Anonymous Conservative News Brief
418 subscribers
4.4K photos
3 videos
5.71K links
Download Telegram
Link says these names were involved:
The American military participants included:
Peter Pace, former Joint Chiefs chairman
Bill Owens, former Joint Chiefs vice chairman
John Abizaid, former CENTCOM commander
George Casey, former Army chief
Ray Odierno, former Army chief
Jonathan Greenert, former Navy chief
Ronald Fogleman, former Air Force chief
Norton Schwartz, former Air Force chief
Dennis Reimer, former Army chief
Joseph Prueher, former Pacific Command chief
Timothy Keating, former Pacific Command chief
John Keane, former Army vice chief
Walter Sharp, former U.S. Forces Korea commander
Charles Jacoby, former NORTHCOM commander
Charles Wilhelm, former SOUTHCOM commander
Robert Van Antwerp, former Army Corps of Engineers chief
Stephen Lanza, former I Corps commander
Karl Eikenberry, retired Army lieutenant general

Lots more at the link.
 
It would seem just the scale of the lawsuit would be newsworthy: https://x.com/TheGreeneBJ/status/2084701622156808637
US has used ‘virtually all’ of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war, sources say. Could the purpose of the Iran war to be to deplete those stores, so they could not be shipped to Ukraine, or given to Israel in an upcoming conflict? Or maybe to encourage domestic production lines to amp up. The whole Iran war feels like something else is the objective, other than forcing the Iranian leadership into a deal.
1
It highlights an interesting psychological dichotomy. We innately tend to take what people say at face value, because we project our own psychology. If we tweet something it is for the cause, borne of belief. But not surveillance. They know there is no fight, no competition, no world as we know it. As a result, they have no aspirations, no dreams, no causes, and if they have a Twitter, it is merely to say what the conspiracy tells them to say, to pull the wool over everyone else’s eyes, in return for some crumbs from those at the top, who can never be challenged. It is just two different mindsets borne of two different perspectives the world is seen through.
🔥1
https://x.com/toxictiramisu/status/2073826282698150236Intel ops don’t like to share territory. If there were two operations – a US domestic surveillance/gangstalking op, and a Zionist gangstalking/harassment operation, the US surveillance would pick up on the Israeli op and either take it over or destroy it. To not do that would be to risk the Israeli’s noticing them, and deciding to infiltrate and subvert the US domestic op. Clearly there was one operation, probably from nearly the beginning. It would make sense. A US domestic surveillance operation would be invested in making the nation great, which would mean exploiting gifted children, and ushering them into well-paying jobs that utilized their talents. An Israeli op would be solely concerned with control, and there, the surer method would be to suppress any American child who might succeed wildly. It would make sense of things like mass shootings and 9/11 as well.
This case is looking a lot more significant, and it is looking like he even had the girlfriend handler. Was anybody here, way back, when I was like, “I know this sounds batshit crazy, but they will send in girls who will sleep with you, and even marry you, and they are like lifetime sleeper agents, assigned to you, who give up their entire lives, and any hope of marrying who they want and raising their own family, just to monitor you…” And I am sure everybody then thought that was batshit crazy. But here we are: https://www.anonymousconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/image-97-scaled.png
👍1