We are taught that urbanization, and industrialization was driven by the people themselves.

Eleven million people migrated from rural to urban areas between 1870 and 1920, and a majority of the twenty-five million immigrants who came to the United States in these same years moved into the nation’s cities. By 1920, more Americans lived in cities than in rural areas for the first time in US history.

Today most Americans live in cities or suburbs, but from colonial times into the early twentieth century a majority of Americans lived in the countryside and worked on farms. Only two percent of Americans live on farms or ranches today, but in 1790 ninety percent of the population did. What caused this shift?

We were told that the people wanted this. They call it “industrial revolution” and say it’s all part of the natural human evolution, but I’m not so sure it’s true.

I bet if we do thorough research, we will uncover that industrial revolution wasn’t driven by the people, but was a combination of both being forced on the people, and people being brainwashed to accept it believing it was a good thing, believing it was humanity making progress and moving forward.

From the little bits and pieces of info I found so far, it appears as though not all people wanted industrial revolution to happen. The government used different tactics to run the people off of their family farms, and herd them into the urban cities.

One of the ways they achieved this was by making it extremely difficult, or in some cases even impossible for the people to remain in the village/country working their family farms, and living a self-sufficient life, which was a lifestyle of their ancestors going back many generations.

The land which freely belonged to the people for many generations was suddenly seized by the ruling power, and the common people were forced to pay high taxes that they could not afford to pay, and so they ended up losing their land and moving to the city looking for work.

This was just one of the many methods the government used to bring about industrial revolution, and fill up urban cities with people.

Wars took all of the able bodied, younger men from the villages, leaving their old and frail fathers to work the farms. The old men were unable to work the land and keep up with the farms, and pay their taxes, and so the farms were abandoned, and remaining family members had to leave to the city looking for work.

Another successful method to drive people out of villages and into the cities was to make the urban city life sound alluring, very modern, interesting, full of opportunities, whilst the country life was deliberate made to look boring, backwards and dull, and completely without opportunity.

In reality I believe we were not told the truth about industrial revolution, and why so many people willingly left the country life to move to the urban cities. With so much poverty, hunger, child labor that we learn took place in urban cities for centuries, I don’t understand why people would willingly leave their family farms where they can be self-sufficient, and always have plenty of food and a roof over their head, and go move to urban cities, where there’s so much struggle starvation and poverty.

Country people are deliberately presented as backwards, ignorant, uneducated, when in reality they are intelligent, and highly skilled. An urban city citizen will not last more than few days without the system

We are creators just as Nature is, and although Nature's laws cannot be changed, we could say they can be bent long enough to create an outcome that would seem improbable or even impossible. This could be where magic and the "paranormal" comes in. Nature even does this itself. Think of the fawn who has met it's fate being in the big cat's grip, but in an instant suddenly slips through the jaws and escapes. What seemed an inevitable outcome has been changed in an instant because of the fawn's life power and refusal to give up. The fawn has determined it's own fate in that moment where there seemed no choice. Fate doesn't equate to any one particular outcome, just that there has to be an outcome, and the Norns can weave any fate into existence, and as creators we can effect that fate..

I will talk more on this but I'll leave it there for now. Maybe parts of my thoughts resonate with you or spark your own deeper thoughts.. Glad if they do either way. May your thoughts and days be well.

Hilarious but absolutely tragic in how accurate it is

Vegans will be exempt from compulsory Covid-19 vaccines in the UK workplace.

Ethical vegans object to animal testing and the use of animal testing in the development of the shots infringes on their beliefs. "Ethical veganism has previously been found by an [employment tribunal] to amount to a belief, capable of being protected," the legal spokesperson said

How will they know? Use every way possible to protect yourselves and your families

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/07/29/compulsory-workplace-vaccination-rules-cannot-apply-vegans/

Hmmmm..Interesting 👆

This is truly SHOCKING!

Check it out on the link below, its TRUE!

https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=covid-19&tab=patent

Glencoe 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Why is Leaky Vaccine keeping up the idea that Covid-19 is a real, novel virus and therefore requires a real, novel medical response?

People love this page but I see it as being no different to the 'made in a lab/bioweapon' theory that is gatekeeping people back to the belief that the lockdown and response is anywise justified, never mind proportionate. Especially when the Leaky Vaccine idea makes the un'vaccinated' terrified about contact with 'vaccinated' people spreading the vaccine, while the 'vaccinated' are terrified about contact with the un'vaccinated' for being 'variant factories' and creating this illusory 'Delta Variant', which appears to have all the symptoms of the Common Cold.

Unless the Leaky Vaccine theory addresses the simple problem of "where did the Flu go?", their medical word-soup is just another psyop as far as I'm concerned. The 'virus' isn't a virus and the 'vaccine' isn't a vaccine, and the entire logic in which they are working forces you to suspend this and continue with variations on the mainstream narrative - i.e. that SARS-CoV-2 is real.

Whether it's:
> "Covid is a real, deadly, global pandemic first discovered in Wuhan, China (bat soup etc.)",
> "Covid is a synthetic, global bioweapon engineered in Wuhan labs",
> "Covid vaccines are leaky and spread from the vaccinated to unvaccinated. The vaccine is the real virus."

All of these are working on the same version of hyperreality, and stirring the same fear propaganda, albeit distortions of each other. People who subscribe to either version, arguing over vaccines and viruses, can all agree with each other on some level, but it is "Covid is not a novel virus, it is repackaged Influenza, there is literally nothing happening here. It is a hoax crisis used to bring about the Great Reset through global technocracy" that is the biggest threat to this Great Lie. Food for thought.

Indeed when I talk about the 99.97% survival rate, I have to pinch myself and ask "What has a 99.97% survival rate? Survival of what?" and before I know it I'm going round in circles and back to acting on the assumption that Covid exists when I say to people that Covid does not exist. This is maddening and only proves Wittgenstein right when he said that "The limits of my language are the limits of my world." This lie prevents us from having the words even to deny it.

https://t.me/LeakyVax/504