Forwarded from ANTI-TECH APOSTLESπ οΈ
Fight for what matters. Nature is the only sanctuary and home we shall ever know.
"The greatest threat to our planet is the belief that someone else will save it," β Robert Swan
"The greatest threat to our planet is the belief that someone else will save it," β Robert Swan
π―9
Forwarded from Anti Tech Revolt π²
β...the chief cause for the impending collapse of the world - the cause sufficient in and by itself - is the enormous growth of the human population: the human flood. The worst enemy of life is too much life: the excess of human life.β ~ Pentti Linkola
π₯8π1π€1
Forwarded from α Tribal Nature α
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯7π1
Today Industrial society is still very dependent on the biosphere for it's existence. This is why crucial for it's survival will be future biotechnology methods. The climate systems are changing,agriculture is falling, numerous invertebrates and vertebrates species with important ecosystem functions are going extinct. Pesticides are polluting the soil and killing microbes necessary for plant life. All thΠ΅se issues can't be solved without advanced biotechnological methods and the scientists are trying desperately to find new and new ways of creating them. In the near future the biggest danger to The Wilderness will be the artificial organisms that will compete with natural organisms for energy and resources. As Anti tech radicals we should attack biotechnology on every level ,we should discredit those who preach it and stand FOR the Wilderness and natural living beings. If enough people become dissatisfied with the system we will have a chance of radicalising them and mak a great deal of damage to technology
π₯10
Forwarded from Anti Tech Revolt π²
"When I returned for a time to the city after living for an extended period in the mountains of Montana, I realized upon readjusting to urban existence that all my life, until I escaped to the mountains, I had been subject to chronic stress. To be sure, it was stress at a relatively low level, a level at which people habituated to urban living are not aware of stress because they've always been subject to it and donβt know how it would feel to be free of it. It was only through my experience in the mountains that I learn how good it felt to escape from chronic stress altogether."
Ted Kaczinsky
Ted Kaczinsky
π₯9π2
Forwarded from ANTI-TECH APOSTLESπ οΈ
ππ πππππΏ π½π π½πππππ ππ πΏπππ πππ πππππ ππππππππ ππππππ πΌππΏ ππΌππ πππ πΎπππππππππΎππ
β Theodore John Kaczynski
β Theodore John Kaczynski
π₯8
Forwarded from ANTI-TECH APOSTLESπ οΈ
Primitive life was more fulfilling because their lives were woven into community, nature and and purposeful tasks such as hunting and providing for your family. Primitive man was not burdened by alienating work, chronic stress or complex societal hierarchies. Their needs were simple, their relationships direct, and their sense of purpose came naturally from survival, cooperation and belonging.
Return to the natural ways of life.
Return to the natural ways of life.
π4π―2π₯1
Forwarded from ANTI TECH TALK
"Technological society leads to increasing numbers of people who cannot adapt to the inhuman rhythm of modern life with its emphasis on specialization. A class of people is growing up who are unexploitable because they are not worth employing even for the minimum wage. Technological progress makes whole categories of people useless without making it possible to support them with the wealth produced by the progress."
- Jacques Ellul
- Jacques Ellul
π₯4
Forwarded from ANTI-TECH APOSTLESπ οΈ
New technologies often appear optional when first introduced, but eventually society restructures itself in such a way that these technologies become necessary just to survive. Take the internet for example, it would be almost impossible to get by without using the internet. Even if one completely eliminates internet usage in his personal life, most jobs still require internet usage. There is simply no way of getting around the internet. The same would apply for transhumanism. Likely even moreso, since the changes brought by transhumanism are even greater than those which were brought by the internet. Even if in the highly unlikely scenario that transhumanism was optional, due to it increasing the efficiency of the human by such a large magnitude, individuals who embraced transhumanism will be propagandized as superior, with those remaining in their natural forms socially ostracized. We see this today as those without the newest belongings, especially those that are technological, as less than others.
π₯5
Forwarded from Anti Tech Revolt π²
[...] It is not the primitive man, who has used his body daily for practical purposes, who fears the deterioration of age, but the modern man, who has never had a practical use for his body beyond walking from his car to his house. It is the man whose need for the power process has been satisfied during his life who is best prepared to accept the end of that life.
ISAIF, paragraph 71.
ISAIF, paragraph 71.
π₯7
The changes in the climate can be used for lowering the faith in Industrial society and technology. Whether the climate is primary driven by humans or largely natural processes doesn't matter. Our civilization can't adapt to the fast changes and soon problems like overpopulation, crowding, lack of resources, widespread diseases and pests will show as unavoidable obstacles to the System. This is the time that we should establish our revolutionary cells and start spreading propaganda. In the desperate moments people will be desperate for solutions and we will give them the right solution!
β€βπ₯3
This is a chat for everyone seriously believing in strictly anti tech ideas. Read the rules before joining
The waste that Industrial society creates will plague humanity for centuries to come. This is clear example how the system doesn't care about human health and freedom but work autonomously for it's own survival. There will be a time when only the highest mountains will have clear water sources , because only there will not be leaking of the various toxins and waste of the Industry.
Revolutionaries should, again, use this as argument against Technological society and the deadly consequences that it creates for the wilderness and humans. We should be ready to survive such conditions and help the people who are willing to fight against the System and it's loyal supporters!
Revolutionaries should, again, use this as argument against Technological society and the deadly consequences that it creates for the wilderness and humans. We should be ready to survive such conditions and help the people who are willing to fight against the System and it's loyal supporters!
π₯1
Forwarded from Anti Tech Revolt π²
184. Nature makes a perfect counter-ideal to technology for several reasons. Nature (that which is outside the power of the system) is the opposite of technology (which seeks to expand indefinitely the power of the system). Most people will agree that nature is beautiful; certainly it
has tremendous popular appeal. The radical environmentalists already hold an ideology that exalts nature and opposes technology.30 It is not necessary for the sake of nature to set up some chimerical
utopia or any new kind of social order. Nature takes care of itself: It was a spontaneous creation that existed long before any human society, and for countless centuries many different kinds of human societies coexisted with nature without doing it an excessive amount of damage. *Only with the Industrial Revolution did the effect of human society on nature become really devastating.*
has tremendous popular appeal. The radical environmentalists already hold an ideology that exalts nature and opposes technology.30 It is not necessary for the sake of nature to set up some chimerical
utopia or any new kind of social order. Nature takes care of itself: It was a spontaneous creation that existed long before any human society, and for countless centuries many different kinds of human societies coexisted with nature without doing it an excessive amount of damage. *Only with the Industrial Revolution did the effect of human society on nature become really devastating.*
π₯1π1
Forwarded from Ted Kaczynski
The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
π₯5