https://t.me/clarionos/636

AMA with Dan Larimer, Clarion OS Related
gogogo t.me/clarionos

[블룸버그, EOS 등 6개 암호화폐 가격 데이터 제공]
코인데스크에 따르면 블룸버그가 OXT, OMG, EOS, LINK, XTZ, XLM 등 6개 암호화폐의 가격 데이터 정보를 제공한다고 발표했다. 데이터는 암호화폐 지수 제공업체이자 미국 시카고상품거래소(CME)에 관련 지수 서비스를 제공하고 있는 CF벤치마크(CF Benchmarks)가 제공한다. 이와관련 CF 벤치마크 CEO인 수이 청(Sui Chung)은 “기관의 관심이 비트코인 외 암호화폐로 넘어가고 있음을 의미한다”고 설명했다.
https://kr.coinness.com/news/910892

[댄 라리머 "EOS 떠날 때 보도 과장됐다...커뮤니티와 협력 기대한다"]
댄 라리머 EOS 창시자가 9일 자신의 트위터를 통해 "내가 EOS 커뮤니티를 떠날 때 각종 보도들이 너무 과장됐다. 나는 EOS가 나의 원래 비전을 실현할 수 있는 길을 마련하기 위해 커뮤니티에 참여하고 협력할 수 있기를 기대한다"고 말했다. 코인마켓캡 기준 EOS는 현재 0.24% 오른 3.90 달러에 거래되고 있다.
https://kr.coinness.com/news/912926

Very insightful

Replying to:
> Don't miss read what I'm trying to say. I think Dan is a genious and I think EOS is the best blockchain on the planet. But investors and users can't relate to just technology. They need leaders. They need to buy in to the leader and know where it's headed. Bitcoin is an exception but people are still searching for the Figure Head. Until a project has reach mass adoption this leadership or figure head is need for people to invest their time and money into anything.

🔗 Context 🔗

B1 is actively funding code for main net

🔗 Context 🔗

if the community has a plan and a design then B1 might fund it

🔗 Context 🔗

I mean EOS-specific code, things like the new resource model

🔗 Context 🔗

So if we want to impliment a new governance system, we document it, we get community buy in on the direction, then B1 might choose to fund it.

🔗 Context 🔗

I am certain that B1 wants EOS to be as independent as possible from them for their own legal defense

🔗 Context 🔗

So anything the community does to "take over" that gives B1 confidence that EOS will be successful with greater independence from B1 the better for B1

🔗 Context 🔗

Other chains have a strong leader that decides things, EOS hasn't.

🔗 Context 🔗

EOS NY was likely to leave EOS due to funding had B1 not integrated them.

🔗 Context 🔗

If we can organize people being a common vision, pull in a common direction, then we won't need B1 for funding because every will work to earn EOS

🔗 Context 🔗

Even at #25 EOS is a 4B market cap, that is HUGE

🔗 Context 🔗

We have "market cap envy"... instead of focusing on being the best we can be

🔗 Context 🔗

they are able, and they are funding certain work. There are huge legal complexities with B1 funding a foundation

Replying to:
> why b1 can not fund?

🔗 Context 🔗

YES

Replying to:
> EOS narrative should return to a better money that promotes freedom rather than just "fuel" for dApps.

🔗 Context 🔗