As our supporters are aware, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II has died. As such, the reign under which Australia has existed for the majority of her post-federation history has come to an end.

Over the past few days, reactions from Nationalists have been varied. Opinion has perhaps been most split in Australia, as has been the case throughout our history.

Many settlers succumbing to our continent’s primitive loneliness clung to Empire and Crown, out of a fear of ethnic isolation. Others, frustrated with the Home Islands' attempts to hinder the national project (ie when Victoria I refused to grant royal ascent to the Coloured Races Restriction Bills) have opposed the monarchy.

Historical reflection is important in understanding our identity, but the primary purpose of The ANA will always be to defend and advance the welfare of our members. When news breaks, our focus is on what challenges our brothers will face as a result, and what we can practically do to overcome them.

Regardless of one's opinion, it's now certain that perfidious elements within the Commonwealth will begin to agitate for a republic for all the wrong reasons. This, combined with the upcoming referendum on ‘an Indigenous voice in parliament’, will doubtless be used to enshrine anti-White policies in the political apparatus and further the interests of global finance.

We encourage all White Australian men to consider their own best interest and join the ANA, as we help each other through these uncertain times.
Email us today:
https://ausnatives.org/join/

Following on from the above, and looking to the future - in which we will inevitably be faced with renewed agitation for an Australian republic - there have been two recent contributions to the public debate which should not be ignored.

The first is the suggestion by Geoffrey Robertson that Australia quietly do away with the role of a head of state separate from the prime minister. This avoids the thorny issue of “Who selects the president?”:
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australia-has-no-need-for-a-head-of-state-royal-or-not-20220912-p5bhhf.html
One commenter below this article objects in these terms:
Even a stable nation needs a titular head of state empowered to dismiss a government behaving badly and force an election. Although we don’t expect such a situation right now, extreme examples might be giving a foreign power command over our armed forces or incarcerating political opponents. 

The second (and more important) is the video by Jim Saleam
https://youtu.be/_jTkA1Afk7Y
in which he cautions that a republic in name which is merely a re-badging of the present arrangements, and which would be far more difficult to resile from, would merely lock in Australia’s commitment and obligations to the globalists and everything they push our way. Dr Saleam’s position is not an easy one to understand at first viewing, but merits the effort needed to come to grips with it.

Nativist culture is a positive culture in our circles; we advocate not only for physical self improvement but moral self improvement also. Men ought to live free from the clutches of addiction, vice and scandal – They should walk with their chin up, working every day towards a fulfilling and morally upright existence in which they secure for themselves a home, a dearly loved wife and cherished children. It is truly our object that all men in the ANA defy the odds set before them in modernity to strive for the life which we seek to live.

https://ausnatives.org/endurance-or-burnout/

Could it happen in Australia?

A fortnight ago there was the video of machete-wielding Africans fighting in Leeds, UK:
https://youtu.be/h0-GD8FjJcA
There are new incidents there every few days.

Earlier this week Tucker Carlson provided over twenty examples of lawlessness and police surrender across the USA:
https://youtu.be/GH7cnmGHNxw

But it’s already happening here in Australia as this new ABC program shows:
https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/sydney-dangerous-postcode-gangs-syndicate-traphouse/101445006

The ABC here talk openly about diversity and refer to “hijab-wearing women” and Vietnamese drug gangs and pathetic police diversionary plans (like teaching the criminals nice “Hakas”). For authenticity, the ABC reporter admits to being an “ex-member” of an outlaw motorcycle gang.

In the leafy suburbs and in country towns Australians are separated from realities like these. But they sneak under our radar and we are told the time has passed to do anything about it. It hasn’t passed, of course, but it would rock the boat to take a stand, to stem the tide.

Our opponents are taking meaningful action. We too, must resolve to do more than gripe about it among ourselves.
But what's to be done? The first step is taking your Own side - join the ANA today.

New episode of the Rouseabout Podcast!

Hear from Grant, Nick, and Tristan about practical skills in budgeting, finance and career.

Sick of wasting your money? Tune in to find out how you can maximise your income.
🫰

https://ausnatives.org/podcast/loads-of-money-budgeting-career-skills-more/

All staunch Nationalists persistently struggle with the temptation to embrace the boogeyman identity which our political opponents paint us with. Does it not strike up inner satisfaction when you fearlessly take upon the tarnished label that has been cast at you?

We hate to be back-footed, to live in fear of a label and so many have taken the natural course of action which is to wear the label as a radical and an extremist, and this has become so well set in people have begun to self-identify with these labels even when they are not accurate or necessarily true.

https://ausnatives.org/winding-back-the-clock-on-radicalism-extremism/

At least our ethnic heritage gets some credit here and there.

This week 81 years ago, John Curtin at the helm of the Australian Labor Party mobilised all of Australia's industries and resources to build up and maintain our defence against the Japanese invader.

"All the advancing that will be done will be by Australians for it is Australians who stand for the policy of advancing Australia."

This action by Curtin and the federal parliament to assert our national interest is commonly held by Nativists to be the most clearly articulated declaration of Australian Independence from the Imperial power of the United Kingdom. It is for this reason, it has become tradition to call the 23 February 1942 Australia’s ‘Independence Day’ as it was on this day that Australia, likely for the first time had firmly asserted its own interest above that of Imperial interest.

https://ausnatives.org/curtin-and-australias-independence-day/

The Australian Natives' Association is pleased to present the first part of a series of Australian History videos in the series - A Year to Remember.

Please bookmark and watch the below playlist from 1931 - 1939

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyfxyd23nk1iAApkE6Eb821kfVFh9mJOv

John Curtin, 1944

John Curtin, 1944

In order for a nation or culture to exist, it must stand for collective ideals and its members must share a common identity, welded together in a common worldview and character that separate the nation from the rest of the world.

You cannot have a nation where the only shared value is the fact that there are no shared beliefs.

The importance of a clear definition is now more urgent, due to the disastrous federal policies of Multiculturalism imposed on us by major political parties since the Whitlam era. Multiculturalism is the negation and rejection of a shared national identity.

Hon. John Fischer MLC
Member for Mining & Pastoral
Western Australian Parliament
December 2001

Many believe that Australia's economic future can only be secured with permanently high levels of immigration, from anywhere and everywhere that people can be found. In fact, economic data indicate that the most efficient, prosperous nations are the most homogeneous.

Ethnic diversity creates pressures on government to conduct "pork-barrel" politics that result in suboptimal economic policies.

It would seem that Australia's architects in the late 19th and early 20th century were right and the modern elites who imposed multiculturalism and ethnic diversity on the country were ignorant and short-sighted.

The extreme Left unions actually believe and promote borderless states. The paradox here is that there is nothing else that would more severely damage the very quality of life and general welfare of the people they purport to support. In many cases it is the people they are selling out who pay their wages as their union leaders.

Graeme Campbell MP (Kalgoorie, WA)
December 2001