π SJS ENTERPRISES Q2 FY27 β CONCALL HIGHLIGHTS
β’ Raises FY27 EBITDA margin guidance to 29β30%.
β’ Revises revenue growth guidance to 1.2β1.5x industry growth.
β’ Targets export contribution of 14β15% by FY28.
β’ Targets βΉ500β700 Cr display revenue by 2031.
β’ Raises FY27 EBITDA margin guidance to 29β30%.
β’ Revises revenue growth guidance to 1.2β1.5x industry growth.
β’ Targets export contribution of 14β15% by FY28.
β’ Targets βΉ500β700 Cr display revenue by 2031.
BMW INDUSTRIES Q2 FY27
β’ Net Profit: βΉ22 Cr | β 44% YoY | β 13% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ182 Cr | β 25% YoY | β 9% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ35 Cr | β 6% YoY | β 3% QoQ
β’ Operating Margin: 19.2% vs 25.5% YoY | 20.3% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ0.96 | β 43% YoY | β 13% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ14 Cr
β’ Net Profit: βΉ22 Cr | β 44% YoY | β 13% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ182 Cr | β 25% YoY | β 9% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ35 Cr | β 6% YoY | β 3% QoQ
β’ Operating Margin: 19.2% vs 25.5% YoY | 20.3% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ0.96 | β 43% YoY | β 13% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ14 Cr
IRB INFRASTRUCTURE Q2 FY27
β’ Net Profit: βΉ260 Cr | β 85% YoY | β 15% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,897 Cr | β 8% YoY | β 11% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ1,055 Cr | β 14% YoY | β 8% QoQ
β’ Operating Margin: 55.6% vs 52.8% YoY | 53.9% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ0.22 | β 83% YoY | β 12% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ47 Cr
β’ Net Profit: βΉ260 Cr | β 85% YoY | β 15% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,897 Cr | β 8% YoY | β 11% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ1,055 Cr | β 14% YoY | β 8% QoQ
β’ Operating Margin: 55.6% vs 52.8% YoY | 53.9% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ0.22 | β 83% YoY | β 12% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ47 Cr
IPCALAB: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 3.75B RUPEES VS 2.83B (YOY)
IPCALAB: Q2 EBITDA 6.73B RUPEES VS 5.45B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 23.14% VS 21.32% (YOY)
IPCALAB: Q2 REVENUE 29.1B RUPEES VS 25.57B (YOY)
IPCALAB: Q2 EBITDA 6.73B RUPEES VS 5.45B (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 23.14% VS 21.32% (YOY)
IPCALAB: Q2 REVENUE 29.1B RUPEES VS 25.57B (YOY)
β€2
BIRLACABLE: Q2 SL NET PROFIT 378M RUPEES VS 6.9M (YOY)
BIRLACABLE: Q2 EBITDA 547M RUPEES VS 66.5M (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 15.42% VS 3.77% (YOY)
BIRLACABLE: Q2 REVENUE 3.55B RUPEES VS 1.76B (YOY)
BIRLACABLE: Q2 EBITDA 547M RUPEES VS 66.5M (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 15.42% VS 3.77% (YOY)
BIRLACABLE: Q2 REVENUE 3.55B RUPEES VS 1.76B (YOY)
β€2
YOGI: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 4.2M RUPEES VS 92.9M (YOY)
YOGI: Q2 EBITDA LOSS 3.4M RUPEES VS PROFIT 127.2M (YOY)
YOGI: Q2 REVENUE 506.3M RUPEES VS 1.35B (YOY)
YOGI: Q2 EBITDA LOSS 3.4M RUPEES VS PROFIT 127.2M (YOY)
YOGI: Q2 REVENUE 506.3M RUPEES VS 1.35B (YOY)
M&M: INDUSTRY OUTLOOK REDUCED TO FLATTISH IN F27; MONSOON DEFICIT WIDENED AND RESERVOIR LEVEL DETERIORATED BETWEEN JULY AND OCT
M&M: CO DOWNGRADES OUTLOOK FOR FY27 FOR TRACTOR FROM HIGH SINGLE DIGIT TO FLATTISH
CEIGALL INDIA Q2 FY27 β
β’ Net Profit: βΉ91 Cr | β57% YoY | β48% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,022 Cr | β27% YoY | β5% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ174 Cr | β53% YoY | β21% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 17.0% vs 14.1% YoY | 14.8% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ91 Cr | β57% YoY | β48% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,022 Cr | β27% YoY | β5% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ174 Cr | β53% YoY | β21% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 17.0% vs 14.1% YoY | 14.8% QoQ
POLY MEDICURE Q2 FY27 π±
β’ Net Profit: βΉ95 Cr | β4% YoY | β12% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ581 Cr | β31% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ138 Cr | β18% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 23.7% vs 26.3% YoY | 23.8% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ9.38 vs βΉ9.06 (YoY) | βΉ8.49 (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ19 Cr vs βΉ32 Cr (YoY) | βΉ33 Cr (QoQ)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ95 Cr | β4% YoY | β12% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ581 Cr | β31% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ138 Cr | β18% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 23.7% vs 26.3% YoY | 23.8% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ9.38 vs βΉ9.06 (YoY) | βΉ8.49 (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ19 Cr vs βΉ32 Cr (YoY) | βΉ33 Cr (QoQ)
PATEL ENGINEERING Q2 FY27 β οΈ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ87 Cr | β19% YoY | β12% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,211 Cr | 0% YoY | β5% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ150 Cr | β5% YoY | β16% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 12.4% vs 13.1% YoY | 14.0% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ0.86 vs βΉ0.82 (YoY) | βΉ0.98 (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ48 Cr vs βΉ63 Cr (YoY) | βΉ25 Cr (QoQ)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ87 Cr | β19% YoY | β12% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,211 Cr | 0% YoY | β5% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ150 Cr | β5% YoY | β16% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 12.4% vs 13.1% YoY | 14.0% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ0.86 vs βΉ0.82 (YoY) | βΉ0.98 (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ48 Cr vs βΉ63 Cr (YoY) | βΉ25 Cr (QoQ)
JOJO Ltd β STANDALONE Q2 FY27 RESULTS
Financial results for the quarter and half-year ended September 30, 2026:
- Standalone Q2 revenue: INR 4.52 Cr (up 317.6% YoY)
- Standalone Q2 PAT: INR 0.46 Cr (up 608.3% YoY)
- Standalone H1 revenue: INR 8.67 Cr (up 255.5% YoY)
- Standalone H1 PAT: INR 1.55 Cr (up 495.7% YoY)
- Expanded distribution via Prime Video, JioFastTV, Samsung TV Plus, and Tata Play Binge
Financial results for the quarter and half-year ended September 30, 2026:
- Standalone Q2 revenue: INR 4.52 Cr (up 317.6% YoY)
- Standalone Q2 PAT: INR 0.46 Cr (up 608.3% YoY)
- Standalone H1 revenue: INR 8.67 Cr (up 255.5% YoY)
- Standalone H1 PAT: INR 1.55 Cr (up 495.7% YoY)
- Expanded distribution via Prime Video, JioFastTV, Samsung TV Plus, and Tata Play Binge
SANJIVANI PARENTERAL Q2 FY27 π
β’ Net Profit: βΉ4 Cr | β153% YoY | β66% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ25 Cr | β63% YoY | β6% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ6 Cr | β188% YoY | β55% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 25.6% vs 14.5% YoY | 17.5% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ4 Cr | β153% YoY | β66% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ25 Cr | β63% YoY | β6% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ6 Cr | β188% YoY | β55% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 25.6% vs 14.5% YoY | 17.5% QoQ
JINDAL WORLDWIDE Q2 FY27 π±
β’ Net Profit: βΉ19 Cr | β56% YoY | β43% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ595 Cr | β4% YoY | β4% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ34 Cr | β12% YoY | β14% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 5.8% vs 5.3% YoY | 5.3% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ0.19 vs βΉ0.12 (YoY) | βΉ0.32 (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ0 Cr vs βΉ0 Cr (YoY) | βΉ18 Cr (QoQ)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ19 Cr | β56% YoY | β43% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ595 Cr | β4% YoY | β4% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ34 Cr | β12% YoY | β14% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 5.8% vs 5.3% YoY | 5.3% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ0.19 vs βΉ0.12 (YoY) | βΉ0.32 (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ0 Cr vs βΉ0 Cr (YoY) | βΉ18 Cr (QoQ)
β€1
BREAKING: Houthis demand $51 billion from Saudi Arabia to end conflict
β€1
SAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON Q2 FY27 β GOOD β
β’ Net Profit: βΉ1,218 Cr | β44% YoY | β13% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ38,280 Cr | β27% YoY | β9% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ3,357 Cr | β29% YoY | β8% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 8.8% vs 8.7% (YoY) | 8.8% (QoQ)
β’ EPS: βΉ1.11 vs βΉ0.78 (YoY) | βΉ0.98 (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ80 Cr vs βΉ121 Cr (YoY) | βΉ82 Cr (QoQ)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ1,218 Cr | β44% YoY | β13% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ38,280 Cr | β27% YoY | β9% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ3,357 Cr | β29% YoY | β8% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 8.8% vs 8.7% (YoY) | 8.8% (QoQ)
β’ EPS: βΉ1.11 vs βΉ0.78 (YoY) | βΉ0.98 (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ80 Cr vs βΉ121 Cr (YoY) | βΉ82 Cr (QoQ)
β€3
NBCC Q2 FY27 π
β’ Net Profit: βΉ210 Cr | β34% YoY | β33% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ3,396 Cr | β17% YoY | β50% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ60 Cr vs βΉ103 Cr (YoY) | βΉ61 Cr (QoQ)
β’ EPS: βΉ0.76 vs βΉ0.57 (YoY) | βΉ0.57 (QoQ)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ210 Cr | β34% YoY | β33% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ3,396 Cr | β17% YoY | β50% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ60 Cr vs βΉ103 Cr (YoY) | βΉ61 Cr (QoQ)
β’ EPS: βΉ0.76 vs βΉ0.57 (YoY) | βΉ0.57 (QoQ)
TEXMACO RAIL Q2 FY27 β
β’ Net Profit: βΉ111 Cr | β74% YoY | β122% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ868 Cr | β31% YoY | β15% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ11 Cr vs βΉ8 Cr (YoY) | βΉ19 Cr (QoQ)
β’ EPS: βΉ2.74 vs βΉ1.62 (YoY) | βΉ1.23 (QoQ)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ111 Cr | β74% YoY | β122% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ868 Cr | β31% YoY | β15% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ11 Cr vs βΉ8 Cr (YoY) | βΉ19 Cr (QoQ)
β’ EPS: βΉ2.74 vs βΉ1.62 (YoY) | βΉ1.23 (QoQ)
β€2
Bazaar.Updateπ
TEXMACO RAIL Q2 FY27 β
β’ Net Profit: βΉ111 Cr | β74% YoY | β122% QoQ β’ Revenue: βΉ868 Cr | β31% YoY | β15% QoQ β’ Other Income: βΉ11 Cr vs βΉ8 Cr (YoY) | βΉ19 Cr (QoQ) β’ EPS: βΉ2.74 vs βΉ1.62 (YoY) | βΉ1.23 (QoQ)
TEXMACO RAIL & ENGINEERING Q2 FY27
β’ EBITDA: βΉ74.64 Cr | β40.00% YoY | β30.95% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 8.60% vs 9.89% (YoY) | 7.53% (QoQ)
β’ EBITDA: βΉ74.64 Cr | β40.00% YoY | β30.95% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 8.60% vs 9.89% (YoY) | 7.53% (QoQ)
TEGA INDUSTRIES Q2 FY27 β GOOD β
β’ Net Loss: of βΉ59 Cr vs Profit of βΉ45 Cr (YoY), vs Loss of βΉ108 Cr (QoQ)
β’ Revenue: βΉ4,254 Cr | β949% YoY | β147% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ489 Cr | β607% YoY | β780% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 11.5% vs 17.1% (YoY) | 3.2% (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ41 Cr vs βΉ16 Cr (YoY) | βΉ17 Cr (QoQ)
β’ EPS: -βΉ6.32 vs βΉ6.75 (YoY) | -βΉ11.47 (QoQ)
β’ Net Loss: of βΉ59 Cr vs Profit of βΉ45 Cr (YoY), vs Loss of βΉ108 Cr (QoQ)
β’ Revenue: βΉ4,254 Cr | β949% YoY | β147% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ489 Cr | β607% YoY | β780% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 11.5% vs 17.1% (YoY) | 3.2% (QoQ)
β’ Other Income: βΉ41 Cr vs βΉ16 Cr (YoY) | βΉ17 Cr (QoQ)
β’ EPS: -βΉ6.32 vs βΉ6.75 (YoY) | -βΉ11.47 (QoQ)