.9B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 87.23% VS 88.45% (YOY)
REPCOHOME: Q2 REVENUE 4.77B RUPEES VS 4.41B (YOY)
REPCOHOME: Q2 EBITDA 4.16B RUPEES VS 3.9B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 87.23% VS 88.45% (YOY)
REPCOHOME: Q2 REVENUE 4.77B RUPEES VS 4.41B (YOY)
VENUSPIPES: Q2 STANDALONE NET PROFIT 260.2M RUPEES VS 260.9M (YOY)
VENUSPIPES: Q2 EBITDA 516.7M RUPEES VS 475.1M (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 14.31% VS 16.30% (YOY)
VENUSPIPES: Q2 REVENUE 3.61B RUPEES VS 2.92B (YOY)
VENUSPIPES: Q2 EBITDA 516.7M RUPEES VS 475.1M (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 14.31% VS 16.30% (YOY)
VENUSPIPES: Q2 REVENUE 3.61B RUPEES VS 2.92B (YOY)
CPPLUS: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 1.86B RUPEES VS 699.8M (YOY)
CPPLUS: Q2 EBITDA 3.24B RUPEES VS 1.26B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 18.57% VS 13.71% (YOY)
CPPLUS: Q2 REVENUE 17.46B RUPEES VS 9.2B (YOY)
CPPLUS: Q2 EBITDA 3.24B RUPEES VS 1.26B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 18.57% VS 13.71% (YOY)
CPPLUS: Q2 REVENUE 17.46B RUPEES VS 9.2B (YOY)
π₯4
FORTIS: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 3.12B RUPEES VS 3.22B (YOY)
FORTIS: Q2 EBITDA 6.23B RUPEES VS 5.56B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 22.79% VS 23.86% (YOY)
FORTIS: Q2 REVENUE 27.35B RUPEES VS 23.31B (YOY)
FORTIS: Q2 EBITDA 6.23B RUPEES VS 5.56B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 22.79% VS 23.86% (YOY)
FORTIS: Q2 REVENUE 27.35B RUPEES VS 23.31B (YOY)
LIC: CO EXEC SAYS EXPECT TO DO MUCH BETTER IN THE INDIVIDUAL SEGMENT IN Q3, Q4
β€1
DCI: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 58M RUPEES VS 50.1M (YOY)
DCI: Q2 EBITDA 107.4M RUPEES VS 84.8M (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 5.05% VS 5.52% (YOY)
DCI: Q2 REVENUE 2.12B RUPEES VS 1.53B (YOY)
DCI: Q2 EBITDA 107.4M RUPEES VS 84.8M (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 5.05% VS 5.52% (YOY)
DCI: Q2 REVENUE 2.12B RUPEES VS 1.53B (YOY)
KPIL: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 2.89B RUPEES VS 2.4B (YOY)
KPIL: Q2 EBITDA 5.81B RUPEES VS 5.61B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 8.29% VS 8.60% (YOY)
KPIL: Q2 REVENUE 70.04B RUPEES VS 65.29B (YOY)
KPIL: Q2 EBITDA 5.81B RUPEES VS 5.61B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 8.29% VS 8.60% (YOY)
KPIL: Q2 REVENUE 70.04B RUPEES VS 65.29B (YOY)
BRITANNIA: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 7.21B RUPEES VS 6.54B (YOY)
BRITANNIA: Q2 EBITDA 10.22B RUPEES VS 9.55B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 18.25% VS 19.72% (YOY)
BRITANNIA: Q2 REVENUE 55.98B RUPEES VS 48.41B (YOY)
BRITANNIA: Q2 EBITDA 10.22B RUPEES VS 9.55B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 18.25% VS 19.72% (YOY)
BRITANNIA: Q2 REVENUE 55.98B RUPEES VS 48.41B (YOY)
Bazaar.Updateπ
LIC: CO EXEC SAYS EXPECT TO DO MUCH BETTER IN THE INDIVIDUAL SEGMENT IN Q3, Q4
LICI: Q2 SL NET PROFIT 120.7B RUPEES VS 100.5B (YOY)
LICI: Q2 REVENUE 1.47T RUPEES VS 1.26T (YOY)
LICI: Q2 REVENUE 1.47T RUPEES VS 1.26T (YOY)
KAMAHOLD: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 2.51B RUPEES VS 1.97B (YOY)
KAMAHOLD: Q2 REVENUE 49.42B RUPEES VS 36.72B (YOY)
KAMAHOLD: Q2 REVENUE 49.42B RUPEES VS 36.72B (YOY)
GODFRYPHLP: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 1.9B RUPEES VS 3.05B (YOY)
GODFRYPHLP: Q2 EBITDA 2.13B RUPEES VS 3.14B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 5.08% VS 19.26% (YOY)
GODFRYPHLP: Q2 REVENUE 41.98B RUPEES VS 16.32B (YOY)
GODFRYPHLP: Q2 EBITDA 2.13B RUPEES VS 3.14B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 5.08% VS 19.26% (YOY)
GODFRYPHLP: Q2 REVENUE 41.98B RUPEES VS 16.32B (YOY)