Forwarded from AFF.TOP
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Clickstar прекращает работу
Clickstar закрывается. Легендарная пуш-сеть прекращает закуп трафика с 1 августа, полная остановка — 20 августа.
Сетка работала почти 8 лет и была одним из лучших источников качественного трафика на Россию и СНГ. Сейчас пуш-трафик стал слишком ботовым из-за гугловских банов на скрипты сбора.
Что это означает для арбитражников — разбираемся в ста…
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/clickstar-prekraschaet-rabotu
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
Clickstar закрывается. Легендарная пуш-сеть прекращает закуп трафика с 1 августа, полная остановка — 20 августа.
Сетка работала почти 8 лет и была одним из лучших источников качественного трафика на Россию и СНГ. Сейчас пуш-трафик стал слишком ботовым из-за гугловских банов на скрипты сбора.
Что это означает для арбитражников — разбираемся в ста…
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/clickstar-prekraschaet-rabotu
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
Replying to your own comments is a reach lever
The question: does the author engaging in their own comment section extend a post's life, or is that just etiquette?
An analysis compared posts where the author actively replied to commenters against matched posts where they did not, measuring reach decay over time. Method: matched comparison on early engagement and topic — author behavior is not randomized, so caution.
Three findings:
— Posts with active author replies sustained reach longer; the decay curve was flatter.
— Each author reply tended to trigger a fresh round of comments, re-surfacing the post in feeds — a re-activation effect.
— Substantive replies that asked a follow-up question outperformed 'thanks!' replies at extending the thread.
Caveats: authors who reply may also write better posts; confounded — treat as directional.
What it means for B2B: the post is not finished when you publish it. Budgeting 20 minutes to answer the first wave of comments with real questions can meaningfully extend reach — the comment section is a second distribution surface.
Bottom line: publish, then stay in the room. The author who works the comments keeps the post alive longer.
The question: does the author engaging in their own comment section extend a post's life, or is that just etiquette?
An analysis compared posts where the author actively replied to commenters against matched posts where they did not, measuring reach decay over time. Method: matched comparison on early engagement and topic — author behavior is not randomized, so caution.
Three findings:
— Posts with active author replies sustained reach longer; the decay curve was flatter.
— Each author reply tended to trigger a fresh round of comments, re-surfacing the post in feeds — a re-activation effect.
— Substantive replies that asked a follow-up question outperformed 'thanks!' replies at extending the thread.
Caveats: authors who reply may also write better posts; confounded — treat as directional.
What it means for B2B: the post is not finished when you publish it. Budgeting 20 minutes to answer the first wave of comments with real questions can meaningfully extend reach — the comment section is a second distribution surface.
Bottom line: publish, then stay in the room. The author who works the comments keeps the post alive longer.
Forwarded from AFF.TOP
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Facebook запретил рекламу онлайн-казино Mr Vegas
Британский ASA запретил рекламу казино Mr Vegas из-за «слишком милых» мультяшных животных в креативах — регулятор счёл, что такой стиль привлекает детей, в том числе через Facebook. Рекламодатель запустил кампанию в феврале, бан вышел в июле. Логика регулятора вызывает вопросы: дети неплатёжеспособны, а таргетировать их на гемблинг бессмысленно.
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/facebook-zapretil-reklamu-onlain-kazino-mr-vegas
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
Британский ASA запретил рекламу казино Mr Vegas из-за «слишком милых» мультяшных животных в креативах — регулятор счёл, что такой стиль привлекает детей, в том числе через Facebook. Рекламодатель запустил кампанию в феврале, бан вышел в июле. Логика регулятора вызывает вопросы: дети неплатёжеспособны, а таргетировать их на гемблинг бессмысленно.
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/facebook-zapretil-reklamu-onlain-kazino-mr-vegas
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
Forwarded from AFF.TOP
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
В Whatsapp скамят пользователей с помощью поддельных никнеймов
WhatsApp запустил никнеймы — и почти сразу начался скам. Мошенники регистрируют имена, похожие на бренды, звёзд и политиков, с минимальными опечатками.
Индия, где 500 млн пользователей WhatsApp, потребовала от Meta объяснений за 3 дня. Meta говорит, что точные совпадения заблокированы — но одна буква в другом месте защиту не триггерит.
Похоже, п…
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/v-whatsapp-skamiat-polzovatelei-s-pomoschiu-poddelnykh-nikneimov
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
WhatsApp запустил никнеймы — и почти сразу начался скам. Мошенники регистрируют имена, похожие на бренды, звёзд и политиков, с минимальными опечатками.
Индия, где 500 млн пользователей WhatsApp, потребовала от Meta объяснений за 3 дня. Meta говорит, что точные совпадения заблокированы — но одна буква в другом месте защиту не триггерит.
Похоже, п…
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/v-whatsapp-skamiat-polzovatelei-s-pomoschiu-poddelnykh-nikneimov
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
What LinkedIn actually rewards: dwell time over reactions
The question: when the feed decides what to amplify, does a reaction count for more than the seconds someone spends reading?
The dataset: a 2023 analysis pooling ~9,000 organic posts from mid-size B2B pages, cross-referenced with platform engineer talks. Dwell time here means the seconds a viewer holds a post on screen before scrolling — a proxy for attention, not a click.
Three findings:
— Posts in the top quartile for median dwell got ~3.4x the reach of bottom-quartile posts at equal reaction counts.
— A 'like' added almost nothing once dwell was controlled for; comments still mattered, but partly because they extend dwell.
— Carousels and text-heavy posts won dwell; single links lost it.
Caveats: this is correlation, not causation — high-quality posts attract both dwell and reach, so dwell may be a marker, not a lever. Sampling skewed toward English-language B2B. Treat as directional.
What it means for B2B: chasing 'like-bait' optimizes the wrong signal. Design for the 8-second hold — front-load tension, withhold the payoff.
Bottom line: attention is the currency; reactions are loose change.
The question: when the feed decides what to amplify, does a reaction count for more than the seconds someone spends reading?
The dataset: a 2023 analysis pooling ~9,000 organic posts from mid-size B2B pages, cross-referenced with platform engineer talks. Dwell time here means the seconds a viewer holds a post on screen before scrolling — a proxy for attention, not a click.
Three findings:
— Posts in the top quartile for median dwell got ~3.4x the reach of bottom-quartile posts at equal reaction counts.
— A 'like' added almost nothing once dwell was controlled for; comments still mattered, but partly because they extend dwell.
— Carousels and text-heavy posts won dwell; single links lost it.
Caveats: this is correlation, not causation — high-quality posts attract both dwell and reach, so dwell may be a marker, not a lever. Sampling skewed toward English-language B2B. Treat as directional.
What it means for B2B: chasing 'like-bait' optimizes the wrong signal. Design for the 8-second hold — front-load tension, withhold the payoff.
Bottom line: attention is the currency; reactions are loose change.
Forwarded from AFF.TOP
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Вышел ZCode - аналог Claude code
Вышел ZCode — десктопный аналог Claude Code от разработчиков GLM-5.2. Работает с API от Anthropic, поддерживает SSH-деплой на сервер, в том числе Linux.
Вместо пошаговых скриптов — система целеполагания Goal: закидываешь сложный промт, агент сам разбивает задачу и выполняет. Плюс управление через Telegram-бота.
Но главная фича — мультиагентность…
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/vyshel-zcode-analog-claude-code
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
Вышел ZCode — десктопный аналог Claude Code от разработчиков GLM-5.2. Работает с API от Anthropic, поддерживает SSH-деплой на сервер, в том числе Linux.
Вместо пошаговых скриптов — система целеполагания Goal: закидываешь сложный промт, агент сам разбивает задачу и выполняет. Плюс управление через Telegram-бота.
Но главная фича — мультиагентность…
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/vyshel-zcode-analog-claude-code
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
Forwarded from AFF.TOP
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Cloudeflare грозит Google блокировкой трафика
Cloudflare объявил: с 15 сентября 2026 года ИИ-краулеры будут заблокированы по умолчанию на всех сайтах с рекламой — включая Googlebot, Applebot и Bingbot.
Главная претензия — к Google: один и тот же бот индексирует страницы и собирает данные для обучения нейросетей, что даёт поисковику нечестное преимущество.
Но есть нюанс, который меняет всю к…
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/cloudeflare-grozit-google-blokirovkoi-trafika
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
Cloudflare объявил: с 15 сентября 2026 года ИИ-краулеры будут заблокированы по умолчанию на всех сайтах с рекламой — включая Googlebot, Applebot и Bingbot.
Главная претензия — к Google: один и тот же бот индексирует страницы и собирает данные для обучения нейросетей, что даёт поисковику нечестное преимущество.
Но есть нюанс, который меняет всю к…
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/cloudeflare-grozit-google-blokirovkoi-trafika
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
Forwarded from AFF.TOP
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Гайд: как заработать первые деньги на Pornhub
Pornhub — самый посещаемый адалт-сайт в мире, и на нём действительно можно зарабатывать. Но схема устроена иначе, чем кажется.
Автор залил ролики, набрал 16 000 просмотров — и получил 47 центов встроенной монетизации. Реальные деньги были в другом.
Есть нюансы с верификацией, голосом в роликах и законодательством РФ, которые ломают большинство с…
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/gaid-kak-zarabotat-pervye-dengi-na-pornhub
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
Pornhub — самый посещаемый адалт-сайт в мире, и на нём действительно можно зарабатывать. Но схема устроена иначе, чем кажется.
Автор залил ролики, набрал 16 000 просмотров — и получил 47 центов встроенной монетизации. Реальные деньги были в другом.
Есть нюансы с верификацией, голосом в роликах и законодательством РФ, которые ломают большинство с…
➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/gaid-kak-zarabotat-pervye-dengi-na-pornhub
🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале AFF.top
The golden-hour comment window is shorter than you think
The question: does the timing of early comments — not just their count — shape how far a LinkedIn post travels?
The dataset: a creator-tool company analyzed ~50,000 posts, logging the timestamp of every comment relative to publish time, then correlated 'first-hour comment velocity' with 24-hour reach.
Three findings:
— Posts that earned 5+ substantive comments within the first 60 minutes outreached comparable posts by roughly 2x.
— Comments after hour two correlated weakly with reach — the amplification decision appears largely made early.
— One-word replies ('Great post!') underperformed; comments over ~12 words tracked with higher reach, plausibly via dwell.
Caveats: 'substantive' was scored by length, a crude proxy; the company sells engagement scheduling, a conflict of interest. Correlation, not causation. Treat as directional.
What it means for B2B: the much-mocked 'engagement pod' has a kernel of mechanism truth — early, real conversation signals quality to the ranker. The ethical version: publish when your network is awake, reply to every early comment within minutes to keep the thread alive, and seed a genuine question that invites length.
Bottom line: the first hour is the audition; everything after is the encore.
The question: does the timing of early comments — not just their count — shape how far a LinkedIn post travels?
The dataset: a creator-tool company analyzed ~50,000 posts, logging the timestamp of every comment relative to publish time, then correlated 'first-hour comment velocity' with 24-hour reach.
Three findings:
— Posts that earned 5+ substantive comments within the first 60 minutes outreached comparable posts by roughly 2x.
— Comments after hour two correlated weakly with reach — the amplification decision appears largely made early.
— One-word replies ('Great post!') underperformed; comments over ~12 words tracked with higher reach, plausibly via dwell.
Caveats: 'substantive' was scored by length, a crude proxy; the company sells engagement scheduling, a conflict of interest. Correlation, not causation. Treat as directional.
What it means for B2B: the much-mocked 'engagement pod' has a kernel of mechanism truth — early, real conversation signals quality to the ranker. The ethical version: publish when your network is awake, reply to every early comment within minutes to keep the thread alive, and seed a genuine question that invites length.
Bottom line: the first hour is the audition; everything after is the encore.
Thought leadership data: the 'too much bad content' paradox
The question: does publishing thought leadership reliably build B2B pipeline, or can it backfire?
The dataset: the annual Edelman–LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership study surveys ~3,500 management-level buyers and C-suite executives across markets, asking how content shaped purchase decisions and vendor perception.
Three findings:
— ~75% of decision-makers said a piece of thought leadership led them to research a product they hadn't considered.
— But ~70% said most thought leadership offered no valuable insight — and a majority said weak content actively lowered their respect for the vendor.
— Roughly half of C-suite buyers said strong content directly influenced who won the deal, often before sales contact.
Caveats: self-reported buyer recall is noisy — people rationalize decisions after the fact. Edelman sells communications services. Treat directional, but it's a large recurring sample.
What it means for B2B: thought leadership is not a volume game; it carries downside risk. Mediocre content doesn't sit at zero — it subtracts from brand equity. One genuinely contrarian, well-argued piece beats twelve safe ones.
Bottom line: publish less, but never publish forgettable.
The question: does publishing thought leadership reliably build B2B pipeline, or can it backfire?
The dataset: the annual Edelman–LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership study surveys ~3,500 management-level buyers and C-suite executives across markets, asking how content shaped purchase decisions and vendor perception.
Three findings:
— ~75% of decision-makers said a piece of thought leadership led them to research a product they hadn't considered.
— But ~70% said most thought leadership offered no valuable insight — and a majority said weak content actively lowered their respect for the vendor.
— Roughly half of C-suite buyers said strong content directly influenced who won the deal, often before sales contact.
Caveats: self-reported buyer recall is noisy — people rationalize decisions after the fact. Edelman sells communications services. Treat directional, but it's a large recurring sample.
What it means for B2B: thought leadership is not a volume game; it carries downside risk. Mediocre content doesn't sit at zero — it subtracts from brand equity. One genuinely contrarian, well-argued piece beats twelve safe ones.
Bottom line: publish less, but never publish forgettable.
The 95-5 rule: most of your buyers aren't in-market
The question: at any given moment, what share of B2B buyers are actually ready to purchase — and what does that imply for content?
The dataset: the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute's B2B work, drawing on category-purchase-cycle data, estimates how many buyers in a category are 'in-market' in a given quarter versus dormant.
Three findings:
— Only ~5% of business buyers are actively in a buying cycle at any time; ~95% are out-of-market, not shopping.
— Purchase cycles for considered B2B categories often run 1–7 years, so today's content mostly reaches people who'll buy much later.
— 'Mental availability' — being the brand recalled when need arises — predicts inclusion in the consideration set more than in-the-moment persuasion.
Caveats: the 5% figure is a category-dependent average, not a constant; cycle lengths vary widely. Treat the ratio as a planning heuristic, not a measured truth for your funnel.
What it means for B2B: lead-gen content optimized only for the 5% ignores the 95% who decide your shortlist position years out. Brand-building isn't fluffy — it's memory pre-loading.
Bottom line: you're not closing today's buyer; you're being remembered by next year's.
The question: at any given moment, what share of B2B buyers are actually ready to purchase — and what does that imply for content?
The dataset: the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute's B2B work, drawing on category-purchase-cycle data, estimates how many buyers in a category are 'in-market' in a given quarter versus dormant.
Three findings:
— Only ~5% of business buyers are actively in a buying cycle at any time; ~95% are out-of-market, not shopping.
— Purchase cycles for considered B2B categories often run 1–7 years, so today's content mostly reaches people who'll buy much later.
— 'Mental availability' — being the brand recalled when need arises — predicts inclusion in the consideration set more than in-the-moment persuasion.
Caveats: the 5% figure is a category-dependent average, not a constant; cycle lengths vary widely. Treat the ratio as a planning heuristic, not a measured truth for your funnel.
What it means for B2B: lead-gen content optimized only for the 5% ignores the 95% who decide your shortlist position years out. Brand-building isn't fluffy — it's memory pre-loading.
Bottom line: you're not closing today's buyer; you're being remembered by next year's.