Past socities offered more personal freedom

"It is said that we live in a free society because we have a certain number of constitutionally guaranteed rights. But these are not as important as they seem. The degree of personal freedom that exists in a society is determined more by the economic and technological structure of the society than by its laws or its form of government. Most of the Indian nations of New England were monarchies, and many of the cities of the Italian Renaissance were controlled by dictators. But in reading about these societies one gets the impression that they allowed far more personal freedom than our society does. In part this was because they lacked efficient mechanisms for enforcing the ruler’s will: There were no modern, well-organized police forces, no rapid long-distance communications, no surveillance cameras, no dossiers of information about the lives of average citizens. Hence it was relatively easy to evade control".

- Ted Kaczynski (The Nature of Freedom p.95)

"Everyone can feel the nothingness, the void, just beneath the surface of everyday routines and securities." ~ John Zerzan

ALL ORGANIZATION-DEPENDANT TECHNOLOGY MUST BE ABOLISHED

Many anti-civ ideologies like anarcho-communism that is cloaked in the false generosity of ecologism, argue that not all technology is inherently bad and can instead serve a use to "protect" humans and the natural environment. Already there are many flaws one can point out with this. "Bad" technology cannot be separated from the supposed "good" because modern technology is an interconnected system in which every part depends on the other. Technologies that seem beneficial like medicine or communication tools rely on the same industrial infrastructure that produces harmful or oppressive technologies. This essentially means that you cannot keep one without also sustaining the system.
All organization-dependant technology ends up enroaching on human freedom.

Contrary to what some politically correct scientists will tell you,the reason why human population is increasing is largely due to the industrial progress and the increase in food production in particular. I can't stop hearing about the idea(raised by social justice "environments") that we somehow will help the environment if we find a way to feed all the people on Earth, which is impossible. Even if we somehow manage to feed all the excess population in the world we will not solve the world hunger , because these populations, following natural reproduction dynamics, will increase,due to the available new resources. The only way to stop the unnatural human growth is to destroy the means that create or transport food supply! This is not Misanthropy,this reality!

"Civilization is capable of making Earth uninhabitable for humans and the majority of living species. Historical civilizations self-destructed before causing global damage, but global industrial civilization has been far more damaging than its predecessors. We no longer have the option of waiting it out. There is nowhere left to go. Civilization will collapse one way or another, and it's our job to insure that something is left afterward." -Deep Green resistance , Derrick Jenson