LG ELECTRONICS INDIA: BACKED BY A STRONG H1FY27 PERFORMANCE, CO. REAFFIRM FY27 TARGETS OF MID-TEEN REVENUE GROWTH AND AN EARLY DOUBLE-DIGIT EBITDA MARGIN
TENNECO CLEAN AIR INDIA LIMITED: BOARD APPROVES CAPACITY EXPANSION BY SETTING UP NEW FACTORY IN WESTERN INDIA; INVESTMENT OF ~INR 450 MILLION; ADDITION OF ~0.3 MILLION "HOT END" PRODUCTS OVER NEXT 2-3 FINANCIAL YEARS.
π₯2
GOLDIAM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED: CO. OPENS 29TH RETAIL STORE FOR LAB-GROWN DIAMOND JEWELLERY UNDER BRAND βORIGEMβ IN VIZAG; STORE COMMENCED OPERATIONS
SETL: Q2 CONS NET PROFIT 264M RUPEES VS 202M (YOY)
SETL: Q2 EBITDA 450M RUPEES VS 286M (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 16.7% VS 15.64% (YOY)
SETL: Q2 REVENUE 3B RUPEES VS 1.8B (YOY)
SETL: Q2 EBITDA 450M RUPEES VS 286M (YOY); Q2 EBITDA MARGIN 16.7% VS 15.64% (YOY)
SETL: Q2 REVENUE 3B RUPEES VS 1.8B (YOY)
RPSG VENTURES Q2 FY27 β οΈ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ88.49 Cr | Turnaround YoY | β 2.85% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ3,243.49 Cr | β 21.56% YoY | β 9.31% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ419.53 Cr | β 37.19% YoY | β 42.97% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 12.93% vs 11.46% YoY | 20.57% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ88.49 Cr | Turnaround YoY | β 2.85% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ3,243.49 Cr | β 21.56% YoY | β 9.31% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ419.53 Cr | β 37.19% YoY | β 42.97% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 12.93% vs 11.46% YoY | 20.57% QoQ
GUJARAT ALKALIES (GUJALKALI) Q2 FY27 π
β’ Net Profit: βΉ82.57 Cr | β 405.32% YoY | β 50.18% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,357.50 Cr | β 25.32% YoY | β 9.04% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ169.92 Cr | β 129.93% YoY | β 23.35% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 12.52% vs 6.82% YoY | 17.81% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ82.57 Cr | β 405.32% YoY | β 50.18% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,357.50 Cr | β 25.32% YoY | β 9.04% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ169.92 Cr | β 129.93% YoY | β 23.35% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 12.52% vs 6.82% YoY | 17.81% QoQ
β€1
UNO MINDA Q2 FY27 π
β’ Net Profit: βΉ441 Cr | β 37% YoY | β 40% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ6,655 Cr | β 38% YoY | β 20% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ733 Cr | β 28% QoQ
β’ Operating Margin: 11.0% vs 10.3% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ7.27 | β 38% YoY | β 42% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ4 Cr
β’ Net Profit: βΉ441 Cr | β 37% YoY | β 40% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ6,655 Cr | β 38% YoY | β 20% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ733 Cr | β 28% QoQ
β’ Operating Margin: 11.0% vs 10.3% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ7.27 | β 38% YoY | β 42% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ4 Cr
π₯2β€1
NATIONAL PLASTIC Q2 FY27 π
β’ Net Profit: βΉ4 Cr | β 53% YoY | β 62% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ128 Cr | β 44% YoY | β 34% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ9 Cr | β 32% YoY | β 38% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 7.1% vs 7.7% YoY | 6.9% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ4 Cr | β 53% YoY | β 62% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ128 Cr | β 44% YoY | β 34% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ9 Cr | β 32% YoY | β 38% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 7.1% vs 7.7% YoY | 6.9% QoQ
β€1
JUNIPER HOTELS Q2 FY27 β οΈ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ37 Cr | β 121% YoY | β 12% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ250 Cr | β 8% YoY | Flat QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ83 Cr | Flat YoY | β 4% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 33.2% vs 35.9% YoY | 34.6% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ37 Cr | β 121% YoY | β 12% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ250 Cr | β 8% YoY | Flat QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ83 Cr | Flat YoY | β 4% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 33.2% vs 35.9% YoY | 34.6% QoQ
INDIABULLS Q2 FY27 π
β’ Net Profit: βΉ151.12 Cr | β 100.66% YoY | β 7.16% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ331.84 Cr | β 40.45% YoY | β 7.68% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ171.97 Cr | β 60.40% YoY | β 11.72% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 51.82% vs 45.38% YoY | 42.82% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ151.12 Cr | β 100.66% YoY | β 7.16% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ331.84 Cr | β 40.45% YoY | β 7.68% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ171.97 Cr | β 60.40% YoY | β 11.72% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 51.82% vs 45.38% YoY | 42.82% QoQ
BLUE JET HEALTH Q2 FY27 (STANDALONE) | GOOD β
β’ Net Profit: βΉ103 Cr | β 97% YoY | β 31% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ376 Cr | β 127% YoY | β 28% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ119 Cr | β 116% YoY | β 21% QoQ
β’ Operating Margin: 31.6% vs 33.2% YoY | 33.5% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ5.46 | β 81% YoY | β 21% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ26 Cr
β’ Net Profit: βΉ103 Cr | β 97% YoY | β 31% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ376 Cr | β 127% YoY | β 28% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ119 Cr | β 116% YoY | β 21% QoQ
β’ Operating Margin: 31.6% vs 33.2% YoY | 33.5% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ5.46 | β 81% YoY | β 21% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ26 Cr
β€1π₯°1
PVP Q4 FY26 | OK π±
β’ Net Loss: βΉ0.37 Cr | Loss narrowed 77.92% YoY | 89.59% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ41.44 Cr | β 117.80% YoY | β 196.79% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ7.21 Cr | β 38.30% YoY | β 44.23% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 17.39% vs 27.38% YoY | 35.78% QoQ
β’ Net Loss: βΉ0.37 Cr | Loss narrowed 77.92% YoY | 89.59% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ41.44 Cr | β 117.80% YoY | β 196.79% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ7.21 Cr | β 38.30% YoY | β 44.23% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 17.39% vs 27.38% YoY | 35.78% QoQ
HT MEDIA Q2 FY27 | GOOD β
β’ Net Profit: βΉ39 Cr | β 106% YoY | β 18% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ442 Cr | β 2% YoY | β 1% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ27 Cr | β 21% YoY | β 9% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 6.2% vs 5.3% YoY | 6.9% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ39 Cr | β 106% YoY | β 18% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ442 Cr | β 2% YoY | β 1% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ27 Cr | β 21% YoY | β 9% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 6.2% vs 5.3% YoY | 6.9% QoQ
CAMPUS ACTIVEWEAR Q2 FY27 (STANDALONE) | OK π±
β’ Net Profit: βΉ24 Cr | β 21% YoY | β 7% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ452 Cr | β 17% YoY | β 17% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ0.79 | β 20% YoY | β 8% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ5 Cr
β’ Net Profit: βΉ24 Cr | β 21% YoY | β 7% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ452 Cr | β 17% YoY | β 17% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ0.79 | β 20% YoY | β 8% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ5 Cr
β€1
BHARAT FORGE Q2 FY27 | GOOD β
β’ Net Profit: βΉ279 Cr | β 7% YoY | β 410% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ4,870 Cr | β 21% YoY | β 5% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ5.77 | β 8% YoY | β 407% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ48 Cr
β’ Net Profit: βΉ279 Cr | β 7% YoY | β 410% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ4,870 Cr | β 21% YoY | β 5% QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ5.77 | β 8% YoY | β 407% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ48 Cr
M&M Q2 FY27 β
- Net Profit: βΉ5,167 Cr | β 30% YoY | β 14% QoQ
- Revenue: βΉ57,515 Cr | β 25% YoY | β 25% QoQ
- EBITDA: βΉ10,183 Cr | β 13% YoY
- EBITDA Margin: 17.7% vs 19.6% YoY
- EPS: βΉ41.04 | β 25% YoY | β 16% QoQ
- Other Income: βΉ1,187 Cr
- Net Profit: βΉ5,167 Cr | β 30% YoY | β 14% QoQ
- Revenue: βΉ57,515 Cr | β 25% YoY | β 25% QoQ
- EBITDA: βΉ10,183 Cr | β 13% YoY
- EBITDA Margin: 17.7% vs 19.6% YoY
- EPS: βΉ41.04 | β 25% YoY | β 16% QoQ
- Other Income: βΉ1,187 Cr
MONEYVIEW Q2 FY27
- Net Profit: βΉ201 Cr | β 418% YoY | β 15% QoQ
- Revenue: βΉ1,120 Cr | β 41% YoY | β 8% QoQ
- EBITDA: βΉ442 Cr | β 79% YoY | β 11% QoQ
- EBITDA Margin: 39.5% vs 31.1% YoY | 38.4% QoQ
- EPS: βΉ1.34 | β 436% YoY | β 20% QoQ
- Other Income: βΉ25 Cr
- Net Profit: βΉ201 Cr | β 418% YoY | β 15% QoQ
- Revenue: βΉ1,120 Cr | β 41% YoY | β 8% QoQ
- EBITDA: βΉ442 Cr | β 79% YoY | β 11% QoQ
- EBITDA Margin: 39.5% vs 31.1% YoY | 38.4% QoQ
- EPS: βΉ1.34 | β 436% YoY | β 20% QoQ
- Other Income: βΉ25 Cr
β€5π1
SHILPA MEDICARE Q2 FY27 |
β’ Net Profit: βΉ79 Cr | β 80% YoY | β 22% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ529 Cr | β 43% YoY | β 14% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ142 Cr | β 31% YoY
β’ Operating Margin: 26.9% vs 29.3% YoY (β 240 bps)
β’ EPS: βΉ4.05 | β 80% YoY | β 22% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ9 Cr
β’ Net Profit: βΉ79 Cr | β 80% YoY | β 22% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ529 Cr | β 43% YoY | β 14% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ142 Cr | β 31% YoY
β’ Operating Margin: 26.9% vs 29.3% YoY (β 240 bps)
β’ EPS: βΉ4.05 | β 80% YoY | β 22% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ9 Cr
TAMBOLI INDUSTRIES Q2 FY27 |
β’ Net Profit: βΉ3 Cr | β 76% YoY | β 63% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ24 Cr | β 23% YoY | β 28% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ6 Cr | β 70% YoY | β 51% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 24.1% vs 17.3% YoY | 20.3% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ3 Cr | β 76% YoY | β 63% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ24 Cr | β 23% YoY | β 28% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ6 Cr | β 70% YoY | β 51% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 24.1% vs 17.3% YoY | 20.3% QoQ
β€1
MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA Q2 FY27 RESULTS VS ESTIMATES
β’ Net Profit: βΉ5,102 Cr vs βΉ4,757 Cr Est. | Beat by 7.25%
β’ Revenue: βΉ42,477 Cr vs βΉ42,110 Cr Est. | Beat by 0.87%
β’ EBITDA: βΉ4,912 Cr vs βΉ4,905 Cr Est. | Beat by 0.14%
β’ EBITDA Margin: 11.6% vs 11.6% Est. | In line
β’ Net Profit: βΉ5,102 Cr vs βΉ4,757 Cr Est. | Beat by 7.25%
β’ Revenue: βΉ42,477 Cr vs βΉ42,110 Cr Est. | Beat by 0.87%
β’ EBITDA: βΉ4,912 Cr vs βΉ4,905 Cr Est. | Beat by 0.14%
β’ EBITDA Margin: 11.6% vs 11.6% Est. | In line
β€2
Bazaar.Updateπ
MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA Q2 FY27 RESULTS VS ESTIMATES β’ Net Profit: βΉ5,102 Cr vs βΉ4,757 Cr Est. | Beat by 7.25% β’ Revenue: βΉ42,477 Cr vs βΉ42,110 Cr Est. | Beat by 0.87% β’ EBITDA: βΉ4,912 Cr vs βΉ4,905 Cr Est. | Beat by 0.14% β’ EBITDA Margin: 11.6% vs 11.6% Est.β¦
M&M Auto and Tractor Internals
β€2