Keywords - demographic dividend, demographic transition, working age population, workforce population
Join -: @AgentsofUPSC
Join -: @AgentsofUPSC
π―5
in case a foreign fund buys below 10% stake in a corporation, such an investment shall be considered as FPI irrespective of the route selected. On the other hand, in case the ownership of an FPI in a corporation crosses 10%, then such an investment shall be considered FDI.
FDI vs FPI vs DII
IPO vs FPO
Primary market vs secondary market
In this question, UPSC interchanged option A,C and D
Join -: @AgentsofUPSC
FDI vs FPI vs DII
IPO vs FPO
Primary market vs secondary market
In this question, UPSC interchanged option A,C and D
Join -: @AgentsofUPSC
π3π1
Forwarded from IAS Corridor (Coaching Mafia)
215 IFS officers will be added in next 5 years
β€9π₯°3
ExplainSpeaking: How to read Indiaβs latest employment data π
#india_employment #unemployment_rate_india
#india_employment #unemployment_rate_india
The Indian Express
ExplainSpeaking: How to read Indiaβs latest employment data
India's official employment data shows that while the unemployment rate has fallen, the quality of jobs getting created is getting worse even as monthly earnings have remained largely stagnant since 2017
Periodic_Labour_Force_Survey_PLFS_data_for_India,_covering_July.pdf
629.9 KB
Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) data for India, covering July 2022 to June 2023, reveals the following key points:
#GS3 #Mains #data
#GS3 #Mains #data
π3π2
Agents of UPSC CSE π©
solid_waste_management_and_the_integration_of_the_informal_sector.pdf
"I was discussing this topic with my non-UPSC Fraands They shared valuable insights, and also had similar ideas. However, the distinction lies in the fact that what they explained couldn't be directly incorporated into GS papers due to the absence of appropriate GS keywords. Therefore, it's important to make a habit of noting down relevant keywords when studying different topics, as good keywords can significantly enhance your chances of scoring well."
β€7
Right to marry .pdf
94.7 KB
The Supreme Court is responsible for interpreting aspects of the Constitution that are not explicitly clear, and its interpretations may evolve over time.
π₯7
Agents of UPSC CSE π©
Right to marry .pdf
In the context of the recent Supreme Court verdict in India, the question of whether the right to marry is considered a fundamental right was debated among the judges.
The minority view, as expressed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Chandrachud, did not agree with the idea that the right to marry is a fundamental right in itself. Instead, the minority view suggested that marriage may have attained significance due to state regulation through law, and it may not be inherently fundamental.
The majority view also leaned towards the idea that the fundamental importance of marriage lies in personal preference and social status rather than it being an enforceable fundamental right. In this view, personal preferences, even if widely accepted or supported, do not necessarily qualify as fundamental rights.
Ultimately, in this specific case, the Supreme Court did not declare the right to marry as an enforceable fundamental right under the Constitution. The majority opinion left the issue of same-sex marriage to the domain of the legislature rather than asserting it as a fundamental right. It's essential to note that the recognition of the right to marry as a fundamental right can vary from one jurisdiction to another and is subject to legal interpretation.
The minority view, as expressed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Chandrachud, did not agree with the idea that the right to marry is a fundamental right in itself. Instead, the minority view suggested that marriage may have attained significance due to state regulation through law, and it may not be inherently fundamental.
The majority view also leaned towards the idea that the fundamental importance of marriage lies in personal preference and social status rather than it being an enforceable fundamental right. In this view, personal preferences, even if widely accepted or supported, do not necessarily qualify as fundamental rights.
Ultimately, in this specific case, the Supreme Court did not declare the right to marry as an enforceable fundamental right under the Constitution. The majority opinion left the issue of same-sex marriage to the domain of the legislature rather than asserting it as a fundamental right. It's essential to note that the recognition of the right to marry as a fundamental right can vary from one jurisdiction to another and is subject to legal interpretation.
π―8