Forwarded from Library of Atlantis
Its too late... i have already depicted you as the soy neolithic farmer and myself as the yamnaya pastoralist chad. Its over
๐คฃ14๐ฅ5๐2๐ฟ1
Forwarded from ๐๏ธโค๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฅ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ข๐ ๐ฏ๐ข๐๐น๐ผ โฅ๐ฅ๐๐ผ ๐๐ผ ๐od๊ฉ๐ฆ๐ฟ๐๏ธโคเผ
1โก5โคโ๐ฅ3๐ฅ2๐คฏ2โค1๐ซก1
Forwarded from Esoteric Dixie Dharma
Middle Way Master Race, Synthesis-maxxing, Aristotle's Law of Non-Contradiction, Jรผnger's Anarch, and the Reconciliation of Seemingly Irreconcilable Opposites
Behold new substack
๐
https://substack.com/@esotericdixiedharma/note/p-177123066?r=5y14ud
Behold new substack
๐
https://substack.com/@esotericdixiedharma/note/p-177123066?r=5y14ud
โคโ๐ฅ6๐ฅ6๐2
Forwarded from ๏ผก๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผก๏ฝ
๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ
๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ
"Neither pleasure nor pain should enter as motives when one must do what must be done." - Julius Evola
๐ฅ7โคโ๐ฅ5โค1๐ฟ1
Forwarded from Abraxas
Duality therefore signifies the establishment of two centres of contemplation, two separate and rival principles โone real and the other apparent โand this is the origin of evil, which is only illegitimate twofoldness. Is this the only possible interpretation of duality, twofoldness, the number two? Does there not exist a legitimate twofoldness?. . .a twofoldness which does not signify the diminution of unity, but rather its qualitative enrichment?
If we return to the conception of Saint-Martin of "two centres of contemplation" which are "two separate and rival principles", we can ask ourselves if they
must necessarily be separate and rival?
If we return to the conception of Saint-Martin of "two centres of contemplation" which are "two separate and rival principles", we can ask ourselves if they
must necessarily be separate and rival?