Today, 9AD, The Battle of the Teutoburg Forest ends after four days with a Germanic alliance defeating Roman forces and putting an end to expansion of the empire east of the Rhine.

Christianity is Jewish, there's no escaping it.

Yahweh The Devil

Revelation chapter 13 tells a harrowing story of how people in the "last days" will be put to death if they refuse to receive the dreadful "mark of the beast" in either their right hand or in their forehead. Christians are convinced that only "the devil" would inspire an evil law like this, but the truth is, Yahweh did this same exact thing in the Old Testament. [Ezekiel 9:5-7]

Show no mercy? Have no pity? Kill them all? Old and young? Girls and women and little children? Fill the courtyards with the bodies of those you kill? Does it even need to be stated that these are not the words of a loving god? Thus, does it look to you like there is any difference between receiving the mark of the beast or the mark of Yahweh? Does Yahweh seem any more loving or compassionate to you than "the beast"?

-----

From: What Is Wrong With the Bible? by Charles Giuliani.

@ChristianityExposed

Queen of the celtic tribe of the Iceni, Boudicca led a rebellion against the Romans, between 61-60 CE. The Iceni king Prasutagus divided his estates between his 2 daughters and Emperor Nero. When the king died, the estates were lost, and the Iceni lost their status as allies. Boudicca objected, suffered some beating, and her 2 daughters were raped. Seeking revenge, she mounted a revolt, which left cities (Camulodunum, Londinium and Verulamium), in ruins, and over 80 000 citizens died, in the process. At the battle of Watling Street, she was defeated by the governor Gaius Suetonius Paulinus.
She is said to have committed suicide, by poisoning herself.

Vlad the Impaler: The True Story of Dracula
DDHistory

This is the incredible story of Vlad the Impaler from his youth in Wallachia and childhood as a hostage to his wars against the Ottoman Turks and his great passion for impaling his enemies.

Everyone wants to be oppressed because it relieves them of the responsibility of improving their life.

It is much easier to complain & play victim than it is to be accountable & try to better themselves.

It is easier to blame others than to look at yourself and see your faults.

99% of fines and tickets that cops hand out have nothing to do with morality, upholding justice, or keeping the peace. They are scum serving their Jewish Masters. "Rules are rules" or ''the law is the law' they will say. You never hear them say 'morals are morals'—because their job hasn't anything to do with morality.
If they actually cared about morality they'd be enforcing the top 1% who are oppressing everyone in every which way. If you're a shabbos cop, just so you know, you're on the wrong side of justice and your job is to serve the J, not your folk. You think you may be a good person because your police chief told you so but you're actually not.
t.me/eurocult

Dissidents tend to mock normie conservatives for engaging in a daily grind of outrage against "woke entertainment," but that's not the real issue; the point is that if every piece of European culture, history, and folklore were blackwashed, you would end up with a bunch of European lore with no European people in it. That's the whole point of why they do it. They are trying to erase Whites from their own stories, history, and culture.

It is perfectly sensible to push back on their constant attempts to do this and to call it out for what it is. The problem with mainstream conservatives isn't that they object to the blackwashing, it's that their objection is weak and conciliatory. The whole point is that the left only targets White history and stories for blackwashing, because the goal is to make White history "more inclusive" and remove it of its European origin and character.

Conservative, Inc. outrage culture consistently avoids this angle, choosing to decry it for being "woke" instead. To the normie conservative, the idea of noticing race at all is a bigger sin than erasing Whites from their own history. They submit themselves to "anti-racist" posturing, touting their racial indifference as though this in itself constitutes some kind of moral high ground.

This is why their cyclical outrage comes off as weak and whiny: they are basically pleading with leftists to play by imaginary rules that only mainstream conservatives follow.

my debate starts in 10 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_wUIrsAGQk