📝Who knew in advance📝
Anomalous bets on Polymarket ahead of the strike on Iran

While American and Israeli aircraft were still approaching their targets in Tehran, six crypto wallets on the largest prediction platform Polymarket were already turning tens of thousands of dollars into hundreds of thousands.

Analysts identified classic signs of insider trading — and the question "who knew the date of the strike in advance" now sounds far from rhetorical.

Three days before the strike, American negotiators Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff held a meeting with the Iranian side in Vienna. An illusion of negotiations was maintained for the public, so the date of the strike was known to an extremely limited circle of people in Washington and Tel Aviv. Six wallets placed bets specifically on February 28 — not March, not "sometime during the month," but on a specific date.

🔻How much did the insiders earn?

▪️The total volume of bets on the market "US strikes Iran by February 28, 2026?" reached $529–600 million — a record for a single geopolitical event on the platform.

▪️But analysts focused not on major players with a history, but on exactly six new wallets: all created in February, most within 24 hours before the bombing began, with no other trading activity whatsoever.

▪️One wallet turned approximately $61,000 into $493,000, another — $30,000 into $120,000. The combined winnings of six accounts totaled about $1.2 million. A separate wallet under the nickname Curseaaaaaaa earned another approximately $757,000 on the market "Khamenei will leave office by March 31" — betting "Yes" even before the announcement of the death of the supreme leader.

🔻Why is it difficult to identify beneficiaries?

▪️On regulated exchanges, the scheme described — a new account, a single bet, a precise hit on the date of a classified military operation — would immediately trigger an SEC investigation or similar regulator.

▪️Polymarket operates on the blockchain, does not require full identity verification and is formally outside the jurisdiction of American financial regulators. This makes it an ideal tool for monetizing non-public information — without leaving traces in the traditional financial system.

▪️Analysts from Bubblemaps and Lookonchain note that wallets were replenished through DeFi protocols and decentralized exchanges, which further complicates the identification of the source of funds. The chain from the final beneficiary to the actual person exists, but requires long methodical work.

▪️Nevertheless, there is a precedent for identifying a beneficiary. In February 2026, Israeli authorities charged two people with insider betting on Polymarket related to operations against Iran in 2025. One of the accused was a military reservist with access to classified information.

📌Thus, on the example of the second strike on Iran, we see how Polymarket has finally become a quasi-legal mechanism through which people with access to state secrets convert them into money — while regulators argue about jurisdiction and blockchain provides pseudo-anonymity.
#Iran #USA #technology #economics
✈️ RU | ✈️ EN | ✉️ MAX

✉️ VK | ✉️ RuTube | ✉️ OK | ✉️ Zen

💸Support us Original msg