It's time to stop taking excuses using bullshit facts https://t.me/AnimalFreaks/1526
We in Switzerland, USA, Russia, etc. pollute too much. Based on EU data, China has a CO2 pro capita of 8.73, EU 6.27, Global 4.81, Germany 8.06, Switzerland 4.02 (but we are still pollute a lot, check https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/239), USA 14.24, United Arab Emirates 19.47!
So stop to check such things just based on % or total pollution, since a lot other factors are needed to consider: 1) where do all our products come from? YES, MADE IN CHINA! 2) We are in 8 billion, in 2080 10 billion https://perma.cc/F5ZZ-MLFV BUT USA has just 337 million, while China 1.43 billion! https://perma.cc/7X99-P58K 3) if you check old data, USA was already much higher in the past! when GDP of China was low!
The world’s top 1% of emitters produce over 1000 times more CO2 than the bottom 1% https://perma.cc/9WTF-4AHY
Per capita CO₂ emissions, 2021 https://perma.cc/R9PF-9RRX
CO2 emissions of all world countries https://perma.cc/K9G2-7SML
How large are inequalities in global carbon emissions – and what to do about it? https://perma.cc/8FZ8-FCNG
9 Charts Explain Per Capita Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Country https://perma.cc/G52J-93RL
First image: https://t.me/AnimalFreaks/1530
Sources: Environmental Science and Pollution Research Allocation of carbon emission quotas based on global equality perspective, Morocco's Road to a Climate-Resilient Energy Transition: Emissions Drivers, Solutions, and Barriers, Predictors of national CO2 emissions: do international commitments matter?, Carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector in major countries: a decomposition analysis, Climate Change and Africa, Consumption-based versus production-based accounting of CO2 emissions: Is there evidence for carbon leakage?, Disaggregated environmental impacts of non-renewable energy and trade openness in selected G-20 countries: the conditioning role of technological innovation, Allocating a 2 °C cumulative carbon budget to countries, etc.
We in Switzerland, USA, Russia, etc. pollute too much. Based on EU data, China has a CO2 pro capita of 8.73, EU 6.27, Global 4.81, Germany 8.06, Switzerland 4.02 (but we are still pollute a lot, check https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/239), USA 14.24, United Arab Emirates 19.47!
So stop to check such things just based on % or total pollution, since a lot other factors are needed to consider: 1) where do all our products come from? YES, MADE IN CHINA! 2) We are in 8 billion, in 2080 10 billion https://perma.cc/F5ZZ-MLFV BUT USA has just 337 million, while China 1.43 billion! https://perma.cc/7X99-P58K 3) if you check old data, USA was already much higher in the past! when GDP of China was low!
The world’s top 1% of emitters produce over 1000 times more CO2 than the bottom 1% https://perma.cc/9WTF-4AHY
Per capita CO₂ emissions, 2021 https://perma.cc/R9PF-9RRX
CO2 emissions of all world countries https://perma.cc/K9G2-7SML
How large are inequalities in global carbon emissions – and what to do about it? https://perma.cc/8FZ8-FCNG
9 Charts Explain Per Capita Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Country https://perma.cc/G52J-93RL
First image: https://t.me/AnimalFreaks/1530
Sources: Environmental Science and Pollution Research Allocation of carbon emission quotas based on global equality perspective, Morocco's Road to a Climate-Resilient Energy Transition: Emissions Drivers, Solutions, and Barriers, Predictors of national CO2 emissions: do international commitments matter?, Carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector in major countries: a decomposition analysis, Climate Change and Africa, Consumption-based versus production-based accounting of CO2 emissions: Is there evidence for carbon leakage?, Disaggregated environmental impacts of non-renewable energy and trade openness in selected G-20 countries: the conditioning role of technological innovation, Allocating a 2 °C cumulative carbon budget to countries, etc.
Learn more how you can reduce pollution with over 10 important tips, no matter if you are a vegan or not!
https://t.me/FoodWasteTelegram/122
Backup https://perma.cc/RRG8-NGXK https://perma.cc/Y4QA-QR33
Or about how you think / act:
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/142
Backup https://perma.cc/VN9N-LAZ3
https://t.me/FoodWasteTelegram/122
Backup https://perma.cc/RRG8-NGXK https://perma.cc/Y4QA-QR33
Or about how you think / act:
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/142
Backup https://perma.cc/VN9N-LAZ3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Switzerland and the Arctic: Closer Than You Think by Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and ETH Zurich
The Arctic hosts about 75 mammals, more than 200 birds and over 3000 insect species.
The Arctic land and sea boast an estimated 22% of global oil and 30% of gas reserves.
Greenland lost about 4,000 billion tonnes of ice since 1992 caused the mean sea level to rise by about 1 centimetre.
It is estimated that more than half of Russia’s oil and gas reserves lies in the Arctic region18 and the country plans to increase their extraction.
While Canada put exploration of Arctic oil reserves on hold, Norway and the United States also ramped up their activities related to the extraction of Arctic oil.
Several severe problems are linked to resource extraction. First, the depletion and burning of oil and gas causes new greenhouse gas emissions. The 6th IPCC report clearly states that the global community has to stop burning fossil fuels.
Second, and as a consequence, global warming and related developments such as ocean acidification are considered the biggest threat to Arctic biodiversity.
Finally, the drillings are - still - subject to high risk due to the difficult climatic conditions for work and rescue operations. The ecosystem may not be able to recover at all or only slowly in case of an oil spill.
The recent oil spill disaster in June 2020 in Norilsk, Russia, exemplifies the high costs of disasters in Arctic regions. Clean-up efforts may take years and cost up to USD 1.5 billion
First, given the Swiss expertise on alpine and glacial environments, Switzerland could help establish a new working group in the Arctic Council to deal with the sustainable development of infrastructure.
Switzerland could - if geopolitical tensions and disputes increase - advocate for the arrangement of a regional security order through the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
Switzerland could offer its Good Offices to facilitate the peaceful resolution of disputes in the Arctic @MissionWillowProject
The Arctic hosts about 75 mammals, more than 200 birds and over 3000 insect species.
The Arctic land and sea boast an estimated 22% of global oil and 30% of gas reserves.
Greenland lost about 4,000 billion tonnes of ice since 1992 caused the mean sea level to rise by about 1 centimetre.
It is estimated that more than half of Russia’s oil and gas reserves lies in the Arctic region18 and the country plans to increase their extraction.
While Canada put exploration of Arctic oil reserves on hold, Norway and the United States also ramped up their activities related to the extraction of Arctic oil.
Several severe problems are linked to resource extraction. First, the depletion and burning of oil and gas causes new greenhouse gas emissions. The 6th IPCC report clearly states that the global community has to stop burning fossil fuels.
Second, and as a consequence, global warming and related developments such as ocean acidification are considered the biggest threat to Arctic biodiversity.
Finally, the drillings are - still - subject to high risk due to the difficult climatic conditions for work and rescue operations. The ecosystem may not be able to recover at all or only slowly in case of an oil spill.
The recent oil spill disaster in June 2020 in Norilsk, Russia, exemplifies the high costs of disasters in Arctic regions. Clean-up efforts may take years and cost up to USD 1.5 billion
First, given the Swiss expertise on alpine and glacial environments, Switzerland could help establish a new working group in the Arctic Council to deal with the sustainable development of infrastructure.
Switzerland could - if geopolitical tensions and disputes increase - advocate for the arrangement of a regional security order through the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
Switzerland could offer its Good Offices to facilitate the peaceful resolution of disputes in the Arctic @MissionWillowProject
Eating less meat 'like taking 8m cars off road' https://perma.cc/D3F3-YGMH
based on: Vegans, vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters in the UK show discrepant environmental impacts
Like we wrote previously here
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/292
or here
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/215
https://t.me/FoodWasteTelegram
https://t.me/PollutionFacts
or better exactly here
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/12
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/15
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/20
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/58
For both land use and eutrophication, there is a large difference between the high meat-eaters and all other groups. For eutrophication, the low-meat diet has an impact that is 57.4% (49.6– 68.4%) of the high-meat-eating group. For land use, the impact of low meat-eaters is 43.8% (20.7–65.4%) of the high meat-eaters.
Dietary impacts of vegans were 25.1% (95% uncertainty interval, 15.1–37.0%) of
high meat-eaters (≥100 g total meat consumed per day) for greenhouse
gas emissions, 25.1% (7.1–44.5%) for land use, 46.4% (21.0–81.0%) for water use, 27.0% (19.4–40.4%) for eutrophication and 34.3% (12.0–65.3%) for biodiversity.
Based on the National Diet and Nutrition Survey, which estimated that in 2016–2019, the average consumption of all meat (that is, processed and unprocessed meat including poultry but excluding fish) in 19–64 year olds was 99 g d−1, and 77 g d−1 in the 65+ age group.
Another reason why a ⅓, ⅔ vegan diet, a flexible vegan diet (or a full vegan diet) are a good options to save our planet, without forcing people to be 100% vegan
About that you can find more
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/164
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/165
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/19
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/265
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/16
https://t.me/VeganNutritionTelegram/94
https://t.me/VeganNutritionTelegram/113
https://t.me/VeganNutritionTelegram/114
based on: Vegans, vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters in the UK show discrepant environmental impacts
Like we wrote previously here
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/292
or here
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/215
https://t.me/FoodWasteTelegram
https://t.me/PollutionFacts
or better exactly here
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/12
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/15
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/20
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/58
For both land use and eutrophication, there is a large difference between the high meat-eaters and all other groups. For eutrophication, the low-meat diet has an impact that is 57.4% (49.6– 68.4%) of the high-meat-eating group. For land use, the impact of low meat-eaters is 43.8% (20.7–65.4%) of the high meat-eaters.
Dietary impacts of vegans were 25.1% (95% uncertainty interval, 15.1–37.0%) of
high meat-eaters (≥100 g total meat consumed per day) for greenhouse
gas emissions, 25.1% (7.1–44.5%) for land use, 46.4% (21.0–81.0%) for water use, 27.0% (19.4–40.4%) for eutrophication and 34.3% (12.0–65.3%) for biodiversity.
Based on the National Diet and Nutrition Survey, which estimated that in 2016–2019, the average consumption of all meat (that is, processed and unprocessed meat including poultry but excluding fish) in 19–64 year olds was 99 g d−1, and 77 g d−1 in the 65+ age group.
Another reason why a ⅓, ⅔ vegan diet, a flexible vegan diet (or a full vegan diet) are a good options to save our planet, without forcing people to be 100% vegan
About that you can find more
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/164
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/165
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/19
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/265
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/16
https://t.me/VeganNutritionTelegram/94
https://t.me/VeganNutritionTelegram/113
https://t.me/VeganNutritionTelegram/114