π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Forwarded from ππ«π±π¦ π
π²π‘π‘π₯π¦π°πͺ
ππ«π±π¦ π
π²π‘π‘π₯π¦π°πͺ | βπ³π π¨π±π₯π¬π©π¦π π¦π°πͺ | π»πππππππππ
β‘2
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
"Show me the verse that explicitly says there's a 2,000-year gap before Christ returns!"
This isnβt the winning argument online Preterist dorks think it is. It's the exact same fallacy the Muslims use when demanding, "Where did Jesus say the exact words, 'I am God, worship Me'?"
No, there's no verse saying "The Second Coming will occur exactly 2,000 years laterβ (and it might not occur for centuries more). Just like there's no verse containing the word "Trinity" or "canonβ or βBible.β
Congratulations: you've discovered that doctrine comes from what Scripture teaches as a whole, not from hunting made up sentences!
The real question is whether Scripture permits long delays after language that sounds near or sudden. It obviously does.
Isaiah declared Babylon's day "at hand" (Isaiah 13:6), yet its full desolation stretched far beyond one generation (Isaiah 13:19β22).
Malachi said the Lord would "suddenly come to his temple" (Malachi 3:1)βyet four silent centuries separated that promise from Christ.
Genesis 3:15 promised the serpent-crushing Seed with no timetable at all; fulfillment took millennia.
The New Testament explicitly prepares us for delay. The bridegroom "tarried" (Matthew 25:5). The lord returns "after a long time" (Matthew 25:19). Jesus directly corrects those expecting the kingdom to "immediately appear" with a parable of a nobleman who leaves for a far country before returning (Luke 19:11β12).
Peter confronts the very objection: "Where is the promise of his coming?" (2 Peter 3:3β4). His answer isn't "you're right"βit's that God isn't bound by man's clock: "one day is with the Lord as a thousand years" (2 Peter 3:8β9). It isnβt a secret math code, but a rebuke to those who think they can dictate God's timetable.
Open the whole Book. Get off the internet, sit down, and let adults discuss eschatology.
π»πππππππππ
This isnβt the winning argument online Preterist dorks think it is. It's the exact same fallacy the Muslims use when demanding, "Where did Jesus say the exact words, 'I am God, worship Me'?"
No, there's no verse saying "The Second Coming will occur exactly 2,000 years laterβ (and it might not occur for centuries more). Just like there's no verse containing the word "Trinity" or "canonβ or βBible.β
Congratulations: you've discovered that doctrine comes from what Scripture teaches as a whole, not from hunting made up sentences!
The real question is whether Scripture permits long delays after language that sounds near or sudden. It obviously does.
Isaiah declared Babylon's day "at hand" (Isaiah 13:6), yet its full desolation stretched far beyond one generation (Isaiah 13:19β22).
Malachi said the Lord would "suddenly come to his temple" (Malachi 3:1)βyet four silent centuries separated that promise from Christ.
Genesis 3:15 promised the serpent-crushing Seed with no timetable at all; fulfillment took millennia.
The New Testament explicitly prepares us for delay. The bridegroom "tarried" (Matthew 25:5). The lord returns "after a long time" (Matthew 25:19). Jesus directly corrects those expecting the kingdom to "immediately appear" with a parable of a nobleman who leaves for a far country before returning (Luke 19:11β12).
Peter confronts the very objection: "Where is the promise of his coming?" (2 Peter 3:3β4). His answer isn't "you're right"βit's that God isn't bound by man's clock: "one day is with the Lord as a thousand years" (2 Peter 3:8β9). It isnβt a secret math code, but a rebuke to those who think they can dictate God's timetable.
Open the whole Book. Get off the internet, sit down, and let adults discuss eschatology.
π»πππππππππ
π₯6π€―1
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
On "Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come"
ππ«π±π¦ ππ―π’π±π’π―π¦π°πͺ
ππ«π±π¦ ππ―π’π±π’π―π¦π°πͺ
π₯2
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ancient examples where the word Quickly ΟΞ±ΟΟ takh-oo'
meant SUDDENLY
Rev 22:12 KJV
Rev 22:7 KJV
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
meant SUDDENLY
Rev 22:12 KJV
And, behold, I come quickly (SUDDENLY); and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
Rev 22:7 KJV
Behold, I come quickly (SUDDENLY): blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book.
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
β4
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Dan 2:41-44 KJV
Little Seasonists chop off the feet of the Statue
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potterβs clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.
42. And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
43. And whereas thou sawest iron mixt with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
44. And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
Little Seasonists chop off the feet of the Statue
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
β1
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Daniel 2:43
Preterist:
Nop, not happening today
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
43. And whereas thou sawest
iron mixt with miry clay,
they shall mingle themselves
with the seed of men:
but they shall not cleave one
to another, even as iron is not
mixed with clay.
Preterist:
Nop, not happening today
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
π―2
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Corrected Version of Daniel Statue for Preterists
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
π³2
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Are those Mongoloids wearing
skirts supposed to be white?
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
skirts supposed to be white?
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
π3
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Forwarded from Strength Made Perfect
Guys, maybe nobody ever told you this and you live under a rockβ¦. But wearing shorts that end above your knees is gay.
You might as well paint your fingernails if youβre going to wear short shorts.
You might as well paint your fingernails if youβre going to wear short shorts.
π―2β€1π«‘1
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Christ at a Secret Chamber in Rupes Nigra
at the North Pole?
Believe them NOT
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
at the North Pole?
Believe them NOT
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
π―3