*FIDIC Red Book 2nd Edition of 2017: Sub-Clause 18.3 Duty to Minimise Delay*
*Introduction*
Sub-Clause 18.3 of the FIDIC Red Book 2017 emphasises the duty to minimise delay resulting from Exceptional Events. This sub-clause is crucial in ensuring that parties to the contract take proactive measures to mitigate delays and their consequences.
*Definition of Exceptional Events*
An Exceptional Event is defined under Sub-Clause 18.1 as an event or circumstance that meets four conditions:
* *Beyond a Party's Control*: The event must be beyond the control of the party affected.
* *Unforeseeable*: The party could not have reasonably provided against the event before entering the contract.
* *Unavoidable*: The party could not have reasonably avoided or overcome the event after it arose.
* *Not Attributable to the Other Party*: The event is not substantially attributable to the other party.
*Cumulative Requirements for Exceptional Event Claims*
Outline the seven tests that a Party must satisfy to claim an Exceptional Event, as mentioned in the provided text. These tests can be summarised as follows:
- Beyond a Party's Control
- Unforeseeable
- Unavoidable
- Not substantially attributable to the other Party
- Prevention from performing obligations
- Proper notice given
- Reasonable endeavours to minimise delay
*Notice Requirements*
If a Party is prevented from performing any obligations under the contract due to an Exceptional Event, they must give notice to the other Party within 14 days after becoming aware of the event. The notice must specify the obligation, the performance of which is or will be prevented.
*Notice of Cessation*
Emphasise that a Party affected by an Exceptional Event must give notice to the other Party when it ceases to be affected. However, there is no express sanction for failing to give such notice.
*Duty to Minimise Delay*
Sub-Clause 18.3 stipulates that each Party must use all reasonable endeavours to minimise any delay in the performance of obligations resulting from an Exceptional Event. The affected Party must give further notices to the other Party if the Exceptional Event has a continuing effect.
*Mitigation of Other Losses*
Clarify that while Sub-Clause 18.3 specifically mentions minimising delay, general legal principles may imply a mitigation requirement for other losses or consequences resulting from Exceptional Events.
*Mitigation of Delay and Loss: Contractor's Duties and Limitations*
The Society of Construction Law's Delay and Disruption Protocol 2nd Edition: February 2017 in accordance with Section CORE PRINCIPLES "15. Mitigation of delay and mitigation of loss" emphasises the importance of mitigation in construction contracts. Specifically, it outlines the Contractor's general duty to mitigate the effects of Employer Risk Events on their works.
*Key Principles*
1. *Reasonable Mitigation*: The Contractor must take reasonable steps to minimise their loss and avoid unreasonable actions that increase their loss.
2. *No Additional Resources*: _Unless specified in the contract or agreed upon, the Contractor is not required to add extra resources or work outside their planned hours to mitigate delay._
3. *Notification*: If the Contractor intends to pace non-critical activities, they should notify the Employer and Contract Administrator (CA) of their intention and reasons.
*Limitations on Mitigation*
1. *No Duty to Exceed Original Scope Efficiency*: _The Contractor is not obligated to carry out changes in scope more efficiently than the original scope._
2. *No Obligation to Expend Money*: _The Contractor is not required to spend money to mitigate the effects of an Employer Risk Event._
3. *Employer's Agreement to Pay*: _If the Employer wants the Contractor to take measures to mitigate delay, they should agree to pay for the costs of those efforts._
*Introduction*
Sub-Clause 18.3 of the FIDIC Red Book 2017 emphasises the duty to minimise delay resulting from Exceptional Events. This sub-clause is crucial in ensuring that parties to the contract take proactive measures to mitigate delays and their consequences.
*Definition of Exceptional Events*
An Exceptional Event is defined under Sub-Clause 18.1 as an event or circumstance that meets four conditions:
* *Beyond a Party's Control*: The event must be beyond the control of the party affected.
* *Unforeseeable*: The party could not have reasonably provided against the event before entering the contract.
* *Unavoidable*: The party could not have reasonably avoided or overcome the event after it arose.
* *Not Attributable to the Other Party*: The event is not substantially attributable to the other party.
*Cumulative Requirements for Exceptional Event Claims*
Outline the seven tests that a Party must satisfy to claim an Exceptional Event, as mentioned in the provided text. These tests can be summarised as follows:
- Beyond a Party's Control
- Unforeseeable
- Unavoidable
- Not substantially attributable to the other Party
- Prevention from performing obligations
- Proper notice given
- Reasonable endeavours to minimise delay
*Notice Requirements*
If a Party is prevented from performing any obligations under the contract due to an Exceptional Event, they must give notice to the other Party within 14 days after becoming aware of the event. The notice must specify the obligation, the performance of which is or will be prevented.
*Notice of Cessation*
Emphasise that a Party affected by an Exceptional Event must give notice to the other Party when it ceases to be affected. However, there is no express sanction for failing to give such notice.
*Duty to Minimise Delay*
Sub-Clause 18.3 stipulates that each Party must use all reasonable endeavours to minimise any delay in the performance of obligations resulting from an Exceptional Event. The affected Party must give further notices to the other Party if the Exceptional Event has a continuing effect.
*Mitigation of Other Losses*
Clarify that while Sub-Clause 18.3 specifically mentions minimising delay, general legal principles may imply a mitigation requirement for other losses or consequences resulting from Exceptional Events.
*Mitigation of Delay and Loss: Contractor's Duties and Limitations*
The Society of Construction Law's Delay and Disruption Protocol 2nd Edition: February 2017 in accordance with Section CORE PRINCIPLES "15. Mitigation of delay and mitigation of loss" emphasises the importance of mitigation in construction contracts. Specifically, it outlines the Contractor's general duty to mitigate the effects of Employer Risk Events on their works.
*Key Principles*
1. *Reasonable Mitigation*: The Contractor must take reasonable steps to minimise their loss and avoid unreasonable actions that increase their loss.
2. *No Additional Resources*: _Unless specified in the contract or agreed upon, the Contractor is not required to add extra resources or work outside their planned hours to mitigate delay._
3. *Notification*: If the Contractor intends to pace non-critical activities, they should notify the Employer and Contract Administrator (CA) of their intention and reasons.
*Limitations on Mitigation*
1. *No Duty to Exceed Original Scope Efficiency*: _The Contractor is not obligated to carry out changes in scope more efficiently than the original scope._
2. *No Obligation to Expend Money*: _The Contractor is not required to spend money to mitigate the effects of an Employer Risk Event._
3. *Employer's Agreement to Pay*: _If the Employer wants the Contractor to take measures to mitigate delay, they should agree to pay for the costs of those efforts._
❤5👍1
*Contractor's Obligations*
1. *Complete on or Before Completion Date*: The Contractor must proceed with the works to complete on or before the completion date.
2. *Discretion on Method, Speed, and Timing*: The Contractor generally has discretion over the method, speed, and timing of activities, subject to any stipulated prior process of acceptance of method and/or programme.
*Changes to Scope*
1. *Similar Obligation as to Efficiency*: The Contractor has a similar obligation to efficiency in relation to the changed scope as they have to the original scope.
In summary, the Contractor has a duty to mitigate the effects of Employer Risk Events, but this duty is limited to reasonable actions and does not require them to add extra resources or expend money. The Employer should agree to pay for any additional measures taken to mitigate delay.
*Dispute Resolution*
In the event of a dispute arising from the contractor's duty to mitigate delay, the parties should follow the dispute resolution procedures outlined in the contract. This may include negotiation, mediation, or arbitration.
*Conclusion*
In conclusion, Sub-Clause 18.3 of the FIDIC Red Book 2017 emphasises the duty to minimise delay resulting from Exceptional Events. The contractor's duty to mitigate delay and loss is limited to reasonable actions and does not require them to add extra resources or expend money without the Employer's agreement to pay.
*Best Practices*
To ensure effective management of Exceptional Events and mitigation of delay, parties should:
1. *Clearly define Exceptional Events*: In the contract, clearly outline what constitutes an Exceptional Event.
2. *Establish communication protocols*: Set up clear communication channels for notification of Exceptional Events and mitigation efforts.
3. *Document mitigation efforts*: Keep detailed records of mitigation efforts, including costs incurred and resources allocated.
*Final Thoughts*
Understanding the provisions of Sub-Clause 18.3 and the related principles outlined in the Society of Construction Law's Delay and Disruption Protocol 2nd Edition is crucial for effective contract management and dispute avoidance. By following best practices and clearly understanding their obligations, parties can minimise delays and losses resulting from Exceptional Events.
1. *Complete on or Before Completion Date*: The Contractor must proceed with the works to complete on or before the completion date.
2. *Discretion on Method, Speed, and Timing*: The Contractor generally has discretion over the method, speed, and timing of activities, subject to any stipulated prior process of acceptance of method and/or programme.
*Changes to Scope*
1. *Similar Obligation as to Efficiency*: The Contractor has a similar obligation to efficiency in relation to the changed scope as they have to the original scope.
In summary, the Contractor has a duty to mitigate the effects of Employer Risk Events, but this duty is limited to reasonable actions and does not require them to add extra resources or expend money. The Employer should agree to pay for any additional measures taken to mitigate delay.
*Dispute Resolution*
In the event of a dispute arising from the contractor's duty to mitigate delay, the parties should follow the dispute resolution procedures outlined in the contract. This may include negotiation, mediation, or arbitration.
*Conclusion*
In conclusion, Sub-Clause 18.3 of the FIDIC Red Book 2017 emphasises the duty to minimise delay resulting from Exceptional Events. The contractor's duty to mitigate delay and loss is limited to reasonable actions and does not require them to add extra resources or expend money without the Employer's agreement to pay.
*Best Practices*
To ensure effective management of Exceptional Events and mitigation of delay, parties should:
1. *Clearly define Exceptional Events*: In the contract, clearly outline what constitutes an Exceptional Event.
2. *Establish communication protocols*: Set up clear communication channels for notification of Exceptional Events and mitigation efforts.
3. *Document mitigation efforts*: Keep detailed records of mitigation efforts, including costs incurred and resources allocated.
*Final Thoughts*
Understanding the provisions of Sub-Clause 18.3 and the related principles outlined in the Society of Construction Law's Delay and Disruption Protocol 2nd Edition is crucial for effective contract management and dispute avoidance. By following best practices and clearly understanding their obligations, parties can minimise delays and losses resulting from Exceptional Events.
❤2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Bridge Deck slab