Forwarded from West Coast News & Discussion
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
IS A MAGNET STICKING TO YOUR COVID INJECTION SPOT?
Many people are reporting that magnets are now sticking to their injection site, leading some to conclude that they have been microchipped, however it may be more sinister than that.
Back in 2016, researchers were celebrating what they called a “badass” new method of remotely controling brain and behaviour using a magnetised protein.
This genetically engineered ‘Magneto’ protein, or 'Magneto DNA sequence' is inserted into the genome of a virus, together with a gene encoding fluorescent protein (likely luciferase), and regulatory DNA sequences.
They can be genetically engineered so that they become sensitive to radio waves and magnetic fields, by attaching them to an iron-storing protein called ferritin, or to inorganic paramagnetic particles. Application of a magnetic field activates the engineered protein. These stimuli evokes nervous impulses that travel into the spinal cord and then up to the brain. Read more here: [ Read the Article | Archive ]
Many people are reporting that magnets are now sticking to their injection site, leading some to conclude that they have been microchipped, however it may be more sinister than that.
Back in 2016, researchers were celebrating what they called a “badass” new method of remotely controling brain and behaviour using a magnetised protein.
This genetically engineered ‘Magneto’ protein, or 'Magneto DNA sequence' is inserted into the genome of a virus, together with a gene encoding fluorescent protein (likely luciferase), and regulatory DNA sequences.
They can be genetically engineered so that they become sensitive to radio waves and magnetic fields, by attaching them to an iron-storing protein called ferritin, or to inorganic paramagnetic particles. Application of a magnetic field activates the engineered protein. These stimuli evokes nervous impulses that travel into the spinal cord and then up to the brain. Read more here: [ Read the Article | Archive ]
Forwarded from THE OLD WAYS (Velesa37)
A topic of interest for me. In fact, I’m quite fascinated by this topic. I’m definitely not a promoter of this model, or of any model for that matter. These things are not set in stone for me. I feel we the common people know very little when it comes to nature of reality, space, consciousness, or even our own planet. We have much, much to learn still.
Out of the Bottomless Pit
Book by S N Strutt
Legends Abound
Legends abound throughout many cultures about the origin of the first people who inhabited the earth. Some describe a race appearing from inside the earth. For example Indian folklore tells of "white tribes that live in the earth" appearing occasionally from caves. A series of Cave drawings from India shows a group of people emerging from a hollow void beneath the earth. According to local legends these were the first human beings that left a subterranean world to begin populating the surface world.
Native American legends from the Mandan, Sioux and Tuscaroras include their tribal origins as coming from inside the earth. Eskimos have the same tribal teachings. The Shawnees claim a civilization of "whites" lived in Florida before they arrived and left their buildings going back into caves in the earth. Incas have a similar folklore of a subterranean white race that travels via caves. From China, Iceland and the South American Aztec’s their writings tell of an inner domain created by the "gods" for the first humans. An Eastern legend describes the origin of Adam came from inside the earth. A Hindu legend adds that Adam was a king of a group who fled a great cataclysm into the hollow earth and then returned to repopulate afterward. Tibetan monks refer to two underground areas Shambala and Agatha as underground dwelling places for ascended masters and others. Orpheus went into the earth to seek out Euridice of Greek mythology, Apollo’s real home was among the Hyperboreans inside the earth of Roman Mythology. The Valkries descended and ascended into an inner domain in Nordic mythology. Even today, the Bon Po sect of Tibet claim to be in contact with underground masters and the "King of the World"; Lord Maitreya, in tunnels and caverns in the Himalayan mountains.
Names like Agharti, Shamballa, Shangri-La, Thule, Arktos, Valhalla, and Hades all speak of different cultural beliefs in an inner earth. The concept in myth and legend is truly as universal as the Flood.
Out of the Bottomless Pit
Book by S N Strutt
Legends Abound
Legends abound throughout many cultures about the origin of the first people who inhabited the earth. Some describe a race appearing from inside the earth. For example Indian folklore tells of "white tribes that live in the earth" appearing occasionally from caves. A series of Cave drawings from India shows a group of people emerging from a hollow void beneath the earth. According to local legends these were the first human beings that left a subterranean world to begin populating the surface world.
Native American legends from the Mandan, Sioux and Tuscaroras include their tribal origins as coming from inside the earth. Eskimos have the same tribal teachings. The Shawnees claim a civilization of "whites" lived in Florida before they arrived and left their buildings going back into caves in the earth. Incas have a similar folklore of a subterranean white race that travels via caves. From China, Iceland and the South American Aztec’s their writings tell of an inner domain created by the "gods" for the first humans. An Eastern legend describes the origin of Adam came from inside the earth. A Hindu legend adds that Adam was a king of a group who fled a great cataclysm into the hollow earth and then returned to repopulate afterward. Tibetan monks refer to two underground areas Shambala and Agatha as underground dwelling places for ascended masters and others. Orpheus went into the earth to seek out Euridice of Greek mythology, Apollo’s real home was among the Hyperboreans inside the earth of Roman Mythology. The Valkries descended and ascended into an inner domain in Nordic mythology. Even today, the Bon Po sect of Tibet claim to be in contact with underground masters and the "King of the World"; Lord Maitreya, in tunnels and caverns in the Himalayan mountains.
Names like Agharti, Shamballa, Shangri-La, Thule, Arktos, Valhalla, and Hades all speak of different cultural beliefs in an inner earth. The concept in myth and legend is truly as universal as the Flood.
Is the jab changing people's natural magnetic field?
https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/jab-changing-your-electric-magnetic-field_X5yH1fccbfTlYr4.html
https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/jab-changing-your-electric-magnetic-field_X5yH1fccbfTlYr4.html
worldtruthvideos.org
Jab Changing your Electric Magnetic Field?
Jab Changing your Electric Magnetic Field? Original video source here: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/jab-changing-your-electric-magnetic-field_RgBjofkAwmdBh64.html Please visit my other channels:
Forwarded from Mana of Moria
Time does not exist in nature. You can go to a forest and don't know what century it is. Time is a human perception. Animals does not plan ahead or live in the past. They only live now. We have a lot to learn from nature. Don't worry about the future, don't regret the past. There is only now.
Forwarded from Agents Of Truth
The Covid vax offers NO
PROTECTION against Covid basically. People who got the shot died and are suffering for nothing.
https://t.co/D2PnkKCEnn?amp=1
PROTECTION against Covid basically. People who got the shot died and are suffering for nothing.
https://t.co/D2PnkKCEnn?amp=1
Forwarded from HapaPerspective 🇺🇸
I think one area where horseshoe theory aptly applies is the similarity between these effete NRX types that claim to oppose Liberalism and normies that think they’re Liberal. They both seem aligned against actual autonomy (power) for themselves, and they both want a better, stronger establishment with greater authority (power) over them.
They’re both hoping for better elites to magically come along that will responsibly wield power on their behalf, in their interests. And in return, they’re happy to give up power (whatever power they even think they have) as individuals and as a people, they just don’t always explicitly state that in those terms.
That’s all that they want: new elites to make the world nice and safe for them, because they’re spiritually peasants. They want better elites to lord over them, but in order to even have better elites you have to command their respect — they must fear you, and that means having some kind of power over them. I just don’t see any other way around this.
What’s the point in even having political opinions in the first place if you don’t want power for yourself? Your opinions are worthless without power. Absolutely worthless.
Why would any elites ever even care about what we think if they have a monopoly on power over us? Because “Muh ideas” or something? The last thing any elites will ever care about is “Muh ideas.”
The main reason why we’re in this mess is because WE lack power.
They’re both hoping for better elites to magically come along that will responsibly wield power on their behalf, in their interests. And in return, they’re happy to give up power (whatever power they even think they have) as individuals and as a people, they just don’t always explicitly state that in those terms.
That’s all that they want: new elites to make the world nice and safe for them, because they’re spiritually peasants. They want better elites to lord over them, but in order to even have better elites you have to command their respect — they must fear you, and that means having some kind of power over them. I just don’t see any other way around this.
What’s the point in even having political opinions in the first place if you don’t want power for yourself? Your opinions are worthless without power. Absolutely worthless.
Why would any elites ever even care about what we think if they have a monopoly on power over us? Because “Muh ideas” or something? The last thing any elites will ever care about is “Muh ideas.”
The main reason why we’re in this mess is because WE lack power.
Forwarded from THE OLD WAYS (Velesa37)
I agree, it is time to start re-examining ALL of the vaccines ever made! If you think about it, the creation of vaccines goes hand in hand with urbanization and industrial revolution. They’ve been domesticating, selective breeding, crossbreeding humans same as they did with wild animals. They have been gradually separating humans from the wild, from organic natural environment and ecosystem, and lowering our immune system. Why do you think in the wild the wildlife is perfectly healthy and don’t need any vaccines or pharmaceutical meds, but domesticated animals, and pets do require vaccinations and medications? It’s because in the wild the wildlife is connected to the organic system of earth and wildlife has strong immune system, but domesticated animals and pets exist in an unnatural, artificial environment, and feed on unnatural, artificial foods. The same applies to human beings. That’s why the further you go into the wild, into remote county, far away from urbanization, the healthier trees and vegetation appears, and the water is pure.
Forwarded from Easter Tidings
These psychopaths have been “monkeying” with us for longer than anyone realizes.
And, sorry not sorry, but it’s really time to now start looking back at ALL the vaccines, their origins, and possible foul play.
This connects in a BIG WAY if you dig into who the developers of the Polio vaccine were and the timeline in which it was developed. That’s all I’m going to say.
https://odysee.com/@VaccineDocumentaries:6/HIV--AIDS-and-the-Polio-Vaccine:d
And, sorry not sorry, but it’s really time to now start looking back at ALL the vaccines, their origins, and possible foul play.
This connects in a BIG WAY if you dig into who the developers of the Polio vaccine were and the timeline in which it was developed. That’s all I’m going to say.
https://odysee.com/@VaccineDocumentaries:6/HIV--AIDS-and-the-Polio-Vaccine:d
Odysee
HIV, AIDS, and the Polio Vaccine
Hi @VaxxedWorld Supporters! LBRY.tv has become our primary video archive. Set-up your LBRY.tv account, follow us, and contribute your personal favorite videos and documents to the archives here:
Forwarded from Hvítgarðr (first - storage account)
https://t.me/markacollett/2187
So far Mark Collett has not provided a satisfactory reason for ethnonationalism compared to civic nationalism when he keeps referring back to the ol' "if you don't like our customs and food, then leave" argument.
The basis for ethnonationalism must refer to the structural arguments for what a nation must be: it must be an Evolutionary Group Strategy, not just simply talk about extreme examples, rape gangs and Halal meats.
The reason that different races are incompatible is that we are mammals, we are animals in an ongoing struggle for survival and access to resources. The spiritual nature of this biological struggle emerges from it, creating a higher level of this conflict. Mark should speak about the Fixation Index, there is more genetic dissimilarity between a European and African human than a coyote and a European dog. They are not separated by cultural norms or values, let alone something as mundane as food, but rather by a tangible biological separation of what we are as different subspecies/races.
Race is not socially defined, it is biologically defined, man in his 'natural state' is ethnocentric, therefore 'racism', that is to say ethnocentrism to one's own kindred, will never disappear. Every race is aware of what and who they are because they recognise a deeply ingrained 'otherness', because survival of the in-group depends on recognising the out-group. The attempt to drill this natural behaviour out of people is like teaching a dog to walk on its hind legs, it is unnatural, unfavourable and immoral that avoidance of ethnocentrism should ever be expected of any race (let alone enforced as a double standard solely on Europeans).
Ethnonationalism is based on the idea that the political world should be inseparable from the natural world. Political law should reflect natural law (i.e. 'Dharma'), that is to say that it should not enforce unnatural behaviour on people with the intention of subverting it for material reward (such as economic growth) or a socially fixed ideology (such as egalitarianism). Man is unhappy and alienated from his true nature because domestication and modernity has separated him from his natural instincts and is unable to express them.
Ethnonationalism is independent of particular societies, and is a position that should be defended in the absolute (the incompatibility of heterogeneous races, compared with the order, trust and common purpose from homogeneous races), where the examples that Mark cites are evidence of transitory behaviour that is not explicit to what we are.
Nor can we keep referring to the primitive civilisations of blacks as a successful argument for ethnonationalism because of superiority. Fuck modernism, technology and defining our race in accordance with this race to the bottom of technological progress - it has given us nothing but complacency, dependency and weakness. It's empty criteria, they are means to an end - but what end? What defines us is not what we have made, but literally the fact that we are us. If non-Europeans could do everything we can, build what we build, make what we make etc., would they be us? No. There is no criteria where one can become European. It is more basic and primitive than that - we are who we are because we are who we are. That's all there is to it.
So far Mark Collett has not provided a satisfactory reason for ethnonationalism compared to civic nationalism when he keeps referring back to the ol' "if you don't like our customs and food, then leave" argument.
The basis for ethnonationalism must refer to the structural arguments for what a nation must be: it must be an Evolutionary Group Strategy, not just simply talk about extreme examples, rape gangs and Halal meats.
The reason that different races are incompatible is that we are mammals, we are animals in an ongoing struggle for survival and access to resources. The spiritual nature of this biological struggle emerges from it, creating a higher level of this conflict. Mark should speak about the Fixation Index, there is more genetic dissimilarity between a European and African human than a coyote and a European dog. They are not separated by cultural norms or values, let alone something as mundane as food, but rather by a tangible biological separation of what we are as different subspecies/races.
Race is not socially defined, it is biologically defined, man in his 'natural state' is ethnocentric, therefore 'racism', that is to say ethnocentrism to one's own kindred, will never disappear. Every race is aware of what and who they are because they recognise a deeply ingrained 'otherness', because survival of the in-group depends on recognising the out-group. The attempt to drill this natural behaviour out of people is like teaching a dog to walk on its hind legs, it is unnatural, unfavourable and immoral that avoidance of ethnocentrism should ever be expected of any race (let alone enforced as a double standard solely on Europeans).
Ethnonationalism is based on the idea that the political world should be inseparable from the natural world. Political law should reflect natural law (i.e. 'Dharma'), that is to say that it should not enforce unnatural behaviour on people with the intention of subverting it for material reward (such as economic growth) or a socially fixed ideology (such as egalitarianism). Man is unhappy and alienated from his true nature because domestication and modernity has separated him from his natural instincts and is unable to express them.
Ethnonationalism is independent of particular societies, and is a position that should be defended in the absolute (the incompatibility of heterogeneous races, compared with the order, trust and common purpose from homogeneous races), where the examples that Mark cites are evidence of transitory behaviour that is not explicit to what we are.
Nor can we keep referring to the primitive civilisations of blacks as a successful argument for ethnonationalism because of superiority. Fuck modernism, technology and defining our race in accordance with this race to the bottom of technological progress - it has given us nothing but complacency, dependency and weakness. It's empty criteria, they are means to an end - but what end? What defines us is not what we have made, but literally the fact that we are us. If non-Europeans could do everything we can, build what we build, make what we make etc., would they be us? No. There is no criteria where one can become European. It is more basic and primitive than that - we are who we are because we are who we are. That's all there is to it.
Telegram
Mark Collett
I'm debating Jeremy Poole from WakeUP UK tonight on the issue of Ethno-Nationalism VS Civic Nationalism.
The debate starts at 9pm UK time (4pm EST) and will last up to two hours.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVIAeTaatRw
The debate starts at 9pm UK time (4pm EST) and will last up to two hours.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVIAeTaatRw