Dear Students,
Please find below the question for daily answer writing practice for today.
[13th July 2020]: Discuss various theories explaining formation of the Moon. How has recent findings by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) modified our understanding about the origin of the Moon? (15 marks, 250 words) [GS1 - Geography]
Source to Study: CA Booklet July 2020 Part 1
I will definitely share a model answer at 9 pm today.
#GS1 #Geography
Please find below the question for daily answer writing practice for today.
[13th July 2020]: Discuss various theories explaining formation of the Moon. How has recent findings by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) modified our understanding about the origin of the Moon? (15 marks, 250 words) [GS1 - Geography]
Source to Study: CA Booklet July 2020 Part 1
I will definitely share a model answer at 9 pm today.
#GS1 #Geography
Model Answer: [13th July 2020]: Discuss various theories explaining formation of the Moon. How has recent findings by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) modified our understanding about the origin of the Moon? (15 marks, 250 words) [GS1 - Geography]
Moon, around 1/4th the size of earth and orbiting 3.8 lakh kms away from it, is it’s only natural satellite. The question about how Moon was formed has intrigued scientists for long and over the years, many different theories have been proposed:
1) In 1838, George Darwin suggested that initially both Earth and Moon were a single body, which over the period took a dumbbell shape and separated into two different bodies.
2) Some scientists also suggest that depression which is currently filled by the Pacific Ocean may have been the source of material from which Moon has been formed.
3) But, the Big Splat theory is the most popular one. Here, Scientists suggest that around 4.5 billion years ago, when Earth was just formed, a body of around same size of that of Mars collided with Earth and separated a big mass from it. This mass kept revolving around Earth and formed Moon around 4.4 billion years ago. This is also supported by the fact that the chemical composition of Moon is similar to that of Earth.
Recent Findings of NASA and its implications: The Miniature Radio-Frequency (Mini-RF) detector of the NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter have recently found that the sub-surface of the Moon (2-5 kms) may have much higher concentration of metals (especially Iron and Titanium oxides) than what was previously thought.
This could mean that Moon may have been formed of material much deeper from the surface of Earth. Moreover, it indicates that Moon’s Molten surface cooled much more gradually.
Above findings clearly indicate that our understanding of the origin of Moon and its relationship with earth is incomplete and a lot of research still needs to happen in future.
#GS1 #Geography
Moon, around 1/4th the size of earth and orbiting 3.8 lakh kms away from it, is it’s only natural satellite. The question about how Moon was formed has intrigued scientists for long and over the years, many different theories have been proposed:
1) In 1838, George Darwin suggested that initially both Earth and Moon were a single body, which over the period took a dumbbell shape and separated into two different bodies.
2) Some scientists also suggest that depression which is currently filled by the Pacific Ocean may have been the source of material from which Moon has been formed.
3) But, the Big Splat theory is the most popular one. Here, Scientists suggest that around 4.5 billion years ago, when Earth was just formed, a body of around same size of that of Mars collided with Earth and separated a big mass from it. This mass kept revolving around Earth and formed Moon around 4.4 billion years ago. This is also supported by the fact that the chemical composition of Moon is similar to that of Earth.
Recent Findings of NASA and its implications: The Miniature Radio-Frequency (Mini-RF) detector of the NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter have recently found that the sub-surface of the Moon (2-5 kms) may have much higher concentration of metals (especially Iron and Titanium oxides) than what was previously thought.
This could mean that Moon may have been formed of material much deeper from the surface of Earth. Moreover, it indicates that Moon’s Molten surface cooled much more gradually.
Above findings clearly indicate that our understanding of the origin of Moon and its relationship with earth is incomplete and a lot of research still needs to happen in future.
#GS1 #Geography
Dear Students,
Please find below the question for daily answer writing practice for tomorrow
[14th July 2020]: "India and Australia needs to build a series of bilateral and minilateral platforms for regional security cooperation to limit the dangers of the growing geopolitical imbalance in the Indo-Pacific" Discuss [12.5 marks, 200 words][GS2 International Relations]
Will share a model answer at 9 pm tomorrow.
#GS2 #InternationalRelation
Please find below the question for daily answer writing practice for tomorrow
[14th July 2020]: "India and Australia needs to build a series of bilateral and minilateral platforms for regional security cooperation to limit the dangers of the growing geopolitical imbalance in the Indo-Pacific" Discuss [12.5 marks, 200 words][GS2 International Relations]
Will share a model answer at 9 pm tomorrow.
#GS2 #InternationalRelation
1. [14th July 2020]:Model Answer: "India and Australia need to build a series of bilateral and minilateral platforms for regional security cooperation to limit the dangers of the growing geopolitical imbalance in the Indo-Pacific" Discuss [12.5 marks, 200 words][GS2 International Relations]
China’s aggression and its assertive policies in the Indo-Pacific have emerged as a key security challenge for both India and Australia. Further, the anxieties about USA’s strategic commitment to Indo-Pacific under the Trump administration have left most of the regional powers worried.
In these circumstances, foreign policy experts like C Raja Mohan suggest that India and Australia should explore a series of bilateral and minilateral security platforms.
1) Indonesian Archipelago are strategically located on the sea-lanes connecting Indian and Pacific Oceans. Since, Indonesia also have security threats from China, a trilateral maritime cooperation between India-Australia and Indonesia should be explored.
2) Quad Security Dialogue need to be expanded at operational level with concrete follow up steps.
3) France and United Kingdom can be other natural partners in the region.
a. France is a resident power in the region and have shown willingness to cooperate. India should endorse this move.
b. United Kingdom is already leading the Five Power Defence Agreement (PFDA) between UK, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia and Singapore. India should explore maritime cooperation with PFDA.
4) Finally, inclusion of Australia in Malabar exercise is a logical step to enhance regional security and should not be delayed.
These strategic regional cooperation can compensate for the lack of military capabilities of both India and Australia beyond their regional waters and should be actively pursued.
223 Words
#GS2 #InternarnationalRelations
China’s aggression and its assertive policies in the Indo-Pacific have emerged as a key security challenge for both India and Australia. Further, the anxieties about USA’s strategic commitment to Indo-Pacific under the Trump administration have left most of the regional powers worried.
In these circumstances, foreign policy experts like C Raja Mohan suggest that India and Australia should explore a series of bilateral and minilateral security platforms.
1) Indonesian Archipelago are strategically located on the sea-lanes connecting Indian and Pacific Oceans. Since, Indonesia also have security threats from China, a trilateral maritime cooperation between India-Australia and Indonesia should be explored.
2) Quad Security Dialogue need to be expanded at operational level with concrete follow up steps.
3) France and United Kingdom can be other natural partners in the region.
a. France is a resident power in the region and have shown willingness to cooperate. India should endorse this move.
b. United Kingdom is already leading the Five Power Defence Agreement (PFDA) between UK, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia and Singapore. India should explore maritime cooperation with PFDA.
4) Finally, inclusion of Australia in Malabar exercise is a logical step to enhance regional security and should not be delayed.
These strategic regional cooperation can compensate for the lack of military capabilities of both India and Australia beyond their regional waters and should be actively pursued.
223 Words
#GS2 #InternarnationalRelations