Agents of UPSC CSE π©
keyterms of past week with MCQs .pdf
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Kuch nahi bro, vo bss rule no 267 samjhne ki kosis kar raha hu π₯² doodh ka doodh pani ka pani hota hai bss itna samaj aaya π
According to the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha), under Rule 267, βAny member, may, with the consent of the Chairman, move that any rule may be suspended in its application to a motion related to the business listed before the Council of that day
According to the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha), under Rule 267, βAny member, may, with the consent of the Chairman, move that any rule may be suspended in its application to a motion related to the business listed before the Council of that day
π6
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What is the Committee of Privileges in Parliament?
β This committee consists of 15 members in Lok Sabha ( 10 in case of Rajya Sabha) nominated by the Speaker (Chairman in case of Rajya Sabha).
β Parliamentary privileges are defined in Article 105 of the Indian Constitution and those of State legislatures in Article 194.
β In the Rajya Sabha, the deputy chairperson heads the committee of privileges.
Powers and Functions:
β The committee examines every question involving a breach of privilege of the House or of the members or of any Committee thereof referred to it by the House or by the Speaker/Chairman.
β It also determines with reference to the facts of each case whether a breach of privilege is involved and makes suitable recommendations in its report.
Join - @AgentsofUPSC π·
β This committee consists of 15 members in Lok Sabha ( 10 in case of Rajya Sabha) nominated by the Speaker (Chairman in case of Rajya Sabha).
β Parliamentary privileges are defined in Article 105 of the Indian Constitution and those of State legislatures in Article 194.
β In the Rajya Sabha, the deputy chairperson heads the committee of privileges.
Powers and Functions:
β The committee examines every question involving a breach of privilege of the House or of the members or of any Committee thereof referred to it by the House or by the Speaker/Chairman.
β It also determines with reference to the facts of each case whether a breach of privilege is involved and makes suitable recommendations in its report.
Join - @AgentsofUPSC π·
π3
India's interest in Central Asia #gs2.pdf
2.1 MB
UPSC Essentials | Mains answer practice : β
India's Interest In Central Asia #GS2 #2024
Join - @AgentsofUPSC π·
Join - @AgentsofUPSC π·
π―2β1
Judiciary's pro active role #gs2.pdf
1.6 MB
UPSC Essentials | Mains answer practice : β
Judiciary's Pro Active Role #Gs2 #2024
Join - @AgentsofUPSC π·
Join - @AgentsofUPSC π·
β‘2β1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
RaGa went to Azadpur Mandi to know why price of vegetables is high.
Vendors told them that there are 5 middlemen in between Farmers and them. If one buys directly from farmers, cost is less.
Vendors told them that there are 5 middlemen in between Farmers and them. If one buys directly from farmers, cost is less.
Agents of UPSC CSE π©
RaGa went to Azadpur Mandi to know why price of vegetables is high. Vendors told them that there are 5 middlemen in between Farmers and them. If one buys directly from farmers, cost is less.
Kuch nahi bro, vo bss ab samaj aa raha hai ki mai 1 mahine se tamatar ki sabji kyu nahi kha paa raha hun
Farm laws rahta to middle man kam hote to price thoda stable hota atleast π₯²
Farm laws rahta to middle man kam hote to price thoda stable hota atleast π₯²
Agents of UPSC CSE π©
RaGa went to Azadpur Mandi to know why price of vegetables is high. Vendors told them that there are 5 middlemen in between Farmers and them. If one buys directly from farmers, cost is less.
β
GS Paper 2 - Effect of Policies & Politics of Countries on India's Interests
β GS Paper 3 - Growth & DevelopmentMonetary Policy
β For Prelims: Inflation, Food Inflation, Food Price Index, CPI, MSP
β For Mains: Food Inflation and issues, Growth & Development
β GS Paper 3 - Growth & DevelopmentMonetary Policy
β For Prelims: Inflation, Food Inflation, Food Price Index, CPI, MSP
β For Mains: Food Inflation and issues, Growth & Development
β
Upsc_Essential_l_Daily_subject_wise_quiz_:_History,_culture_and.pdf
70.5 KB
β
Upsc Essential l #Daily_subjectwise_quiz : History, culture and social issues #2024
join - @AgentsofUPSC π¦
join - @AgentsofUPSC π¦
π¦2
July Current Sociology @aakutyagi.pdf
1.4 MB
π₯πΎ July Current update for socio ,π·π·
Can selectively use for gs1, gs4, essay also
join - @AgentsofUPSC ποΈ
Can selectively use for gs1, gs4, essay also
join - @AgentsofUPSC ποΈ
π₯°3π―2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dur se hi achi lgti h ye post π£ π₯Ί
π€£20π’6β1π1
Agents of UPSC CSE π©
Photo
β
Pratap Bhanu Mehta's arguments about why the judiciary might not be the best selector of election commissioners include:
1. Conflict of Interest: Judges already have a role in interpreting laws and ensuring their implementation. If they were to also choose election commissioners, it could create a conflict of interest, potentially impacting the impartiality and credibility of both roles.
2. Accountability: Election commissioners need to be accountable to the public and political parties. If the judiciary were responsible for their appointment, it might reduce the level of accountability as they would not be directly answerable to the electorate.
3. Separation of Powers: A fundamental tenet of democracy is the separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Allowing the judiciary to select election commissioners could blur these lines, compromising the checks and balances that are crucial for the functioning of a democratic system.
4. Lack of Expertise: The selection of election commissioners requires a deep understanding of electoral processes, administration, and political dynamics. Judges may not necessarily possess this specialized knowledge compared to other bodies or individuals.
5. Potential for Judicial Overreach: Empowering the judiciary to choose election commissioners could open the door to potential overreach, where the judiciary becomes too influential in shaping electoral matters, possibly leading to erosion of political and democratic norms.
6. Public Perception: The perception of impartiality is important in the functioning of both the judiciary and the election commission. Allowing the judiciary to select election commissioners could lead to suspicions of bias or favoritism.
It's important to consider a balanced approach that ensures the independence, expertise, and accountability of election commissioners while upholding the principles of democracy and the separation of powers.
1. Conflict of Interest: Judges already have a role in interpreting laws and ensuring their implementation. If they were to also choose election commissioners, it could create a conflict of interest, potentially impacting the impartiality and credibility of both roles.
2. Accountability: Election commissioners need to be accountable to the public and political parties. If the judiciary were responsible for their appointment, it might reduce the level of accountability as they would not be directly answerable to the electorate.
3. Separation of Powers: A fundamental tenet of democracy is the separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Allowing the judiciary to select election commissioners could blur these lines, compromising the checks and balances that are crucial for the functioning of a democratic system.
4. Lack of Expertise: The selection of election commissioners requires a deep understanding of electoral processes, administration, and political dynamics. Judges may not necessarily possess this specialized knowledge compared to other bodies or individuals.
5. Potential for Judicial Overreach: Empowering the judiciary to choose election commissioners could open the door to potential overreach, where the judiciary becomes too influential in shaping electoral matters, possibly leading to erosion of political and democratic norms.
6. Public Perception: The perception of impartiality is important in the functioning of both the judiciary and the election commission. Allowing the judiciary to select election commissioners could lead to suspicions of bias or favoritism.
It's important to consider a balanced approach that ensures the independence, expertise, and accountability of election commissioners while upholding the principles of democracy and the separation of powers.
π5
arguments_about_why_the_judiciary_might_not_be_the_best_selector.pdf
107.6 KB
β
arguments about why the judiciary might not be the best
selector of election commissioners
#GS2 #Governance #judiciary #2024
selector of election commissioners
#GS2 #Governance #judiciary #2024
π3
For #prelims - software as a service (PYQs), GitHub, layoff
For #mains - As AI gains prominence in the software services industry, how India's tech companies deal with this will determine employment generation in this sector
#GS3 #Technology #AI
For #mains - As AI gains prominence in the software services industry, how India's tech companies deal with this will determine employment generation in this sector
#GS3 #Technology #AI
β3
Keywords For Prelims : #NFC #UPI #AI #NPCI #real_time #MPC
For mains : #Inclusive_growth #Digital_india #Technology #GS3 #Artificial_intelligence
For mains : #Inclusive_growth #Digital_india #Technology #GS3 #Artificial_intelligence
π₯5