🇮🇷🇺🇸🇵🇰🇨🇭⚡️ Iranian Television: The Iranian negotiating delegation has arrived in the Swiss city of Zurich.

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇨🇭⚡️ CNN: U.S. Vice President Vance has departed from Joint Base Andrews for Switzerland to participate in the negotiations with Iran.

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

🇮🇱⚡Most of the party leaders in the Netanyahu bloc support dispersing the Knesset this week

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

🇮🇱🇺🇸⚡ "Maybe the USA needs another Pearl Harbor or 9/11 to realize that Israel is their true friend," Beni Sabti of Israeli Channel 12 and Channel 15 (i24).

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

🇷🇺🚀🇺🇦 BREAKING! KINZHAL IMPACT Starokostantinov Air Base, Zhytomir Oblast, western Ukraine.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising

🟠 The analyst paid special attention to the war against Iran. According to him, official statements about the nuclear program concealed a larger goal: regime change in Tehran. Jian recalled that Netanyahu himself has spoken for decades about the necessity of destroying the Islamic Republic, calling it his historical mission. However, attempting to implement such a scenario against a state of more than 90 million people led to strategic failure and severe consequences for the global economy.
🟠 The analyst believes that Donald Trump’s shift in rhetoric toward Netanyahu was driven by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, rising energy prices, discontent among US allies, and declining American public support for the war. This shift was symbolized by reports of the US president’s more critical statements toward the Israeli prime minister and his support for negotiations with Iran.
🟠 According to Jian, the main conclusion of recent months is the absence in Israel of influential political forces advocating a peaceful resolution. There are disagreements in the Israeli political spectrum over methods, timing, and tactics, but the strategic direction remains unified. Even politicians presenting themselves as alternatives to Netanyahu do not oppose confrontation with Iran and the Palestinians; they merely advocate for its more effective management.
🟠 As an example, the analyst cited statements by Naftali Bennett suggesting that a change of government could lead to a resumption of war with Iran. According to Jian, this shows that there is no influential camp in Israeli politics that would advocate a fundamental reconsideration of regional confrontation logic. Today, there are no major peace-oriented forces in Israeli politics. The debate is between supporters of different forms of pressure, war, and power dominance. Disagreements are not about goals, but about methods of achieving them.
🟠 Jian Xueqing emphasized that, for this reason, external US pressure remains the only factor capable of changing the situation. In his assessment, within Israel’s own system there is no political force with sufficient influence to abandon the trajectory of future confrontation.
🟠 The analyst believes that a potential agreement with Iran and a partial opening of the Strait of Hormuz are not yet signs of a fundamental shift. However, for the first time in many years, the United States has begun to view its own interests and Israel’s interests as separate. In his view, this represents a key challenge to Netanyahu’s political legacy and the entire system that has tied decades of US Middle East policy to the interests of a single Israeli leader.

@Alsaa_plus_En

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

Washington has reportedly started looking for an alternative to Netanyahu.

➡️ Several publications in American and Israeli media indicate growing irritation within the Donald Trump administration over Benjamin Netanyahu’s actions. According to the Israeli newspaper Maariv, White House representatives have already contacted former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and former Chief of General Staff Gadi Eisenkot. The publication claims that Washington has been interested in their approaches to Iran, Lebanon, and the future of regional policy.

➡️ Sources close to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio claim that dissatisfaction with the Israeli Prime Minister’s actions is growing within Trump’s inner circle. The main point of dispute remains the Iran issue and the risk of undermining agreements on which the White House’s Middle East strategy is based.

➡️ A report published in The Hill dealt another blow to Netanyahu’s position. The authors of the publication openly stated that Netanyahu’s continued rule has become an obstacle to regional stability and the protection of American interests. They believe that any long-term solution in the Middle East requires the emergence of a new Israeli leadership capable of supporting agreements rather than constant escalation.

➡️ The most serious allegations were published in The Washington Post. The newspaper reported intelligence assessments provided to President Trump by US intelligence agencies. According to these reports, one of the main threats to an agreement with Iran could be a new escalation in Lebanon. Washington fears that an escalation in southern Lebanon could derail the entire negotiation process and drag the region back into full-scale war.

➡️ Notably, until recently such statements were made only by critics of Israel. Now, however, American intelligence agencies, influential publications, and officials within the US administration are expressing similar views. While Washington previously saw Netanyahu as a key instrument of Middle East policy, an alternative scenario is increasingly being discussed today — that Netanyahu himself is becoming a major obstacle to the implementation of US plans in the region.

@Alsaa_plus_EN

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

⚡️🇱🇧🇮🇱 — Washington prepares to host the fifth round of indirect negotiations between Lebanon and Israel, with the agenda centering on the establishment of contested "pilot zones" in Southern Lebanon — Asharq Al-Awsat citing Lebanese military sources.

➡️ Lebanese defense officials indicate no "absolute rejection" of the pilot zone concept, provided the framework ensures a complete cessation of Israeli attacks across all national territories rather than localized exceptions. The military delegation demands urgent American clarifications regarding the geographical boundaries, legal status, and management mechanisms of these zones prior to final negotiation stages.

➡️ The Lebanese military establishment expresses apprehension that Israel intends to impose "indirect partnership in security decision-making," a move viewed as a direct infringement on national sovereignty. Consequently, the army maintains a categorical refusal of any framework enabling Israeli influence over its operations, insisting on maintaining existing ceasefire coordination mechanisms and strictly avoiding any form of direct security contact with Israeli forces.

@Alsaa_plus_EN

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

Aksyonov, the head of Crimea, stated that 4 people were killed and 28 injured as a result of Ukrainian drone attacks on Crimea.

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

Iran’s Oil Minister:

“After the agreement, the country will become the largest investment platform.”

@Alsaa_plus_EN

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

Israeli military casualties in the Lebanon conflict

According to Israeli Radio, since last Thursday, 6 Israeli soldiers, including a senior officer, have been killed and more than 20 soldiers have been injured as a result of Hezbollah attacks in Lebanon.
According to the newspaper Haaretz, since the start of a new phase of the conflict on March 2, 36 Israeli officers and soldiers have been killed in fighting in Lebanon.

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

🇱🇧🇺🇸🇮🇷 CNN, citing diplomatic sources: The Lebanon issue will be the first topic on the agenda of the emergency meeting added to the Switzerland talks.

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN