βThe United States promised Yeltsin not to expand NATO without consulting Russia.
This became known from a declassified archival document published on the website of the National Security Archive at George Washington University.
"Yeltsin and his foreign minister in 1997, Yevgeny Primakov, provided the Americans neither the βgrudging endorsementβ of NATO expansion that the U.S. hoped for nor even the βacquiescenceβ that subsequent American memoirs claimed. Rather, as Yeltsin told Clinton personally at Helsinki in March 1997: βOur position has not changed. It remains a mistake for NATO to move eastward. But I need to take steps to alleviate the negative consequences of this for Russia. I am prepared to enter into an agreement with NATO, not because I want to but because it is a forced step. There is no other solution for today.β
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
This became known from a declassified archival document published on the website of the National Security Archive at George Washington University.
"Yeltsin and his foreign minister in 1997, Yevgeny Primakov, provided the Americans neither the βgrudging endorsementβ of NATO expansion that the U.S. hoped for nor even the βacquiescenceβ that subsequent American memoirs claimed. Rather, as Yeltsin told Clinton personally at Helsinki in March 1997: βOur position has not changed. It remains a mistake for NATO to move eastward. But I need to take steps to alleviate the negative consequences of this for Russia. I am prepared to enter into an agreement with NATO, not because I want to but because it is a forced step. There is no other solution for today.β
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π€¨101π50π€¬23π―4π3β€1π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
βοΈA Japanese volunteer soldier on the Russian front lines:
π―π΅π€π·πΊ"I would like to do everything possible for Russia to win this battle!"
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π―π΅π€π·πΊ"I would like to do everything possible for Russia to win this battle!"
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π₯234π«‘128β€60π40π24β€βπ₯5π―5π₯°3π€£2π€2π1
βUkraine wants Washington to give them permission to fire missiles deep into Russia's territory during the NATO summit
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π€¬276π€£72β€7π±5π3π1π1π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€£173π117π€¬38π₯6π5π2π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€£307π22π€¬16π€2π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
βπ¨πEVIL vibes from NATO Chief Stoltenburg:
β‘οΈ"China, Iran and North Korea all want NATO to fail, they all support Russia."
β‘οΈ"The greatest risk will be if Russia wins in Ukraine."
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
β‘οΈ"China, Iran and North Korea all want NATO to fail, they all support Russia."
β‘οΈ"The greatest risk will be if Russia wins in Ukraine."
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π€£258π122π11π€¬11π―7π5π5π4π3β€2
βThe FSB detained a Russian recruited by the Ukrainian Main Intelligence Directorate, who was preparing a terrorist attack against three Russian high-ranking military personnel
A man born in 1994 organized the delivery of three explosive devices through couriers, the FSB reported.
The bombs were wrapped as gifts. The detainee confessed.
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
A man born in 1994 organized the delivery of three explosive devices through couriers, the FSB reported.
The bombs were wrapped as gifts. The detainee confessed.
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π191π30π«‘13π±5β€2π₯2π€£2
βοΈThe Russian FSB reports that Ukraine tried to carry out a terrorist attack on the Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov.
βIn March 2024, a Ukrainian intelligence officer who introduced himself as Oleg contacted a Russian serviceman on a cruiser and offered to carry out a terrorist attack on the ship, for which he promised a large sum of money.
The Russian officer immediately reported to his superiors and FSB employees. After this, the special services began conducting operational game. The Ukrainian told the Russian military that the entire operation was personally supervised by the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate, Kirill Budanov, and in preparation for the terrorist attack, components for assembling an incendiary device were sent from Ukraine.
As a result, the Ukrainian curator was sent a recording of the terrorist attack on the cruiser. After that, he stopped communicating."
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
βIn March 2024, a Ukrainian intelligence officer who introduced himself as Oleg contacted a Russian serviceman on a cruiser and offered to carry out a terrorist attack on the ship, for which he promised a large sum of money.
The Russian officer immediately reported to his superiors and FSB employees. After this, the special services began conducting operational game. The Ukrainian told the Russian military that the entire operation was personally supervised by the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate, Kirill Budanov, and in preparation for the terrorist attack, components for assembling an incendiary device were sent from Ukraine.
As a result, the Ukrainian curator was sent a recording of the terrorist attack on the cruiser. After that, he stopped communicating."
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π137π26π«‘18β€6π₯°1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
βοΈHow many Australians have Scomo and Albo killed through vaccine mandates?
π¦πΊHow many Australians are on death row who will soon die of heart attacks, blood clots and cancer associated with the vaccines?
π³Meanwhile how many Australians has Putin killed? ZERO.
π·πΊRussia is not the enemy. The Australian Government is the enemy!
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π¦πΊHow many Australians are on death row who will soon die of heart attacks, blood clots and cancer associated with the vaccines?
π³Meanwhile how many Australians has Putin killed? ZERO.
π·πΊRussia is not the enemy. The Australian Government is the enemy!
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π―485π51β€24π₯8π6π€£4π1
β NATO countries will announce their intention to provide Kiev with at least β¬40 billion in assistance throughout 2025.
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π€£221π39π€¬24π€―19π6β€4π―2
β Dmitry Medvedev:
"Will the godless clown and former Ukrainian president agree to negotiate?
The question is, is this beneficial for Russia? I think absolutely not.
Our country has repeatedly stated its readiness to return to negotiations only on our own terms. They are simple - recognition of the results of the SMO, recorded in the Constitution of Russia, and refusal to accept former Ukraine to the Alliance. The last time the President of Russia spoke about this, NATO members and Zelensky rejected this proposal out of the gate.
What if they take it and accept it?
In this case, we need to be as careful as possible. Why?
1). The negotiations themselves, until the Kiev regimeβs clearly expressed intention to capitulate, will only be a respite for the enemy in order to replenish its military and human potential.
2). Ukraineβs declarations of refusal to join NATO will not lead to anything.
3). If 1 and 2 still happen, a new, third bloody Maidan will quickly begin in Kiev, which will sweep away the current junta and bring an even more radical one to power.
And then, oddly enough, conditions for negotiations may arise, including the issue of surrender. It will be much more difficult for the Western Alliance to help obvious extremists. In addition, they will have to openly admit that hundreds of billions of their taxpayers' money have gone to waste. The ruling clique, led by a rag-tag clown, flees to the West or will be torn to pieces by the crowd.
But this will not be the end of Russiaβs military operation. Even after signing the papers and accepting defeat, the rest of the radicals, after a regrouping of forces, will sooner or later return to power, inspired by Russiaβs Western enemies. And then the time will come to finally crush the reptile.
But Russiaβs enemies will not go anywhere after this. They will accumulate strength and wait for a new convenient reason to destroy our country. We must be prepared for future battles to defend the Fatherland."
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
"Will the godless clown and former Ukrainian president agree to negotiate?
The question is, is this beneficial for Russia? I think absolutely not.
Our country has repeatedly stated its readiness to return to negotiations only on our own terms. They are simple - recognition of the results of the SMO, recorded in the Constitution of Russia, and refusal to accept former Ukraine to the Alliance. The last time the President of Russia spoke about this, NATO members and Zelensky rejected this proposal out of the gate.
What if they take it and accept it?
In this case, we need to be as careful as possible. Why?
1). The negotiations themselves, until the Kiev regimeβs clearly expressed intention to capitulate, will only be a respite for the enemy in order to replenish its military and human potential.
2). Ukraineβs declarations of refusal to join NATO will not lead to anything.
3). If 1 and 2 still happen, a new, third bloody Maidan will quickly begin in Kiev, which will sweep away the current junta and bring an even more radical one to power.
And then, oddly enough, conditions for negotiations may arise, including the issue of surrender. It will be much more difficult for the Western Alliance to help obvious extremists. In addition, they will have to openly admit that hundreds of billions of their taxpayers' money have gone to waste. The ruling clique, led by a rag-tag clown, flees to the West or will be torn to pieces by the crowd.
But this will not be the end of Russiaβs military operation. Even after signing the papers and accepting defeat, the rest of the radicals, after a regrouping of forces, will sooner or later return to power, inspired by Russiaβs Western enemies. And then the time will come to finally crush the reptile.
But Russiaβs enemies will not go anywhere after this. They will accumulate strength and wait for a new convenient reason to destroy our country. We must be prepared for future battles to defend the Fatherland."
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π―254β€37π19π6π¨3π₯°2π€£2π1π€¨1π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π―173π13π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€£223π7π3π3π€2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€£195π€6π3π€¬2π1π₯1π1
Forwarded from DD Geopolitics
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πΊπ¦π€‘ Zelensky's advisor Mykhailo Podolyak says Russia doesn't have great literature.
Russia has historically been known for its significant contributions to literature, boasting famous writers such as Leo Tolstoy, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Anton Chekhov, and Alexander Pushkin. These authors are renowned worldwide and have had a profound impact on global literature.
Pretty bold statements coming from someone from a made-up country with a made-up culture consisting of Bandera, mud huts, and half of borscht.
π» UNESCO had to select a cultural item to protect, but the choices were so limited they had to pick A SOUP!
Think about that...
π΄ @DDGeopolitics
Russia has historically been known for its significant contributions to literature, boasting famous writers such as Leo Tolstoy, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Anton Chekhov, and Alexander Pushkin. These authors are renowned worldwide and have had a profound impact on global literature.
Pretty bold statements coming from someone from a made-up country with a made-up culture consisting of Bandera, mud huts, and half of borscht.
Think about that...
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€£263π€¬28π13β€5π€―3π2π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π139π31π€¨24π€―10π€¬9π3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€¬224π€£85π9π5β€4π1
βοΈGeneral Adolf Heusinger was the commander of Wehrmacht high command and Hitler's right-hand man and also chairman of NATO from 1961 to 1964.
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
πSubscribe @AussieCossack
π€¬290π―49π27β€25π€―18π12β‘6π«‘2π1π1