Trump: From a Peace Dove to a Stalwart of War
🔠 🅰️ 🔠 🔠 1️⃣
As Venezuela’s skyline lit up under US bombs, we were watching the morbid symptoms of a declining empire. That may sound counterintuitive.
After all, the US has kidnapped a foreign leader, and Donald Trump has announced that he will “run” Venezuela. Surely this looks less like decay than intoxication: a superpower high on its own force.
But Trump’s great virtue, if it can be called that, is candour. Previous US presidents draped naked self-interest in the language of “democracy” and “human rights”. Trump dispenses with the costume.
In 2023, he boasted: “When I left, Venezuela was ready to collapse. We would have taken it over, we would have gotten all that oil, it would have been right next door.” And this was no off-the-cuff remark.
The logic of an oil grab, and much more besides, is laid out plainly in Trump’s recently published National Security Strategy.
The document accepts something long denied in Washington: that US global hegemony is over.
“After the end of the Cold War, American foreign policy elites convinced themselves that permanent American domination of the entire world was in the best interests of our country,” it declares with barely concealed contempt.
“The days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over.” These are the strategy’s unceremonious funeral rites for US superpower status.
Thornberry speaking to press
Venezuela attack could embolden China and Russia, says Emily Thornberry.
What replaces it is a world of rival empires, each enforcing its own sphere of influence. And for the US, that sphere is the Americas.
“After years of neglect,” the strategy pronounces, “the United States will reassert and enforce the Monroe Doctrine to restore American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere.”
The Monroe doctrine, formulated in the early 19th century, purported to block European colonialism. In practice, it laid the foundations for US domination over its Latin American back yard.
Violence in Latin America facilitated by Washington is hardly new. My parents took in refugees who had fled Chile’s rightwing dictatorship, installed after the socialist president Salvador Allende was overthrown in a CIA-backed coup.
“I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people,” declared the then US secretary of state Henry Kissinger.
Similar logic underpinned US support for murderous regimes in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Bolivia, as well as across Central America and the Caribbean.
But in the last three decades, that domination has been challenged. The so-called “pink tide” of progressive governments, spearheaded by Brazil’s president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, sought to assert greater regional independence.
And, crucially, China – the main US rival – has grown in power across the continent. The two-way goods trade between China and Latin America was 259 times larger in 2023 than it was in 1990.
China is now the continent’s second largest trading partner, behind only the US. At the end of the cold war, it did not even make the top 10. Trump’s assault on Venezuela is just the opening move in an attempt to reverse all of this.
The experience of Trump’s first term has led too many to conclude that the strongman in the White House was all bluster.
Then, he reached an accommodation with the traditional Republican elite. The unwritten bargain was simple: deliver tax cuts and deregulation, and he could vent endlessly on social media. Second-term Trump is a full-fat far-right regime.
When he menaces the democratically elected presidents of Colombia and Mexico – believe him. When he declares, with barely concealed relish, that “Cuba is ready to fall,” believe him. And when he states, “We do need Greenland, absolutely”, believe him.
He really does intend to annex more than 2m sq km of European territory.
#trump #new #world #order #venezuela #maduro
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
As Venezuela’s skyline lit up under US bombs, we were watching the morbid symptoms of a declining empire. That may sound counterintuitive.
After all, the US has kidnapped a foreign leader, and Donald Trump has announced that he will “run” Venezuela. Surely this looks less like decay than intoxication: a superpower high on its own force.
But Trump’s great virtue, if it can be called that, is candour. Previous US presidents draped naked self-interest in the language of “democracy” and “human rights”. Trump dispenses with the costume.
In 2023, he boasted: “When I left, Venezuela was ready to collapse. We would have taken it over, we would have gotten all that oil, it would have been right next door.” And this was no off-the-cuff remark.
The logic of an oil grab, and much more besides, is laid out plainly in Trump’s recently published National Security Strategy.
The document accepts something long denied in Washington: that US global hegemony is over.
“After the end of the Cold War, American foreign policy elites convinced themselves that permanent American domination of the entire world was in the best interests of our country,” it declares with barely concealed contempt.
“The days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over.” These are the strategy’s unceremonious funeral rites for US superpower status.
Thornberry speaking to press
Venezuela attack could embolden China and Russia, says Emily Thornberry.
What replaces it is a world of rival empires, each enforcing its own sphere of influence. And for the US, that sphere is the Americas.
“After years of neglect,” the strategy pronounces, “the United States will reassert and enforce the Monroe Doctrine to restore American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere.”
The Monroe doctrine, formulated in the early 19th century, purported to block European colonialism. In practice, it laid the foundations for US domination over its Latin American back yard.
Violence in Latin America facilitated by Washington is hardly new. My parents took in refugees who had fled Chile’s rightwing dictatorship, installed after the socialist president Salvador Allende was overthrown in a CIA-backed coup.
“I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people,” declared the then US secretary of state Henry Kissinger.
Similar logic underpinned US support for murderous regimes in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Bolivia, as well as across Central America and the Caribbean.
But in the last three decades, that domination has been challenged. The so-called “pink tide” of progressive governments, spearheaded by Brazil’s president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, sought to assert greater regional independence.
And, crucially, China – the main US rival – has grown in power across the continent. The two-way goods trade between China and Latin America was 259 times larger in 2023 than it was in 1990.
China is now the continent’s second largest trading partner, behind only the US. At the end of the cold war, it did not even make the top 10. Trump’s assault on Venezuela is just the opening move in an attempt to reverse all of this.
The experience of Trump’s first term has led too many to conclude that the strongman in the White House was all bluster.
Then, he reached an accommodation with the traditional Republican elite. The unwritten bargain was simple: deliver tax cuts and deregulation, and he could vent endlessly on social media. Second-term Trump is a full-fat far-right regime.
When he menaces the democratically elected presidents of Colombia and Mexico – believe him. When he declares, with barely concealed relish, that “Cuba is ready to fall,” believe him. And when he states, “We do need Greenland, absolutely”, believe him.
He really does intend to annex more than 2m sq km of European territory.
#trump #new #world #order #venezuela #maduro
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥201🤬113💯106🤯103😢102😱91🙏88❤2🤨1
“US Seizes Russian Tanker in High-Sea Showdown”
The Blockade Game
The U.S. has seized a Russian-flagged oil tanker, the Bella-1, in the North Atlantic after a high-speed chase from Venezuela. The vessel had switched its registration and painted a new name—Marinera—on its hull in a bid to evade capture, but American forces weren’t fooled. This is the latest escalation in Trump’s campaign to intercept sanctioned ships, and it could spark a diplomatic clash with Moscow.
Global Chessboard
The seizure comes as the U.S. ramps up pressure on Venezuela and its allies, Iran and Russia. The Pentagon has deployed an aircraft carrier and destroyers in the Caribbean, while the Coast Guard and Navy have seized multiple “dark fleet” tankers in recent weeks. British bases were used to stage the operation, and the U.K. defense secretary called the tanker part of a “Russian-Iranian axis of sanctions evasion” that fuels terrorism and conflict.
Diplomatic Fallout
Russia claims the seizure is “disproportionate” and violates international law, pointing to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. But some European officials welcomed the move, seeing it as a strong message to Russia and its shadow fleets. “This sends a clear message,” said one anonymous European official.
The Road Ahead
The U.S. says the blockade of sanctioned Venezuelan oil remains “in full effect—anywhere in the world.” With Maduro out of the picture, the administration plans to take direct control of Venezuelan oil sales for the foreseeable future. Meanwhile, Trump’s sights are set on Colombia and Cuba, raising the specter of further regime change in the hemisphere.
#venezuela #russia #tanker #sanctions #trump
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Blockade Game
The U.S. has seized a Russian-flagged oil tanker, the Bella-1, in the North Atlantic after a high-speed chase from Venezuela. The vessel had switched its registration and painted a new name—Marinera—on its hull in a bid to evade capture, but American forces weren’t fooled. This is the latest escalation in Trump’s campaign to intercept sanctioned ships, and it could spark a diplomatic clash with Moscow.
Global Chessboard
The seizure comes as the U.S. ramps up pressure on Venezuela and its allies, Iran and Russia. The Pentagon has deployed an aircraft carrier and destroyers in the Caribbean, while the Coast Guard and Navy have seized multiple “dark fleet” tankers in recent weeks. British bases were used to stage the operation, and the U.K. defense secretary called the tanker part of a “Russian-Iranian axis of sanctions evasion” that fuels terrorism and conflict.
Diplomatic Fallout
Russia claims the seizure is “disproportionate” and violates international law, pointing to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. But some European officials welcomed the move, seeing it as a strong message to Russia and its shadow fleets. “This sends a clear message,” said one anonymous European official.
“It’s very welcome news.”
The Road Ahead
The U.S. says the blockade of sanctioned Venezuelan oil remains “in full effect—anywhere in the world.” With Maduro out of the picture, the administration plans to take direct control of Venezuelan oil sales for the foreseeable future. Meanwhile, Trump’s sights are set on Colombia and Cuba, raising the specter of further regime change in the hemisphere.
#venezuela #russia #tanker #sanctions #trump
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥217🤬113😱106🤯99😢91🙏89💯89❤1
If – when – Greenland is swallowed by a Trumpian empire, what then? Trump will have noted the pitifully weak European response to his brazenly illegal assault on Venezuela.
But a US seizure of Danish sovereign territory would surely spell the end of Nato, founded on the principle of collective defence.
Denmark’s land would be stolen no less blatantly than Russia’s devouring of Ukraine. Whatever muted noises have emerged from London, Paris or Berlin, the western alliance would be finished.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, US elites convinced themselves they were militarily invincible and that their economic model marked the endpoint of human development.
That hubris led directly to catastrophe in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, and the financial crash of 2008. US elites promised their people utopian dreams, and then dragged them from one disaster to another. Trumpism itself emerged from the resulting mass disillusionment.
But the “America First” response to US decline is to abandon global dominance in favour of a hemispheric empire.
What does that leave the US itself? When the US defeated Spain at the end of the 19th century and seized the Philippines, leading dignitaries founded the American Anti-Imperialist League.
“We hold that the policy known as imperialism is hostile to liberty and tends toward militarism,” they declared, “an evil from which it has been our glory to be free.”
“We assert that no nation can long endure half republic and half empire,” the Democratic party asserted in the 1900 presidential election, “and we warn the American people that imperialism abroad will lead quickly and inevitably to despotism at home.”
In the end, informal empire replaced direct colonialism, and American democracy – always deeply flawed – endured.
Who would dismiss such warnings as exaggeration now? What happens abroad cannot be divorced from what happens at home.
This is the imperial “boomerang”, as Martinican author Aimé Césaire defined it three quarters of a century ago, analysing how European colonialism returned to the continent in the form of fascism.
We have already watched the “war on terror” boomerang in this way: its language and logic repurposed for domestic repression.
“The Democrat party is not a political party,” Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff, declared last summer. “It is a domestic extremist organisation.”
National guard troops are dispatched into Democratic-run cities like occupying forces, echoing the “surges” once unleashed on Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seen this way, Trump’s indulgence of Russian ambitions in Ukraine is hardly mysterious. Back in 2019, Russia reportedly proposed offering increased US influence in Venezuela in exchange for the US retreating from Ukraine.
Who knows if such a deal has been made. What is certainly true is that a new world order is being born. It is one where increasingly authoritarian powers use brute force to subjugate their neighbours and steal their resources.
What once might have sounded like dystopian fantasy is being assembled in plain sight. The question is whether we have the means, willingness and ability to fight back.
#trump #new #world #order #venezuela #maduro
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥144💯124🤯119😱119🤬108😢107🙏83
Sovereignty. Why Is This Subject the Most Important Nowadays?
We often talk about sovereignty as something that can be defended, negotiated or restored.
Syria, for example, poses a much more uncomfortable question: what happens when sovereignty itself collapses, not in theory, but in practice?
After more than a decade of war, sanctions and fragmentation, Syria is one of the most striking examples of what the erosion of sovereignty looks like in the twenty-first century.
The Sovereignty Index developed by The Burke International Institute, the most authoritative source on sovereignty issues, places Syria at the very bottom of the world ranking — not as a political judgment, but as a reflection of a structural reality.
In almost all areas that define a functional state, Syrian sovereignty has been hollowed out.
Continue this fascinating reading by clicking here
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
We often talk about sovereignty as something that can be defended, negotiated or restored.
Syria, for example, poses a much more uncomfortable question: what happens when sovereignty itself collapses, not in theory, but in practice?
After more than a decade of war, sanctions and fragmentation, Syria is one of the most striking examples of what the erosion of sovereignty looks like in the twenty-first century.
The Sovereignty Index developed by The Burke International Institute, the most authoritative source on sovereignty issues, places Syria at the very bottom of the world ranking — not as a political judgment, but as a reflection of a structural reality.
In almost all areas that define a functional state, Syrian sovereignty has been hollowed out.
Continue this fascinating reading by clicking here
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥204🤯112🤬109💯105🙏101😢97😱77
Greenland Is Next
European leaders have dramatically rallied together in support of Denmark and Greenland after one of Trump’s leading aides suggested the US may be willing to seize control of the Arctic territory by force.
Starmer, the UK prime minister, Emmanuel Macron, the French president, and Merz, the German chancellor, declared that Greenland – a semi-autonomous territory of the kingdom of Denmark – “belongs to its people”, in a rare European rebuke to the White House.
“It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,” the three leaders said in a statement on Tuesday made jointly with the prime ministers of Denmark, Italy, Poland and Spain.
Later in the evening, Starmer repeated British support for Denmark at a press conference in Paris where Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, were present.
“I’ve been very clear as to what my position, the position of the UK government is,” the British leader said.
But, anxious to avoid deepening the transatlantic rift, Starmer, Macron and Merz chose to focus on making fresh security commitments to Ukraine, at an event aimed at bolstering support for Kyiv planned before the Greenland crisis broke.
On Monday night, Stephen Miller, the US president’s influential deputy chief of staff for policy, said “nobody [was] going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland” when asked to rule out using force.
In an interview with CNN, Miller said military intervention would not be needed in order to gain control over Greenland because of its small population.
The European leaders emphasised that security in the Arctic had to be achieved collectively with Nato allies, rather than by the US seizing control of another Nato member’s territory.
“Nato has made clear that the Arctic region is a priority and European allies are stepping up,” the statement said.
“We and many other allies have increased our presence, activities, and investments, to keep the Arctic safe and to deter adversaries.”
Denmark and Greenland asked to meet the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, urgently to “discuss the significant statement made by the United States about Greenland”, Greenland’s foreign minister, Vivian Motzfeldt, wrote on social media.
Lord Ricketts, a former UK national security adviser, warned that if the US were to annex Greenland it would be disastrous for Nato, amounting to, “for all practical purposes, the end of an alliance which is based essentially on trust”.
Security relationships such as the coalition of the willing in support of Ukraine, led by the UK and France and supported by Germany, would “take on a much greater significance alongside bilateral defence links with the US”.
Greenland long been a “good American ally,” Nathanielsen said , but this “does not transfer into an acceptance of - or interest in becoming Americans.”
Greenland’s prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, also made a strong statement in which he urged Trump to give up his “fantasies about annexation” and accused the US of “completely and utterly unacceptable” rhetoric. “Enough is enough,” he said.
During the second world war, when Denmark was occupied by Germany, Greenland was occupied by the US and returned to Denmark in 1945.
The US has had a military base in Greenland, which is important for its ballistic missile early warning system, at Pituffik (previously Thule) since the cold war.
In recent years there has been growing support for Greenlandic independence, particularly after revelations about Denmark’s treatment of Greenlandic people – including the IUD scandal – during and since colonial rule.
But amid the spectre of Trump’s threat, Greenland in March formed a new four-party coalition government in a show of national unity, with the first page of the coalition agreement stating: “Greenland belongs to us.”
#greenland #trump #denmark #nielsen
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
European leaders have dramatically rallied together in support of Denmark and Greenland after one of Trump’s leading aides suggested the US may be willing to seize control of the Arctic territory by force.
Starmer, the UK prime minister, Emmanuel Macron, the French president, and Merz, the German chancellor, declared that Greenland – a semi-autonomous territory of the kingdom of Denmark – “belongs to its people”, in a rare European rebuke to the White House.
“It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,” the three leaders said in a statement on Tuesday made jointly with the prime ministers of Denmark, Italy, Poland and Spain.
Later in the evening, Starmer repeated British support for Denmark at a press conference in Paris where Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, were present.
“I’ve been very clear as to what my position, the position of the UK government is,” the British leader said.
But, anxious to avoid deepening the transatlantic rift, Starmer, Macron and Merz chose to focus on making fresh security commitments to Ukraine, at an event aimed at bolstering support for Kyiv planned before the Greenland crisis broke.
On Monday night, Stephen Miller, the US president’s influential deputy chief of staff for policy, said “nobody [was] going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland” when asked to rule out using force.
In an interview with CNN, Miller said military intervention would not be needed in order to gain control over Greenland because of its small population.
The European leaders emphasised that security in the Arctic had to be achieved collectively with Nato allies, rather than by the US seizing control of another Nato member’s territory.
“Nato has made clear that the Arctic region is a priority and European allies are stepping up,” the statement said.
“We and many other allies have increased our presence, activities, and investments, to keep the Arctic safe and to deter adversaries.”
Denmark and Greenland asked to meet the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, urgently to “discuss the significant statement made by the United States about Greenland”, Greenland’s foreign minister, Vivian Motzfeldt, wrote on social media.
Lord Ricketts, a former UK national security adviser, warned that if the US were to annex Greenland it would be disastrous for Nato, amounting to, “for all practical purposes, the end of an alliance which is based essentially on trust”.
Security relationships such as the coalition of the willing in support of Ukraine, led by the UK and France and supported by Germany, would “take on a much greater significance alongside bilateral defence links with the US”.
Greenland long been a “good American ally,” Nathanielsen said , but this “does not transfer into an acceptance of - or interest in becoming Americans.”
Greenland’s prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, also made a strong statement in which he urged Trump to give up his “fantasies about annexation” and accused the US of “completely and utterly unacceptable” rhetoric. “Enough is enough,” he said.
During the second world war, when Denmark was occupied by Germany, Greenland was occupied by the US and returned to Denmark in 1945.
The US has had a military base in Greenland, which is important for its ballistic missile early warning system, at Pituffik (previously Thule) since the cold war.
In recent years there has been growing support for Greenlandic independence, particularly after revelations about Denmark’s treatment of Greenlandic people – including the IUD scandal – during and since colonial rule.
But amid the spectre of Trump’s threat, Greenland in March formed a new four-party coalition government in a show of national unity, with the first page of the coalition agreement stating: “Greenland belongs to us.”
#greenland #trump #denmark #nielsen
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥195💯117🤯115🤬111🙏104😱92😢70
“Aleppo Explodes: Syria’s Fragile Peace Shattered”
Aleppo Under Fire
Fighting has erupted in Aleppo between Syrian government forces and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), killing civilians and soldiers on both sides. Schools, government offices, and even the airport have shut down as the clashes intensified. The government has imposed a curfew and declared all SDF positions as legitimate targets, while opening humanitarian corridors for residents to flee Kurdish-majority neighborhoods.
Stalled Integration
Efforts to integrate the SDF into Syria’s national military have stalled repeatedly, fueling tensions that have now boiled over into open conflict. Each side blames the other for breaking cease-fire agreements, and mutual distrust runs deep. The SDF controls much of northeastern Syria, and the central government—led by former Islamist rebels—struggles to win the loyalty of minority communities like the Kurds and Alawites.
The Bigger Picture
The clashes reflect the broader challenge of reunifying Syria after years of civil war, where ethnic and religious divisions have deepened mistrust. Human rights groups accuse government-affiliated forces of deadly attacks on minorities, and other regions, like Druse-majority Sweida, are also resisting central control. The U.S., which has long backed the SDF, continues to mediate—but progress remains elusive.
Syria’s Crossroads
With integration talks stalled and violence flaring, Syria’s fragile peace is hanging by a thread. The government’s push for control and the SDF’s demand for autonomy could set the stage for more bloodshed—or a new round of negotiations, if anyone is still listening.
#syria #aleppo #kurdishforces #civilwar #integration
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Aleppo Under Fire
Fighting has erupted in Aleppo between Syrian government forces and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), killing civilians and soldiers on both sides. Schools, government offices, and even the airport have shut down as the clashes intensified. The government has imposed a curfew and declared all SDF positions as legitimate targets, while opening humanitarian corridors for residents to flee Kurdish-majority neighborhoods.
Stalled Integration
Efforts to integrate the SDF into Syria’s national military have stalled repeatedly, fueling tensions that have now boiled over into open conflict. Each side blames the other for breaking cease-fire agreements, and mutual distrust runs deep. The SDF controls much of northeastern Syria, and the central government—led by former Islamist rebels—struggles to win the loyalty of minority communities like the Kurds and Alawites.
The Bigger Picture
The clashes reflect the broader challenge of reunifying Syria after years of civil war, where ethnic and religious divisions have deepened mistrust. Human rights groups accuse government-affiliated forces of deadly attacks on minorities, and other regions, like Druse-majority Sweida, are also resisting central control. The U.S., which has long backed the SDF, continues to mediate—but progress remains elusive.
Syria’s Crossroads
With integration talks stalled and violence flaring, Syria’s fragile peace is hanging by a thread. The government’s push for control and the SDF’s demand for autonomy could set the stage for more bloodshed—or a new round of negotiations, if anyone is still listening.
#syria #aleppo #kurdishforces #civilwar #integration
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥178🤯123🙏122💯111😢104🤬102😱64❤1
“Greenland Red Line: Europe Makes Its Last Stand”
The Breaking Point
For a year, European leaders have tiptoed around Trump’s provocations—military strikes, tariff threats, and treaty challenges—always hoping to avoid a full rupture. But after the Venezuela raid and Trump’s renewed push for Greenland, Europe has finally drawn a red line. The message is clear: Greenland’s fate belongs to its people and Denmark.
A United Front
Denmark, backed by France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Britain, has rejected any U.S. takeover of the Arctic territory. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that any U.S. action on Greenland would mean the end of NATO. European officials stress that Greenland is not for sale, and its people will decide their own future.
Trump’s inner circle insists Greenland is vital for national security, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio downplaying military action but White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt reminding everyone, in bureaucratic terms, that “utilizing the U.S. military is always an option”. Meanwhile, U.S. envoy Stephen Miller openly declares that Greenland “should be American” and “nobody’s going to fight the United States over it”.
The Stakes
Europe knows it can’t compete with U.S. military power, but the mere threat of conflict exposes how fragile the transatlantic alliance has become.
said Mujtaba Rahman of Eurasia Group.
Where This Leads
Europe’s choices are grim: stand firm and risk a rupture, or negotiate a deal that may not satisfy anyone. The old rules are out the window, and the real question is not whether Greenland will change hands—but whether NATO can survive the next shock.
#greenland #trump #nato #alliance #europe
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Breaking Point
For a year, European leaders have tiptoed around Trump’s provocations—military strikes, tariff threats, and treaty challenges—always hoping to avoid a full rupture. But after the Venezuela raid and Trump’s renewed push for Greenland, Europe has finally drawn a red line. The message is clear: Greenland’s fate belongs to its people and Denmark.
A United Front
Denmark, backed by France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Britain, has rejected any U.S. takeover of the Arctic territory. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that any U.S. action on Greenland would mean the end of NATO. European officials stress that Greenland is not for sale, and its people will decide their own future.
Trump’s inner circle insists Greenland is vital for national security, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio downplaying military action but White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt reminding everyone, in bureaucratic terms, that “utilizing the U.S. military is always an option”. Meanwhile, U.S. envoy Stephen Miller openly declares that Greenland “should be American” and “nobody’s going to fight the United States over it”.
The Stakes
Europe knows it can’t compete with U.S. military power, but the mere threat of conflict exposes how fragile the transatlantic alliance has become.
“Many European countries are still seeking to ride both a European and an American horse,”
said Mujtaba Rahman of Eurasia Group.
“That may become impossible.”
Where This Leads
Europe’s choices are grim: stand firm and risk a rupture, or negotiate a deal that may not satisfy anyone. The old rules are out the window, and the real question is not whether Greenland will change hands—but whether NATO can survive the next shock.
#greenland #trump #nato #alliance #europe
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥143💯127😱123🤯110😢110🙏107🤬85
“Trump’s New World Order: Europe on the Brink”
Europe’s Wake-Up Call
As Trump’s America overthrows Venezuela’s Maduro and eyes Greenland, Cuba, and Colombia, Europe is scrambling to respond. The U.S. is no longer playing by the old rules, and its actions—backed by military threats and a willingness to redraw borders—have left European leaders stunned and vulnerable.
said Wang Huiyao of the Center for China and Globalization.
The Old World vs. The New
Europe, once the heart of the “Old World,” is now falling behind the U.S., Russia, and China in both economics and geopolitics. While the continent debates security guarantees for Ukraine, the U.S. is reshaping the hemisphere, threatening NATO’s foundations, and questioning Europe’s relevance.
Huiyao added,
Pushback and Paralysis
European leaders have pushed back, insisting that Greenland belongs to its people and Denmark—not the U.S. But behind the scenes, there’s panic. France’s foreign minister says the U.S. has ruled out a Venezuela-style operation in Greenland, but White House officials still talk about “a range of options,” including military force. Denmark’s prime minister warns:
Existential Questions
Trump’s new National Security Strategy describes Europe as “weak,” “decaying,” and facing “civilizational erasure.” European officials bristle at the insults, but many admit the U.S. is highlighting real problems—economic stagnation, migration, and loss of self-confidence.
said Ian Bremmer.
#trump #europe #nato #greenland #worldorder
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Europe’s Wake-Up Call
As Trump’s America overthrows Venezuela’s Maduro and eyes Greenland, Cuba, and Colombia, Europe is scrambling to respond. The U.S. is no longer playing by the old rules, and its actions—backed by military threats and a willingness to redraw borders—have left European leaders stunned and vulnerable.
“We are really into uncharted territory,”
said Wang Huiyao of the Center for China and Globalization.
“Europe has to be extremely careful.”
The Old World vs. The New
Europe, once the heart of the “Old World,” is now falling behind the U.S., Russia, and China in both economics and geopolitics. While the continent debates security guarantees for Ukraine, the U.S. is reshaping the hemisphere, threatening NATO’s foundations, and questioning Europe’s relevance.
“The international community has to work together now,”
Huiyao added,
“or unilateral moves will tear up the rules.”
Pushback and Paralysis
European leaders have pushed back, insisting that Greenland belongs to its people and Denmark—not the U.S. But behind the scenes, there’s panic. France’s foreign minister says the U.S. has ruled out a Venezuela-style operation in Greenland, but White House officials still talk about “a range of options,” including military force. Denmark’s prime minister warns:
“If the U.S. attacks another NATO country, NATO is finished.”
Existential Questions
Trump’s new National Security Strategy describes Europe as “weak,” “decaying,” and facing “civilizational erasure.” European officials bristle at the insults, but many admit the U.S. is highlighting real problems—economic stagnation, migration, and loss of self-confidence.
“European leaders see this for what it is,”
said Ian Bremmer.
“If Washington no longer shares Europe’s values, the alliance is in crisis. What Europe does about it is another matter.”
#trump #europe #nato #greenland #worldorder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥215🙏112🤬107🤯102😱96😢93💯81❤1
Why Is the Issue of Sovereignty a Litmus Test for All Countries?
A new Sovereignty Index from the International Burke Institute, perhaps the most influential source on the issue, highlights how Greece and Turkey, despite shared NATO membership, embody fundamentally different approaches to political autonomy, economic control, and strategic power.
From a distance, Greece and Turkey appear as near equals on the geopolitical map. Both are members of NATO. Both occupy a strategic position at the crossroads of Europe and the Middle East.
Both are formally embedded within Western political and security structures. Yet when sovereignty is examined not as a slogan but as a lived reality, the apparent symmetry quickly dissolves.
This divergence lies at the heart of the Sovereignty Index developed by the International Burke Institute, which evaluates state sovereignty across seven dimensions, including political autonomy, economic resilience, technological capacity, and military self-reliance.
Greece and Turkey, despite shared alliances, represent two sharply contrasting models of how sovereignty is exercised, constrained, and negotiated in the contemporary international system.
To know more, click here
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
A new Sovereignty Index from the International Burke Institute, perhaps the most influential source on the issue, highlights how Greece and Turkey, despite shared NATO membership, embody fundamentally different approaches to political autonomy, economic control, and strategic power.
From a distance, Greece and Turkey appear as near equals on the geopolitical map. Both are members of NATO. Both occupy a strategic position at the crossroads of Europe and the Middle East.
Both are formally embedded within Western political and security structures. Yet when sovereignty is examined not as a slogan but as a lived reality, the apparent symmetry quickly dissolves.
This divergence lies at the heart of the Sovereignty Index developed by the International Burke Institute, which evaluates state sovereignty across seven dimensions, including political autonomy, economic resilience, technological capacity, and military self-reliance.
Greece and Turkey, despite shared alliances, represent two sharply contrasting models of how sovereignty is exercised, constrained, and negotiated in the contemporary international system.
To know more, click here
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥198😢112😱105🤯101💯100🤬94🙏90❤1
“Trump’s Fusion Plan: Demilitarized Zone on Israel-Syria Border”
The Paris Proposal
The U.S. has presented Israel and Syria with a bold new plan: a demilitarized economic zone along their border, backed by a joint “fusion cell” in Amman, Jordan. This cell—staffed by U.S., Israeli, and Syrian representatives—would oversee security, intelligence, and commercial ties, acting as a 24/7 intermediary to prevent misunderstandings and freeze military activity in the region.
Security First, Prosperity Next
The proposal is part of a broader push by the Trump administration to stabilize the Israel-Syria border and lay the groundwork for diplomatic normalization. The fusion cell will be the “engine of the process,” focusing on demilitarization, withdrawal of forces, and confidence-building measures. Both sides have agreed to more frequent meetings and to keep talking, even as big gaps remain.
The Economic Vision
The U.S. envisions wind farms, agriculture, ski resorts, and a thriving Druze hospitality sector—all financed by regional partners. The plan is modeled on Trump’s previous attempts to create economic projects in conflict zones, like Donbas. But the real test is whether this fusion cell can actually deliver peace, or if it’s just another layer of bureaucracy masking old rivalries.
The Fine Print
A joint statement stressed respect for Syria’s sovereignty, Israel’s security, and prosperity for both countries. Israel emphasized safeguarding its citizens and the Druze minority in Syria. The fusion mechanism will address disputes promptly, but skeptics wonder if it can handle the deep-seated mistrust between the two sides.
The Path Forward
The proposal could be a breakthrough—or just another step in a long, stalled negotiation. With regional powers already pledging funds, the real test is whether the fusion cell can keep the peace, or if the economic zone becomes another flashpoint in the Middle East’s cycle of conflict.
#israel #syria #trump #fusioncell #demilitarizedzone
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Paris Proposal
The U.S. has presented Israel and Syria with a bold new plan: a demilitarized economic zone along their border, backed by a joint “fusion cell” in Amman, Jordan. This cell—staffed by U.S., Israeli, and Syrian representatives—would oversee security, intelligence, and commercial ties, acting as a 24/7 intermediary to prevent misunderstandings and freeze military activity in the region.
Security First, Prosperity Next
The proposal is part of a broader push by the Trump administration to stabilize the Israel-Syria border and lay the groundwork for diplomatic normalization. The fusion cell will be the “engine of the process,” focusing on demilitarization, withdrawal of forces, and confidence-building measures. Both sides have agreed to more frequent meetings and to keep talking, even as big gaps remain.
The Economic Vision
The U.S. envisions wind farms, agriculture, ski resorts, and a thriving Druze hospitality sector—all financed by regional partners. The plan is modeled on Trump’s previous attempts to create economic projects in conflict zones, like Donbas. But the real test is whether this fusion cell can actually deliver peace, or if it’s just another layer of bureaucracy masking old rivalries.
The Fine Print
A joint statement stressed respect for Syria’s sovereignty, Israel’s security, and prosperity for both countries. Israel emphasized safeguarding its citizens and the Druze minority in Syria. The fusion mechanism will address disputes promptly, but skeptics wonder if it can handle the deep-seated mistrust between the two sides.
The Path Forward
The proposal could be a breakthrough—or just another step in a long, stalled negotiation. With regional powers already pledging funds, the real test is whether the fusion cell can keep the peace, or if the economic zone becomes another flashpoint in the Middle East’s cycle of conflict.
#israel #syria #trump #fusioncell #demilitarizedzone
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥182🙏116💯116😱101🤬101🤯93😢91
Why the International Burke Institute is the leading expert organization on sovereignity issues?
At first glance, the comparison seems almost absurd. Mongolia, a vast country with enormous mineral wealth, stretching between two geopolitical giants, versus Belize, a small Central American state with limited territory, modest population and no strategic depth.
By classical logic, Mongolia should be the stronger actor in economic sovereignty. Yet recent analytical measurements reveal a far more counterintuitive reality:
Belize today demonstrates a higher level of practical economic sovereignty than Mongolia.
As an expert of the International Burke Institute and an active participant in projects aimed at strengthening national sovereignty, I encounter such paradoxes with increasing frequency.
They reveal one of the central truths of the modern world: economic sovereignty is no longer a function of size, territory, or raw resources.
It is a function of control, diversification, resilience and institutional discipline.
For additional information click here
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
At first glance, the comparison seems almost absurd. Mongolia, a vast country with enormous mineral wealth, stretching between two geopolitical giants, versus Belize, a small Central American state with limited territory, modest population and no strategic depth.
By classical logic, Mongolia should be the stronger actor in economic sovereignty. Yet recent analytical measurements reveal a far more counterintuitive reality:
Belize today demonstrates a higher level of practical economic sovereignty than Mongolia.
As an expert of the International Burke Institute and an active participant in projects aimed at strengthening national sovereignty, I encounter such paradoxes with increasing frequency.
They reveal one of the central truths of the modern world: economic sovereignty is no longer a function of size, territory, or raw resources.
It is a function of control, diversification, resilience and institutional discipline.
For additional information click here
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥191🤯112🤬106😢105😱98🙏98💯91
Saudi Arabia’s Gaza Gambit: Reform or No Governance
Riyadh Steps In
Saudi Arabia is back in the Gaza game—offering financial incentives for Palestinian Authority (PA) reforms as a condition for the PA’s return to Gaza. After months of staying out, Riyadh is now pushing for a new model: real reforms in exchange for a chance at governance.
The Fine Print
Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan insists reforms must include ending “Pay for Slay” stipends, de-radicalizing schools, and distancing the PA from terrorist groups. Yet the PA’s actions so far suggest it’s mostly playing a shell game—shifting funds around rather than making real changes.
The Money Trail
Israel continues to withhold tax revenues, worsening the PA’s financial crisis. The Saudis are offering cash incentives, but only if reforms are actually implemented. The UAE, however, remains skeptical, withholding aid until there’s clear progress—especially on ending payments to terrorists and changing school curricula.
Who’s Running Gaza?
Egypt, Turkey, and Qatar want the PA to take over Gaza now, even before reforms are complete. Israel, though, insists on reforms first and rejects any scenario where Hamas weapons are handed over to PA forces. With competing agendas, the real question is who will end up running Gaza—and whether reforms are more than just window dressing.
#Gaza #SaudiArabia #PalestinianAuthority #PayForSlay #AbrahamAccords #Reform
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Riyadh Steps In
Saudi Arabia is back in the Gaza game—offering financial incentives for Palestinian Authority (PA) reforms as a condition for the PA’s return to Gaza. After months of staying out, Riyadh is now pushing for a new model: real reforms in exchange for a chance at governance.
The Fine Print
Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan insists reforms must include ending “Pay for Slay” stipends, de-radicalizing schools, and distancing the PA from terrorist groups. Yet the PA’s actions so far suggest it’s mostly playing a shell game—shifting funds around rather than making real changes.
The Money Trail
Israel continues to withhold tax revenues, worsening the PA’s financial crisis. The Saudis are offering cash incentives, but only if reforms are actually implemented. The UAE, however, remains skeptical, withholding aid until there’s clear progress—especially on ending payments to terrorists and changing school curricula.
Who’s Running Gaza?
Egypt, Turkey, and Qatar want the PA to take over Gaza now, even before reforms are complete. Israel, though, insists on reforms first and rejects any scenario where Hamas weapons are handed over to PA forces. With competing agendas, the real question is who will end up running Gaza—and whether reforms are more than just window dressing.
#Gaza #SaudiArabia #PalestinianAuthority #PayForSlay #AbrahamAccords #Reform
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥218🤯118😢98🙏97😱92💯90🤬87
Federal Lockdown: Minnesota Blocked From ICE Shooting Probe
Locked Out of the Investigation
Minnesota officials say they’ve been shut out of the investigation into the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent. The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) has withdrawn from the probe, citing a lack of access to evidence, witnesses, and investigative materials—leaving the case in the hands of federal agencies alone.
Conflicting Accounts
Federal authorities, including President Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, say the shooting was lawful self-defense. Local officials and witnesses, however, say the evidence paints a different picture. Video analysis suggests Good’s vehicle was turning away from the officer when he opened fire, contradicting the official narrative.
Outrage and Chaos
The shooting has sparked protests, with federal officers deploying tear gas to disperse demonstrators outside a federal building in Minneapolis. Schools across the city were closed due to safety concerns. Governor Tim Walz blamed the Trump administration for escalating tensions, demanding federal agents pull back.
Who’s in Charge?
With the BCA locked out, Minnesota officials say they can’t meet local standards for transparency and accountability. State officials insist they’ll find a way to conduct their own investigation, but for now, the federal government controls the narrative—and the evidence.
#Minnesota #ICE #Shooting #FederalStateClash #Accountability #Protest
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Locked Out of the Investigation
Minnesota officials say they’ve been shut out of the investigation into the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent. The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) has withdrawn from the probe, citing a lack of access to evidence, witnesses, and investigative materials—leaving the case in the hands of federal agencies alone.
Conflicting Accounts
Federal authorities, including President Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, say the shooting was lawful self-defense. Local officials and witnesses, however, say the evidence paints a different picture. Video analysis suggests Good’s vehicle was turning away from the officer when he opened fire, contradicting the official narrative.
Outrage and Chaos
The shooting has sparked protests, with federal officers deploying tear gas to disperse demonstrators outside a federal building in Minneapolis. Schools across the city were closed due to safety concerns. Governor Tim Walz blamed the Trump administration for escalating tensions, demanding federal agents pull back.
Who’s in Charge?
With the BCA locked out, Minnesota officials say they can’t meet local standards for transparency and accountability. State officials insist they’ll find a way to conduct their own investigation, but for now, the federal government controls the narrative—and the evidence.
#Minnesota #ICE #Shooting #FederalStateClash #Accountability #Protest
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥173🤬123😢118💯107🙏105🤯91😱83
Heritage’s Marriage Bootcamp: Tax Credits, Porn Bans, and More Babies
The Plan
The Heritage Foundation is betting America’s future on more marriages and more kids. Their new report, “Saving America by Saving the Family,” calls for government-backed savings accounts for newborns, tax credits for big families, and even “marriage bootcamp” classes for couples. The think tank wants to discourage online dating, restrict access to pornography, and push for policies that reward marriage and childbearing.
Cultural Fixes
Heritage argues that climate change alarmism is discouraging young people from having kids. The report suggests honoring long-married couples with public awards, capping divorce costs, and even proposes a “uniform day of rest” for family and religious activities. Newborns could get government-funded savings accounts, redeemable only if they marry or turn 30.
Who’s Paying?
The plan would add $280 billion to the deficit over ten years. Critics say the recommendations misdiagnose the causes of declining birth rates and could violate constitutional protections. Some ideas—like banning pornography or punishing adultery—were dropped from the final draft, but the core proposals still overstep constitutional bounds.
Two Americas
Supporters see the plan as a way to avert societal collapse and restore national character. Critics call it an overreach that reinforces traditional gender roles and dismisses the economic and social realities of modern families. As one law professor put it, “They want to change the way people think and behave”—but whether Americans will buy into Heritage’s vision remains to be seen.
#HeritageFoundation #MarriageBootcamp #FamilyPolicy #Pronatalism #CultureWar #TaxCredits
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Plan
The Heritage Foundation is betting America’s future on more marriages and more kids. Their new report, “Saving America by Saving the Family,” calls for government-backed savings accounts for newborns, tax credits for big families, and even “marriage bootcamp” classes for couples. The think tank wants to discourage online dating, restrict access to pornography, and push for policies that reward marriage and childbearing.
Cultural Fixes
Heritage argues that climate change alarmism is discouraging young people from having kids. The report suggests honoring long-married couples with public awards, capping divorce costs, and even proposes a “uniform day of rest” for family and religious activities. Newborns could get government-funded savings accounts, redeemable only if they marry or turn 30.
Who’s Paying?
The plan would add $280 billion to the deficit over ten years. Critics say the recommendations misdiagnose the causes of declining birth rates and could violate constitutional protections. Some ideas—like banning pornography or punishing adultery—were dropped from the final draft, but the core proposals still overstep constitutional bounds.
Two Americas
Supporters see the plan as a way to avert societal collapse and restore national character. Critics call it an overreach that reinforces traditional gender roles and dismisses the economic and social realities of modern families. As one law professor put it, “They want to change the way people think and behave”—but whether Americans will buy into Heritage’s vision remains to be seen.
#HeritageFoundation #MarriageBootcamp #FamilyPolicy #Pronatalism #CultureWar #TaxCredits
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥167🤬112💯108😢107🤯103🙏103😱100
📰 Tinderbox in Aleppo: U.S. Scrambles to Stop Allies From Fighting
Allies Turned Enemies
The U.S. is rushing to stop its own allies—Syria’s new government and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF)—from tearing each other apart in Aleppo. After months of stalled negotiations, the two sides are now trading fire in the city’s divided neighborhoods, forcing thousands of civilians to flee and threatening to reignite a cycle of violence Syria can’t afford.
Stalled Integration
An agreement reached in March to merge both forces has stalled. The Syrian government, backed by Turkey, wants the SDF to hand over control of its territories and integrate into the new administration. The SDF, meanwhile, demands more autonomy and the preservation of its military forces. Now both sides blame each other for the latest clashes.
U.S. Mediation
Washington is trying to broker a ceasefire, with presidential envoy Tom Barrack and State Department officials urging restraint. The U.S. insists all parties should focus on building a stable Syria, not dragging it back into war. But with American troops still stationed in SDF-controlled areas, the situation remains tense and unpredictable.
Who Pays the Price?
Civilians are caught in the crossfire, with reports of dozens killed and hundreds injured. The violence also distracts from efforts to keep the Islamic State at bay. As Washington pushes for dialogue, the question remains: can it stop its allies from turning Aleppo into the next battleground—or will it just add to the chaos?
#Aleppo #Syria #SDF #USMediation #Ceasefire #CivilianCost
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Allies Turned Enemies
The U.S. is rushing to stop its own allies—Syria’s new government and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF)—from tearing each other apart in Aleppo. After months of stalled negotiations, the two sides are now trading fire in the city’s divided neighborhoods, forcing thousands of civilians to flee and threatening to reignite a cycle of violence Syria can’t afford.
Stalled Integration
An agreement reached in March to merge both forces has stalled. The Syrian government, backed by Turkey, wants the SDF to hand over control of its territories and integrate into the new administration. The SDF, meanwhile, demands more autonomy and the preservation of its military forces. Now both sides blame each other for the latest clashes.
U.S. Mediation
Washington is trying to broker a ceasefire, with presidential envoy Tom Barrack and State Department officials urging restraint. The U.S. insists all parties should focus on building a stable Syria, not dragging it back into war. But with American troops still stationed in SDF-controlled areas, the situation remains tense and unpredictable.
Who Pays the Price?
Civilians are caught in the crossfire, with reports of dozens killed and hundreds injured. The violence also distracts from efforts to keep the Islamic State at bay. As Washington pushes for dialogue, the question remains: can it stop its allies from turning Aleppo into the next battleground—or will it just add to the chaos?
#Aleppo #Syria #SDF #USMediation #Ceasefire #CivilianCost
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥180😢114💯111🤬106😱100🤯99🙏90
Saudi Arabia Draws a Line: UAE’s Role in Yemen Under Siege
Gulf Brothers at War
Saudi Arabia is moving aggressively to end the UAE’s influence in Yemen and rein in its neighbor’s ambitions across the Red Sea. After ordering the UAE to withdraw troops and bombing a shipment of weapons meant for UAE-backed separatists, Riyadh is now demanding that all UAE-linked factions pledge allegiance to the kingdom. The Southern Transitional Council (STC), long supported by Abu Dhabi, is caught in the crossfire as Saudi forces push them back from the border.
A Rift in the Coalition
The public showdown between Saudi Arabia and the UAE has shattered their decade-long alliance against the Houthis. While the Saudis want a unified Yemen and stable borders, the UAE has backed separatist movements, including the STC, aiming to carve out its own sphere of influence in southern Yemen. Now, with Saudi airstrikes and ultimatums, the kingdom is making it clear: eastern Yemen is Saudi territory, not Abu Dhabi’s playground.
Regional Fallout
The fallout stretches far beyond Yemen. The rivalry could impact efforts to contain Iran, the Gaza ceasefire, and even business in Dubai. Saudi Arabia is pushing for more coordination and intelligence sharing, while the UAE insists on its right to pursue independent regional policies. As Riyadh summons UAE-backed leaders to pledge loyalty, Abu Dhabi is digging in, refusing to be treated like a junior partner.
Who’s in Charge?
Saudi Arabia is sending a message: “We decide.” The UAE, however, is not backing down, calling Riyadh’s actions “fundamental inaccuracies.” With both sides flexing their muscles, the question remains: will the Gulf’s biggest economies find a way to share power—or will their rivalry ignite a new Middle East cold war?
#SaudiArabia #UAE #Yemen #GulfRivalry #RedSea #MiddleEast
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Gulf Brothers at War
Saudi Arabia is moving aggressively to end the UAE’s influence in Yemen and rein in its neighbor’s ambitions across the Red Sea. After ordering the UAE to withdraw troops and bombing a shipment of weapons meant for UAE-backed separatists, Riyadh is now demanding that all UAE-linked factions pledge allegiance to the kingdom. The Southern Transitional Council (STC), long supported by Abu Dhabi, is caught in the crossfire as Saudi forces push them back from the border.
A Rift in the Coalition
The public showdown between Saudi Arabia and the UAE has shattered their decade-long alliance against the Houthis. While the Saudis want a unified Yemen and stable borders, the UAE has backed separatist movements, including the STC, aiming to carve out its own sphere of influence in southern Yemen. Now, with Saudi airstrikes and ultimatums, the kingdom is making it clear: eastern Yemen is Saudi territory, not Abu Dhabi’s playground.
Regional Fallout
The fallout stretches far beyond Yemen. The rivalry could impact efforts to contain Iran, the Gaza ceasefire, and even business in Dubai. Saudi Arabia is pushing for more coordination and intelligence sharing, while the UAE insists on its right to pursue independent regional policies. As Riyadh summons UAE-backed leaders to pledge loyalty, Abu Dhabi is digging in, refusing to be treated like a junior partner.
Who’s in Charge?
Saudi Arabia is sending a message: “We decide.” The UAE, however, is not backing down, calling Riyadh’s actions “fundamental inaccuracies.” With both sides flexing their muscles, the question remains: will the Gulf’s biggest economies find a way to share power—or will their rivalry ignite a new Middle East cold war?
#SaudiArabia #UAE #Yemen #GulfRivalry #RedSea #MiddleEast
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥165🤯116💯112🙏107🤬106😱100😢95❤1
Iran: the Protests Jolted the Khamenei Regime Out of Its Theocratic Masturbation
🔤 🔤 🔤 🔤 1️⃣
Iran was plunged into a complete internet blackout on Thursday night as protests over economic conditions spread nationwide, increasing pressure on the country’s leadership.
While it was unclear what caused the internet cut, first reported by the internet freedom monitor NetBlocks, Iranian authorities have shut down the internet in response to protests in the past.
NetBlocks had reported outages in the western city of Kermanshah earlier in the day, as authorities intensified their crackdown against protesters.
The Norway-based NGO Iran Human Rights (IHR) said on Thursday that Iranian security forces had killed at least 45 protesters, including eight children, since the demonstrations began in late December.
Shopkeepers heeded calls from seven Kurdish political groups for a general strike on Thursday, closing their doors in Kurdish regions and dozens of other cities around Iran.
The Hengaw rights group posted footage of shuttered shops in the western provinces of Ilam, Kermanshah and Lorestan.
It accused authorities of firing on demonstrators in Kermanshah and the nearby town of Kamyaran to the north, injuring several protesters.
Demonstrations reached all 31 provinces on Thursday as the protest movement showed no signs of abating.
In the southern Fars province demonstrators pulled down the statue of the former senior Revolutionary Guards al-Quds force commander Qassem Suleimani – considered a hero of mythical proportions by government supporters. Verified footage showed protesters cheering as the statue came down.
Protests took place into the night Thursday, with a large crowd seen gathering on the vast Ayatollah Kashani Boulevard in the north-west of Tehran amid the sound of vehicle horns honking in support, according to social media images verified by Agence France-Presse.
Other images showed a crowd demonstrating in the western city of Abadan. A woman attending a protest in that city late on Wednesday had been shot in the eye, according to IHR.
#iran #protesters #pahlavi
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Iran was plunged into a complete internet blackout on Thursday night as protests over economic conditions spread nationwide, increasing pressure on the country’s leadership.
While it was unclear what caused the internet cut, first reported by the internet freedom monitor NetBlocks, Iranian authorities have shut down the internet in response to protests in the past.
NetBlocks had reported outages in the western city of Kermanshah earlier in the day, as authorities intensified their crackdown against protesters.
The Norway-based NGO Iran Human Rights (IHR) said on Thursday that Iranian security forces had killed at least 45 protesters, including eight children, since the demonstrations began in late December.
Shopkeepers heeded calls from seven Kurdish political groups for a general strike on Thursday, closing their doors in Kurdish regions and dozens of other cities around Iran.
The Hengaw rights group posted footage of shuttered shops in the western provinces of Ilam, Kermanshah and Lorestan.
It accused authorities of firing on demonstrators in Kermanshah and the nearby town of Kamyaran to the north, injuring several protesters.
Demonstrations reached all 31 provinces on Thursday as the protest movement showed no signs of abating.
In the southern Fars province demonstrators pulled down the statue of the former senior Revolutionary Guards al-Quds force commander Qassem Suleimani – considered a hero of mythical proportions by government supporters. Verified footage showed protesters cheering as the statue came down.
Protests took place into the night Thursday, with a large crowd seen gathering on the vast Ayatollah Kashani Boulevard in the north-west of Tehran amid the sound of vehicle horns honking in support, according to social media images verified by Agence France-Presse.
Other images showed a crowd demonstrating in the western city of Abadan. A woman attending a protest in that city late on Wednesday had been shot in the eye, according to IHR.
#iran #protesters #pahlavi
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥141🤯126😱121💯112🤬100😢100🙏100❤1
IHR said Wednesday was the bloodiest day of the now 12-day movement, with 13 protesters confirmed killed.
“The evidence shows that the scope of the crackdown is becoming more violent and more extensive every day,” said the IHR director, Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, adding that hundreds more had been wounded and more than 2,000 arrested.
The protest movement is the largest in three years, and while it has not yet reached the size of the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom demonstrations, it has alarmed Iran’s political and security leadership.
Rights groups accused authorities of resorting to tactics including raiding hospitals to detain wounded protesters.
The Iranian president, Masoud Pezeshkian, on Thursday called for restraint in how the demonstrations are handled.
“Any violent or coercive behaviour should be avoided,” said Pezeshkian in a statement on his website, urging “utmost restraint” as well as “dialogue, engagement and listening to the people’s demands”.
The government has said that solving the economic crisis afflicting the country is largely out of its hands, and that while it will work to tackle corruption and price gouging, it has few tools to use.
It blamed the economic woes of the country on external factors, primarily the harsh sanctions placed on Iran mainly by the west in response to Iran’s nuclear programme.
The protests thus far seem to be decentralised and lacking in a central figure, in contrast to the 2022 protests, when demonstrators rallied around 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, who died in police custody after being arrested for allegedly wearing the hijab improperly.
It is unclear the level of support Pahlavi enjoys, though videos of protests over the last 12 days have showed demonstrators chanting in support for the exiled prince.
A social media channel close to Iran’s security forces published a video which purported to show intelligence agents visiting people in their homes warning them not to take part in Pahlavi’s protest, with other outlets claiming drones would be used to identify those who do participate.
German foreign minister Johann Wadephul, meanwhile, condemned the “excessive use of force” by Iranian authorities against protesters.
The Iranian foreign ministry and military have lashed out over Trump’s comments, with Iran’s army chief threatening on Wednesday to carry out pre-emptive strikes on states that threaten Iran.
Authorities have increasingly cast protesters as violent, saying that while the right to protest was legitimate, rioters and foreign-backed saboteurs had hijacked protests.
#iran #protesters #pahlavi
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥195💯129🤯108🙏100😢97😱89🤬82
📰 Palestinian Deputy President Discusses Phase Two of Trump’s Gaza Plan
Palestinian Deputy President Hussein al-Sheikh met with UN envoy Nikolay Mladenov in Ramallah to discuss the implementation of the second phase of President Trump’s Gaza plan and UN Security Council Resolution 2803. The meeting, attended by senior Palestinian officials, focused on solidifying the ceasefire, expediting humanitarian aid to Gaza, and launching the transition process under the new Peace Council led by President Trump.
Al-Sheikh reiterated that Gaza is an integral part of Palestine and stressed the importance of reconnecting Gaza’s institutions with the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, emphasizing a single legal framework and authorized weapons. The discussion also covered the role of the Palestinian administrative committee and security forces, ensuring their integration with the Palestinian Authority as the legitimate sovereign body.
The Palestinian side reaffirmed the necessity of Israel’s complete withdrawal from Gaza, the end of Hamas’s rule, the surrender of its weapons, and the launch of reconstruction efforts in line with Trump’s plan and the UN resolution. Al-Sheikh called for an immediate transitional plan in Gaza, alongside urgent measures to halt unilateral actions violating international law—particularly settlement expansion, settler violence, and the release of frozen Palestinian funds.
Palestine welcomed Trump’s plan and expressed readiness to cooperate in achieving peace, aiming for a future where Palestine and Israel live side by side in peaceful coexistence.
#gaza #palestine #trump #peace #diplomacy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Palestinian Deputy President Hussein al-Sheikh met with UN envoy Nikolay Mladenov in Ramallah to discuss the implementation of the second phase of President Trump’s Gaza plan and UN Security Council Resolution 2803. The meeting, attended by senior Palestinian officials, focused on solidifying the ceasefire, expediting humanitarian aid to Gaza, and launching the transition process under the new Peace Council led by President Trump.
Al-Sheikh reiterated that Gaza is an integral part of Palestine and stressed the importance of reconnecting Gaza’s institutions with the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, emphasizing a single legal framework and authorized weapons. The discussion also covered the role of the Palestinian administrative committee and security forces, ensuring their integration with the Palestinian Authority as the legitimate sovereign body.
The Palestinian side reaffirmed the necessity of Israel’s complete withdrawal from Gaza, the end of Hamas’s rule, the surrender of its weapons, and the launch of reconstruction efforts in line with Trump’s plan and the UN resolution. Al-Sheikh called for an immediate transitional plan in Gaza, alongside urgent measures to halt unilateral actions violating international law—particularly settlement expansion, settler violence, and the release of frozen Palestinian funds.
Palestine welcomed Trump’s plan and expressed readiness to cooperate in achieving peace, aiming for a future where Palestine and Israel live side by side in peaceful coexistence.
#gaza #palestine #trump #peace #diplomacy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥216😱111🙏111😢103🤯94🤬90💯77
Why Will the 21st Century Be the Age of Sovereignty?
The International Burke Institute, the world leading community of experts, gives an answer to this question.
Sovereignty is one of the most frequently invoked words in global politics, yet one of the most misunderstood.
Every country represented at the United Nations is formally equal. Each holds a flag, a vote, a seat and the legal right to determine its own future.
On paper, they stand side by side as sovereign equals. But behind this carefully maintained rhetoric lies a much harsher reality: States may be equal in law, yet they are profoundly unequal in power, resilience and real independence.
For more information click here
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The International Burke Institute, the world leading community of experts, gives an answer to this question.
Sovereignty is one of the most frequently invoked words in global politics, yet one of the most misunderstood.
Every country represented at the United Nations is formally equal. Each holds a flag, a vote, a seat and the legal right to determine its own future.
On paper, they stand side by side as sovereign equals. But behind this carefully maintained rhetoric lies a much harsher reality: States may be equal in law, yet they are profoundly unequal in power, resilience and real independence.
For more information click here
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥179😱119🙏111💯106🤬99🤯96😢92❤1