Only you, the citizen of some community, can warn your local leaders to take action while there is still time to do so.

Tech billionaires have criticized the FCC for giving more funding to SpaceX than other companies like theirs.

Cue the Emergency State, the government’s Machiavellian version of crisis management that justifies all manner of tyranny.

Earlier this month, a medical journal issued a warning about pacemakers and defibrillators being vulnerable to EMI from wireless sources.

Wait until you hear what the Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania had to say about protected speech. Ben Swann covers the latest.

The last time these actors did something at all similar in scope was in 1939 on the very eve of World War II. Here's the history...

A week ago Merkel announced that renewed pandemic restrictions would last until at least mid-February.

Find out the details as James highlights the resistance movements that are rising up around the world on this week’s edition.

Many American “public health experts” have urged legislators to adopt the Australia and New Zealand model.

Now, in a move that eerily invokes a number of "Black Mirror" plot arcs, reality seems to be trying to reclaim its monopoly on dystopia.

If you’re reading this website, you probably believe in freedom, liberty, independence, and self-reliance. Does this mean you’ll be a target?

This appears a recipe for alleging "potential terrorist" with a very broad brush.

History shows that after each crisis, the government lets go of some of the power, but never all of it.

Here come the "Pipebots" which will communicate via WiFi, Bluetooth and/or 5G relaying an array of information.

Because many symptoms resemble those of other less serious conditions, victims of toxic exposure are frequently misdiagnosed.

We need to change the entire ecosystem that Big Tech has manipulated to protect its power. And it starts with competition, not Section 230.

The memelords use the fixed system to attack the fixed system — and won.

Another hearing will be conducted to decide whether that injunction will be permanent. Here are the details.

How does DHS determine who is and who is not an extremist? By trusting DHS employees to make those decisions of course.

"For all board members, you start with the supremacy of free speech," said board member Alan Rusbridger.