FII FPI LTCG TAX CUT PREOPOSAL SET ON TABLE FOR FIN MIN TO REVIEW: ZEE BUSINESS
π₯6π2π€1
Bazaar.Updateπ
FII FPI LTCG TAX CUT PREOPOSAL SET ON TABLE FOR FIN MIN TO REVIEW: ZEE BUSINESS
Common guys
Don't fall for this again.
Let chart decide whats coming next!
Don't fall for this again.
Let chart decide whats coming next!
π€£6β€1π1
MAZAGON DOCK SHIPBUILDERS Q2 FY27 (CONS.)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ345.40 Cr β53.91% YoY | β37.25% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ2,446.09 Cr β16.49% YoY | β16.88% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ199.17 Cr β71.33% YoY | β55.40% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 8.14% vs 23.71% YoY | 15.18% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ251 Cr
β’ EPS: βΉ8.53 β54% YoY | β37% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ345.40 Cr β53.91% YoY | β37.25% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ2,446.09 Cr β16.49% YoY | β16.88% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ199.17 Cr β71.33% YoY | β55.40% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 8.14% vs 23.71% YoY | 15.18% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ251 Cr
β’ EPS: βΉ8.53 β54% YoY | β37% QoQ
β€4
SAPL- SAR AUTO PRODUCTS Q2 FY27 (STANDALONE)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ1 Cr vs βΉ0 Cr YoY | βΉ0 Cr QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ6 Cr β142% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ0 Cr vs βΉ0 Cr YoY | βΉ0 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ1.08 vs βΉ0.29 YoY | βΉ0.78 QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ1 Cr vs βΉ0 Cr YoY | βΉ0 Cr QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ6 Cr β142% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ0 Cr vs βΉ0 Cr YoY | βΉ0 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ1.08 vs βΉ0.29 YoY | βΉ0.78 QoQ
ACC Q2 FY27
β’ Net Profit: βΉ93 Cr β92% YoY | β37% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ5,656 Cr β5% YoY | β2% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ107 Cr vs βΉ224 Cr YoY | βΉ53 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ4.95 vs βΉ59.60 YoY | βΉ7.83 QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ93 Cr β92% YoY | β37% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ5,656 Cr β5% YoY | β2% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ107 Cr vs βΉ224 Cr YoY | βΉ53 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ4.95 vs βΉ59.60 YoY | βΉ7.83 QoQ
KREMLIN ON OLESHKY CEASIFIRE AGREEMENT- NO VIOLATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED SO FAR
β€1
TCI - TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF INDIA Q2 FY27
β’ Net Profit: βΉ117 Cr β3% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,388 Cr β15% YoY | β11% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ10 Cr vs βΉ12 Cr YoY | βΉ6 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ15.08 vs βΉ14.69 YoY | βΉ13.77 QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ117 Cr β3% YoY | β10% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,388 Cr β15% YoY | β11% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ10 Cr vs βΉ12 Cr YoY | βΉ6 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ15.08 vs βΉ14.69 YoY | βΉ13.77 QoQ
INDIAMART INTERMESH Q2 FY27 (CONS.)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ90.80 Cr β9.79% YoY | β47.27% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ428.60 Cr β9.62% YoY | β3.43% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ159.20 Cr β22.74% YoY | β13.63% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 37.14% vs 33.17% YoY | 33.81% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ90.80 Cr β9.79% YoY | β47.27% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ428.60 Cr β9.62% YoY | β3.43% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ159.20 Cr β22.74% YoY | β13.63% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 37.14% vs 33.17% YoY | 33.81% QoQ
BAJAJ AUTO Q2 FY27
β’ Net Profit: βΉ3,436 Cr β62% YoY | β7% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ25,126 Cr β60% YoY | β16% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ551 Cr vs βΉ576 Cr YoY | βΉ688 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ124.60 vs βΉ76.00 YoY | βΉ115.50 QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ3,436 Cr β62% YoY | β7% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ25,126 Cr β60% YoY | β16% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ551 Cr vs βΉ576 Cr YoY | βΉ688 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ124.60 vs βΉ76.00 YoY | βΉ115.50 QoQ
BAJAJ AUTO Q2 FY27 : ACTUAL VS ESTIMATES
β’ NET PROFIT AT βΉ3,353.76 CR VS EST βΉ3,190 CR β BEAT BY 5.13% π’
β’ REVENUE AT βΉ20,003.43 CR VS EST βΉ19,125 CR β BEAT BY 4.59% π’
β’ EBITDA AT βΉ4,170.83 CR VS EST βΉ3,915 CR β BEAT BY 6.53% π’
β’ EBITDA MARGINS AT 20.85% VS EST 20.6% β BEAT BY 25 BPS π’
β’ NET PROFIT AT βΉ3,353.76 CR VS EST βΉ3,190 CR β BEAT BY 5.13% π’
β’ REVENUE AT βΉ20,003.43 CR VS EST βΉ19,125 CR β BEAT BY 4.59% π’
β’ EBITDA AT βΉ4,170.83 CR VS EST βΉ3,915 CR β BEAT BY 6.53% π’
β’ EBITDA MARGINS AT 20.85% VS EST 20.6% β BEAT BY 25 BPS π’
β€3
BAJAJ AUTO Q2 FY27 (STANDALONE)
β’ Net Profit: βΉ3,353.76 Cr β35.25% YoY | β12.44% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ20,003.43 Cr β34.05% YoY | β16.00% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ4,170.83 Cr β36.67% YoY | β16.01% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 20.85% vs 20.45% YoY | 20.85% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ551 Cr vs βΉ576 Cr YoY | βΉ688 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ124.60 vs βΉ76.00 YoY | βΉ115.50 QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ3,353.76 Cr β35.25% YoY | β12.44% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ20,003.43 Cr β34.05% YoY | β16.00% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ4,170.83 Cr β36.67% YoY | β16.01% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 20.85% vs 20.45% YoY | 20.85% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ551 Cr vs βΉ576 Cr YoY | βΉ688 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ124.60 vs βΉ76.00 YoY | βΉ115.50 QoQ
π₯2β€1
MARUTI SUZUKI Q2 FY27
β’ Net Profit: βΉ2,466 Cr β26% YoY | β28% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ53,356 Cr β26% YoY | β2% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ414 Cr vs βΉ946 Cr YoY | βΉ1,874 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ78.44 vs βΉ106.52 YoY | βΉ109.63 QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ2,466 Cr β26% YoY | β28% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ53,356 Cr β26% YoY | β2% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ414 Cr vs βΉ946 Cr YoY | βΉ1,874 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ78.44 vs βΉ106.52 YoY | βΉ109.63 QoQ
β€1
MARUTI: Q2 SL NET PROFIT 25B RUPEES VS 33B (YOY); EST 26.55B
MARUTI: Q2 REVENUE 533B RUPEES VS 421B (YOY); EST 533.5B
MARUTI: Q2 REVENUE 533B RUPEES VS 421B (YOY); EST 533.5B
IRAN SUPREME LEADER CALLS FOR MEETING CONDITIONS TO END WAR
π₯6π4β€3
QATARENERGY EXTENDS EDISON LNG FORCE MAJEURE THROUGH DECEMBER
π₯2π1
CEASEFIRE IN OLESHKY WILL LAST TILL NOV 1, SENIOR UKRAINIAN OFFICIAL
π₯2π1
JSW INFRASTRUCTURE Q2 FY27
β’ Net Profit: βΉ328 Cr β11% YoY | β8% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,481 Cr β17% YoY | β2% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ674 Cr β11% YoY | Unchanged QoQ
β’ Operating Margin: 45.5% vs 48.2% YoY | 46.6% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ189 Cr vs βΉ107 Cr YoY | βΉ57 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ1.35 vs βΉ1.74 YoY | βΉ1.65 QoQ
β’ Net Profit: βΉ328 Cr β11% YoY | β8% QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ1,481 Cr β17% YoY | β2% QoQ
β’ Operating Profit: βΉ674 Cr β11% YoY | Unchanged QoQ
β’ Operating Margin: 45.5% vs 48.2% YoY | 46.6% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ189 Cr vs βΉ107 Cr YoY | βΉ57 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: βΉ1.35 vs βΉ1.74 YoY | βΉ1.65 QoQ
β€2
NIIT Q2 FY27
β’ Net Profit: Loss of βΉ2 Cr vs profit of βΉ1 Cr YoY | vs profit of βΉ8 Cr QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ98 Cr β6% YoY | β3% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ8 Cr vs βΉ14 Cr YoY | βΉ22 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: -βΉ0.16 vs βΉ0.10 YoY | βΉ0.59 QoQ
β’ Net Profit: Loss of βΉ2 Cr vs profit of βΉ1 Cr YoY | vs profit of βΉ8 Cr QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ98 Cr β6% YoY | β3% QoQ
β’ Other Income: βΉ8 Cr vs βΉ14 Cr YoY | βΉ22 Cr QoQ
β’ EPS: -βΉ0.16 vs βΉ0.10 YoY | βΉ0.59 QoQ
VEDANTA IRON & STEEL Q2 FY27 (CONS.)
β’ Net Profit: Loss of βΉ324 Cr vs loss of βΉ477 Cr YoY | vs profit of βΉ121 Cr QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ2,788 Cr β2.45% YoY | β23.87% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ48 Cr β37.14% YoY | β90.55% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 1.72% vs 1.22% YoY | 13.87% QoQ
β’ Net Profit: Loss of βΉ324 Cr vs loss of βΉ477 Cr YoY | vs profit of βΉ121 Cr QoQ
β’ Revenue: βΉ2,788 Cr β2.45% YoY | β23.87% QoQ
β’ EBITDA: βΉ48 Cr β37.14% YoY | β90.55% QoQ
β’ EBITDA Margin: 1.72% vs 1.22% YoY | 13.87% QoQ