Some good points here👇

https://t.me/markacollett/2187

So far Mark Collett has not provided a satisfactory reason for ethnonationalism compared to civic nationalism when he keeps referring back to the ol' "if you don't like our customs and food, then leave" argument.

The basis for ethnonationalism must refer to the structural arguments for what a nation must be: it must be an Evolutionary Group Strategy, not just simply talk about extreme examples, rape gangs and Halal meats.

The reason that different races are incompatible is that we are mammals, we are animals in an ongoing struggle for survival and access to resources. The spiritual nature of this biological struggle emerges from it, creating a higher level of this conflict. Mark should speak about the Fixation Index, there is more genetic dissimilarity between a European and African human than a coyote and a European dog. They are not separated by cultural norms or values, let alone something as mundane as food, but rather by a tangible biological separation of what we are as different subspecies/races.

Race is not socially defined, it is biologically defined, man in his 'natural state' is ethnocentric, therefore 'racism', that is to say ethnocentrism to one's own kindred, will never disappear. Every race is aware of what and who they are because they recognise a deeply ingrained 'otherness', because survival of the in-group depends on recognising the out-group. The attempt to drill this natural behaviour out of people is like teaching a dog to walk on its hind legs, it is unnatural, unfavourable and immoral that avoidance of ethnocentrism should ever be expected of any race (let alone enforced as a double standard solely on Europeans).

Ethnonationalism is based on the idea that the political world should be inseparable from the natural world. Political law should reflect natural law (i.e. 'Dharma'), that is to say that it should not enforce unnatural behaviour on people with the intention of subverting it for material reward (such as economic growth) or a socially fixed ideology (such as egalitarianism). Man is unhappy and alienated from his true nature because domestication and modernity has separated him from his natural instincts and is unable to express them.

Ethnonationalism is independent of particular societies, and is a position that should be defended in the absolute (the incompatibility of heterogeneous races, compared with the order, trust and common purpose from homogeneous races), where the examples that Mark cites are evidence of transitory behaviour that is not explicit to what we are.

Nor can we keep referring to the primitive civilisations of blacks as a successful argument for ethnonationalism because of superiority. Fuck modernism, technology and defining our race in accordance with this race to the bottom of technological progress - it has given us nothing but complacency, dependency and weakness. It's empty criteria, they are means to an end - but what end? What defines us is not what we have made, but literally the fact that we are us. If non-Europeans could do everything we can, build what we build, make what we make etc., would they be us? No. There is no criteria where one can become European. It is more basic and primitive than that - we are who we are because we are who we are. That's all there is to it.

You can be the people that live in fear of what people think about you and their reaction to your words and actions.... ....or you can be the people whose words and actions are feared by others. The choice is yours. Not everything is a binary, but this is. There is a power imbalance in every relationship. There is always an alpha and a beta. Dominant and dominated. Unbelievable, the levels of feminine thinking at work inside the minds of Western men. Servile and weak, eager to please the dominant groups engineering their extermination. Eager to be dominated. They mask their inferior posture as “going along to get along” every step of the way to annihilation, feeding their compulsive feminine need for approval. Relinquishing their duty as men for those last few drops of dopamine before they slip away into nothingness.

If you could summarise my entire worldview in one word, it would be Naturalism.

I am vehemently opposed to all that imposes an artificial world on the Natural one. With this came a rather misanthropic opposition to how unnatural the 'human world' itself is.

My opposition to Christianity is manifold. It rests on this same premise - a man deprived of his own nature, folk community, landscape and gods, but given a universal surrogate as consolation will feel this inner conflict with his nature just as Ravage said above. Even further however, is Christianity and its secular counterpart 'Humanism', which includes Critical Theory and materialism such as Marxism, concerns the idea of a common 'Humanity', suggesting an interchangeable and fungible 'human'. The consequences of this are that what it means to be human is rooted in the abstract or in phenomenological experience. The realms of post-humanism and 'gender reassignment' are founded in the idea that we are an ghost in a flesh-suit, devoid of essential natures, where we can "choose to be who we want to be."

I found long ago that this obvious disharmony between our inner natures and the concrete, digital, synthetic and unhealthy modern world in which we live is the reason for depression and unhappiness as a whole.

We do not need drugs or patronising therapy to resolve our problems, but rather to recognise that we are indeed like a fish out of water. The modern world is an unnatural place, and it goes against our very natures. We must embrace our inner nature and become what we are, we must immerse ourselves again in the natural world that is in alignment with our biological instincts and inner natures.

If you see a fairy ring
In a field of grass,
Very lightly step around,
Tiptoe as you pass;
Last night fairies frolicked there,
And they’re sleeping somewhere near.

William Shakespeare

“On May 8, 1945 the shooting ended in Europe. But, shockingly, the war against Germany went on. Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill had decreed that the German people must suffer–and suffer they did. Driven from their homes, looted of their property, decimated by famine and disease, raped, robbed, and enslaved, millions of Germans–most of them women and children–bore the brunt of what Time magazine called ‘history’s most terrifying peace.’ Gruesome Harvest was one of the first books in America to sound the alarm against the victor’s postwar war against the Germans.”

Gruesome Harvest: The Allied Attempt To Exterminate Germany After 1945

e-book: https://archive.org/details/GruesomeHarvestTheAlliedAttemptToExterminateGermanyAfter1945/mode/1up

Bøensætre crofter cottage, Aremark kommune, situated in Østfold, Norway🇳🇴

Drone flyover at Bøensætre - Aremark crofters kommune, Østfold, Norway🇳🇴

https://youtu.be/HTeW1rO7KWI

Hear that?? We're the real people of the bible... Insanity👇

The Germanic, Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian and kindred peoples of the world today are the Biblical Israel. All Hail Christ! ✞

I honestly don't know what is worse, the tribe or identity christians..

Attempting to divorce the West from it's Greek and Roman roots and reframe it with Jews at the center of its foundation. This is a level of chutzpah that shouldn't even be possible. I'm thunderstruck.

That is literally what Christianity did.

Every European people conquered by the 'True Faith' of Christianity's Semitic cult gave up their native traditions and beliefs and became "grafted onto the vine of Israel" (Rom. 11:17-24).

It is only the fact that conversion was a two way process and that Christianity became paganised as much as pagans became 'Christian' that Europe was so well preserved as European.

I do not think that this Jew's claim has as much 'chutzpah' as one may think, he's partly right. The 'Enlightenment' was indeed anti-semitic, when Europeans finally discovered the triumphant history that Jewstianity had concealed from us, we shrugged it off and looked up to Augustus Caesar and Alexander the Great instead of Kings David and Solomon. We admired the heroism of Herakles, Achilles, Beowulf and Armenius, not Moses, Elijah, Noah and Samson.

If Europeans discovering their own history without the Jews is anti-semitic, then this says a great deal about the spiritual mire into which Christianity put us.

Interesting👇