Time does not exist in nature. You can go to a forest and don't know what century it is. Time is a human perception. Animals does not plan ahead or live in the past. They only live now. We have a lot to learn from nature. Don't worry about the future, don't regret the past. There is only now.

Hammer of Thunar

Accurate

Father and child in Hardanger, Norge🇳🇴 1890's

Put down your phone and go outside.

The Covid vax offers NO
PROTECTION against Covid basically. People who got the shot died and are suffering for nothing.

https://t.co/D2PnkKCEnn?amp=1

I think one area where horseshoe theory aptly applies is the similarity between these effete NRX types that claim to oppose Liberalism and normies that think they’re Liberal. They both seem aligned against actual autonomy (power) for themselves, and they both want a better, stronger establishment with greater authority (power) over them.

They’re both hoping for better elites to magically come along that will responsibly wield power on their behalf, in their interests. And in return, they’re happy to give up power (whatever power they even think they have) as individuals and as a people, they just don’t always explicitly state that in those terms.

That’s all that they want: new elites to make the world nice and safe for them, because they’re spiritually peasants. They want better elites to lord over them, but in order to even have better elites you have to command their respect — they must fear you, and that means having some kind of power over them. I just don’t see any other way around this.

What’s the point in even having political opinions in the first place if you don’t want power for yourself? Your opinions are worthless without power. Absolutely worthless.

Why would any elites ever even care about what we think if they have a monopoly on power over us? Because “Muh ideas” or something? The last thing any elites will ever care about is “Muh ideas.”

The main reason why we’re in this mess is because WE lack power.

I agree, it is time to start re-examining ALL of the vaccines ever made! If you think about it, the creation of vaccines goes hand in hand with urbanization and industrial revolution. They’ve been domesticating, selective breeding, crossbreeding humans same as they did with wild animals. They have been gradually separating humans from the wild, from organic natural environment and ecosystem, and lowering our immune system. Why do you think in the wild the wildlife is perfectly healthy and don’t need any vaccines or pharmaceutical meds, but domesticated animals, and pets do require vaccinations and medications? It’s because in the wild the wildlife is connected to the organic system of earth and wildlife has strong immune system, but domesticated animals and pets exist in an unnatural, artificial environment, and feed on unnatural, artificial foods. The same applies to human beings. That’s why the further you go into the wild, into remote county, far away from urbanization, the healthier trees and vegetation appears, and the water is pure.

These psychopaths have been “monkeying” with us for longer than anyone realizes.

And, sorry not sorry, but it’s really time to now start looking back at ALL the vaccines, their origins, and possible foul play.

This connects in a BIG WAY if you dig into who the developers of the Polio vaccine were and the timeline in which it was developed. That’s all I’m going to say.

https://odysee.com/@VaccineDocumentaries:6/HIV--AIDS-and-the-Polio-Vaccine:d

Some good points here👇

https://t.me/markacollett/2187

So far Mark Collett has not provided a satisfactory reason for ethnonationalism compared to civic nationalism when he keeps referring back to the ol' "if you don't like our customs and food, then leave" argument.

The basis for ethnonationalism must refer to the structural arguments for what a nation must be: it must be an Evolutionary Group Strategy, not just simply talk about extreme examples, rape gangs and Halal meats.

The reason that different races are incompatible is that we are mammals, we are animals in an ongoing struggle for survival and access to resources. The spiritual nature of this biological struggle emerges from it, creating a higher level of this conflict. Mark should speak about the Fixation Index, there is more genetic dissimilarity between a European and African human than a coyote and a European dog. They are not separated by cultural norms or values, let alone something as mundane as food, but rather by a tangible biological separation of what we are as different subspecies/races.

Race is not socially defined, it is biologically defined, man in his 'natural state' is ethnocentric, therefore 'racism', that is to say ethnocentrism to one's own kindred, will never disappear. Every race is aware of what and who they are because they recognise a deeply ingrained 'otherness', because survival of the in-group depends on recognising the out-group. The attempt to drill this natural behaviour out of people is like teaching a dog to walk on its hind legs, it is unnatural, unfavourable and immoral that avoidance of ethnocentrism should ever be expected of any race (let alone enforced as a double standard solely on Europeans).

Ethnonationalism is based on the idea that the political world should be inseparable from the natural world. Political law should reflect natural law (i.e. 'Dharma'), that is to say that it should not enforce unnatural behaviour on people with the intention of subverting it for material reward (such as economic growth) or a socially fixed ideology (such as egalitarianism). Man is unhappy and alienated from his true nature because domestication and modernity has separated him from his natural instincts and is unable to express them.

Ethnonationalism is independent of particular societies, and is a position that should be defended in the absolute (the incompatibility of heterogeneous races, compared with the order, trust and common purpose from homogeneous races), where the examples that Mark cites are evidence of transitory behaviour that is not explicit to what we are.

Nor can we keep referring to the primitive civilisations of blacks as a successful argument for ethnonationalism because of superiority. Fuck modernism, technology and defining our race in accordance with this race to the bottom of technological progress - it has given us nothing but complacency, dependency and weakness. It's empty criteria, they are means to an end - but what end? What defines us is not what we have made, but literally the fact that we are us. If non-Europeans could do everything we can, build what we build, make what we make etc., would they be us? No. There is no criteria where one can become European. It is more basic and primitive than that - we are who we are because we are who we are. That's all there is to it.

You can be the people that live in fear of what people think about you and their reaction to your words and actions.... ....or you can be the people whose words and actions are feared by others. The choice is yours. Not everything is a binary, but this is. There is a power imbalance in every relationship. There is always an alpha and a beta. Dominant and dominated. Unbelievable, the levels of feminine thinking at work inside the minds of Western men. Servile and weak, eager to please the dominant groups engineering their extermination. Eager to be dominated. They mask their inferior posture as “going along to get along” every step of the way to annihilation, feeding their compulsive feminine need for approval. Relinquishing their duty as men for those last few drops of dopamine before they slip away into nothingness.

If you could summarise my entire worldview in one word, it would be Naturalism.

I am vehemently opposed to all that imposes an artificial world on the Natural one. With this came a rather misanthropic opposition to how unnatural the 'human world' itself is.

My opposition to Christianity is manifold. It rests on this same premise - a man deprived of his own nature, folk community, landscape and gods, but given a universal surrogate as consolation will feel this inner conflict with his nature just as Ravage said above. Even further however, is Christianity and its secular counterpart 'Humanism', which includes Critical Theory and materialism such as Marxism, concerns the idea of a common 'Humanity', suggesting an interchangeable and fungible 'human'. The consequences of this are that what it means to be human is rooted in the abstract or in phenomenological experience. The realms of post-humanism and 'gender reassignment' are founded in the idea that we are an ghost in a flesh-suit, devoid of essential natures, where we can "choose to be who we want to be."

I found long ago that this obvious disharmony between our inner natures and the concrete, digital, synthetic and unhealthy modern world in which we live is the reason for depression and unhappiness as a whole.

We do not need drugs or patronising therapy to resolve our problems, but rather to recognise that we are indeed like a fish out of water. The modern world is an unnatural place, and it goes against our very natures. We must embrace our inner nature and become what we are, we must immerse ourselves again in the natural world that is in alignment with our biological instincts and inner natures.

If you see a fairy ring
In a field of grass,
Very lightly step around,
Tiptoe as you pass;
Last night fairies frolicked there,
And they’re sleeping somewhere near.

William Shakespeare