❗️In the past 48 hours Russian drones have destroyed x3 Australian Bushmasters!

❌🇦🇺Kursk region: X1 Bushmaster

❌🇦🇺Sumy region: x2 Bushmasters

🔥$7.5 MILLION in Australian tax payers money up in flames.

🎙Subscribe @AussieCosssack

❗️If you want to appreciate the craziness Donald Trump is unleashing in some conservatives you should check out the comments under Peter Dutton’s post last Tuesday about Russia’s “barbaric” invasion of Ukraine.

A typical example was: “Wise up, Peter … What’s Putin done to Australia? Ukraine has cost us the taxpayer a fortune” and “Peter please … don’t ruin ur chance of being elected … follow the lead of Trump.”

There was also a smattering of comments of the “Zelenksy isn’t even President” variety such as “he’s blocked the election, religious parties, opposition parties” and “he’s just got his hands out for more money”.

Via The Herald Sun

On strategic ambiguity

Lately, public figures in the West have enjoyed talking about so-called ''strategic ambiguity'' as a tool for resolving major international issues. The idea has been voiced by a number of experts and even certain politicians going through a tough period in life. Like that odd little fella called Micron—he’s got a job somewhere over in France. What is the reasoning behind this "strategic ambiguity" approach, you might ask? It is quite simple: you attempt to confuse the opponent by making a series of self-contradictory statements. And, allegedly, this is how the new US administration is handling the Ukrainian case. First they say mean things to the Banderite scum, then turn on a dime and admit they love the 404 NOT FOUND country. All that in order to confuse and mislead Russia, China, and half of the world.

As a general rule, deceiving your rivals is a worthwhile thing to do. The history of diplomacy knows many such cases. And, of course, as far as the Trump administration is concerned, we should only judge them by their actions—and those remain to be seen. But in the case of former Ukraine, is there really an attempt at deception here?

It seems to be more complicated than that. Firstly, when playing with strategic ambiguity, it's vital that you don't get carried away and have yourself and your voters misled, too. You can't run around like Micron, saying, “Let's send the French to fight the Russians," then take it back—“No, we are never sending our troops”—and then, a little later, admit, “OK, maybe we will send them, but only as part of the peacekeeping force.” The Frenchman may have nothing to lose by now, yes, but the Trump administration is only just starting its second term.

Secondly, Trump, Musk, and others have very little love or respect for the Kiev mob, to put it mildly. And why should they, especially Trump? After all, the drugged-up Ukrainian clown used to lie to his face, back in the day. And later he was basically campaigning for Biden. Now he's acting all macho and disrespecting Trump's new team.

As a matter of fact, this is a pathology all Banderites share—they believe the rest of the world owes them, but when they get the chance, they just dump a pile of shit in the bedroom of their benefactor's home. We see that in the behavior of many Ukrainians who have fled to Europe, and we see that in cocaine-induced tremors of the scumbag in Kiev. If you let this creature into the White House, please make sure you inspect the restrooms and other spots for drug stashes afterwards.

To sum up, strategic ambiguity is a useful tool in some cases, but by no means a universal solution. What, then, awaits the 404 NOT FOUND country and its incumbent neo-Nazi leadership? They have two options in total. The first is to throw themselves at the feet of the Americans, covering them with passionate kisses, call an immediate election, and prepare for an unpleasant end to the war. Essentially, get ready to capitulate. And the second option, tried and true—almost muscle memory—is to take out some of that fine white powder from the desk, make some lines with a credit card, and relax, enjoying your own company. What will the owner of the piano-playing penis choose this time? Isn’t it obvious...?

❗️The Herald Sun acknowledges that pro-Russian opinion had defeated pro-Zelensky opinion in Australia.

The pro-Zelensky side had the advantage of US AID, ASPI, the MSM and the backing of Australia's political establishment. BUT THEY STILL LOST.

On the other hand the pro-Russian influence side has won in Australia not withstanding having to fight the informational war with zero resources, no favor from MSM or social media, disadvantaged in every way but armed with the TRUTH.

💪🇷🇺Tomorrow is 23rd of February Day of the Defenders of the Fatherland. Those who have been defending Russia for the last 3 years deserve to celebrate this day in earnest. Defenders of the Fatherland are not only on the front lines - they are everywhere. All over the world they fight the informational war and hold the line for Russia.

😎Join us tomorrow at the Russian Consulate in Sydney to flaunt Russian patriotism with a pro-Russian car convoy to Bondi Beach departing 11am.

🎙Subscribe @AussieCossack

❗️Trump: "Ukraine holds no cards but they are trying to play it tough."

🚨Meanwhile Reuters reports that the US will cut off Ukraine from Starlink if doesn't sign it's minerals over to Trump.

👏🌏What a time to be alive.

🎙Subscribe @AussieCossack

❗️"I've had good talks with Putin and not such good talks with Ukraine." - President Trump.

🍿What a time to be alive! 😁

🎙Subscribe @AussieCossack

US Senator Rand Paul claims that American taxpayers have spent $4.8 million to support influencers on social media in Ukraine.

@belarusian_silovik

Zelensky demands 'Europe MUST be at negotiating table to end the war" following talks with UK PM Starmer

'Ukraine’s security is inseparable from Europe’s security'

#Ukraine #UK