Forwarded from David Clements
More thoughts on Trump's EO.
At first blush, I thought it was rather benign. That may be its greatest strength. The Youngstown Steel case, which is the definitive case on war powers, holds that the President's powers are at their "zenith" when he works in tandem with Congress. And that's what this EO does. It takes existing law, some of it 20 years old, and shoves it down the throats of all the democrat lawyers.
While Trump still has the "Trump card" through his plenary authority under Article II to do way more, the restraint of this EO is like pitching the Supreme Court a soft ball, where they affirm long held legal standards.
Much like the recent tariffs decision, where the Court struck down one provision, only to affirm several other routes for tariffs, with the President and Scott Bessent declaring victory by hiding their "real" power, I think a challenge to this EO may do the same.
It invokes Article II’s command that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It frames non-citizen voting and unsecured mail-in ballots as violations of federal criminal statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 611, 1015; 52 U.S.C. §§ 20511, etc.).
The federal government has a direct duty to prevent dilution of the citizen vote through fraud or ineligible participation. Directing agencies (DHS, SSA, USPS, DOJ) to share verified citizenship data and secure postal transmission of ballots is faithful execution of existing prohibitions on non-citizen voting, not new legislation.
Courts have recognized broad presidential discretion in directing executive-branch enforcement priorities, especially for national interests like election integrity. Providing states with federal databases (SSA records + DHS SAVE) assists compliance with NVRA/HAVA list-maintenance requirements without commandeering state officials.
This is narrower than earlier 2025 attempts to rewrite registration forms, which faced injunctions; the 2026 EO focuses more on data-sharing and USPS operations.
Also consider the Guarantee Clause (Art. IV, §4): The EO cites the federal obligation to guarantee every state “a Republican Form of Government.” I would argue that widespread non-citizen voting or unverifiable mail-in processes undermines the republican character of elections by allowing ineligible votes to dilute lawful ones. This provides a constitutional hook for federal intervention to protect the integrity of the electoral process itself, beyond routine “manner” regulations.
In short, federal databases already exist for citizenship verification; the EO systematizes their use to fulfill HAVA/NVRA accuracy mandates.
The irony of course is that the swamp used these systems to inflate numbers and commit massive fraud.
Now their toys are being used against them.
At first blush, I thought it was rather benign. That may be its greatest strength. The Youngstown Steel case, which is the definitive case on war powers, holds that the President's powers are at their "zenith" when he works in tandem with Congress. And that's what this EO does. It takes existing law, some of it 20 years old, and shoves it down the throats of all the democrat lawyers.
While Trump still has the "Trump card" through his plenary authority under Article II to do way more, the restraint of this EO is like pitching the Supreme Court a soft ball, where they affirm long held legal standards.
Much like the recent tariffs decision, where the Court struck down one provision, only to affirm several other routes for tariffs, with the President and Scott Bessent declaring victory by hiding their "real" power, I think a challenge to this EO may do the same.
It invokes Article II’s command that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It frames non-citizen voting and unsecured mail-in ballots as violations of federal criminal statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 611, 1015; 52 U.S.C. §§ 20511, etc.).
The federal government has a direct duty to prevent dilution of the citizen vote through fraud or ineligible participation. Directing agencies (DHS, SSA, USPS, DOJ) to share verified citizenship data and secure postal transmission of ballots is faithful execution of existing prohibitions on non-citizen voting, not new legislation.
Courts have recognized broad presidential discretion in directing executive-branch enforcement priorities, especially for national interests like election integrity. Providing states with federal databases (SSA records + DHS SAVE) assists compliance with NVRA/HAVA list-maintenance requirements without commandeering state officials.
This is narrower than earlier 2025 attempts to rewrite registration forms, which faced injunctions; the 2026 EO focuses more on data-sharing and USPS operations.
Also consider the Guarantee Clause (Art. IV, §4): The EO cites the federal obligation to guarantee every state “a Republican Form of Government.” I would argue that widespread non-citizen voting or unverifiable mail-in processes undermines the republican character of elections by allowing ineligible votes to dilute lawful ones. This provides a constitutional hook for federal intervention to protect the integrity of the electoral process itself, beyond routine “manner” regulations.
In short, federal databases already exist for citizenship verification; the EO systematizes their use to fulfill HAVA/NVRA accuracy mandates.
The irony of course is that the swamp used these systems to inflate numbers and commit massive fraud.
Now their toys are being used against them.
❤5
Forwarded from Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WOW No Kings Protest Organizers Paid Themselves $6M Last Year
Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin, co-directors of Indivisible and organizers of “No Kings” rallies, reportedly paid themselves $6 million in 2025. The PAC, funded by George Soros, spent tens of thousands on merchandise, hundreds of thousands on ad agencies, plus payments to media and processing fees, with top payroll including $1M and two $750K paychecks.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin, co-directors of Indivisible and organizers of “No Kings” rallies, reportedly paid themselves $6 million in 2025. The PAC, funded by George Soros, spent tens of thousands on merchandise, hundreds of thousands on ad agencies, plus payments to media and processing fees, with top payroll including $1M and two $750K paychecks.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
😈1
Forwarded from Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
HOLY CRAP. 20 hotels in California were caught for a huge birthright citizenship fraud scheme, where people illegally come from China just to give birth
Then use the hotel as a maternity hotel, clients charge up to $80,000 each
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
Then use the hotel as a maternity hotel, clients charge up to $80,000 each
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
Forwarded from Gateway Pundit
BREAKING UPDATE: Colorado Court Affirms Tina Peters’ Convictions But Reverses Sentencing Back to Trial Court, Ignores Trump’s Pardon and Supremacy Clause of Constitution
https://joehoft.com/breaking-update-colorado-court-affirms-tina-peters-convictions/
https://joehoft.com/breaking-update-colorado-court-affirms-tina-peters-convictions/
Joe Hoft
BREAKING UPDATE: Colorado Court Affirms Tina Peters' Convictions But Reverses Sentencing Back to Trial Court, Ignores Trump's Pardon…
Another sad day for justice in America. A division of the Colorado Court of Appeals affirms Tina Peters’ convictions but reverses her sentencing back to the trial court. The overall ... Read
🤬5
Forwarded from David Clements
Response to all the democrats about Trump’s EO being unlawful, i.e., violating state’s rights. Posted yesterday on X.
The Elections Clause gives states the initial role to set time, place and manner, but expressly authorizes Congress to enact nationwide rules for federal elections (House and Senate races), including voter registration, list maintenance, fraud prevention, and ballot procedures.
The Supreme Court has interpreted “manner” broadly to include “notices, registration, supervision of voting, protection of voters, prevention of fraud and corrupt practices,” etc.
The Help America Vote Act imposes mandatory minimum federal standards on states (e.g., statewide computerized voter registration lists, provisional ballots, and election administration improvements) and provides federal grants (“requirements payments”) explicitly conditioned on compliance. States must submit plans showing how they meet these standards to receive funding.
The National Voter Registration was also enacted under the Elections Clause. It mandates that states maintain accurate voter rolls (“list maintenance”), offer registration at certain agencies, and accept a federal mail-registration form. Courts have upheld NVRA provisions as valid under the Elections Clause precisely because they target voter eligibility verification and roll accuracy.
Trump’s EO explicitly cites both HAVA and NVRA as authority. It does not create new substantive rules from scratch; it directs federal agencies to implement and enhance existing federal statutory requirements using federal databases (SSA records, DHS’s SAVE program).
Moreover, Congress’s power under Article I, Section 8 to tax and spend for the general welfare includes the ability to attach conditions to federal grants to states. This is classic conditional spending, upheld in South Dakota v. Dole (1987): conditions must be unambiguous, related to the federal interest (here, integrity of federal elections), and not coercive.
- HAVA already does exactly this—grants are withheld or conditioned on states meeting federal election-administration standards.
- The EO (Section 5) authorizes withholding “federal funds from noncompliant states/localities where authorized by law.” This is not a new commandeering of state legislatures; states can decline the funds (and the attached conditions) if they wish. Precedent confirms Congress (and the executive administering congressional appropriations) can use the purse to encourage compliance without directly dictating state election codes.
Finally, Trump’s EO’s core mechanisms operate through federal entities like the post office, not state legislatures:
- USPS rulemaking directs the Postmaster General to require barcoded, trackable “Official Election Mail” envelopes and to transmit ballots only to voters on the federal/state-verified Mail-In/Absentee Participation Lists. USPS is a federal agency; the President may direct its operations via executive order. States are not forced to change their own mailing processes—they simply cannot use federal postal service for non-compliant ballots if they want the service.
This avoids the anti-commandeering doctrine (Printz v. United States, 1997), which prohibits the federal government from forcing state officials to enforce federal law. Here, the federal government is regulating its own property (mail) and funds.
Once Congress has acted (via HAVA/NVRA), federal requirements preempt conflicting state practices for federal elections.
The democrats are toast.
The Elections Clause gives states the initial role to set time, place and manner, but expressly authorizes Congress to enact nationwide rules for federal elections (House and Senate races), including voter registration, list maintenance, fraud prevention, and ballot procedures.
The Supreme Court has interpreted “manner” broadly to include “notices, registration, supervision of voting, protection of voters, prevention of fraud and corrupt practices,” etc.
The Help America Vote Act imposes mandatory minimum federal standards on states (e.g., statewide computerized voter registration lists, provisional ballots, and election administration improvements) and provides federal grants (“requirements payments”) explicitly conditioned on compliance. States must submit plans showing how they meet these standards to receive funding.
The National Voter Registration was also enacted under the Elections Clause. It mandates that states maintain accurate voter rolls (“list maintenance”), offer registration at certain agencies, and accept a federal mail-registration form. Courts have upheld NVRA provisions as valid under the Elections Clause precisely because they target voter eligibility verification and roll accuracy.
Trump’s EO explicitly cites both HAVA and NVRA as authority. It does not create new substantive rules from scratch; it directs federal agencies to implement and enhance existing federal statutory requirements using federal databases (SSA records, DHS’s SAVE program).
Moreover, Congress’s power under Article I, Section 8 to tax and spend for the general welfare includes the ability to attach conditions to federal grants to states. This is classic conditional spending, upheld in South Dakota v. Dole (1987): conditions must be unambiguous, related to the federal interest (here, integrity of federal elections), and not coercive.
- HAVA already does exactly this—grants are withheld or conditioned on states meeting federal election-administration standards.
- The EO (Section 5) authorizes withholding “federal funds from noncompliant states/localities where authorized by law.” This is not a new commandeering of state legislatures; states can decline the funds (and the attached conditions) if they wish. Precedent confirms Congress (and the executive administering congressional appropriations) can use the purse to encourage compliance without directly dictating state election codes.
Finally, Trump’s EO’s core mechanisms operate through federal entities like the post office, not state legislatures:
- USPS rulemaking directs the Postmaster General to require barcoded, trackable “Official Election Mail” envelopes and to transmit ballots only to voters on the federal/state-verified Mail-In/Absentee Participation Lists. USPS is a federal agency; the President may direct its operations via executive order. States are not forced to change their own mailing processes—they simply cannot use federal postal service for non-compliant ballots if they want the service.
This avoids the anti-commandeering doctrine (Printz v. United States, 1997), which prohibits the federal government from forcing state officials to enforce federal law. Here, the federal government is regulating its own property (mail) and funds.
Once Congress has acted (via HAVA/NVRA), federal requirements preempt conflicting state practices for federal elections.
The democrats are toast.
Forwarded from David Clements
More thoughts on Trump's EO.
At first blush, I thought it was rather benign. That may be its greatest strength. The Youngstown Steel case, which is the definitive case on war powers, holds that the President's powers are at their "zenith" when he works in tandem with Congress. And that's what this EO does. It takes existing law, some of it 20 years old, and shoves it down the throats of all the democrat lawyers.
While Trump still has the "Trump card" through his plenary authority under Article II to do way more, the restraint of this EO is like pitching the Supreme Court a soft ball, where they affirm long held legal standards.
Much like the recent tariffs decision, where the Court struck down one provision, only to affirm several other routes for tariffs, with the President and Scott Bessent declaring victory by hiding their "real" power, I think a challenge to this EO may do the same.
It invokes Article II’s command that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It frames non-citizen voting and unsecured mail-in ballots as violations of federal criminal statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 611, 1015; 52 U.S.C. §§ 20511, etc.).
The federal government has a direct duty to prevent dilution of the citizen vote through fraud or ineligible participation. Directing agencies (DHS, SSA, USPS, DOJ) to share verified citizenship data and secure postal transmission of ballots is faithful execution of existing prohibitions on non-citizen voting, not new legislation.
Courts have recognized broad presidential discretion in directing executive-branch enforcement priorities, especially for national interests like election integrity. Providing states with federal databases (SSA records + DHS SAVE) assists compliance with NVRA/HAVA list-maintenance requirements without commandeering state officials.
This is narrower than earlier 2025 attempts to rewrite registration forms, which faced injunctions; the 2026 EO focuses more on data-sharing and USPS operations.
Also consider the Guarantee Clause (Art. IV, §4): The EO cites the federal obligation to guarantee every state “a Republican Form of Government.” I would argue that widespread non-citizen voting or unverifiable mail-in processes undermines the republican character of elections by allowing ineligible votes to dilute lawful ones. This provides a constitutional hook for federal intervention to protect the integrity of the electoral process itself, beyond routine “manner” regulations.
In short, federal databases already exist for citizenship verification; the EO systematizes their use to fulfill HAVA/NVRA accuracy mandates.
The irony of course is that the swamp used these systems to inflate numbers and commit massive fraud.
Now their toys are being used against them.
At first blush, I thought it was rather benign. That may be its greatest strength. The Youngstown Steel case, which is the definitive case on war powers, holds that the President's powers are at their "zenith" when he works in tandem with Congress. And that's what this EO does. It takes existing law, some of it 20 years old, and shoves it down the throats of all the democrat lawyers.
While Trump still has the "Trump card" through his plenary authority under Article II to do way more, the restraint of this EO is like pitching the Supreme Court a soft ball, where they affirm long held legal standards.
Much like the recent tariffs decision, where the Court struck down one provision, only to affirm several other routes for tariffs, with the President and Scott Bessent declaring victory by hiding their "real" power, I think a challenge to this EO may do the same.
It invokes Article II’s command that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It frames non-citizen voting and unsecured mail-in ballots as violations of federal criminal statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 611, 1015; 52 U.S.C. §§ 20511, etc.).
The federal government has a direct duty to prevent dilution of the citizen vote through fraud or ineligible participation. Directing agencies (DHS, SSA, USPS, DOJ) to share verified citizenship data and secure postal transmission of ballots is faithful execution of existing prohibitions on non-citizen voting, not new legislation.
Courts have recognized broad presidential discretion in directing executive-branch enforcement priorities, especially for national interests like election integrity. Providing states with federal databases (SSA records + DHS SAVE) assists compliance with NVRA/HAVA list-maintenance requirements without commandeering state officials.
This is narrower than earlier 2025 attempts to rewrite registration forms, which faced injunctions; the 2026 EO focuses more on data-sharing and USPS operations.
Also consider the Guarantee Clause (Art. IV, §4): The EO cites the federal obligation to guarantee every state “a Republican Form of Government.” I would argue that widespread non-citizen voting or unverifiable mail-in processes undermines the republican character of elections by allowing ineligible votes to dilute lawful ones. This provides a constitutional hook for federal intervention to protect the integrity of the electoral process itself, beyond routine “manner” regulations.
In short, federal databases already exist for citizenship verification; the EO systematizes their use to fulfill HAVA/NVRA accuracy mandates.
The irony of course is that the swamp used these systems to inflate numbers and commit massive fraud.
Now their toys are being used against them.
Forwarded from The People's Audit - Kris Jurski
IMPORTANT RULING FOR ACCESS TO VOTER ROLL!
On March 27, Chief Judge Denise Casper of the District of Massachusetts granted summary judgment in favor of VRF in its lawsuit against Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin, who was attempting to block public access to voter rolls.
https://restoration-news.com/commonsense-prevails-in-massachusetts-voter-roll-transparency-case
On March 27, Chief Judge Denise Casper of the District of Massachusetts granted summary judgment in favor of VRF in its lawsuit against Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin, who was attempting to block public access to voter rolls.
https://restoration-news.com/commonsense-prevails-in-massachusetts-voter-roll-transparency-case
Restoration News
EXCLUSIVE: Commonsense Prevails in Massachusetts Voter Roll Transparency Case
In major win for election integrity, a federal judge rules in favor of Voter Reference Foundation.
Forwarded from Gateway Pundit
Former J6 Defendant Turned DOJ Senior Adviser RESIGNS — Says Deep-State Rot Too Entrenched to Expose From Within
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/former-j6-defendant-turned-doj-senior-adviser-resigns/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/former-j6-defendant-turned-doj-senior-adviser-resigns/
The Gateway Pundit
Former J6 Defendant Turned DOJ Senior Adviser RESIGNS — Says Deep-State Rot Too Entrenched to Expose From Within | The Gateway…
Former FBI agent and J6 defendant Jared Wise has officially resigned from his senior position at the DOJ.
Forwarded from Gateway Pundit
Finally, After 11 Years, Charges Dropped Against Pro-Life Investigator David Daleiden for Exposing Planned Parenthood’s Baby Parts Sales
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/finally-after-11-years-charges-dropped-against-pro/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/finally-after-11-years-charges-dropped-against-pro/
The Gateway Pundit
Finally, After 11 Years, Charges Dropped Against Pro-Life Investigator David Daleiden for Exposing Planned Parenthood's Baby Parts…
David Daleiden, a pro-life hero who exposed Planned Parenthood's baby parts harvesting and sales operations, announced on Wednesday that the final charge against him for exposing this barbarism was dropped this week.
👍5👏1
Forwarded from WarRoom: Official Telegram Channel
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mike Davis on Tina Peters' wrongful imprisonment: I think Harmeet Dhillon should open a criminal probe, call in the FBI, and arrest Mesa County District Court Judge Matthew Barrett. @mrddmia
❤7👍4💯1
Forwarded from Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
HOLY SMOKES. Double mail-in ballots just got sent out in the Green Bay, Wisconsin election, and voters are raising security concerns
We need to abolish mass mail-in voting. IT'S FRAUD PRONE
REP. TOM TIFFANY: "Over 150 Green Bay voters were mailed DUPLICATE absentee ballots for the spring election. This comes after Madison mailed 2,215 DUPLICATE absentee ballots in the 2024 presidential election."
Local news says, "This incident brings up worries over potential election fraud within the city of Green Bay."
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
We need to abolish mass mail-in voting. IT'S FRAUD PRONE
REP. TOM TIFFANY: "Over 150 Green Bay voters were mailed DUPLICATE absentee ballots for the spring election. This comes after Madison mailed 2,215 DUPLICATE absentee ballots in the 2024 presidential election."
Local news says, "This incident brings up worries over potential election fraud within the city of Green Bay."
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
🔥2
Forwarded from David Clements
He is Risen.
Ep. 24 is up.
Confusion has never been greater in MAGA.
Death, Resurrection, and the Arena: Why I Still Stand With Donald J. Trump
https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/death-resurrection-and-the-arena
Ep. 24 is up.
Confusion has never been greater in MAGA.
Death, Resurrection, and the Arena: Why I Still Stand With Donald J. Trump
https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/death-resurrection-and-the-arena
❤6
Forwarded from Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
GOD IS GOOD! The missing U.S. Airman sent a message to U.S. Forces through his Emergency Beacon saying simply, "GOD IS GOOD."
At first, U.S. forces thought it could be a trap by Iranian forces, but his fellow airman KNEW it was him.
"He said something over the airways."
"He said, 'GOD IS GOOD'—his fellow pilots and weapon system officers knew it was him beacuse he was a religious man!"
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
At first, U.S. forces thought it could be a trap by Iranian forces, but his fellow airman KNEW it was him.
"He said something over the airways."
"He said, 'GOD IS GOOD'—his fellow pilots and weapon system officers knew it was him beacuse he was a religious man!"
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
❤2
Forwarded from Gateway Pundit
Mike Benz: ‘NATO Doesn’t Have Tanks Because They Spent Their Budget Going After Your Tweets’ (Video)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/mike-benz-nato-doesnt-have-tanks-because-they/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/mike-benz-nato-doesnt-have-tanks-because-they/
The Gateway Pundit
Mike Benz: 'NATO Doesn’t Have Tanks Because They Spent Their Budget Going After Your Tweets' (Video) | The Gateway Pundit | by…
President Trump has been vocal in calling NATO a one-way street.
💯1
Forwarded from The People's Audit - Kris Jurski
This seems to be the next play...
As election integrity advocates have put pressure on states to remove or correct registrations with invalid addresses, the states have been quieltly changing laws to let INACTIVE registrants to request mail ballots.
Why would they do something like this?
Well, how else can you cheat when you can no longer create people living at fake addresses?
See we can spot fake addresses after an election.
I don't think it's a concidence that local election officials fight like hell to keep inactive voters on the voter rolls EVEN WHEN THEY CAN BE INDENTIFIED AS BEING REGISTERED IN ANOTHER STATE.
We have even heard reports that individuals are ignored when they notify the county that they want to be removed from the voter rolls because they have moved to another state.
How are you going to know that those inactive registrations were harvsted and voted for?
Every state has laws and procedures that flip that registraiton back to active the moment they request a mail in ballot.
They are taking advantage of a loophole that was ment for people that PHYSICALLY SHOWED UP AT THE POLLS TO VOTE.
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/132646
As election integrity advocates have put pressure on states to remove or correct registrations with invalid addresses, the states have been quieltly changing laws to let INACTIVE registrants to request mail ballots.
Why would they do something like this?
Well, how else can you cheat when you can no longer create people living at fake addresses?
See we can spot fake addresses after an election.
I don't think it's a concidence that local election officials fight like hell to keep inactive voters on the voter rolls EVEN WHEN THEY CAN BE INDENTIFIED AS BEING REGISTERED IN ANOTHER STATE.
We have even heard reports that individuals are ignored when they notify the county that they want to be removed from the voter rolls because they have moved to another state.
How are you going to know that those inactive registrations were harvsted and voted for?
Every state has laws and procedures that flip that registraiton back to active the moment they request a mail in ballot.
They are taking advantage of a loophole that was ment for people that PHYSICALLY SHOWED UP AT THE POLLS TO VOTE.
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/132646
Telegram
Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
⚠️BREAKING: The Republican National Committee just SUED to strike down a Virginia law that lets NON-RESIDENTS vote in elections
"People who have never lived in Virginia — or even in the United States — should NOT be voting in Virginia's elections," RNC Chair…
"People who have never lived in Virginia — or even in the United States — should NOT be voting in Virginia's elections," RNC Chair…
Forwarded from Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In just a few days, the Trump DOJ secured guilty pleas and a sentencing totaling over $500 million in healthcare and COVID fraud. Acting AG Todd Blanche highlighted a $160M healthcare enrollment fraud plea, a $100M COVID fraud sentencing, and another $160M healthcare fraud plea, crediting prosecutors, federal agents, and local law enforcement for their relentless work.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍4
Forwarded from Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
DEMOCRAT EX-LAWMAKER ACCUSED OF RAPING CHILD, FACES LIFE IN PRISON
Former Democrat NC Rep. Cecil Brockman is facing eight child sex charges after allegedly raping a minor between the ages of 13 and 15, according to court documents. He previously opposed the “Parents’ Bill of Rights” requiring schools to inform parents about their child’s mental and physical health, and a youth academic center in North Carolina was named after him. Prosecutors allege he was living with the child and at one point broke through a locked hospital door to contact the victim during treatment. If convicted, he faces the possibility of life in prison.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
Former Democrat NC Rep. Cecil Brockman is facing eight child sex charges after allegedly raping a minor between the ages of 13 and 15, according to court documents. He previously opposed the “Parents’ Bill of Rights” requiring schools to inform parents about their child’s mental and physical health, and a youth academic center in North Carolina was named after him. Prosecutors allege he was living with the child and at one point broke through a locked hospital door to contact the victim during treatment. If convicted, he faces the possibility of life in prison.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social