Forwarded from Nationalist-13
Forwarded from 🌲𝕳𝖊𝖗𝖆𝖑𝖉 𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕷𝖎𝖌𝖍𝖙𝖓𝖎𝖓𝖌🌲
“Life, as a part, is interwoven with the life of the whole, not only present, but past and future, for while men come and go the folk lives on, continuous, eternal, providing its members perform their duty to it. Thus, in identifying himself with his folk man prolongs himself through the multiplicity of his ancestors and his descendants, and thereby attains immortality.”
— Colin Jordan
— Colin Jordan
Forwarded from Canada Manifest
Prime Minister Wisdom
Sir Wilfrid Laurier
The 7th Prime Minister of Canada
1896-1911
An era remembered for prosperity, development and order under a calm, reasonable and intelligent man.
One of Canada's finest.
X/Twitter
Sir Wilfrid Laurier
The 7th Prime Minister of Canada
1896-1911
An era remembered for prosperity, development and order under a calm, reasonable and intelligent man.
One of Canada's finest.
X/Twitter
Forwarded from Loyalist Pioneers
We want you. We want men of honour. We want men of commitment and will. We want men of discipline. We want you.
The Loyalist movement is all encompassing, it is unlike anything seen before in this nation. We seek to advance our ideology by all possible means. We seek an approach to the salvation of our nation that involves the whole of our folk. As such, we need men of many talents, men from all walks of life, who are able to form the base of a new political elite for our nation.
The Loyalist movement is exclusive, and elite. We only accept men of our folk who seek to advance that folk in both their personal and political lives. We are building a new movement, by Canadians, for Canadians, no exceptions, no compromise.
The Loyalist movement is disciplined. We want men with the strength of will to fully commit to the cause with their time, talents, and resources. In the struggle to take back our home there is no room for hobbyists and trend hoppers. Any man with the drive and ambition to see himself reach the height of his potential physically, financially, or intellectually, will find a brotherhood equally willing to push him forward and build him up.
We want the blood of the old, we want the vigour of the present, we want the vision of the future. We. Want. You.
Prove yourself a man amongst men, join today: LoyalistPioneers@proton.me
The Loyalist movement is all encompassing, it is unlike anything seen before in this nation. We seek to advance our ideology by all possible means. We seek an approach to the salvation of our nation that involves the whole of our folk. As such, we need men of many talents, men from all walks of life, who are able to form the base of a new political elite for our nation.
The Loyalist movement is exclusive, and elite. We only accept men of our folk who seek to advance that folk in both their personal and political lives. We are building a new movement, by Canadians, for Canadians, no exceptions, no compromise.
The Loyalist movement is disciplined. We want men with the strength of will to fully commit to the cause with their time, talents, and resources. In the struggle to take back our home there is no room for hobbyists and trend hoppers. Any man with the drive and ambition to see himself reach the height of his potential physically, financially, or intellectually, will find a brotherhood equally willing to push him forward and build him up.
We want the blood of the old, we want the vigour of the present, we want the vision of the future. We. Want. You.
Prove yourself a man amongst men, join today: LoyalistPioneers@proton.me
Forwarded from Nationalist-13
Some of the men who participated in this demonstration in Edmonton, will be involved in our new Alberta chapter of the Nationalist 13 Vanguard. If you are from Alberta and interested in joining, send us an email.
Folk-Family-Future!
Join the Vanguard: NS13_88@protonmail.com
Folk-Family-Future!
Join the Vanguard: NS13_88@protonmail.com
Forwarded from The Traditional Heathens
Shame Culture - A Revival of Morals
To our ancestors, shame and dishonor were among the worst labels a person could receive. This persisted until more recent times, when shame culture came to be viewed as “regressive,” and often even as wrong for judging the behavior of others. This is where we have failed as a culture.
A functioning society requires consequences that are social, not only legal. Law can punish crimes, but it cannot protect trust, loyalty, or integrity. When dishonorable behavior carries no loss of reputation or standing, apathy takes root and moral responsibility weakens across the whole community. Dishonorable behavior is not theoretical. It appears in slander, stealing from one’s own people, breaking one’s word, exploiting trust, and abandoning responsibility. These acts weaken the bonds a culture depends on.
This is especially visible online, where anonymity shields people from consequences. Slander, false accusations, and character attacks are treated as entertainment or political tools because reputational cost has been removed. In earlier cultures, damaging another person’s name without cause was itself dishonorable. Today it is routine. When people can destroy reputations without risking their own, social trust becomes impossible.
This is why shame culture must be restored, not as cruelty, but as accountability. A culture must be able to say plainly that some actions cost a person their standing until they make things right. Shame should be tied to behavior, proportional, grounded in shared standards, and applied consistently. This principle is not new. Tacitus records that among the Germanic peoples:
“To throw away one’s shield is the supreme disgrace, and the man who has thus dishonoured himself is debarred from attendance at sacrifice or assembly. Many such survivors from the battlefield have ended their shame by hanging themselves.”
— Germania
A culture that holds people accountable must also allow a path back. Atonement should require owning the wrongdoing, making restitution where possible, and proving change through conduct over time. But it is not unlimited. Betrayal of one’s people, deliberate corruption, and repeated violations of trust can place a person beyond reconciliation. In such cases, permanent loss of standing is not cruelty, but protection. Without this boundary, standards collapse into empty words. If we want a better culture, we must demand better behavior. Standards are what make something worth defending. Without them, nothing lasting can endure.
Art- Hagen kills Siegfried by Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld, 1847
To our ancestors, shame and dishonor were among the worst labels a person could receive. This persisted until more recent times, when shame culture came to be viewed as “regressive,” and often even as wrong for judging the behavior of others. This is where we have failed as a culture.
A functioning society requires consequences that are social, not only legal. Law can punish crimes, but it cannot protect trust, loyalty, or integrity. When dishonorable behavior carries no loss of reputation or standing, apathy takes root and moral responsibility weakens across the whole community. Dishonorable behavior is not theoretical. It appears in slander, stealing from one’s own people, breaking one’s word, exploiting trust, and abandoning responsibility. These acts weaken the bonds a culture depends on.
This is especially visible online, where anonymity shields people from consequences. Slander, false accusations, and character attacks are treated as entertainment or political tools because reputational cost has been removed. In earlier cultures, damaging another person’s name without cause was itself dishonorable. Today it is routine. When people can destroy reputations without risking their own, social trust becomes impossible.
This is why shame culture must be restored, not as cruelty, but as accountability. A culture must be able to say plainly that some actions cost a person their standing until they make things right. Shame should be tied to behavior, proportional, grounded in shared standards, and applied consistently. This principle is not new. Tacitus records that among the Germanic peoples:
“To throw away one’s shield is the supreme disgrace, and the man who has thus dishonoured himself is debarred from attendance at sacrifice or assembly. Many such survivors from the battlefield have ended their shame by hanging themselves.”
— Germania
A culture that holds people accountable must also allow a path back. Atonement should require owning the wrongdoing, making restitution where possible, and proving change through conduct over time. But it is not unlimited. Betrayal of one’s people, deliberate corruption, and repeated violations of trust can place a person beyond reconciliation. In such cases, permanent loss of standing is not cruelty, but protection. Without this boundary, standards collapse into empty words. If we want a better culture, we must demand better behavior. Standards are what make something worth defending. Without them, nothing lasting can endure.
Art- Hagen kills Siegfried by Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld, 1847
Forwarded from American Freedom Party
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 13, 2026
Statement on Australia’s Assault on Free Expression
January 13, 2026
Statement on Australia’s Assault on Free Expression
Forwarded from Tom Sewell (Uncensored)
https://www.givesendgo.com/FreeSpeechAustralia
I am fundraising in order to challenge the anti-free speech laws in Australia, and to prepare a High Court challenge to the recently proposed legislation that threatens political organisers with 15 years in prison for opposing the Governments agenda.
The fundraiser is to me as an individual to challenge the aforementioned law's unconstitutionality. I will place the money in legal trust when I have decided which firm to go with. The fundraising is in no way a breach of the proposed laws itself, and the High Court challenge will proceed with attempting to strike out the laws against free speech that have already passed even if the current proposed laws fail to pass through parliament next week.
Thank you for your support over the years. No matter what happens, I will never give up the struggle for our Nation.
I am fundraising in order to challenge the anti-free speech laws in Australia, and to prepare a High Court challenge to the recently proposed legislation that threatens political organisers with 15 years in prison for opposing the Governments agenda.
The fundraiser is to me as an individual to challenge the aforementioned law's unconstitutionality. I will place the money in legal trust when I have decided which firm to go with. The fundraising is in no way a breach of the proposed laws itself, and the High Court challenge will proceed with attempting to strike out the laws against free speech that have already passed even if the current proposed laws fail to pass through parliament next week.
Thank you for your support over the years. No matter what happens, I will never give up the struggle for our Nation.
GiveSendGo
Support Tom Sewell's Free Speech High Court Case
Support Thomas Sewell's Free Speech High Court Challenge in Australia.
In the last 18 months, the Australian Government has passed a number of laws that imp...
In the last 18 months, the Australian Government has passed a number of laws that imp...
Forwarded from White Canada
Forwarded from Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
It’s like opposite land down here.
They say ‘hate-speech’ laws are about protecting the vulnerable or stopping people from feeling fear.
But they’re really about protecting the powerful by imposing a higher threshold of fear.
It’s about making you too afraid to effectively criticise or challenge the government and its lobbyists.
They say ‘hate-speech’ laws are about protecting the vulnerable or stopping people from feeling fear.
But they’re really about protecting the powerful by imposing a higher threshold of fear.
It’s about making you too afraid to effectively criticise or challenge the government and its lobbyists.
Forwarded from Endeavour
Just days ago, Carney declared the "rules-based world order" over. Meanwhile the Canadian military stated that it wouldn't last a week if the US invaded and Canada would be reduced to an Afghanistan-style guerrilla war.
Today, Carney reasserted the idea that Canada is a multicultural, post-national country. If the Canadian government think Canadians (and the hodgepodge of migrants they've imported) would put their lives on the line to wage a desperate guerrilla war for this, they are delusional.
They haven't acknowledged it yet, but the Laurentian Elite now need nationalism more than ever. They'll have to adapt accordingly or they'll be swept out of power.
PS I don't think a US invasion is at all a likely possibility in the foreseeable future. This just highlights the disconnect between telling people they have no definable culture or nationality then believing they'd fight a war for you.
https://t.me/disclosetv/19464
Today, Carney reasserted the idea that Canada is a multicultural, post-national country. If the Canadian government think Canadians (and the hodgepodge of migrants they've imported) would put their lives on the line to wage a desperate guerrilla war for this, they are delusional.
They haven't acknowledged it yet, but the Laurentian Elite now need nationalism more than ever. They'll have to adapt accordingly or they'll be swept out of power.
PS I don't think a US invasion is at all a likely possibility in the foreseeable future. This just highlights the disconnect between telling people they have no definable culture or nationality then believing they'd fight a war for you.
https://t.me/disclosetv/19464
Telegram
Disclose.tv
NOW - Canada's Mark Carney: "Canadians are inclusive. We know our country is stronger when everyone belongs... It was manifest in our adoption of multiculturalism, first as policy and then as law."
@disclosetv
@disclosetv